<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitsubishi denies joint venture plans with Proton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaif</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32380</link>
		<dc:creator>shaif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32380</guid>
		<description>Read newspaper today that Proton should enter the China market and JV with some of the companies. Well if the big boys don&#039;t want Proton, perhaps Proton can find new companies from China. I wonder if Proton JV with some China company, the price will be lowered compared to Malaysian market as China offer a larger market. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read newspaper today that Proton should enter the China market and JV with some of the companies. Well if the big boys don&#039;t want Proton, perhaps Proton can find new companies from China. I wonder if Proton JV with some China company, the price will be lowered compared to Malaysian market as China offer a larger market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajis</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32326</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 07:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32326</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... How about Subaru? If they still want an asian touch? hehehe... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; How about Subaru? If they still want an asian touch? hehehe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuzzary</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32193</link>
		<dc:creator>nuzzary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32193</guid>
		<description>malaysian like japan engine &amp; Cars because malaysia is one of the junkyard for old cars from japan..  
kete potong so many.. turbo oso got what.. part ori no need to buy.. 
those conti cars hard to find.. if buy ori parts oso same as expensive.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>malaysian like japan engine &amp; Cars because malaysia is one of the junkyard for old cars from japan.. </p>
<p>kete potong so many.. turbo oso got what.. part ori no need to buy..</p>
<p>those conti cars hard to find.. if buy ori parts oso same as expensive..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HatukNgkau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32093</link>
		<dc:creator>HatukNgkau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32093</guid>
		<description>well freeze, it seems like that, but do u think Proton would have the face to ask mitsubishi again? i&#039;m not sure though but definitely no reputable carmaker would want to jump in so early since this VW issue... perhaps in later time, or perhaps, maybe some &quot;lesser&quot; asian carmaker? it remains to be seen... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well freeze, it seems like that, but do u think Proton would have the face to ask mitsubishi again? i&#039;m not sure though but definitely no reputable carmaker would want to jump in so early since this VW issue&#8230; perhaps in later time, or perhaps, maybe some &quot;lesser&quot; asian carmaker? it remains to be seen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeze</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32089</link>
		<dc:creator>freeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32089</guid>
		<description>So basically Mitsubishi said NO even before Proton asked them?  
 
thats sad. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically Mitsubishi said NO even before Proton asked them? </p>
<p>thats sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32079</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32079</guid>
		<description>I have a suggestion over here Hatuk or other ppl, STOP RESPONDING to this SO-called Pig lah......don&#039;t get your hand dirty and the war will over!!  
How can you expect a PIG to understand your Speech! 
I have stop already See! 
 
Back to the topic as Paul request. 
 
YAU MOU GAU...CHOR!! :P </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a suggestion over here Hatuk or other ppl, STOP RESPONDING to this SO-called Pig lah&#8230;&#8230;don&#039;t get your hand dirty and the war will over!! </p>
<p>How can you expect a PIG to understand your Speech!</p>
<p>I have stop already See!</p>
<p>Back to the topic as Paul request.</p>
<p>YAU MOU GAU&#8230;CHOR!! <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HatukNgkau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32061</link>
		<dc:creator>HatukNgkau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32061</guid>
		<description>say whatever u want then... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>say whatever u want then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaymen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32026</link>
		<dc:creator>shaymen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32026</guid>
		<description>hmmm...kepala hatukngkau. 
u are right by saying budi bahasa mencerminkan keperibadian manusia...but,you are the one who insult me here for no reason,writing s(tut)id essay to confuse others,bla,bla,bla... 
youre the one who is unmatured here because if we started to quarrel,you will find paul for help who would always be on your side for no exec reason..you cant even talk by your own and surely you dont know what the bloody hell youre talking about... 
i think kepala hatuk kau,see fu,zahrul shahrin is the one who need to see the doctor because obviously,theres somethings wrong with ur membrane... 
i pitty ur wife for being ur wife because i dont think a ppl like u can satisfy ur wife need because ur busy writing essay here... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm&#8230;kepala hatukngkau.</p>
<p>u are right by saying budi bahasa mencerminkan keperibadian manusia&#8230;but,you are the one who insult me here for no reason,writing s(tut)id essay to confuse others,bla,bla,bla&#8230;</p>
<p>youre the one who is unmatured here because if we started to quarrel,you will find paul for help who would always be on your side for no exec reason..you cant even talk by your own and surely you dont know what the bloody hell youre talking about&#8230;</p>
<p>i think kepala hatuk kau,see fu,zahrul shahrin is the one who need to see the doctor because obviously,theres somethings wrong with ur membrane&#8230;</p>
<p>i pitty ur wife for being ur wife because i dont think a ppl like u can satisfy ur wife need because ur busy writing essay here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paramsingwalia</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32000</link>
		<dc:creator>paramsingwalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-32000</guid>
		<description>hehehhehe...ala hatuk kau...maybe u should&#039;t just single out shaymen...as far as i know..ur friend see fuu had gone overboard by using the f word multiple times...nice to know it had been deleted.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehehhehe&#8230;ala hatuk kau&#8230;maybe u should&#039;t just single out shaymen&#8230;as far as i know..ur friend see fuu had gone overboard by using the f word multiple times&#8230;nice to know it had been deleted..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HatukNgkau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31999</link>
		<dc:creator>HatukNgkau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31999</guid>
		<description>Shaymen, this is not an internet public forum that is run by software bots where u can simply drop ur pants and shit wherever u like, tanpa malu, behind the anonymity of a screen name. 
 
