<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 Volvo XC50 in development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:16:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: offroader manix</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-50797</link>
		<dc:creator>offroader manix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-50797</guid>
		<description>Wah..........OUTLANDER only 90K in Japan.......looking good for them but down here..........ng sai lam.......minimum.......180K so look see look see loh. 
 
At the rate the goverment....goes......looks like we are going to buy proton for sure and forever ........( only for salary workers like me ) Loh sai no problem. 
 
:( </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wah&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.OUTLANDER only 90K in Japan&#8230;&#8230;.looking good for them but down here&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.ng sai lam&#8230;&#8230;.minimum&#8230;&#8230;.180K so look see look see loh.</p>
<p>At the rate the goverment&#8230;.goes&#8230;&#8230;looks like we are going to buy proton for sure and forever &#8230;&#8230;..( only for salary workers like me ) Loh sai no problem.</p>
<p>  <img src='http://s3.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volvo XC60 Artist&#8217;s Impression</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-50685</link>
		<dc:creator>Volvo XC60 Artist&#8217;s Impression</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 03:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-50685</guid>
		<description>[...] Volvo&#8217;s new smaller-sized SUV (above is an artist&#8217;s impression) will join it&#8217;s bigger brother the Volvo XC90 first as a concept version displayed at the upcoming North American International Auto Show in Detroit, and will subsequently debut as a production model in the second quarter of 2008. Despite previous reports calling the new SUV the XC50, Volvo insiders have informed the motoring world that it will be called the Volvo XC60 instead. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Volvo&#8217;s new smaller-sized SUV (above is an artist&#8217;s impression) will join it&#8217;s bigger brother the Volvo XC90 first as a concept version displayed at the upcoming North American International Auto Show in Detroit, and will subsequently debut as a production model in the second quarter of 2008. Despite previous reports calling the new SUV the XC50, Volvo insiders have informed the motoring world that it will be called the Volvo XC60 instead. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Smith</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-26008</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-26008</guid>
		<description>Volvo has done it again... bringing out the most stunning and phenominal cars available in this day and age 
 
the XC50 will merely add to a outstanding range </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Volvo has done it again&#8230; bringing out the most stunning and phenominal cars available in this day and age</p>
<p>the XC50 will merely add to a outstanding range </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streamyx User</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-21498</link>
		<dc:creator>Streamyx User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 03:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-21498</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d always suggest you to buy a Proton. Much better QC. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d always suggest you to buy a Proton. Much better QC. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOG THE WAN</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-21150</link>
		<dc:creator>DOG THE WAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-21150</guid>
		<description>Marmitecarb: I do agree wtih you lei, if you ask me to choose RM180k for Japanese models or Continental models, I will choose Continental. Just the bottom line is Japanese models design and quality is still a distance away from Europe. 
 
For me, Japanese models should be around RM80k to RM100 max. If more than RM100K, I feels it was over price!! Don&#039;t you think so?? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marmitecarb: I do agree wtih you lei, if you ask me to choose RM180k for Japanese models or Continental models, I will choose Continental. Just the bottom line is Japanese models design and quality is still a distance away from Europe.</p>
<p>For me, Japanese models should be around RM80k to RM100 max. If more than RM100K, I feels it was over price!! Don&#039;t you think so?? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epalhead</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-21134</link>
		<dc:creator>epalhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-21134</guid>
		<description>SEE FU, 
 
i did? really? where? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEE FU,</p>
<p>i did? really? where? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-21108</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-21108</guid>
		<description>Crab Arr!! 
 
Are you sure is from JAPAN?? maybe you KENA CHEAT by FIAT lol. You like European or Continental car but this Company use JAPANESE products and sell it to you as CONTINENTAL models.....WAH!! you KENA TIPULAH!!! Wah...ha..ah.... :P 
 
YAU MO KAU.......CHOU!!!!! So high ma!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crab Arr!!</p>
<p>Are you sure is from JAPAN?? maybe you KENA CHEAT by FIAT lol. You like European or Continental car but this Company use JAPANESE products and sell it to you as CONTINENTAL models&#8230;..WAH!! you KENA TIPULAH!!! Wah&#8230;ha..ah&#8230;. <img src='http://s3.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>YAU MO KAU&#8230;&#8230;.CHOU!!!!! So high ma!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marmitecrab</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-21071</link>
		<dc:creator>Marmitecrab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-21071</guid>
		<description>See Fu, 
 
