Comments on: Chery QQ Crash Test http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/ Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry Wed, 23 May 2012 18:08:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Andrew http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-550259 Andrew Thu, 27 Oct 2011 04:42:21 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-550259 So, you dont have any more Chinese Produts in your house? everything is Made in China... just see the label. So, you dont have any more Chinese Produts in your house?
everything is Made in China… just see the label.

]]> By: AMILA ALWIS JAYATHILAKA http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-533639 AMILA ALWIS JAYATHILAKA Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:12:09 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-533639 I think this is a good and ecconomical car. I think this is a good and ecconomical car.

]]> By: NO ONE http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-438846 NO ONE Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:25:50 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-438846 THIS CAR IS VERY GOOD, THE DIE IS VERY FAST, PEOPLE DO NOT SUFFER A LOT TO DIE! THIS CAR IS VERY GOOD, THE DIE IS VERY FAST, PEOPLE DO NOT SUFFER A LOT TO DIE!

]]> By: henry http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-385626 henry Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:30:40 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-385626 id rather have one than none :D id rather have one than none :D

]]> By: zain http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-378128 zain Fri, 08 Oct 2010 04:37:33 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-378128 This is amazing surprise B/c in this danger situation driver will be safe nice, This is amazing surprise B/c in this danger situation driver will be safe nice,

]]> By: heinkoch http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-346312 heinkoch Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:59:51 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-346312 Hello Fiona I am still very happy with this car. I bought this car because of it's safety. It has the airbags for both the front seat and the driver seat. It has ABS. These are the safety factors i considered when i was looking for something small and decided to take the QQ. Look the car looks terribly small from the outside, inside you are very surprised. It is spacious. I would advise you not to go lower than the 1100 engine. The 800cc you need to press it harder to get somewhere. The 1100 does just fine. For around Pretoria, wonderful. I drive mine ever 2nd day from pta to rivonia. And my speed is 110 in average. I have once or twice took it to 130, it feels okay with 3 full grown people in it. It does not tend to go from the left to the right and vise versa due to wind. It sits static. My airbag once or twice popped a warning light on the dash and i took it in and the little connection under the panel in the front passenger side got loose, the connector was just a bit stiff, now still good. My engine is semi automatic. Even driving in automatic by just pushing the stick forward it will allow you to change gears separately and then will correct it self. While in automatic you can let it go lower in gear if you need power without pressing the pedal through the carpet. Same if you feel the car take to long to to a better gear, it will allow you. Mostly i drive it with the automatic off, changing my gears on my own as i choose. When you stop, it will correct it self according to your speed by lowering gears. SO, you have a choice how to drive your gears. SO i believe the QQ is good and very practical. Getting to a crossing, you can simply touch the gear stick to the right, the car will go out of gears and you can free to your crossing, preparing to drive ahead, just step on the break and push forward with the stick and gear 1 you go. When idling at a intersection it is advisable to take it our of gears to help you clucth not spinning all the time against the gears, bigger cars does not have this issue. My service spanner has popped on the dash , little red light at 5000 km, but it is due for service at 15000km. I phoned the agent and they confirmed i can still drive till 15000. Service centres are Pretoria mid town and Midrand and Sandton. Service at the midrand Oliefantsfontein is really good, professional. Fast. So i have not seen any negativity on this QQ yet. O do not bother with road ragers. You will get them every where. Even if they chase you on your bumper, they still can not touch you, cause if they do, they will find them in with lot of problems from your insurance, police and attorneys :-) with lots of consequences up his way. But look , it is not only happening with the QQ, it happens with my jag as well. So, do not feel intimidated. Enjoy the QQ as it is the smallest best thing i have came across with a 1100 engine. Best regards Hein Hello Fiona
I am still very happy with this car. I bought this car because of it’s safety. It has the airbags for both the front seat and the driver seat. It has ABS. These are the safety factors i considered when i was looking for something small and decided to take the QQ.