this is a blog that BELONGS to someone who actually exists and living, who spends his time and effort to share his passion among other ppl. as a guest to his &quot;house&quot;, i, and many others should very much respect him as much as u respect the host or house owner who invited us to his place.  
 
if there is an unruly guest at his functions, the host would politely ask the guest to behave or to leave the function. i believe paul knows what to do here. 
 
by the way, i am not in any way hurt by ur childish remarks, it simply shows the person u are. budi bahasa mencerminkan keperibadian manusia. anyway, words dont hurt me. u can go on and post insults and calling names to whoever u want. it&#039;s ur problem, not with me...  
 
however as a friendly advice, see a psychiatric. research shows that ppl&#039;s online persona turns out totally diffrent in real life. i dont know about u, but i have always been honest to myself. by the way, i recalled there&#039;s a saying, 
 
&quot;dont fight with a pig in the mud, in the end, u get dirty, and the pig loves it.&quot; 
 
maka, dengan ini saya sudahi dengan serangkap pantun, (ala Karam Singh Walia) 
 
Nobody cares about threats over the internet, 
U don&#039;t have to try to act hard with the keyboard, 
that&#039;s so sad.  
 
unless you actually, physically, beat someone 
with the keyboard.  
then thats ironically, hilarious. 
 
 
 
well wishes to evryone else here. it&#039;s my wife&#039;s birthday today! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaymen, this is not an internet public forum that is run by software bots where u can simply drop ur pants and shit wherever u like, tanpa malu, behind the anonymity of a screen name.</p>
<p>this is a blog that BELONGS to someone who actually exists and living, who spends his time and effort to share his passion among other ppl. as a guest to his &quot;house&quot;, i, and many others should very much respect him as much as u respect the host or house owner who invited us to his place. </p>
<p>if there is an unruly guest at his functions, the host would politely ask the guest to behave or to leave the function. i believe paul knows what to do here.</p>
<p>by the way, i am not in any way hurt by ur childish remarks, it simply shows the person u are. budi bahasa mencerminkan keperibadian manusia. anyway, words dont hurt me. u can go on and post insults and calling names to whoever u want. it&#039;s ur problem, not with me&#8230; </p>
<p>however as a friendly advice, see a psychiatric. research shows that ppl&#039;s online persona turns out totally diffrent in real life. i dont know about u, but i have always been honest to myself. by the way, i recalled there&#039;s a saying,</p>
<p>&quot;dont fight with a pig in the mud, in the end, u get dirty, and the pig loves it.&quot;</p>
<p>maka, dengan ini saya sudahi dengan serangkap pantun, (ala Karam Singh Walia)</p>
<p>Nobody cares about threats over the internet,</p>
<p>U don&#039;t have to try to act hard with the keyboard,</p>
<p>that&#039;s so sad. </p>
<p>unless you actually, physically, beat someone</p>
<p>with the keyboard. </p>
<p>then thats ironically, hilarious.</p>
<p>well wishes to evryone else here. it&#039;s my wife&#039;s birthday today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paramsingwalia</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31992</link>
		<dc:creator>paramsingwalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31992</guid>
		<description>SEE FU said, 
 
January 17, 2006 @ 7:54 am  
Back to the topic: 
JV is important to share the TECHNOLOGIES example: new Engine technologies, 4WD &amp; AWC (All wheels Control system) from Mitsu. POTONG can only applied the same technologies on WAJA when JV with Mitsu and must continue paying royalty or Wait until the patent protection period expired. (I think Usually a patent protection period is 15 years in USA, but Invetor can extend it for extra 5 years max). 
 