That bodooooh CVT you referring to is manufactured by Fuji Industries of Japan. Most CVT&#039;s come from Japan. Want to take back your words? :-) 
 
I agree with Dog The Wan that most Japanese cars are on par in terms of safety but they still don&#039;t lead the field, choosing instead to leave it to their European counterparts, Note that ABS and airbags first debuted in Mercs, traction control in Saabs, etc. You get what I&#039;m saying. They&#039;re happy playing follow the leader and that&#039;s what makes the Continental marques better, regardless of marketing or branding. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Fu, </p>
<p>That bodooooh CVT you referring to is manufactured by Fuji Industries of Japan. Most CVT&#039;s come from Japan. Want to take back your words? <img src='http://s3.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I agree with Dog The Wan that most Japanese cars are on par in terms of safety but they still don&#039;t lead the field, choosing instead to leave it to their European counterparts, Note that ABS and airbags first debuted in Mercs, traction control in Saabs, etc. You get what I&#039;m saying. They&#039;re happy playing follow the leader and that&#039;s what makes the Continental marques better, regardless of marketing or branding. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOG THE WAN</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20985</link>
		<dc:creator>DOG THE WAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20985</guid>
		<description>As mentioned by SEE FU, this Outlander has scored 6 stars JNCAP (japanese crash test) which is equal to 5 stars in EUROPE or NAS, Why question on Safety issue of Outlander compare to XC90?  
So, how many stars score on this models (XC90)? Paul do you have the no.? 
 
Just My opinions: In terms of safety or crash performance, most of the NEW developed cars are perform well and this Volvo only had a corporate image or brand causing you all feel safer. I believed most of the japanese models nowaday have the same performance as continental cars and some even better. (example: LEXUS) 
 
Besides the safety on XC90 and good looking in styling, what else?? Just the quality is better compare to Japanese car? I don&#039;t disagreed on it, But in general the Outlander score more points on features and technologies, Don&#039;t you agree? Pls correct me if I am wrong!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned by SEE FU, this Outlander has scored 6 stars JNCAP (japanese crash test) which is equal to 5 stars in EUROPE or NAS, Why question on Safety issue of Outlander compare to XC90? </p>
<p>So, how many stars score on this models (XC90)? Paul do you have the no.?</p>
<p>Just My opinions: In terms of safety or crash performance, most of the NEW developed cars are perform well and this Volvo only had a corporate image or brand causing you all feel safer. I believed most of the japanese models nowaday have the same performance as continental cars and some even better. (example: LEXUS)</p>
<p>Besides the safety on XC90 and good looking in styling, what else?? Just the quality is better compare to Japanese car? I don&#039;t disagreed on it, But in general the Outlander score more points on features and technologies, Don&#039;t you agree? Pls correct me if I am wrong!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20960</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20960</guid>
		<description>MarmitECRab: 
 
Fiat is famous as &quot;Fix It All The time&quot;, that&#039;s why your Fiat BODOooH CVT KONG all the time. haaa   :) fix and repair ...fix and repair.....infinity!! :P 
 
Japanese car is more reliable in terms of Engine components and low maintenance cost!! I just wanna to tell you Outlander looks better and good specs too. :) 
 
epalhead arr!! 
Don&#039;t START THE FIRE!! You are Kids too!! :P  
Eat your CHAR KUEY....Lah 
 
YAU MO KAU.......CHOU!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MarmitECRab:</p>
<p>Fiat is famous as &quot;Fix It All The time&quot;, that&#039;s why your Fiat BODOooH CVT KONG all the time. haaa   <img src='http://s3.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  fix and repair &#8230;fix and repair&#8230;..infinity!! <img src='http://s3.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Japanese car is more reliable in terms of Engine components and low maintenance cost!! I just wanna to tell you Outlander looks better and good specs too. <img src='http://s3.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>epalhead arr!!</p>
<p>Don&#039;t START THE FIRE!! You are Kids too!! <img src='http://s3.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Eat your CHAR KUEY&#8230;.Lah</p>
<p>YAU MO KAU&#8230;&#8230;.CHOU!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epalhead</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20942</link>
		<dc:creator>epalhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20942</guid>
		<description>marmitecrab: 
 
hey mit, leave the kid (SEE FU) alone. he&#039;s just a kid. have pity on him. he knows notin&#039;. always out of subject....always...(sighs) 
 
