<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proton reviews non-core investments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:16:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dozz vader</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-24910</link>
		<dc:creator>dozz vader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-24910</guid>
		<description>Oh..one more thing..Proton loss or profits doesn&#039;t effect me in any way.So be it. :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh..one more thing..Proton loss or profits doesn&#039;t effect me in any way.So be it. <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dozz vader</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-24909</link>
		<dc:creator>dozz vader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-24909</guid>
		<description>typical malaysian. 
 
only knows how to complains. 
 
I have no interest in Proton&#039;s internal affairs nor i care about it&#039;s rival Myvi.I still have confidence in proton&#039;s cars eventhough some of it&#039;s model is juz not my taste.Perodua for me is total daihatsu and I don&#039;t like daihatsu.I would like to give some suggestions to proton..if they care lah. 
 
proton should juz concetrate on their recent model such as the satria,wira,V6,gen2,savvy and not to mention the ugly aerobacks. 
 
Why not bring back the putra model? 
 
Why not try to improve the TECHNOLOGY and DESIGN in the recent models instead of thinking creating a new ones? 
 
Proton should try to think from consumers point of views.Do some research in whats in and whats not.Like me,I don&#039;t give a f## if a cars comes with a CD player or not coz I can put an mp3 player and a PSP anytime.And my car will look cool internaly than other car.Proton should also considering the material they used for the interior.There&#039;s nothing wrong if proton used leather for the seats and wood for the dashboard panel and gear knobs.Think about the cool factor to attract buyer.It&#039;s not what proton designers or marketing thinks that counts,its the target market point of view that proton should consider because we&#039;re the ones that gonna buy your car.Give us a GOOD and QUALITY car plus good services,we don&#039;t mind paying extra. 
 
Try to think globally.Try to think about the MAJORITY who thinks like me.The ones who keep bashing proton is the one who thinks driving a honda or a mitsu make him or her looks soooooooooooooo cool.But 70% can&#039;t afford any of it.heheh 
 
Bash me for all i care. 
 
peace. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>typical malaysian.</p>
<p>only knows how to complains.</p>
<p>I have no interest in Proton&#039;s internal affairs nor i care about it&#039;s rival Myvi.I still have confidence in proton&#039;s cars eventhough some of it&#039;s model is juz not my taste.Perodua for me is total daihatsu and I don&#039;t like daihatsu.I would like to give some suggestions to proton..if they care lah.</p>
<p>proton should juz concetrate on their recent model such as the satria,wira,V6,gen2,savvy and not to mention the ugly aerobacks.</p>
<p>Why not bring back the putra model?</p>
<p>Why not try to improve the TECHNOLOGY and DESIGN in the recent models instead of thinking creating a new ones?</p>
<p>Proton should try to think from consumers point of views.Do some research in whats in and whats not.Like me,I don&#039;t give a f## if a cars comes with a CD player or not coz I can put an mp3 player and a PSP anytime.And my car will look cool internaly than other car.Proton should also considering the material they used for the interior.There&#039;s nothing wrong if proton used leather for the seats and wood for the dashboard panel and gear knobs.Think about the cool factor to attract buyer.It&#039;s not what proton designers or marketing thinks that counts,its the target market point of view that proton should consider because we&#039;re the ones that gonna buy your car.Give us a GOOD and QUALITY car plus good services,we don&#039;t mind paying extra.</p>
<p>Try to think globally.Try to think about the MAJORITY who thinks like me.The ones who keep bashing proton is the one who thinks driving a honda or a mitsu make him or her looks soooooooooooooo cool.But 70% can&#039;t afford any of it.heheh</p>
<p>Bash me for all i care.</p>
<p>peace. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMS</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-24868</link>
		<dc:creator>HMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-24868</guid>
		<description>zongtwi, you should be saked, you are a lotus R&amp; D engineer and you have done nothing to improve proton or our country car&#039;s campro, what are you doing zongtwi, shaking your legs, go home </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zongtwi, you should be saked, you are a lotus R&amp; D engineer and you have done nothing to improve proton or our country car&#039;s campro, what are you doing zongtwi, shaking your legs, go home </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-23400</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 02:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-23400</guid>
		<description>what u all talking about? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what u all talking about? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abe pie</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-23071</link>
		<dc:creator>abe pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-23071</guid>
		<description>If Tgku Mahalel write a book . I&#039;l make sure i will get one. so anybody interested with his book? for me TMahalel is great guy. he got great vision to drive the proton. Great in manage the proton .hmm..dunno., no idea. wat do u think. but proton can built the tanjung malim plant w/o any finance help from gov.( or bcoz of gov protection).. 
 