If POTONG don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t want to pay Royalty to Anybody: 
1) Copy it and sell it to NO LAWS countries maybe at Vietnam or China. 
--------is there any market there ka?(param) 
2) Wait until the Patent protection period expired (15 to 20 years later). 
--------YA RIGHT....we wait then u bash cos of old tech...make up ur mind.(param said) 
3) Buy the Compay and own it automatically. 
-----------lotus and mv?remember...no money making co will sell...simple logic(param said) 
4) Invent it by POTONG engineer. 
-----------campro..gen2,waja,savvy(param said) 
5) Buy the patent from Inventor 
----------so expensive,we got lotus..gen2 interior got from lotus m250 what.(param said) 
6) Someone donate it for FREE to POTONG. 
----------small boy&#039;s fantasy(param said) 
7) Work together with Supplier who own the patent rights. 
-----------already got lotus...use it la(param said) 
8) JV with specail agreement (maybe free, but nothing is free in this world they will charged POTONG back from somewhere lah like Technical support bla&#226;&#8364;&#166;bla&#226;&#8364;&#166;bla&#226;&#8364;&#166;.methods) 
------------that&#039;s what tun and TM negotiatons with VW in the first place...azlan screw it up.(param said) 
9) Still thinking!! 
-----think with other people brain la better.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEE FU said,</p>
<p>January 17, 2006 @ 7:54 am </p>
<p>Back to the topic:</p>
<p>JV is important to share the TECHNOLOGIES example: new Engine technologies, 4WD &amp; AWC (All wheels Control system) from Mitsu. POTONG can only applied the same technologies on WAJA when JV with Mitsu and must continue paying royalty or Wait until the patent protection period expired. (I think Usually a patent protection period is 15 years in USA, but Invetor can extend it for extra 5 years max).</p>
<p>If POTONG don&acirc;&euro;&trade;t want to pay Royalty to Anybody:</p>
<p>1) Copy it and sell it to NO LAWS countries maybe at Vietnam or China.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;is there any market there ka?(param)</p>
<p>2) Wait until the Patent protection period expired (15 to 20 years later).</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;YA RIGHT&#8230;.we wait then u bash cos of old tech&#8230;make up ur mind.(param said)</p>
<p>3) Buy the Compay and own it automatically.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;lotus and mv?remember&#8230;no money making co will sell&#8230;simple logic(param said)</p>
<p>4) Invent it by POTONG engineer.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;campro..gen2,waja,savvy(param said)</p>
<p>5) Buy the patent from Inventor</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-so expensive,we got lotus..gen2 interior got from lotus m250 what.(param said)</p>
<p>6) Someone donate it for FREE to POTONG.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-small boy&#039;s fantasy(param said)</p>
<p>7) Work together with Supplier who own the patent rights.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;already got lotus&#8230;use it la(param said)<br />
  <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> JV with specail agreement (maybe free, but nothing is free in this world they will charged POTONG back from somewhere lah like Technical support bla&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;bla&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;bla&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;.methods)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;that&#039;s what tun and TM negotiatons with VW in the first place&#8230;azlan screw it up.(param said)</p>
<p>9) Still thinking!!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;think with other people brain la better..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaymen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31976</link>
		<dc:creator>shaymen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31976</guid>
		<description>huhuhuhuh.....looks like ur singapore with a protection from america(paul) and im malaysian.....really funny!but nevermind,i can stand on my own. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huhuhuhuh&#8230;..looks like ur singapore with a protection from america(paul) and im malaysian&#8230;..really funny!but nevermind,i can stand on my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaymen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31971</link>
		<dc:creator>shaymen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31971</guid>
		<description>eeeeeeeeee!!!!!!geram betul aku hatokkau ni...see u on the next topic.we will have a proper discussion when ur father is not here.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eeeeeeeeee!!!!!!geram betul aku hatokkau ni&#8230;see u on the next topic.we will have a proper discussion when ur father is not here..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaymen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31970</link>
		<dc:creator>shaymen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31970</guid>
		<description>hey shyamalang....what u can do with ur gen2 is add a fuel regulator,buy an extractor and complete xzos system from r3,buy an cf airbox from r3,buy a camshaft stage2 from r3 and buy the suspension system component with the bumpsteer kit....or maybe u can ask them to remap ur engine system. 
the car would be marvellous to drive.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey shyamalang&#8230;.what u can do with ur gen2 is add a fuel regulator,buy an extractor and complete xzos system from r3,buy an cf airbox from r3,buy a camshaft stage2 from r3 and buy the suspension system component with the bumpsteer kit&#8230;.or maybe u can ask them to remap ur engine system.</p>
<p>the car would be marvellous to drive..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaymalan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31959</link>
		<dc:creator>shaymalan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31959</guid>
		<description>o.k guys i m the new owner of new gen2, just wait for my finding, coz i own it! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>o.k guys i m the new owner of new gen2, just wait for my finding, coz i own it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HatukNgkau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31898</link>
		<dc:creator>HatukNgkau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31898</guid>
		<description>Glad u&#039;re here Paul... i wonder how other readers are gonna put up with this... it&#039;s high time something has to be done to protect ur blog... by the way u might&#039;ve forgotten include its alter ego as well... anyway, looks like u have to be here more often as long as they&#039;re are still here. 
 