Look the car looks terribly small from the outside, inside you are very surprised. It is spacious. I would advise you not to go lower than the 1100 engine. The 800cc you need to press it harder to get somewhere. The 1100 does just fine. For around Pretoria, wonderful. I drive mine ever 2nd day from pta to rivonia. And my speed is 110 in average. I have once or twice took it to 130, it feels okay with 3 full grown people in it. It does not tend to go from the left to the right and vise versa due to wind. It sits static. My airbag once or twice popped a warning light on the dash and i took it in and the little connection under the panel in the front passenger side got loose, the connector was just a bit stiff, now still good. My engine is semi automatic. Even driving in automatic by just pushing the stick forward it will allow you to change gears separately and then will correct it self. While in automatic you can let it go lower in gear if you need power without pressing the pedal through the carpet. Same if you feel the car take to long to to a better gear, it will allow you. Mostly i drive it with the automatic off, changing my gears on my own as i choose. When you stop, it will correct it self according to your speed by lowering gears. SO, you have a choice how to drive your gears. SO i believe the QQ is good and very practical. Getting to a crossing, you can simply touch the gear stick to the right, the car will go out of gears and you can free to your crossing, preparing to drive ahead, just step on the break and push forward with the stick and gear 1 you go. When idling at a intersection it is advisable to take it our of gears to help you clucth not spinning all the time against the gears, bigger cars does not have this issue.

My service spanner has popped on the dash , little red light at 5000 km, but it is due for service at 15000km. I phoned the agent and they confirmed i can still drive till 15000. Service centres are Pretoria mid town and Midrand and Sandton. Service at the midrand Oliefantsfontein is really good, professional. Fast. So i have not seen any negativity on this QQ yet.

O do not bother with road ragers. You will get them every where. Even if they chase you on your bumper, they still can not touch you, cause if they do, they will find them in with lot of problems from your insurance, police and attorneys :-) with lots of consequences up his way. But look , it is not only happening with the QQ, it happens with my jag as well. So, do not feel intimidated. Enjoy the QQ as it is the smallest best thing i have came across with a 1100 engine.

Best regards
Hein

]]> By: Fiona http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-346305 Fiona Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:27:02 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-346305 afternoon Hein, after your comment on this, looking at it two months down the line, do you still think it is a good buy. It is for my sister and them (who can't even afford any new car!), so they do most of their driving in and around Pretoria area (on child of 10). so I don't see why they really need more. I love speed and open roads, but the closest they get to it is when visiting me in Secunda, and with our potholes a whole lot of other issues pop up even with the smartest most expensive cars. And really on our roads, shouldn't 120 km/h be more than enough for the average driver to be able to reach? Speeding maniacs are a scarry thing, especially if it is just people who drive cars that think they drive well!!!!!!! What do you think? For the around Pretoria purpose, once a month the 200km to Secunda, isn't this all they should actually need? Hope you comment. Thanks fiona afternoon Hein, after your comment on this, looking at it two months down the line, do you still think it is a good buy. It is for my sister and them (who can’t even afford any new car!), so they do most of their driving in and around Pretoria area (on child of 10). so I don’t see why they really need more. I love speed and open roads, but the closest they get to it is when visiting me in Secunda, and with our potholes a whole lot of other issues pop up even with the smartest most expensive cars. And really on our roads, shouldn’t 120 km/h be more than enough for the average driver to be able to reach? Speeding maniacs are a scarry thing, especially if it is just people who drive cars that think they drive well!!!!!!!
What do you think? For the around Pretoria purpose, once a month the 200km to Secunda, isn’t this all they should actually need?
Hope you comment.
Thanks
fiona

]]> By: Waleed http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-336141 Waleed Tue, 01 Jun 2010 06:15:08 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-336141 Dear !!! Allow to me at first introduce my self my name is Waleed, from Iraq - Mosul City, my old 24 years. I bought a car ( CHERY QQ ), it's very good car according to my opinion but there is only a one problem, the problem is that I hered a noise in the gear and this noise I hered it in all the new car that I'm tried it before I buy...So how can I fix it ...Please a nswer me it will be nice from you if you are learn me how can i fix it.....Yours Waleed from iraq Dear !!!
Allow to me at first introduce my self my name is Waleed, from Iraq – Mosul City, my old 24 years. I bought a car ( CHERY QQ ), it’s very good car according to my opinion but there is only a one problem, the problem is that I hered a noise in the gear and this noise I hered it in all the new car that I’m tried it before I buy…So how can I fix it …Please a nswer me it will be nice from you if you are learn me how can i fix it…..Yours Waleed from iraq