 
soorry . friend.. out of topic </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Tgku Mahalel write a book . I&#039;l make sure i will get one. so anybody interested with his book? for me TMahalel is great guy. he got great vision to drive the proton. Great in manage the proton .hmm..dunno., no idea. wat do u think. but proton can built the tanjung malim plant w/o any finance help from gov.( or bcoz of gov protection)..</p>
<p>soorry . friend.. out of topic </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outspoken</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22899</link>
		<dc:creator>outspoken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22899</guid>
		<description>kecoh la diorang berdua ni!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kecoh la diorang berdua ni!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zongtwi a.k.a. speed</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22852</link>
		<dc:creator>zongtwi a.k.a. speed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22852</guid>
		<description>To Abu, I appreciate you trying to be a peacemaker heh I don&#039;t mind people giving out views. I just don&#039;t like it when someone comes out with all guns blazing, bashing other people with their comments, and the comments are based on some stupid fairy tale information that that person gets from his own little world. Btw, if you think properly, saying that Proton pays the sallary for Lotus employees are as bad as saying the CEO is from Mars. Those statements have the same level of ridiculousness! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Abu, I appreciate you trying to be a peacemaker heh I don&#039;t mind people giving out views. I just don&#039;t like it when someone comes out with all guns blazing, bashing other people with their comments, and the comments are based on some stupid fairy tale information that that person gets from his own little world. Btw, if you think properly, saying that Proton pays the sallary for Lotus employees are as bad as saying the CEO is from Mars. Those statements have the same level of ridiculousness! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanasai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22845</link>
		<dc:creator>kanasai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22845</guid>
		<description>SEE FU 
 
u r the CEO of BMW ka?  
YAU MOU GAU&#226;&#8364;&#166;CHOR!!  
LOL </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEE FU</p>
<p>u r the CEO of BMW ka? </p>
<p>YAU MOU GAU&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;CHOR!! </p>
<p>LOL </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22825</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22825</guid>
		<description>abu arr!! 
 
You are great.....closed to COPYCAT China, they COPY almost 99% the same!!! Kudo!! Malaysian Also BOLEH not only China!!! abu BOleh!! 
 
YAU MOU GAU...CHOR!! BTW my trandmark doesn&#039;t cares about .... or ,,,,.as long as close to the shape and sound you will get SUE due to copyright issue. Cheers!! :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abu arr!!</p>
<p>You are great&#8230;..closed to COPYCAT China, they COPY almost 99% the same!!! Kudo!! Malaysian Also BOLEH not only China!!! abu BOleh!!</p>
<p>YAU MOU GAU&#8230;CHOR!! BTW my trandmark doesn&#039;t cares about &#8230;. or ,,,,.as long as close to the shape and sound you will get SUE due to copyright issue. Cheers!! <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazzy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22813</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22813</guid>
		<description>I have been reading stuff here on Paul&#039;s blog on a frequent basis. On Nederland vs. Zongtwi issue... I really cant help but laugh out aloud on these posts. As a Lotus employee myself... I cant agree more to statements made by Zongtwi. So, Nederland...I guess you ought to do some homework before you pop some opinions. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading stuff here on Paul&#039;s blog on a frequent basis. On Nederland vs. Zongtwi issue&#8230; I really cant help but laugh out aloud on these posts. As a Lotus employee myself&#8230; I cant agree more to statements made by Zongtwi. So, Nederland&#8230;I guess you ought to do some homework before you pop some opinions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abu</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22794</link>
		<dc:creator>abu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22794</guid>
		<description>ei SEE FU told u i am using pirated from pasar malam lo...u check on the dot ar? a bit less than urs leh...u know la this bolehland...everything boleh 1 ma....YAO MOU GAO........CHOR!!!!! 
 
p.s. SEE FU&#039;s blog got lotsa karma...so its goodie man :P </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ei SEE FU told u i am using pirated from pasar malam lo&#8230;u check on the dot ar? a bit less than urs leh&#8230;u know la this bolehland&#8230;everything boleh 1 ma&#8230;.YAO MOU GAO&#8230;&#8230;..CHOR!!!!!</p>
<p>p.s. SEE FU&#039;s blog got lotsa karma&#8230;so its goodie man <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22770</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22770</guid>
		<description>Handsfree said, 
November 11, 2005 @ 9:42 pm  
 
SEE FU wat is yr blog add??  
 
YAU MOU GAU....CHOR!!!....MY blog add!!??.....Just click my Name above lah!!! Anyway.....I had added new Topics already......wanna to see your comments too!!! 
 
abu, have you registered your ID before using YAU MOU GAU...CHOR!!!?? Please login yours now. 
 
again....YAU MOU GAU....CHOR!!! :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Handsfree said,</p>
<p>November 11, 2005 @ 9:42 pm </p>
<p>SEE FU wat is yr blog add?? </p>
<p>YAU MOU GAU&#8230;.CHOR!!!&#8230;.MY blog add!!??&#8230;..Just click my Name above lah!!! Anyway&#8230;..I had added new Topics already&#8230;&#8230;wanna to see your comments too!!!</p>
<p>abu, have you registered your ID before using YAU MOU GAU&#8230;CHOR!!!?? Please login yours now.</p>
<p>again&#8230;.YAU MOU GAU&#8230;.CHOR!!! <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marmitecrab</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22759</link>
		<dc:creator>Marmitecrab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22759</guid>
		<description>Abu, 
 
How can you &quot;hijack&quot; other people&#039;s sign-off? 
 