have a nice day! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad u&#039;re here Paul&#8230; i wonder how other readers are gonna put up with this&#8230; it&#039;s high time something has to be done to protect ur blog&#8230; by the way u might&#039;ve forgotten include its alter ego as well&#8230; anyway, looks like u have to be here more often as long as they&#039;re are still here.</p>
<p>have a nice day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31897</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31897</guid>
		<description>shaymen - please discuss without being so emotional and insulting. this is my final warning. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shaymen &#8211; please discuss without being so emotional and insulting. this is my final warning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaymen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31896</link>
		<dc:creator>shaymen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31896</guid>
		<description>THEN MUST USE 4G18 ENGINE UNTIL 2020 LA...WAIT FOR PATENT TO EXPIRE THEN COPY..HMMM *TUT* BOY...BACKWARDS THINKING.. 
AND YES...HONDA 8VALVE IS OLD ENGINE..JUST IMPROVE ABIT HERE AND THERE DOESNT HIDE THE FACT THAT&#039;S ITS OLD AND JUST 8 VALVE...USE SAGA LA 8 VALVE ALSO...IF PROTON DOES THAT U KUTUK...HONDA NO PROBLEM..U WANT PROTON TO IMPROVE THIS THAT LA...BUT ONE STATEMENT U SAID MUST WAIT FOR PATENT TO EXPIRE IN 15YEARS TIME </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THEN MUST USE 4G18 ENGINE UNTIL 2020 LA&#8230;WAIT FOR PATENT TO EXPIRE THEN COPY..HMMM *TUT* BOY&#8230;BACKWARDS THINKING..</p>
<p>AND YES&#8230;HONDA 8VALVE IS OLD ENGINE..JUST IMPROVE ABIT HERE AND THERE DOESNT HIDE THE FACT THAT&#039;S ITS OLD AND JUST 8 VALVE&#8230;USE SAGA LA 8 VALVE ALSO&#8230;IF PROTON DOES THAT U KUTUK&#8230;HONDA NO PROBLEM..U WANT PROTON TO IMPROVE THIS THAT LA&#8230;BUT ONE STATEMENT U SAID MUST WAIT FOR PATENT TO EXPIRE IN 15YEARS TIME</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaymen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31895</link>
		<dc:creator>shaymen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31895</guid>
		<description>If POTONG don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t want to pay Royalty to Anybody: 
1) Copy it and sell it to NO LAWS countries maybe at Vietnam or China. 
2) Wait until the Patent protection period expired (15 to 20 years later). 
3) Buy the Compay and own it automatically. 
4) Invent it by POTONG engineer. 
5) Buy the patent from Inventor. 
6) Someone donate it for FREE to POTONG. 
7) Work together with Supplier who own the patent rights. 
8) JV with specail agreement (maybe free, but nothing is free in this world they will charged POTONG back from somewhere lah like Technical support bla&#226;&#8364;&#166;bla&#226;&#8364;&#166;bla&#226;&#8364;&#166;.methods) 
9) Still thinking!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If POTONG don&acirc;&euro;&trade;t want to pay Royalty to Anybody:</p>
<p>1) Copy it and sell it to NO LAWS countries maybe at Vietnam or China.</p>
<p>2) Wait until the Patent protection period expired (15 to 20 years later).</p>
<p>3) Buy the Compay and own it automatically.</p>
<p>4) Invent it by POTONG engineer.</p>
<p>5) Buy the patent from Inventor.</p>
<p>6) Someone donate it for FREE to POTONG.</p>
<p>7) Work together with Supplier who own the patent rights.<br />
  <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> JV with specail agreement (maybe free, but nothing is free in this world they will charged POTONG back from somewhere lah like Technical support bla&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;bla&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;bla&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;.methods)</p>
<p>9) Still thinking!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31883</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31883</guid>
		<description>I totally agreed that, to explain something in Technical way sometime is very hard to make some Non-technical ppl to fully understand it. Don&#039;t worry it is not your fault! Just I don&#039;t want to waste my Energy to further explains it! :) 
 
