<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Lotus Involvement in Proton New Engine?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habib</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-27783</link>
		<dc:creator>Habib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 05:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-27783</guid>
		<description>Why would Lotus have any involvement in Proton engines? hello %#%$!^ 
Even the lotus elise 2.0 engine is sourced from toyota. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Lotus have any involvement in Proton engines? hello %#%$!^</p>
<p>Even the lotus elise 2.0 engine is sourced from toyota. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vhtan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-26210</link>
		<dc:creator>vhtan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-26210</guid>
		<description>dun say engine lah, they should look into the power windows issue first. 
the Gen2 and Savvy is still having power window problem. 20 years already also cannot fix.. how can?? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dun say engine lah, they should look into the power windows issue first.</p>
<p>the Gen2 and Savvy is still having power window problem. 20 years already also cannot fix.. how can?? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tariq</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-18200</link>
		<dc:creator>tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-18200</guid>
		<description>this article probably refers to another engine range. i read somewhere tht proton is developing another family of engines which will start from 2.5 lt V6 to nearly 4.0 lt V8. maybe they dont want this engine family anymore </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this article probably refers to another engine range. i read somewhere tht proton is developing another family of engines which will start from 2.5 lt V6 to nearly 4.0 lt V8. maybe they dont want this engine family anymore </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-16448</link>
		<dc:creator>Lo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-16448</guid>
		<description>all because of the TDM&#039;s sight la .  
they just want to push the M race up , then uses the M as an excuse for the suppliers and they go on to their masterminded punya company ...  
summore proton is damn serious into debt ... how ?  
ask u la ..how ?  
 
ok , the workers in proton are mixed . but the suppliers ..nope . </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all because of the TDM&#039;s sight la . </p>
<p>they just want to push the M race up , then uses the M as an excuse for the suppliers and they go on to their masterminded punya company &#8230; </p>
<p>summore proton is damn serious into debt &#8230; how ? </p>
<p>ask u la ..how ? </p>
<p>ok , the workers in proton are mixed . but the suppliers ..nope . </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashes</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-9334</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 07:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-9334</guid>
		<description>Well in term of handling, proton did gain sumthing. coz lotus is considered to be among the world best in car handling. Lotus even design the top gear test track to test the handling of a car. In term of handling, proton is getting better after buying lotus. But still interior quality is proton main problems. Like james said in top gear when he was testing gen2 &quot; i prefer a toyota developed interior than lotus developed handling &quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well in term of handling, proton did gain sumthing. coz lotus is considered to be among the world best in car handling. Lotus even design the top gear test track to test the handling of a car. In term of handling, proton is getting better after buying lotus. But still interior quality is proton main problems. Like james said in top gear when he was testing gen2 &quot; i prefer a toyota developed interior than lotus developed handling &quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haidir</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-9051</link>
		<dc:creator>haidir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-9051</guid>
		<description>hai.. wonder y proton acquired lotus in the first place if we dont exploit their technology! proton has the technology at its command yet it refuses to use it! I assume that when proton acquired lotus, the quality of proton cars would improve. clearly, its not happening! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hai.. wonder y proton acquired lotus in the first place if we dont exploit their technology! proton has the technology at its command yet it refuses to use it! I assume that when proton acquired lotus, the quality of proton cars would improve. clearly, its not happening! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAN</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-9011</link>
		<dc:creator>DAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-9011</guid>
		<description>buy lotus ?ha.. ha. i toad why proton buy London. 
lotus Mosley do a performance car for there national trad mark. 
do u think there really interested in conventional car? my b yes for them to test ground ha... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buy lotus ?ha.. ha. i toad why proton buy London.</p>
<p>lotus Mosley do a performance car for there national trad mark.</p>
<p>do u think there really interested in conventional car? my b yes for them to test ground ha&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zongtwi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8945</link>
		<dc:creator>zongtwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8945</guid>
		<description>xyz said, 
July 30, 2005 @ 11:29 pm  
 
but Lotus isn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t famous for making engine.  
 
-------------------------------------------------- 
 
Lotus is an engineering consultant, i.e. they never get the credits of designing anything.  
 