Yao Mou Gao...Chor??? :-) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abu,</p>
<p>How can you &quot;hijack&quot; other people&#039;s sign-off?</p>
<p>Yao Mou Gao&#8230;Chor??? <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abu</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22748</link>
		<dc:creator>abu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22748</guid>
		<description>To Zongtwi: 
 
If the person is not an employee or related to 1 company. Do you think he knows abt how the co. runs or functioned?? I am not too sure how ur co. runs neither do you know how mr. Nederlander&#039;s co. runs. The thing we do is to assume and voice out their view. Speculations and assumption not come with nothing. Atlease mr. Nederlander did not mention that lotus or potong is hiring employee from MARS or they have hire an eight legs freaks as their CEO. thats nothing wrong or right with his assumption nor &#039;speculation&#039;. Probably one patriotic employee would defend his co. if something abt his co. is not right...truly understandable...Syabas! 
 
To Nederland: 
 
Be &#039;humble&#039; in your question and expect to be &#039;bashed&#039; kao kao if u are putting ur view to someone esp. an engineer ok? ur point may not sound harsh but maybe idiotic or probably from ur arsh (smelly?). So please be humble ya...esp. question abt protong and err...lotus? 
 
To MutantTomato: 
 
Exactly right man! but roman still have to sign the cheque to his freak manager if he wants to buy someone worth 21m (worth that?) i think the matter of &#039;owning&#039; means he still needs to invest to improve the club....make sense ar?  
 
Be cool man! its a blog afterall...harmony we are! YAO MOU GAO......CHOR!!! :D </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Zongtwi:</p>
<p>If the person is not an employee or related to 1 company. Do you think he knows abt how the co. runs or functioned?? I am not too sure how ur co. runs neither do you know how mr. Nederlander&#039;s co. runs. The thing we do is to assume and voice out their view. Speculations and assumption not come with nothing. Atlease mr. Nederlander did not mention that lotus or potong is hiring employee from MARS or they have hire an eight legs freaks as their CEO. thats nothing wrong or right with his assumption nor &#039;speculation&#039;. Probably one patriotic employee would defend his co. if something abt his co. is not right&#8230;truly understandable&#8230;Syabas!</p>
<p>To Nederland:</p>
<p>Be &#039;humble&#039; in your question and expect to be &#039;bashed&#039; kao kao if u are putting ur view to someone esp. an engineer ok? ur point may not sound harsh but maybe idiotic or probably from ur arsh (smelly?). So please be humble ya&#8230;esp. question abt protong and err&#8230;lotus?</p>
<p>To MutantTomato:</p>
<p>Exactly right man! but roman still have to sign the cheque to his freak manager if he wants to buy someone worth 21m (worth that?) i think the matter of &#039;owning&#039; means he still needs to invest to improve the club&#8230;.make sense ar? </p>
<p>Be cool man! its a blog afterall&#8230;harmony we are! YAO MOU GAO&#8230;&#8230;CHOR!!! <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zongtwi a.k.a. speed</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22720</link>
		<dc:creator>zongtwi a.k.a. speed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 22:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22720</guid>
		<description>Well said, Mutanttomato...it&#039;s not lotus aren&#039;t generating $$ (as how Mr nederlander put it) they aren&#039;t generating ENOUGH $$ to make PROFITS. Do you know what profit is? Or do I need to explain? 
 
I am an R&amp;D engineer in Lotus, why are you so curious? 
 
So if you already predicted that you are going to get &quot;shot kao kao one&quot; why did you still post your comments? I mean, if I knew what I was about to say was total bollocks and people would bash me for that, I am not STUPID to post those comments then, am I? 
 