]]> By: isg http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-335777 isg Sun, 30 May 2010 17:45:32 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-335777 look at the investment news in the QQ too,. isnt alot of foreign JV being added included Fiat and US manufactuer taken up some kind of this cherry into their small car segments. does this company relied on those test mentioned here or they have thier own test . I am sure these are better proof look at the investment news in the QQ too,.
isnt alot of foreign JV being added included Fiat and US manufactuer taken up
some kind of this cherry into their small car segments.

does this company relied on those test mentioned here or they have
thier own test .

I am sure these are better proof

]]> By: hein http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-331658 hein Tue, 18 May 2010 12:14:49 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-331658 sorry about my spelling, at the moment not my brightest in a office of no circulation..:( sorry about my spelling, at the moment not my brightest in a office of no circulation..:(

]]> By: hein http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-331656 hein Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:58 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-331656 Hi Guys, I bought a QQ TXE last year in December. I drove with it 44 kms daily. It is a 1100 engine with automatic/manual, dual airbags. I drove with it, with me or 3 people in the car at 130km/s. ref counters sits on 4700. I know it is fast but that car no ways swing from left to right, it stays stuck on it's 4 rims an ever go lucky all the way. I had issues with my airbag light, it cam ons a few times, took it in and found that the airbag plug under the passenger's side was loose, was fixed and happen again. Agent fixed it once again. This car is excellent in traffic that runs grid locked 15+ km /h. The unfortunate is that is the traffic is standing still, and you get to go less t hat 15km/h, the poor car computer tries to compensate the for clutch grip all the time, but i have learned to cominsate negatively and it works for me. I have a Jaguar at home sitting nicely in my garage, I enjoy the Jag in open traffic, but the same with the QQ TXE in the grid traffic. My 2 cents Br Hi Guys, I bought a QQ TXE last year in December. I drove with it 44 kms daily. It is a 1100 engine with automatic/manual, dual airbags. I drove with it, with me or 3 people in the car at 130km/s. ref counters sits on 4700. I know it is fast but that car no ways swing from left to right, it stays stuck on it’s 4 rims an ever go lucky all the way. I had issues with my airbag light, it cam ons a few times, took it in and found that the airbag plug under the passenger’s side was loose, was fixed and happen again. Agent fixed it once again.
This car is excellent in traffic that runs grid locked 15+ km /h. The unfortunate is that is the traffic is standing still, and you get to go less t hat 15km/h, the poor car computer tries to compensate the for clutch grip all the time, but i have learned to cominsate negatively and it works for me. I have a Jaguar at home sitting nicely in my garage, I enjoy the Jag in open traffic, but the same with the QQ TXE in the grid traffic.
My 2 cents

Br

]]> By: Lucas http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-261821 Lucas Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:26:26 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-261821 I drive a GM Corsa in Brazil. I happened to drive many other brands with a car quality offered in Brazil (which is terrible). Many car spare parts are produced in China, including tyres, machanical parts and screen wipers. I once bought a pair of windscreen wiper for the car and I got a damaged glass. The rubber detached from the metal part and scratched my windsreen. I promised that I will neve buy Chinese products again. Never!!! I drive a GM Corsa in Brazil. I happened to drive many other brands with a car quality offered in Brazil (which is terrible). Many car spare parts are produced in China, including tyres, machanical parts and screen wipers. I once bought a pair of windscreen wiper for the car and I got a damaged glass. The rubber detached from the metal part and scratched my windsreen. I promised that I will neve buy Chinese products again. Never!!!

]]> By: shepherd http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-259804 shepherd Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:33:29 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-259804 bull shit! bull shit!

