the engine is quiet, seats are comfortable,the good thing abt this car is the new engine as compared to the old which consume less fuel,sound of the exhaust like european made, best of it ,there is no lack of power carrying full load.the engine is 30% less in weight as compared to the old engine therefore its already a plus point.the torque graph which i studied in the internet is much better than the old engine.1.5 is mounted with 4AT & 2.0 is extronic CVT.(as u know CVT???no feel and spongy)It also has a better shock absorbing handling as compare to their competitor(not to mention brand).basically the car need not slow down much when approaching humps on the road,there is "no rock and roll" just smooth ride.

The engine moving parts are polished to mirror finish to reduce friction as much so the engine will have less stress when aircon is on.mirror finished parts in engine are mostly found in sports car.keyless entry is also a plus point only found in luxury model and equipment like GPS.(2.0) ABS/etc

i have booked the 1.5 instead as it suits my needs and also it comes with a 4AT(u control the car) less expensive,lower tax /insurance.

thats is all I know abt this car.

But would only seriously consider buying if it’s about S$60K for the 1.5 litre model though…anything else, and I'll consider other brands/make.

2.0 litre? When I make it to Managing Director perhaps…lol…then again, Audi would be MY dream car by then!

Btw, this is your target audience for Sylphy speaking……

tail light.

Does it makes the woman who drives it more hospitable and caring once they drives it?Or the car itself is hospitable and caring towards its drivers?

I dont seem to be able to figure it out.

Can anyone help out here?

Just my 2 cents worth.

cheerios

Why cant they just simply put it this way,targetted for today's demanding family

man,focusing on safety and value for money.

just my 2 cents worth.

cheerios

Proportionately nice! Especially the head lamp..

If TCM sells 1500cc at around RM60k plus, I'll book one.!

And these japanese marketing dept, are they high on crack to call a car sylphy? Luckily they didnt sell the car with the same name because I bet if they use that name worldwide, the 1st thought that comes to ppl mind is syphilis. Hahahaha….

really can't wait to launched in Malaysia…

Look's likes skyline(front)…..ok what, for those can't afford to buy the ori skyline.

overall i will said, Nissan plz launched this model but try to keep the price below 75K for 1.5cc.

rather amusing how you keep referring to me as a 'mate', when your nick makes reference to an american city:)

i digress.

nissan does not work on emotions or pms. i beg to differ. As much homework they do, and as much as our learnings on motivations and behaviour tells us, they are interpreted and more importantly decisions based on them, are made by people (most of the time, 1 big datuk-person). And people are fallible. As i am too. Besides, its not the first time that end products have deviated from its original intention and development brief. now this may not translate to failure necessarily (the 1st SLK was never designed with women in mind primarily, but it translated to much success amongst them) but thats beside the point. The bluebird, if it did have women in mind during conception, has lost the plot. My opinion stands on that, but i also think it will be successful purely because it seems like a pretty handsome 4 box sedan and space is a practical benefit that appeals to many in that segment. It will sell to middle class, 2.5 kid families.

It wasnt my intention to imply women as retards. As a matter a fact, i am more retarded than women (caveat: only when i'm on the road. i d like to think i m not handicapped the rest of my days). Yes women have interests in compacts, coupes, drop-tops, monsta mpvs, soccer mom wagons, etc etc etc. I m not denying that. It doesnt change the fact that i think women are about aesthetics and style, and are willing to compromise on practicality (except said soccer moms). At least they DESIRE that, i d feel. Matter a fact, I desire that. Dont you? Now the only difference, is our interpretation of auto aesthetics – as much as you and i may appreciate the skyline's butch styling, the majority of women may not. I wont pretend to have done my homework with women's preference on auto styling/ motivations/ behaviour, but they probably express in quite differently that what is provided by our Nissan Bluebird. In sum, women are more emotional-biased than men are (in general – stereotypes work) and to really design a car for women, you d have to at least concede that to be true.. Dont take me literally, but do take a moment to reflect on the success of designed goods and maybe my point would see some light.

I have a personal dislike for un-romanticized animal names. It is characterless and an easy way out. Build a tough car – rhino. Build a pretty, ditzy, cutey car – bumblebee. Build a all-weather 4WD – Croc (*snicker)… ya ya.. i mean Diablo and Gallardos have origins of animals, but hey it's a name of an animal that had famous battles in the arena. Now that has got some character.

Look, the Bluebird i believe is a decent alt to your Vios/ City, or the Altis/ Civic (depending on price cat). I m not knocking the bluebird as a car. All i m saying is:

a) It is not a THE choice for women per se. Neither should it be positioned as such.

b) The name sucks. It is unimaginative, but if its about historical equity, then perhaps i do not understand the history of the bluebird. My bad

c) Unless you re australian, refrain from using 'mate'.

unregistered toyota camry get burn
http://autoworld.com.my
….cammry pun terbakar…beb…!! lebih 100K tu..punya keato…..lebih 20thn operasi…..aaamacam..??

I'd have this over the VIOS, anytime. Providing it's in the same price range.. And the air-cond vents sucks.. Can't they just align it horizontally?

the 1st thing nissan has to do is to change the name . Nissan Silverbird ..perhaps