FYI, I don&#039;t love Lotus or Proton so much. I like them only the appropriate amount. But if any of them forks up, ofcourse la I&#039;ll bash them as well. What I hate to see are people who don&#039;t know their facts, who are talking from their arses, speculate and assume things, and suddenly think they are good enough to become the next CEO of a company. WTF?!? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Mutanttomato&#8230;it&#039;s not lotus aren&#039;t generating $$ (as how Mr nederlander put it) they aren&#039;t generating ENOUGH $$ to make PROFITS. Do you know what profit is? Or do I need to explain?</p>
<p>I am an R&amp;D engineer in Lotus, why are you so curious?</p>
<p>So if you already predicted that you are going to get &quot;shot kao kao one&quot; why did you still post your comments? I mean, if I knew what I was about to say was total bollocks and people would bash me for that, I am not STUPID to post those comments then, am I?</p>
<p>FYI, I don&#039;t love Lotus or Proton so much. I like them only the appropriate amount. But if any of them forks up, ofcourse la I&#039;ll bash them as well. What I hate to see are people who don&#039;t know their facts, who are talking from their arses, speculate and assume things, and suddenly think they are good enough to become the next CEO of a company. WTF?!? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aksMs</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22716</link>
		<dc:creator>aksMs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 20:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22716</guid>
		<description>LotusGT1: Errr...what are trying to say there? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LotusGT1: Errr&#8230;what are trying to say there? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LotusGT1</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22700</link>
		<dc:creator>LotusGT1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22700</guid>
		<description>malaysia everything also want to be the best. people have what they also want to have it. people produce car they have proton. people have bike they got MV Agusta. they what also want but after they have it they did not really put effort to produce it. they do not know what malaysian want. try to look at korea they are so successful in their car production(Hyundai &amp; KIA). KIA also a partnership with mitsubishi how come they are so successful? why PROTON can&#039;t? why people can produce a car  with such a low cost Malaysia can&#039;t? coz they all makan makan till the cost goes up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>malaysia everything also want to be the best. people have what they also want to have it. people produce car they have proton. people have bike they got MV Agusta. they what also want but after they have it they did not really put effort to produce it. they do not know what malaysian want. try to look at korea they are so successful in their car production(Hyundai &amp; KIA). KIA also a partnership with mitsubishi how come they are so successful? why PROTON can&#039;t? why people can produce a car  with such a low cost Malaysia can&#039;t? coz they all makan makan till the cost goes up. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MutantTomato</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22586</link>
		<dc:creator>MutantTomato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22586</guid>
		<description>Nederlander: Bro, if I&#039;m not mistaken, Lotus does provide service to many other car manufacturers as well la. And I really don&#039;t know much about business either but, I think Proton is the biggest shareholder, i.e. 100%. Something like Roman Abramovich owns Chelsea F.C. Fine, so he owns the club. But that don&#039;t mean he takes all the revenue from it. Neither does he contribute entirely to the revenue. They generate their own revenue by buying&amp;selling players, getting sponsorship and advert deals, ticket sales, etc. Of course major decisions pass through him first la. But smaller things, like selling players, buying players; he leaves Chelsea to do it themselves. So, as much as he owns Chelsea, he doesn&#039;t &quot;own&quot; it... Now did that make sense? :P </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nederlander: Bro, if I&#039;m not mistaken, Lotus does provide service to many other car manufacturers as well la. And I really don&#039;t know much about business either but, I think Proton is the biggest shareholder, i.e. 100%. Something like Roman Abramovich owns Chelsea F.C. Fine, so he owns the club. But that don&#039;t mean he takes all the revenue from it. Neither does he contribute entirely to the revenue. They generate their own revenue by buying&amp;selling players, getting sponsorship and advert deals, ticket sales, etc. Of course major decisions pass through him first la. But smaller things, like selling players, buying players; he leaves Chelsea to do it themselves. So, as much as he owns Chelsea, he doesn&#039;t &quot;own&quot; it&#8230; Now did that make sense? <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doc2mee</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22572</link>
		<dc:creator>doc2mee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 22:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22572</guid>
		<description>yo  
and now we want to axe LOTUS.. 
 
Funny .. maybe POtong has learned everything from Lotus ...hehe 
 
Our Malaysian engineer damn smart lot ah? 
 
Hopefully we will see an IMPROV PROTON . eh? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo </p>
<p>and now we want to axe LOTUS..</p>
<p>Funny .. maybe POtong has learned everything from Lotus &#8230;hehe</p>
<p>Our Malaysian engineer damn smart lot ah?</p>
<p>Hopefully we will see an IMPROV PROTON . eh? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nederlander</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22560</link>
		<dc:creator>Nederlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22560</guid>
		<description>To my dearest zongtwi a.k.a. speed junkie 
  Maybe I am too young to understand a lot of bizness stuffs, could someone please tell me if &quot;Proton now own 100 per cent of Lotus&quot; cited from &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/car-reviews/car-and-driving/proton-gen-2-1.3-gls-1004560.html,&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/car-reviews/car-and-driv...&lt;/a&gt; plus if lotus dont generate $$, where lotus get $$ for their employees (if i remember correctly that u r one of the employees).  
Btw, I am curious wat is ur job position in Lotus since u r oni 24-25 years old. U can choose not to answer is ur right. 
  Haha! I really predicted u will shot me kao kao one!! So, please inform ur boss (Lotus or Proton) I am a good candidate!! heyhey!! Soon I become new CEO, I will certain promote u coz u love and protect lotus so much! how abt head RnD department? 
Also, to you, &quot;THINK, if you are bashing someone else,someone else would bash you instead&quot; Syabas!!!!!!!!!!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my dearest zongtwi a.k.a. speed junkie</p>
<p>  Maybe I am too young to understand a lot of bizness stuffs, could someone please tell me if &quot;Proton now own 100 per cent of Lotus&quot; cited from <a href="http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/car-reviews/car-and-driving/proton-gen-2-1.3-gls-1004560.html," rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/car-reviews/car-and-driv" rel="nofollow">http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/car-reviews/car-and-driv</a>&#8230; plus if lotus dont generate $$, where lotus get $$ for their employees (if i remember correctly that u r one of the employees). </p>
<p>Btw, I am curious wat is ur job position in Lotus since u r oni 24-25 years old. U can choose not to answer is ur right.</p>
<p>  Haha! I really predicted u will shot me kao kao one!! So, please inform ur boss (Lotus or Proton) I am a good candidate!! heyhey!! Soon I become new CEO, I will certain promote u coz u love and protect lotus so much! how abt head RnD department?</p>
<p>Also, to you, &quot;THINK, if you are bashing someone else,someone else would bash you instead&quot; Syabas!!!!!!!!!!!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keniji</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22540</link>
		<dc:creator>keniji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22540</guid>
		<description>dr. Mess to blame </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dr. Mess to blame </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outspoken</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22537</link>
		<dc:creator>outspoken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22537</guid>
		<description>MV Agusta was bought for business expansion, However, probably too little were done since the purchase and it becomes more of &quot;Proton :the owner of MV&#039; , rather than &quot; Proton: the beneficiary of owning MV&quot; . Letting MV go does make business sense, but i do hope atleast they try to look at other possibilities to make MV a profitable company and not  just a liability. I am not a staunch supporter of Proton, but for the sake of all the people involve in that company (employees, vendors, suppliers etc), I hope they do their best. It&#039;s time to work smart and focus. Hopefully the next CEO would someone more practical and no more &quot;selective decisions&quot; made. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MV Agusta was bought for business expansion, However, probably too little were done since the purchase and it becomes more of &quot;Proton :the owner of MV&#039; , rather than &quot; Proton: the beneficiary of owning MV&quot; . Letting MV go does make business sense, but i do hope atleast they try to look at other possibilities to make MV a profitable company and not  just a liability. I am not a staunch supporter of Proton, but for the sake of all the people involve in that company (employees, vendors, suppliers etc), I hope they do their best. It&#039;s time to work smart and focus. Hopefully the next CEO would someone more practical and no more &quot;selective decisions&quot; made. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrewhtf</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22531</link>
		<dc:creator>andrewhtf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22531</guid>
		<description>most of the times, it is not about doing the right thing (expanding capacity and more products offering) but it&#039;s about doing things right in the first place.  
 