]]> By: tvtsolution http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-232213 tvtsolution Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:19:40 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-232213 With above discussion, we should buy old car but more safer for driver & passenger or buy qq3? With above discussion, we should buy old car but more safer for driver & passenger or buy qq3?

]]> By: GremlinSA http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-203783 GremlinSA Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:05:08 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-203783 "A car that size doing 110km/h already feels like swinging from left to right on the highway. Who are they tryin to kid?" Well I purchased a QQ last month, and i'm no softy with cars, and have written of two cars (one twice). The Chery QQ has pretty good handeling, I've driven a Uno, and a Matiz, and neither felt as comfortable on the road as the QQ.. I've topped 140Km/h and there was no swinging or fish tailing. The braking is also true, and sharp. On the day that we got the vehicle, some Blond Bimbo jumped a Stop in front of us, and to top it, the roads were wet after a heavy downpour. Needless to say, the QQ stopped on a dime. For the Price, Fuel economy, look & Interior space, the car was a very good buy.. (Also i need something to slow me down) “A car that size doing 110km/h already feels like swinging from left to right on the highway. Who are they tryin to kid?”

Well I purchased a QQ last month, and i’m no softy with cars, and have written of two cars (one twice). The Chery QQ has pretty good handeling, I’ve driven a Uno, and a Matiz, and neither felt as comfortable on the road as the QQ.. I’ve topped 140Km/h and there was no swinging or fish tailing.

The braking is also true, and sharp. On the day that we got the vehicle, some Blond Bimbo jumped a Stop in front of us, and to top it, the roads were wet after a heavy downpour. Needless to say, the QQ stopped on a dime.

For the Price, Fuel economy, look & Interior space, the car was a very good buy.. (Also i need something to slow me down)

]]> By: adamccl http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-130552 adamccl Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:14:28 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-130552 Simple conclusion = Aesthetics - Yes (Look at its cute front!), best for unique car collectors! Safety - I DON'T think so, Airbags only for body, legs surely recieve injuries. Simple conclusion =
Aesthetics – Yes (Look at its cute front!), best for unique car collectors!
Safety – I DON’T think so, Airbags only for body, legs surely recieve injuries.

]]> By: taras http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-93416 taras Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:37:50 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-93416 This crash test was performed in Russia, in NICIAMT passive safety laboratory; test was ordered by Autoreview magazine. The car was bought anonymously in one of Chery dealerships. The red car above is Daewoo Matiz built in Uzbekistan (rather popular car in Russia), and tested earlier in the same laboratory. It was not equipped with airbags (all Uzbek Matizs are not equipped with them). The article and some data on this crashtest: <a href="http://www.autoreview.ru/archive/2006/01/CheryQQ/" rel="nofollow">http://www.autoreview.ru/archive/2006/01/CheryQQ/</a> This crash test was performed in Russia, in NICIAMT passive safety laboratory; test was ordered by Autoreview magazine.

The car was bought anonymously in one of Chery dealerships.

The red car above is Daewoo Matiz built in Uzbekistan (rather popular car in Russia), and tested earlier in the same laboratory. It was not equipped with airbags (all Uzbek Matizs are not equipped with them).

The article and some data on this crashtest:
http://www.autoreview.ru/archive/2006/01/CheryQQ/

]]> By: mcch8855 http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-87813 mcch8855 Fri, 18 May 2007 13:40:55 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-87813 how to proof this is true Chery QQ car?????? how to proof this is true Chery QQ car??????