YAU MOU GAU....CHOR!! Cheers! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agreed that, to explain something in Technical way sometime is very hard to make some Non-technical ppl to fully understand it. Don&#039;t worry it is not your fault! Just I don&#039;t want to waste my Energy to further explains it! <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>YAU MOU GAU&#8230;.CHOR!! Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biggie</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31882</link>
		<dc:creator>biggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31882</guid>
		<description>thats why you need a leader with a vision. Doing RnD means that you&#039;re working on something that may (and may not) be in use in another 20 yrs time. Hybrid and alternative energy has been researched intensively from 1973, up till now 40yrs on it still not viable although it look like it will be there maybe in10yrs time. 
 
Proton and other small car makers do not have such capital, in fact they just going from model to model. Thats where NAP (which still on paper) come in. It will provide such capital but then Proton need to have a clear roadmap. 
 
As for Mitsu... it does not make sense to associate yourself with a comp. that just take a massive plunge in its share prices. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats why you need a leader with a vision. Doing RnD means that you&#039;re working on something that may (and may not) be in use in another 20 yrs time. Hybrid and alternative energy has been researched intensively from 1973, up till now 40yrs on it still not viable although it look like it will be there maybe in10yrs time.</p>
<p>Proton and other small car makers do not have such capital, in fact they just going from model to model. Thats where NAP (which still on paper) come in. It will provide such capital but then Proton need to have a clear roadmap.</p>
<p>As for Mitsu&#8230; it does not make sense to associate yourself with a comp. that just take a massive plunge in its share prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaymen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31879</link>
		<dc:creator>shaymen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31879</guid>
		<description>wahhhhhh.....still have fictional essay by those pig huh..... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wahhhhhh&#8230;..still have fictional essay by those pig huh&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paramsingwalia</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31871</link>
		<dc:creator>paramsingwalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31871</guid>
		<description>oii ketuk 
 
u want campro bring old management back la...new management only wants to sell and rebadge like p2...p2 got late tech cos like proton with mitsu...their ori models must be sold in japan first for few years..6 if im not mistaken...just like what vw wants to do with proton..are u happy if we get old cars from vw or mitsu? 
 
admit la that 8 valve engine is the 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s engine with few enhancement...check the engine code...old tech..rear disc takde...rear suspension lama...so lousy..but still wahhhhhhhhh.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oii ketuk</p>
<p>u want campro bring old management back la&#8230;new management only wants to sell and rebadge like p2&#8230;p2 got late tech cos like proton with mitsu&#8230;their ori models must be sold in japan first for few years..6 if im not mistaken&#8230;just like what vw wants to do with proton..are u happy if we get old cars from vw or mitsu?</p>
<p>admit la that 8 valve engine is the 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s engine with few enhancement&#8230;check the engine code&#8230;old tech..rear disc takde&#8230;rear suspension lama&#8230;so lousy..but still wahhhhhhhhh..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paramsingwalia</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31870</link>
		<dc:creator>paramsingwalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31870</guid>
		<description>see fuu go chong what ni insa*e la...unser 8valve tu engine from the 80&#039;s lagi la...same with the city...do same reseach la boy.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see fuu go chong what ni insa*e la&#8230;unser 8valve tu engine from the 80&#039;s lagi la&#8230;same with the city&#8230;do same reseach la boy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEE FU</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31865</link>
		<dc:creator>SEE FU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31865</guid>
		<description>I heard someone define the 8 valves Single CAM Engine is OLD TECH Engine. It is definately WRONG statement!!!  
 