if Proton concentrates on making one model until they can hammer down their defective parts per unit until 0.somethingsomething, thus making an excellent car, wouldn&#039;t customer confidence will be back? plus with the efficiency of doing something again and again (practice makes perfect, remember?) until it is right, i&#039;m sure one day Proton could make a car that is as reliable as a BMW or a Toyota! 
 
but then of course the idea to build only one car model is quite extreme, but maybe around 2-3 cars, with different model and engine capacity, perhaps may share the same platform or most of the parts inside, thus Proton shall be able to achieve a reasonable level economies of scales. 
 
workers that concentrate on that few work will become better skilled and faster in executing their work. QC ppl would be easily detect defects since it&#039;s a routine work with a proper and clear benchmark. 
 
imagine that, higher purchase volume of similar parts, leads to lower cost per unit. highly skilled and efficient workers will lead to lower labour cost because 1) increased productivity, more cars assembled per worker per hour, and 2) less workers are required to accomplish the same amount of jobs. All in all, this should translate to a lower cost per car for Proton.  
 
how they want to position the pricing, is up to them to decide, as long as the car is worthy of the price. not because the cost is such and such so have to price it like this. there is this thing called target costing... i guess the planners in Proton have to re-learn they management accounting stuffs. 
 
Proton is not only a national pride (or shame to some) but it is, for god&#039;s sake, A BUSINESS!!! Proton should not think of itself as a badan kebajikan to keep people in jobs and to support other peripheral businesses that is unworthy of surviving. More even so when Proton is facing the prospect that it will soon have to be the one to struggle to live. in business world,if u&#039;re unfit, u&#039;re a goner. no amount of help and protection can save any business from doom (gulung tikar), both the parts supplier or the main company itself. 
 
For 15 years (until 5 years ago, if i&#039;m not mistaken but do correct me if i&#039;m wrong) Proton has been &quot;learning&quot; from the Japanese (Japanese here does not necessarily only means Mitsubishi), what did they learn? did they actively search for knowledge or did they just sit around waiting to be spoon fed as is our education has always taught us? we all know how Japanese does things... they make sure they can complete one job flawlessly before moving onto the next job. but do we see it incorporated in Proton&#039;s work culture? So much for the Look East Policies (Dasar Pandang Ke Timur). the intention&#039;s noble but the implementation... err... u komen sendiri-lah... 
 
Proton should axe whichever position that is living off Proton like parasites, i.e lousy parts vendors and manufacturers, and underperforming employees. in times of heavy competition most companies that faced hardships cuts off alot of non-essential subsidiaries and suppliers, initiated lay-offs and retrenchments to stay afloat and focusing, concentrating only on what they does best, and most of them managed to turn around back into profitability.  
 
in other words, we called it core competencies. core competencies is what a company has or does, better or faster or cheaper compared to its competitors. some refers it as an absolute advantage that will attract buyers to choose them over others. 
 
so what is Proton&#039;s core competencies? do they have one? if they have none, then it is high time for them to create one for themselves in order to overcome its current problem. Proton needs to stay lean and be focused to do their things right. do what it takes to be fit and competitive, no matter what the costs are. and these costs cant be judged based on the figures and book value alone. there are intangibles as well.  
 