Example: 
 
GM asked Lotus to design an engine for them a few years back, the L850 engine. And also this engine has been made into a number of variants. Currently, this engine and it&#039;s variants are being made every 2 seconds worldwide, because it was that good. Every 2 seconds!! but since GM paid for everything, they own the IP. So why should GM let Lotus get any credits for this engineering masterpiece? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xyz said,</p>
<p>July 30, 2005 @ 11:29 pm </p>
<p>but Lotus isn&acirc;&euro;&trade;t famous for making engine. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Lotus is an engineering consultant, i.e. they never get the credits of designing anything. </p>
<p>Example:</p>
<p>GM asked Lotus to design an engine for them a few years back, the L850 engine. And also this engine has been made into a number of variants. Currently, this engine and it&#039;s variants are being made every 2 seconds worldwide, because it was that good. Every 2 seconds!! but since GM paid for everything, they own the IP. So why should GM let Lotus get any credits for this engineering masterpiece? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sekot</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8916</link>
		<dc:creator>sekot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8916</guid>
		<description>Oh, Paul. I&#039;m trying to be more sarcarstic here to ask the car manufacturer to built their own tranny.  Anyway, keep up the good work. Nice blog mate. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Paul. I&#039;m trying to be more sarcarstic here to ask the car manufacturer to built their own tranny.  Anyway, keep up the good work. Nice blog mate. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8915</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8915</guid>
		<description>sekot: gearboxes require economies of scale much much more larger than engines. even BMW does not manufacture it&#039;s own SMG gearbox. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sekot: gearboxes require economies of scale much much more larger than engines. even BMW does not manufacture it&#039;s own SMG gearbox. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neurra</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8887</link>
		<dc:creator>neurra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 02:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8887</guid>
		<description>the weird thing bout proton is why they designed the savvy not to fit their 1.3L campro engine.. swtz. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the weird thing bout proton is why they designed the savvy not to fit their 1.3L campro engine.. swtz. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MutantTomato</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8881</link>
		<dc:creator>MutantTomato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 01:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8881</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand something... If the stupid bastards at Proton never intended to use the expertise and technical know-how of Lotus for GOOD things like developing engines, then why did they buy Lotus in the first place? Just so that they could put a little metal plaque at ther back of some cars saying &quot;tuned by Lotus&quot; ? 
 
Grrrrrreat move Proton....viva boleh-land...... :&#124; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t understand something&#8230; If the stupid bastards at Proton never intended to use the expertise and technical know-how of Lotus for GOOD things like developing engines, then why did they buy Lotus in the first place? Just so that they could put a little metal plaque at ther back of some cars saying &quot;tuned by Lotus&quot; ?</p>
<p>Grrrrrreat move Proton&#8230;.viva boleh-land&#8230;&#8230; <img src='http://s2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sekot</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8907</link>
		<dc:creator>sekot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 00:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8907</guid>
		<description>Dont be a fool la mutant tomato... dont you think it is not a good bussiness move to design a new engine when you can have it off the shelves (from your parent company a.k.a. VW)? and cheaper? and when break even of cost is when 400,000 units of it is built? we are not talking plastic injection parts, or slush moulding parts, or simple resin parts. We are talking casting here. Damn expensive. Why dont they made their own gearbox? why most manufacturer bought their gearbox from ZF? er, Paul, could you ask your &#039;little bird&#039; is this the NEF engines that Lotus share with (Large) Proton?  its top secret and I&#039;ll chiow .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont be a fool la mutant tomato&#8230; dont you think it is not a good bussiness move to design a new engine when you can have it off the shelves (from your parent company a.k.a. VW)? and cheaper? and when break even of cost is when 400,000 units of it is built? we are not talking plastic injection parts, or slush moulding parts, or simple resin parts. We are talking casting here. Damn expensive. Why dont they made their own gearbox? why most manufacturer bought their gearbox from ZF? er, Paul, could you ask your &#8216;little bird&#8217; is this the NEF engines that Lotus share with (Large) Proton?  its top secret and I&#8217;ll chiow &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xyz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8878</link>
		<dc:creator>xyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8878</guid>
		<description>but Lotus isn&#039;t famous for making engine. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but Lotus isn&#039;t famous for making engine. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haji</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8872</link>
		<dc:creator>haji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8872</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not the campro engine. This one is another range of proton&#039;s next generation engine. At first, they want to use campro in Savvy but the engine bay design doesn&#039;t allow this (size problem) so they use renault&#039;s due to their previous renault&#039;s 1.8l engine in waja experience. Campro engine can be easily converted to 1.3, 1.6, 1.8 variant. That&#039;s why proton opt for campro. Still, the cam profiling is not in yet. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not the campro engine. This one is another range of proton&#039;s next generation engine. At first, they want to use campro in Savvy but the engine bay design doesn&#039;t allow this (size problem) so they use renault&#039;s due to their previous renault&#039;s 1.8l engine in waja experience. Campro engine can be easily converted to 1.3, 1.6, 1.8 variant. That&#039;s why proton opt for campro. Still, the cam profiling is not in yet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chorwin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8869</link>
		<dc:creator>Chorwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8869</guid>
		<description>First of all, thx for ur visiting to my blog. Anyway you are the great guru of blog to me, haha.... 
 