Questions? 
 
Why valve is used? 8 Valves or 16 Valves or even 20 Valves is no different of Technologies, apparently the Valve is used just for the function of open and close to allow air flow into combustion chamber a the right timing. The number of valves applied is depend on the Cylinder size and engine performance. If 1 valve is sufficient or enough to allow the optimun air flows in and out why needs 4 or Even 5 valves per cylinder??? Same goes wtih SOHC or DOHC. 
  
Also, Can an engine with 8 valves SOHC using V-TEC and all Valves are using composite material installed in an Aluminium Cylinder head and Blocks Engine plus Electronic Control unit for air flow Temperature and humidities applied CALLED as Old engine? The point is 8 valves and SOHC does not define as OLD or NEW technology. ONLY The complete engine design package with better performance can be called as New technology. 
 
Example: if an engine only got 2 Cylinders (660cc) (2x2= 4 valves in total) but the output is the same as V6 engine (3000cc) (4x 6= 24 valves in total) , I think we can call it as NEW Tech Engine and the V6 engine with 24V can be called old. The judgement is not based on the number of Valves apply but it is based on the OUTPUT!! Don&#039;t you agreed? 
 
Another good example is the WHEELs on the vehicle. You see Hundred years ago the car got 4 wheels and Tyres, until now the year 2006, our High tech vehicle including EV car still got 4 Wheels and Tyres. But look at the TYRE&#039;s technology now it is completely different from 100 year ago. Can you say our car is old technologies because it still having 4 Wheels and tyres? 
 
Back to the topic: 
JV is important to share the TECHNOLOGIES example: new Engine technologies, 4WD &amp; AWC (All wheels Control system) from Mitsu. POTONG can only applied the same technologies on WAJA when JV with Mitsu and must continue paying royalty or Wait until the patent protection period expired. (I think Usually a patent protection period is 15 years in USA, but Invetor can extend it for extra 5 years max).  
 
If POTONG don&#039;t want to pay Royalty to Anybody: 
1) Copy it and sell it to NO LAWS countries maybe at Vietnam or China. 
2) Wait until the Patent protection period expired (15 to 20 years later). 
3) Buy the Compay and own it automatically. 
4) Invent it by POTONG engineer. 
5) Buy the patent from Inventor. 
6) Someone donate it for FREE to POTONG. 
7) Work together with Supplier who own the patent rights. 
8) JV with specail agreement (maybe free, but nothing is free in this world they will charged POTONG back from somewhere lah like Technical support bla...bla...bla....methods) 
9) Still thinking!! 
 
One of the reason why the Japanese cars are getting better and better like Continental car, because most of the body and chasis design which patented by American and German has been expired. Everybody is free to copy it nowadays.  
 
Now the next battle of patent rights issue are Fuel Cell Vechicle (FCV) and Electric Vehicle (EV) and Hybrids! Therefore the German is working with French and French is working with the Japanese and American just wanna to share the same techologies, with But our POTONG still owning NOTHING in this areas. Only CAMPRO?? :P 
 