this leads to the goodwills... when they can build a car as reliable as a BMW, Volvo or a Mercedes, and provide equally top-notch services and parts,  surely these qualities will travel by words of mouths like fire spreading on dry grass, without having to spend as much on telling the world themselves that they&#039;re &quot;TUV certified&quot; or &quot;Das ist Perfekt&quot;. it will help rebuilding the brand image and prestige and also restores the pride it once had. put ur action to ur mouth. taglines like &quot;Asia&#039;s answer to BMW&quot; and &quot;My first Lotus&quot; are meaningless if u dont have a product that attests to it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most of the times, it is not about doing the right thing (expanding capacity and more products offering) but it&#039;s about doing things right in the first place. </p>
<p>if Proton concentrates on making one model until they can hammer down their defective parts per unit until 0.somethingsomething, thus making an excellent car, wouldn&#039;t customer confidence will be back? plus with the efficiency of doing something again and again (practice makes perfect, remember?) until it is right, i&#039;m sure one day Proton could make a car that is as reliable as a BMW or a Toyota!</p>
<p>but then of course the idea to build only one car model is quite extreme, but maybe around 2-3 cars, with different model and engine capacity, perhaps may share the same platform or most of the parts inside, thus Proton shall be able to achieve a reasonable level economies of scales.</p>
<p>workers that concentrate on that few work will become better skilled and faster in executing their work. QC ppl would be easily detect defects since it&#039;s a routine work with a proper and clear benchmark.</p>
<p>imagine that, higher purchase volume of similar parts, leads to lower cost per unit. highly skilled and efficient workers will lead to lower labour cost because 1) increased productivity, more cars assembled per worker per hour, and 2) less workers are required to accomplish the same amount of jobs. All in all, this should translate to a lower cost per car for Proton. </p>
<p>how they want to position the pricing, is up to them to decide, as long as the car is worthy of the price. not because the cost is such and such so have to price it like this. there is this thing called target costing&#8230; i guess the planners in Proton have to re-learn they management accounting stuffs.</p>
<p>Proton is not only a national pride (or shame to some) but it is, for god&#039;s sake, A BUSINESS!!! Proton should not think of itself as a badan kebajikan to keep people in jobs and to support other peripheral businesses that is unworthy of surviving. More even so when Proton is facing the prospect that it will soon have to be the one to struggle to live. in business world,if u&#039;re unfit, u&#039;re a goner. no amount of help and protection can save any business from doom (gulung tikar), both the parts supplier or the main company itself.</p>
<p>For 15 years (until 5 years ago, if i&#039;m not mistaken but do correct me if i&#039;m wrong) Proton has been &quot;learning&quot; from the Japanese (Japanese here does not necessarily only means Mitsubishi), what did they learn? did they actively search for knowledge or did they just sit around waiting to be spoon fed as is our education has always taught us? we all know how Japanese does things&#8230; they make sure they can complete one job flawlessly before moving onto the next job. but do we see it incorporated in Proton&#039;s work culture? So much for the Look East Policies (Dasar Pandang Ke Timur). the intention&#039;s noble but the implementation&#8230; err&#8230; u komen sendiri-lah&#8230;</p>
<p>Proton should axe whichever position that is living off Proton like parasites, i.e lousy parts vendors and manufacturers, and underperforming employees. in times of heavy competition most companies that faced hardships cuts off alot of non-essential subsidiaries and suppliers, initiated lay-offs and retrenchments to stay afloat and focusing, concentrating only on what they does best, and most of them managed to turn around back into profitability. </p>
<p>in other words, we called it core competencies. core competencies is what a company has or does, better or faster or cheaper compared to its competitors. some refers it as an absolute advantage that will attract buyers to choose them over others.</p>
<p>so what is Proton&#039;s core competencies? do they have one? if they have none, then it is high time for them to create one for themselves in order to overcome its current problem. Proton needs to stay lean and be focused to do their things right. do what it takes to be fit and competitive, no matter what the costs are. and these costs cant be judged based on the figures and book value alone. there are intangibles as well. </p>
<p>this leads to the goodwills&#8230; when they can build a car as reliable as a BMW, Volvo or a Mercedes, and provide equally top-notch services and parts,  surely these qualities will travel by words of mouths like fire spreading on dry grass, without having to spend as much on telling the world themselves that they&#039;re &quot;TUV certified&quot; or &quot;Das ist Perfekt&quot;. it will help rebuilding the brand image and prestige and also restores the pride it once had. put ur action to ur mouth. taglines like &quot;Asia&#039;s answer to BMW&quot; and &quot;My first Lotus&quot; are meaningless if u dont have a product that attests to it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trav da man</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22527</link>
		<dc:creator>trav da man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22527</guid>
		<description>keke thanks for ur inputs zongtwi :) 
I once read anissue frm autocar asean on lotus&#039;s future plan article. On that article they did plan to built the esprit in mysia. Now see this link to know what happends next! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.autocar.co.uk/News_Article.asp?NA_ID=217484&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.autocar.co.uk/News_Article.asp?NA_ID=2...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
swee: 
well i do trading of top gear show frm season 4-6, DVD and VCD. Interested? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keke thanks for ur inputs zongtwi <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I once read anissue frm autocar asean on lotus&#039;s future plan article. On that article they did plan to built the esprit in mysia. Now see this link to know what happends next! <a href="http://www.autocar.co.uk/News_Article.asp?NA_ID=217484" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.autocar.co.uk/News_Article.asp?NA_ID=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.autocar.co.uk/News_Article.asp?NA_ID=2</a>&#8230;  </p>
<p>swee:</p>
<p>well i do trading of top gear show frm season 4-6, DVD and VCD. Interested? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nohiddenagenda</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22524</link>
		<dc:creator>nohiddenagenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22524</guid>
		<description>since when we can buy what sales people talk? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since when we can buy what sales people talk? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zongtwi a.k.a. speed</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22523</link>
		<dc:creator>zongtwi a.k.a. speed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22523</guid>
		<description>Mmm...seems that that particular R&amp;D engineer was not trying good enough to keep quiet hehehe he must be quite high up to be willing to open his mouth giving informations like that. although I think the quote was wrong. a 3.5L engine only producing 220 hp? that is crap. a 3.5L engine should be producing at least 300hp (typically, engines are designed to give 70 to 80 hp per litre) 
 