Char Kuey Teow...HaHaHaHaHa </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marmitecrab:</p>
<p>hey mit, leave the kid (SEE FU) alone. he&#039;s just a kid. have pity on him. he knows notin&#039;. always out of subject&#8230;.always&#8230;(sighs)</p>
<p>Char Kuey Teow&#8230;HaHaHaHaHa </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marmitecrab</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20918</link>
		<dc:creator>Marmitecrab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20918</guid>
		<description>See Fu, 
 
I thought we were talking about it&#039;s looks. Why you give me specs? Besides, the specs doesn&#039;t sound that interesting to me...Ho hum! 
 
And you say it comes with CVT? I used to drive a Fiat Punto with CVT. Helluva lot a problem and when need to fix, costs a bomb! 
 
I dont&#039; know which planet you come from but generally, continental cars are much better than Japanese. Volvo in particular has a strong following especially in the area of safety. Can anyone else claim to have the safety standards Volvo has? 
 
You want an Outlander, your problem. Give me a Volvo anytime! 
 
Ngoh mou kau chor! Hahahaha! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Fu,</p>
<p>I thought we were talking about it&#039;s looks. Why you give me specs? Besides, the specs doesn&#039;t sound that interesting to me&#8230;Ho hum!</p>
<p>And you say it comes with CVT? I used to drive a Fiat Punto with CVT. Helluva lot a problem and when need to fix, costs a bomb!</p>
<p>I dont&#039; know which planet you come from but generally, continental cars are much better than Japanese. Volvo in particular has a strong following especially in the area of safety. Can anyone else claim to have the safety standards Volvo has?</p>
<p>You want an Outlander, your problem. Give me a Volvo anytime!</p>
<p>Ngoh mou kau chor! Hahahaha! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20914</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20914</guid>
		<description>Hei marMITeCraB ar!! 
 
Do you know about OUTLANDER in details? 
 
1) Aluminium ROOF panel (lower the CG) 
2) Aluminium Block Engine. 
3) NEW MIVEC DOHC 2.4liters 16 valves, INVECS-III 6 speeds CVT transmission. 
4) A/T and M/T selection control system and Speed control/selection pedals at Steering Wheel just like F1 racer use or Alfa R. 
5) 2WD and 4WD mode control by Electronic system not mechanically. 
6) AWC: All Wheels Control system. 
7) 5 stars NAS and 6 stars JNCAP Crash test results. 
8) 7 seaters (normally only 5 seater for competitors CRV or Harrier other SUV maker) 
9) ROCKFORD FOGATE audio system (650Watt as Standards) with 9 speakers including one 8 inch SUBWOOFER at the rear. 
10) 18 inches Alloy Rims. 
11) All seasons Tyres as standards. 
12) Fuel consumption 11.6km/l at highway 
13) HiD Head lamps 
14) LED Rear lamps 
15) Total weight: 1620Kg only 
16) Sporty interior design (All black) 
17) Special foldable rear seat for easy access to rear seats (1 touch switch) 
18) KEYLESS entry as standard feature. 
19) UV cut Windshield and all glasses. 
20) New chassis and suspension system. 
Price only 270,0000yen (Equal to RM90k) , more.....find out by yourself!! 
 