I feel that Proton face a lot of problem in the management side especially R&amp;D in new technology. Don&#039;t you find that Proton technology is far lack behind and they rarely announce their future roadmap. Roadmap is an important path to strengthen the confident of buyers. Even through they annouce the launch of Savvy and Satria Replacement Model, but it delay the launch date.  
 
To achieve the status of world class car maker, proton need to start with the quality and management. So, now proton do start with the quality...... but how about management side...... and do it too late to take action on the quality improvement for their products?????  
 
I had my proton gen2 car............. if you ask me what my comments, i do say.... i respect the design and development team for such a good looking and great effort to design such a good car... but....i do not satisfy with the car i got..... because a lot of issue and problem!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, thx for ur visiting to my blog. Anyway you are the great guru of blog to me, haha&#8230;.</p>
<p>I feel that Proton face a lot of problem in the management side especially R&amp;D in new technology. Don&#039;t you find that Proton technology is far lack behind and they rarely announce their future roadmap. Roadmap is an important path to strengthen the confident of buyers. Even through they annouce the launch of Savvy and Satria Replacement Model, but it delay the launch date. </p>
<p>To achieve the status of world class car maker, proton need to start with the quality and management. So, now proton do start with the quality&#8230;&#8230; but how about management side&#8230;&#8230; and do it too late to take action on the quality improvement for their products????? </p>
<p>I had my proton gen2 car&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. if you ask me what my comments, i do say&#8230;. i respect the design and development team for such a good looking and great effort to design such a good car&#8230; but&#8230;.i do not satisfy with the car i got&#8230;.. because a lot of issue and problem!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apai Mau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8866</link>
		<dc:creator>Apai Mau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8866</guid>
		<description>Or maybe the engineers become TOO intelligent to listen to anyone for more feasible ideas???? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe the engineers become TOO intelligent to listen to anyone for more feasible ideas???? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8860</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8860</guid>
		<description>qlp: The context of the article seems to mean that they lost the bid for a new contract. Not sure lah. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qlp: The context of the article seems to mean that they lost the bid for a new contract. Not sure lah. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qlp</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8859</link>
		<dc:creator>qlp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8859</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it more likely that the contract to develop the campro engine ended? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#039;t it more likely that the contract to develop the campro engine ended? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Noone</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8857</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Noone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8857</guid>
		<description>Could Proton have finally realised that engine manufacturing is a big volume business?  More Renault engines in Protons? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could Proton have finally realised that engine manufacturing is a big volume business?  More Renault engines in Protons? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8855</link>
		<dc:creator>akari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/30/no-lotus-involvement-in-proton-new-engine/#comment-8855</guid>
		<description>no one know what proton thinking, no one know what proton doing... we only can watch show what going to happen on them... haha... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no one know what proton thinking, no one know what proton doing&#8230; we only can watch show what going to happen on them&#8230; haha&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 1548/1548 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via s2.paultan.org

Served from: _ @ 2012-05-22 00:14:32 -->