YAU MOU GAU....CHOR!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard someone define the 8 valves Single CAM Engine is OLD TECH Engine. It is definately WRONG statement!!! </p>
<p>Questions?</p>
<p>Why valve is used? 8 Valves or 16 Valves or even 20 Valves is no different of Technologies, apparently the Valve is used just for the function of open and close to allow air flow into combustion chamber a the right timing. The number of valves applied is depend on the Cylinder size and engine performance. If 1 valve is sufficient or enough to allow the optimun air flows in and out why needs 4 or Even 5 valves per cylinder??? Same goes wtih SOHC or DOHC.</p>
<p>Also, Can an engine with 8 valves SOHC using V-TEC and all Valves are using composite material installed in an Aluminium Cylinder head and Blocks Engine plus Electronic Control unit for air flow Temperature and humidities applied CALLED as Old engine? The point is 8 valves and SOHC does not define as OLD or NEW technology. ONLY The complete engine design package with better performance can be called as New technology.</p>
<p>Example: if an engine only got 2 Cylinders (660cc) (2&#215;2= 4 valves in total) but the output is the same as V6 engine (3000cc) (4x 6= 24 valves in total) , I think we can call it as NEW Tech Engine and the V6 engine with 24V can be called old. The judgement is not based on the number of Valves apply but it is based on the OUTPUT!! Don&#039;t you agreed?</p>
<p>Another good example is the WHEELs on the vehicle. You see Hundred years ago the car got 4 wheels and Tyres, until now the year 2006, our High tech vehicle including EV car still got 4 Wheels and Tyres. But look at the TYRE&#039;s technology now it is completely different from 100 year ago. Can you say our car is old technologies because it still having 4 Wheels and tyres?</p>
<p>Back to the topic:</p>
<p>JV is important to share the TECHNOLOGIES example: new Engine technologies, 4WD &amp; AWC (All wheels Control system) from Mitsu. POTONG can only applied the same technologies on WAJA when JV with Mitsu and must continue paying royalty or Wait until the patent protection period expired. (I think Usually a patent protection period is 15 years in USA, but Invetor can extend it for extra 5 years max). </p>
<p>If POTONG don&#039;t want to pay Royalty to Anybody:</p>
<p>1) Copy it and sell it to NO LAWS countries maybe at Vietnam or China.</p>
<p>2) Wait until the Patent protection period expired (15 to 20 years later).</p>
<p>3) Buy the Compay and own it automatically.</p>
<p>4) Invent it by POTONG engineer.</p>
<p>5) Buy the patent from Inventor.</p>
<p>6) Someone donate it for FREE to POTONG.</p>
<p>7) Work together with Supplier who own the patent rights.<br />
  <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> JV with specail agreement (maybe free, but nothing is free in this world they will charged POTONG back from somewhere lah like Technical support bla&#8230;bla&#8230;bla&#8230;.methods)</p>
<p>9) Still thinking!!</p>
<p>One of the reason why the Japanese cars are getting better and better like Continental car, because most of the body and chasis design which patented by American and German has been expired. Everybody is free to copy it nowadays. </p>
<p>Now the next battle of patent rights issue are Fuel Cell Vechicle (FCV) and Electric Vehicle (EV) and Hybrids! Therefore the German is working with French and French is working with the Japanese and American just wanna to share the same techologies, with But our POTONG still owning NOTHING in this areas. Only CAMPRO?? <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>YAU MOU GAU&#8230;.CHOR!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HatukNgkau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31863</link>
		<dc:creator>HatukNgkau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 03:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31863</guid>
		<description>haha, param... Unser is not new la... only introduced late in malaysian market when it has already been selling in indonesia as Kijang for a few years. same goes for Avanza... the reason why it came in late compared to our &quot;lesser&quot; neighbours? all of us here knows-lah kan? i never praised that car anyway... 
 
by the way honda city&#039;s 8-valves engine are only limited to i-DSi models, while the i-VTECs variants are 16-valves engines...the reason for a limited valve to i-DSi variants are for fuel efficiency and practicality. both i-DSI and i-VTEC operates on dual-sparkplug engine and CVT with 7-speed Steermatic... 
 
but do we see at least cam profiling with the CamPro? rumours are that it has been built and stil undergoing tests in Proton... i wonder how long are they gonna complete it and put it in their product offerings... by the time hybrids technology are the standard in all cars around the world?  
 