Enough?? anything else?? Who can beat it???? 
You ask for it!!   YAU MO KAU.........CHOU!!!! I want one!! Who will reject it?? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hei marMITeCraB ar!!</p>
<p>Do you know about OUTLANDER in details?</p>
<p>1) Aluminium ROOF panel (lower the CG)</p>
<p>2) Aluminium Block Engine.</p>
<p>3) NEW MIVEC DOHC 2.4liters 16 valves, INVECS-III 6 speeds CVT transmission.</p>
<p>4) A/T and M/T selection control system and Speed control/selection pedals at Steering Wheel just like F1 racer use or Alfa R.</p>
<p>5) 2WD and 4WD mode control by Electronic system not mechanically.</p>
<p>6) AWC: All Wheels Control system.</p>
<p>7) 5 stars NAS and 6 stars JNCAP Crash test results.<br />
  <img src='http://s3.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> 7 seaters (normally only 5 seater for competitors CRV or Harrier other SUV maker)</p>
<p>9) ROCKFORD FOGATE audio system (650Watt as Standards) with 9 speakers including one 8 inch SUBWOOFER at the rear.</p>
<p>10) 18 inches Alloy Rims.</p>
<p>11) All seasons Tyres as standards.</p>
<p>12) Fuel consumption 11.6km/l at highway</p>
<p>13) HiD Head lamps</p>
<p>14) LED Rear lamps</p>
<p>15) Total weight: 1620Kg only</p>
<p>16) Sporty interior design (All black)</p>
<p>17) Special foldable rear seat for easy access to rear seats (1 touch switch)</p>
<p>18) KEYLESS entry as standard feature.</p>
<p>19) UV cut Windshield and all glasses.</p>
<p>20) New chassis and suspension system.</p>
<p>Price only 270,0000yen (Equal to RM90k) , more&#8230;..find out by yourself!!</p>
<p>Enough?? anything else?? Who can beat it????</p>
<p>You ask for it!!   YAU MO KAU&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;CHOU!!!! I want one!! Who will reject it?? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20877</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20877</guid>
		<description>outlander is better than xc90........ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>outlander is better than xc90&#8230;&#8230;.. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-nabill</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20749</link>
		<dc:creator>E-nabill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20749</guid>
		<description>seriously,noting can rival the x3 wen it comes to driving...it drives like a small hatch  GTI..read the reviews...its not the bigest,or most spacious,or most practical...bt it drives like a 3 series...i always like the xc90 .if uve been inside one,my god the interior is soooo HUGE! really comfy n the quality damn nice...lots of clever touches here n thr.and ofcourse...everywer u look thrs a luvly sign that says &#039;srs airbag&quot;...i tink it has 8 if im nt mistaken....its really practical..bt i tink its expensive to run though....btw the front looks like the s40 n notice the car rides lower now..see the gap now is small between the tyres and the fenders... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously,noting can rival the x3 wen it comes to driving&#8230;it drives like a small hatch  GTI..read the reviews&#8230;its not the bigest,or most spacious,or most practical&#8230;bt it drives like a 3 series&#8230;i always like the xc90 .if uve been inside one,my god the interior is soooo HUGE! really comfy n the quality damn nice&#8230;lots of clever touches here n thr.and ofcourse&#8230;everywer u look thrs a luvly sign that says &#039;srs airbag&quot;&#8230;i tink it has 8 if im nt mistaken&#8230;.its really practical..bt i tink its expensive to run though&#8230;.btw the front looks like the s40 n notice the car rides lower now..see the gap now is small between the tyres and the fenders&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20739</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20739</guid>
		<description>When it comes to automotive design the Germans and Italian does a better job. the Thats why I only drive German or Italian made cars. Proud owner on an X5 and a Cayenne. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to automotive design the Germans and Italian does a better job. the Thats why I only drive German or Italian made cars. Proud owner on an X5 and a Cayenne. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marmitecrab</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20697</link>
		<dc:creator>Marmitecrab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20697</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon, See Fuul. Sunglasses or not, it&#039;s butt ugly. The Outlander is way out in terms of design and probably can&#039;t land a modelling job on the moon if it&#039;s life depended on it. 
 
XC50 however, can pass the interview. 
 
MOU KAU CHOU! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#039;mon, See Fuul. Sunglasses or not, it&#039;s butt ugly. The Outlander is way out in terms of design and probably can&#039;t land a modelling job on the moon if it&#039;s life depended on it. </p>
<p>XC50 however, can pass the interview. </p>
<p>MOU KAU CHOU! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20688</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20688</guid>
		<description>Beats the X3 easily anyway. Like to see the back too before I&#039;d be sure though. But two thumbs up from me. Should be a sweet SUV. Let&#039;s hope they put a nice diesel engine in there. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beats the X3 easily anyway. Like to see the back too before I&#039;d be sure though. But two thumbs up from me. Should be a sweet SUV. Let&#039;s hope they put a nice diesel engine in there. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hfrshah</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20670</link>
		<dc:creator>hfrshah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20670</guid>
		<description>Looks good.. Gonna be one hell of a fight for class honours with BMW X3, Mercs planned X-Class, and Audi Q5 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good.. Gonna be one hell of a fight for class honours with BMW X3, Mercs planned X-Class, and Audi Q5 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20658</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20658</guid>
		<description>Just to remind you all that pls don&#039;t wear SUNGLASSES (especially RED color) to see this OUTLANDER!! 
 
also, to Marmitecrab!! 
Wash your backside doesn&#039;t helps your eyes VISION better. 
 