two things...First, TM had vision, to develop Proton into this a world player, embracing all the technology in the world. Unfortunately, he was unrealistic. Too ambitious, and the small volume of cars being produced meant the technology wasn&#039;t feasible to be used. Ended up losing tonnes of cash. 
 
second, seriously, there are alot of pretty interesting stuff going on behind the scenes. Just hope the new management can reorganise and restructure soon to move the company forward. I think the Malaysian people are tired of waiting already...right? heh </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm&#8230;seems that that particular R&amp;D engineer was not trying good enough to keep quiet hehehe he must be quite high up to be willing to open his mouth giving informations like that. although I think the quote was wrong. a 3.5L engine only producing 220 hp? that is crap. a 3.5L engine should be producing at least 300hp (typically, engines are designed to give 70 to 80 hp per litre)</p>
<p>two things&#8230;First, TM had vision, to develop Proton into this a world player, embracing all the technology in the world. Unfortunately, he was unrealistic. Too ambitious, and the small volume of cars being produced meant the technology wasn&#039;t feasible to be used. Ended up losing tonnes of cash.</p>
<p>second, seriously, there are alot of pretty interesting stuff going on behind the scenes. Just hope the new management can reorganise and restructure soon to move the company forward. I think the Malaysian people are tired of waiting already&#8230;right? heh </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yhtan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22522</link>
		<dc:creator>yhtan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22522</guid>
		<description>So what ur mean? 
u mean TM mess up whole proton R&amp;D? 
i&#039;m glad that they really can built up new models,let us wait or another few yrs </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what ur mean?</p>
<p>u mean TM mess up whole proton R&amp;D?</p>
<p>i&#039;m glad that they really can built up new models,let us wait or another few yrs </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aR</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22520</link>
		<dc:creator>aR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 07:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22520</guid>
		<description>copied from autoworld forum 
 
Posted by T.W.O  
Posted - 08/11/2005 : 17:46:10  
----------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
Well I went and talk to some of my friends in Proton R&amp;D because I&#039;m  
buying a Perdana V6 and wanted to make sure that there&#039;s no new model  
thats coming out in 4 years time (so that my car will still have some  
value if i want to sell it later). Here&#039;s what he told me...  
 
The Passat as the next Perdana replacement model? pure fantasy, they have  
started work on it using their own chasis but it was scrapped when TM  
left. It&#039;s hard to have a direction as they have no CEO yet. He said if  
there&#039;s a new CEO maybe a PRM project will get underway, but that&#039;ll at  
least took 2-3 years.  
 
So I asked him what the latest model thats going to roll out from proton  
in 2 years time? He said the closest is the SRM (but that got some  
problem that he&#039;s not at liberty to say) and IRM (iswara replacement  
model). I was pretty suprised at this as he told me about 2 years ago  
that Proton are going to keep punching out the current iswara for at  
least 10 years which is why they make radical upgrades with the car. I  
asked how far is the progress with the IRM prototype, he said they  
already have a final design and now testing the car &quot;virtually&quot;. And he  
said it&#039;s a wee bit bigger than a savvy in some area (which i think is  
the interior) but he&#039;s not at liberty to say more.  
 
MPV, he was pretty excited with the Proton MPV but he said if they ever  
built one, Malaysian cant afford to buy it. Why I asked? Simple, it got a  
3.5L V6 engine and all aluminum chasis he said. (What kind of an idiot  
built a bloody MPV with an all aluminum chasis?!!!) He said it&#039;s TM  
(Mahalel) idea and they (engineers) just built it. The floorpan and wheel  
wells are all cast aluminum which makes the MPV very very light and  
pretty quick since the 3.5L engine punches more than 220 horsepower.  
 
Then I said, must still be in design phase right? Nope... there&#039;s a full  
working prototype at running at the factory (they regularly test the mpv  
on the test track just for shits and giggles and it&#039;s much much quicker  
than any proton models, save the R3 GTi). He cant talk about the  
performance detail but he said it&#039;s safe to say there&#039;s no other MPV in  
Msia than can top this one in performance and handlig. How does it look I  
ask? He cant go into details but he said it&#039;s a lot like the Wish.  
 
And the SRM as most of you guys know, is planned for release in Q1 in 06  
but it could be delayed up till June.  
 
And I ask about if there&#039;s any SUV model in the works? None...  
 