well i guess we just have to sit down and wait till the cow comes home. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, param&#8230; Unser is not new la&#8230; only introduced late in malaysian market when it has already been selling in indonesia as Kijang for a few years. same goes for Avanza&#8230; the reason why it came in late compared to our &quot;lesser&quot; neighbours? all of us here knows-lah kan? i never praised that car anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>by the way honda city&#039;s 8-valves engine are only limited to i-DSi models, while the i-VTECs variants are 16-valves engines&#8230;the reason for a limited valve to i-DSi variants are for fuel efficiency and practicality. both i-DSI and i-VTEC operates on dual-sparkplug engine and CVT with 7-speed Steermatic&#8230;</p>
<p>but do we see at least cam profiling with the CamPro? rumours are that it has been built and stil undergoing tests in Proton&#8230; i wonder how long are they gonna complete it and put it in their product offerings&#8230; by the time hybrids technology are the standard in all cars around the world? </p>
<p>well i guess we just have to sit down and wait till the cow comes home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paramsingwalia</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31851</link>
		<dc:creator>paramsingwalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31851</guid>
		<description>this see fuu...haiyaaa.....so boring...first wants proton to go ahead with tech..but not copy like china..that&#039;s why they bought lotus,mv.then u know that for proton to move ahead must get those tech and expertise from others..thats what the japs did last time..now can design their own la..but people like u la say no good..just jv..rebadge..i wanna buy cars cheaply la...no need to pursue any rnd,no need lotus and mv...let vw take over la...but wants new tech... 
 
u say one thing,then u say something the opposite...make up ur mind la boy.. 
you mou u sorang la.. 
 
and hatuk kau la htuk kau..what about the city 8valve single cam engine?is it this year&#039;s design?hahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahah 
or toyota unser 8 valve...wahhhhh...so new ka?hahahhaahhahahah...check first la...just see the brand then say wahhhh without looking at the specs...3rd world mentality.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this see fuu&#8230;haiyaaa&#8230;..so boring&#8230;first wants proton to go ahead with tech..but not copy like china..that&#039;s why they bought lotus,mv.then u know that for proton to move ahead must get those tech and expertise from others..thats what the japs did last time..now can design their own la..but people like u la say no good..just jv..rebadge..i wanna buy cars cheaply la&#8230;no need to pursue any rnd,no need lotus and mv&#8230;let vw take over la&#8230;but wants new tech&#8230;</p>
<p>u say one thing,then u say something the opposite&#8230;make up ur mind la boy..</p>
<p>you mou u sorang la..</p>
<p>and hatuk kau la htuk kau..what about the city 8valve single cam engine?is it this year&#039;s design?hahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahah</p>
<p>or toyota unser 8 valve&#8230;wahhhhh&#8230;so new ka?hahahhaahhahahah&#8230;check first la&#8230;just see the brand then say wahhhh without looking at the specs&#8230;3rd world mentality..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAN</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31849</link>
		<dc:creator>DAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31849</guid>
		<description>proton only know how to used other people thing to get brand n say there made it, if there made is good, but how if not.  
vw is international car maker n there way of culture whit nature of there business is different. 
we r 3rd mind mentality. 
who 1 there product been do whit not in there spec n monitoring by them. 
at the end it will turn like proton story now, this n that blame to vendor. what a stupid minority do business!. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>proton only know how to used other people thing to get brand n say there made it, if there made is good, but how if not. </p>
<p>vw is international car maker n there way of culture whit nature of there business is different.</p>
<p>we r 3rd mind mentality.</p>
<p>who 1 there product been do whit not in there spec n monitoring by them.</p>
<p>at the end it will turn like proton story now, this n that blame to vendor. what a stupid minority do business!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gegaoff Max</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31846</link>
		<dc:creator>gegaoff Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31846</guid>
		<description>i wonder is that actually that the PROTON that miss understanding the first place? i mean, may be the first intention from VW actually is &#039;take over&#039;, not JV? just some though... 
 
so now MItsubishi want to make clear line between them n PROTON? is fair enough... coz they just starting to pust bigger percentage on local market... no benefit if they have any futher relation like JV with PROTON... :D 
 
cheers... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wonder is that actually that the PROTON that miss understanding the first place? i mean, may be the first intention from VW actually is &#039;take over&#039;, not JV? just some though&#8230;</p>
<p>so now MItsubishi want to make clear line between them n PROTON? is fair enough&#8230; coz they just starting to pust bigger percentage on local market&#8230; no benefit if they have any futher relation like JV with PROTON&#8230; <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>cheers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HatukNgkau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31842</link>
		<dc:creator>HatukNgkau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/01/15/mitsubishi-denies-joint-venture-plans-with-proton/#comment-31842</guid>
		<description>a 20 year old 16 valve DOHC engine technology is Proton&#039;s NEWEST TECHNOLOGY la, SeeFu... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a 20 year old 16 valve DOHC engine technology is Proton&#039;s NEWEST TECHNOLOGY la, SeeFu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