YAU MO KAU.......CHOU!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to remind you all that pls don&#039;t wear SUNGLASSES (especially RED color) to see this OUTLANDER!!</p>
<p>also, to Marmitecrab!!</p>
<p>Wash your backside doesn&#039;t helps your eyes VISION better.</p>
<p>YAU MO KAU&#8230;&#8230;.CHOU!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chua</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20653</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20653</guid>
		<description>This XC50 looks even better than the XC90. Since BMW has X3 after its X5, surely Volvo can&#039;t be sitting idle, can it? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This XC50 looks even better than the XC90. Since BMW has X3 after its X5, surely Volvo can&#039;t be sitting idle, can it? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marmitecrab</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20650</link>
		<dc:creator>Marmitecrab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20650</guid>
		<description>The only thing nice about the Outlander as it&#039;s website. Come on, lah! The thing looks so square, like a car made from Lego parts. 
 
I wouldn&#039;t say the XC90 is the prettiest SUV, nor the X5 but the Outlander? You gotta be kidding.  
 
Btw, I washed my eyes and backside. The car still looks like a hearse. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing nice about the Outlander as it&#039;s website. Come on, lah! The thing looks so square, like a car made from Lego parts.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#039;t say the XC90 is the prettiest SUV, nor the X5 but the Outlander? You gotta be kidding. </p>
<p>Btw, I washed my eyes and backside. The car still looks like a hearse. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20645</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20645</guid>
		<description>aksMs arr!!! 
 
You eyes got sand arr?? Clear it first and have a look again..........YAU MO KAU....CHOU!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aksMs arr!!!</p>
<p>You eyes got sand arr?? Clear it first and have a look again&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.YAU MO KAU&#8230;.CHOU!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aksMs</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20641</link>
		<dc:creator>aksMs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20641</guid>
		<description>SEE FU, where got Outlander best looking???? My outdated Pajero looks even better lah! Haiyyoohh! :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEE FU, where got Outlander best looking???? My outdated Pajero looks even better lah! Haiyyoohh! <img src='http://s3.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20639</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20639</guid>
		<description>So so only lah!! Boleh tahan lah!! 
 
The best looking SUV is Mitsubishi OUTLANDER SUV just launched in this Month, paul go and BLOG it first!! Thanks DOG THE WAN info.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://outlander.jp/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://outlander.jp/&lt;/a&gt;  
 
YAU MO KAU......CHOU!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So so only lah!! Boleh tahan lah!!</p>
<p>The best looking SUV is Mitsubishi OUTLANDER SUV just launched in this Month, paul go and BLOG it first!! Thanks DOG THE WAN info.<br />
  <a href="http://outlander.jp/" rel="nofollow">http://outlander.jp/</a>  </p>
<p>YAU MO KAU&#8230;&#8230;CHOU!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-mivec</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20635</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-mivec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20635</guid>
		<description>**** star </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>**** star </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yhtan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20633</link>
		<dc:creator>yhtan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20633</guid>
		<description>nice looks SUV </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice looks SUV </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOG THE WAN</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20626</link>
		<dc:creator>DOG THE WAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20626</guid>
		<description>Nice looking SUV!!! GOOD job! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice looking SUV!!! GOOD job! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aksMs</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/10/25/2007-volvo-xc50-in-development/#comment-20623</link>
		<dc:creator>aksMs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=567#comment-20623</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Paul. I&#039;ve been fancying the XC90 for a long time too. It looks better in every angle compared to Land Rovers, BMW X5 and others. It just simply in its own class. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Paul. I&#039;ve been fancying the XC90 for a long time too. It looks better in every angle compared to Land Rovers, BMW X5 and others. It just simply in its own class. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 2053/2053 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via s2.paultan.org

Served from: _ @ 2012-05-23 23:45:21 -->