--------------- </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>copied from autoworld forum</p>
<p>Posted by T.W.O </p>
<p>Posted &#8211; 08/11/2005 : 17:46:10 </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- </p>
<p>Well I went and talk to some of my friends in Proton R&amp;D because I&#039;m </p>
<p>buying a Perdana V6 and wanted to make sure that there&#039;s no new model </p>
<p>thats coming out in 4 years time (so that my car will still have some </p>
<p>value if i want to sell it later). Here&#039;s what he told me&#8230; </p>
<p>The Passat as the next Perdana replacement model? pure fantasy, they have </p>
<p>started work on it using their own chasis but it was scrapped when TM </p>
<p>left. It&#039;s hard to have a direction as they have no CEO yet. He said if </p>
<p>there&#039;s a new CEO maybe a PRM project will get underway, but that&#039;ll at </p>
<p>least took 2-3 years. </p>
<p>So I asked him what the latest model thats going to roll out from proton </p>
<p>in 2 years time? He said the closest is the SRM (but that got some </p>
<p>problem that he&#039;s not at liberty to say) and IRM (iswara replacement </p>
<p>model). I was pretty suprised at this as he told me about 2 years ago </p>
<p>that Proton are going to keep punching out the current iswara for at </p>
<p>least 10 years which is why they make radical upgrades with the car. I </p>
<p>asked how far is the progress with the IRM prototype, he said they </p>
<p>already have a final design and now testing the car &quot;virtually&quot;. And he </p>
<p>said it&#039;s a wee bit bigger than a savvy in some area (which i think is </p>
<p>the interior) but he&#039;s not at liberty to say more. </p>
<p>MPV, he was pretty excited with the Proton MPV but he said if they ever </p>
<p>built one, Malaysian cant afford to buy it. Why I asked? Simple, it got a </p>
<p>3.5L V6 engine and all aluminum chasis he said. (What kind of an idiot </p>
<p>built a bloody MPV with an all aluminum chasis?!!!) He said it&#039;s TM </p>
<p>(Mahalel) idea and they (engineers) just built it. The floorpan and wheel </p>
<p>wells are all cast aluminum which makes the MPV very very light and </p>
<p>pretty quick since the 3.5L engine punches more than 220 horsepower. </p>
<p>Then I said, must still be in design phase right? Nope&#8230; there&#039;s a full </p>
<p>working prototype at running at the factory (they regularly test the mpv </p>
<p>on the test track just for shits and giggles and it&#039;s much much quicker </p>
<p>than any proton models, save the R3 GTi). He cant talk about the </p>
<p>performance detail but he said it&#039;s safe to say there&#039;s no other MPV in </p>
<p>Msia than can top this one in performance and handlig. How does it look I </p>
<p>ask? He cant go into details but he said it&#039;s a lot like the Wish. </p>
<p>And the SRM as most of you guys know, is planned for release in Q1 in 06 </p>
<p>but it could be delayed up till June. </p>
<p>And I ask about if there&#039;s any SUV model in the works? None&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haji</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22519</link>
		<dc:creator>haji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 06:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22519</guid>
		<description>Even GM and Ford sales dwindling right now. GM owns many other small marques companies. Ford too. I think they should merged, and sell under different name. Cost cutting. Lotus plant in Malaysia, done by malaysian, local contents, still top quality and same like the UK counterpart. This can be reflected to other Proton&#039;s make to. How about that. We don&#039;t need to publicise our name more. Furthermore, jusk look at Hyundai. They just copy the other design but it is well blended. Just look at the new Sonata. Honda Accord ma. The old one, Jaguar S-type. Gen-2=Mazda 6 hatchback, but not well design and blend. My friends said one thing to me and i think it is one of the failure of proton. Waja seem to look like for old people, and Gen-2 for younger people. If someone saw a teenagers drove Waja you probably think it is his father car. The same goes with Waja. If a pakcik drove it, guess what. I think it is his daugter car. Cakap banyak pun sama je. People don&#039;t trust Proton due to self experience. Experienced it yourself. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even GM and Ford sales dwindling right now. GM owns many other small marques companies. Ford too. I think they should merged, and sell under different name. Cost cutting. Lotus plant in Malaysia, done by malaysian, local contents, still top quality and same like the UK counterpart. This can be reflected to other Proton&#039;s make to. How about that. We don&#039;t need to publicise our name more. Furthermore, jusk look at Hyundai. They just copy the other design but it is well blended. Just look at the new Sonata. Honda Accord ma. The old one, Jaguar S-type. Gen-2=Mazda 6 hatchback, but not well design and blend. My friends said one thing to me and i think it is one of the failure of proton. Waja seem to look like for old people, and Gen-2 for younger people. If someone saw a teenagers drove Waja you probably think it is his father car. The same goes with Waja. If a pakcik drove it, guess what. I think it is his daugter car. Cakap banyak pun sama je. People don&#039;t trust Proton due to self experience. Experienced it yourself. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swee</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22518</link>
		<dc:creator>swee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 05:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/11/11/proton-reviews-non-core-investments/#comment-22518</guid>
		<description>where is this top gear i keep hearing of and where can i see it? im not so poor (ive got astro) but buying the dvds burns a hole in my goddamn wallet T.T </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is this top gear i keep hearing of and where can i see it? im not so poor (ive got astro) but buying the dvds burns a hole in my goddamn wallet T.T </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 2109/2109 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via vcdn1.paultan.org

Served from: _ @ 2012-05-24 00:20:37 -->