]]> By: Chery and GM settlement over QQ http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-46401 Chery and GM settlement over QQ Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:01:27 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-46401 [...] UK magazine AutoExpress carried photos of the Chery QQ crash test results yesterday. Clearly European consumers are a little worried about the influx of Chinese cars into their market soon in the future, for example the new Nanjing-assembled MG Rover cars, the JiangLing Landwind, and the Geely Beauty Leopard. Bad crash test result photos (as well as some good ones?) of the Chery QQ have been around the internet for a long time, so it is not exactly breaking news for us. There are also accusations that the Chery QQ is a rip-off of the Chevy Spark, and there was a lawsuit but it was settled out of court and since dropped. [...] [...] UK magazine AutoExpress carried photos of the Chery QQ crash test results yesterday. Clearly European consumers are a little worried about the influx of Chinese cars into their market soon in the future, for example the new Nanjing-assembled MG Rover cars, the JiangLing Landwind, and the Geely Beauty Leopard. Bad crash test result photos (as well as some good ones?) of the Chery QQ have been around the internet for a long time, so it is not exactly breaking news for us. There are also accusations that the Chery QQ is a rip-off of the Chevy Spark, and there was a lawsuit but it was settled out of court and since dropped. [...]

]]> By: New Chery QQ Crash Test Photos http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-43563 New Chery QQ Crash Test Photos Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:59:42 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-43563 [...] QXTX, which looks like some kind of Chery QQ fan club website has posted a different set of Chery QQ crash test result photos on their site last year. In these new crash test photos, the damage does not look bad at all, but even through Babelfish Chinese to English translation I could not really determine to which crash testing standards was used as guidelines for the crash test. Perhaps a reader who can read Chinese could help? You can see that the last photo was shot intentionally to show that all four doors of the Chery QQ could be opened after the crash. For older photos showing much worse results, click here. More crash test photos after the jump. [...] [...] QXTX, which looks like some kind of Chery QQ fan club website has posted a different set of Chery QQ crash test result photos on their site last year. In these new crash test photos, the damage does not look bad at all, but even through Babelfish Chinese to English translation I could not really determine to which crash testing standards was used as guidelines for the crash test. Perhaps a reader who can read Chinese could help? You can see that the last photo was shot intentionally to show that all four doors of the Chery QQ could be opened after the crash. For older photos showing much worse results, click here. More crash test photos after the jump. [...]

]]> By: kt71 http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-43005 kt71 Sun, 02 Jul 2006 15:03:00 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-43005 Don't trust anything that is not 'yet' in EuroNcap official website. Chery managed to copy Spark, it might as well 'copied' the crash results too ! Don't trust anything that is not 'yet' in EuroNcap official website. Chery managed to copy Spark, it might as well 'copied' the crash results too !

]]> By: Chery QQ coming to town this month » http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-42970 Chery QQ coming to town this month » Sat, 01 Jul 2006 19:42:42 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-42970 [...] Chery QQ Crash Test Visionary Vehicles to bring Chery to USA [...] [...] Chery QQ Crash Test Visionary Vehicles to bring Chery to USA [...]

]]> By: nkhhenry http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-36544 nkhhenry Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:13:03 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-36544 waw, the crash worse than riding a scooter!!!! is oklah cos china still hv a lot more people 4 accident die.....how can china govt approved QQ road safety control n standard????? waw, the crash worse than riding a scooter!!!! is oklah cos china still hv a lot more people 4 accident die…..how can china govt approved QQ road safety control n standard?????

]]> By: egytuner http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-34385 egytuner Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:10:08 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-34385 well, here we go... The chery QQ is based on the daewoo matiz, by GM. Which is called spark elsawhere... anyways. EuroNcap Matiz crash test. <a href="http://www.euroncap.com/content/safety_ratings/details.php?id1=1&id2=65" rel="nofollow">http://www.euroncap.com/content/safety_ratings/de...</a> Which states that on frontal impact: " the driver still contacted the steering wheel with his chest which lost marks. Hard structures under the facia were hazardous to the driver’s knees, and the brake pedal was hazardous to the feet." & i think this is exactly what we can see in the QQ pictures. So i guess they are both tipical . During what happened. ( for the driver ). reply back :) well, here we go…

The chery QQ is based on the daewoo matiz, by GM. Which is called spark elsawhere… anyways.

EuroNcap Matiz crash test.

http://www.euroncap.com/content/safety_ratings/de…

Which states that on frontal impact:

" the driver still contacted the steering wheel with his chest which lost marks. Hard structures under the facia were hazardous to the driver’s knees, and the brake pedal was hazardous to the feet."

& i think this is exactly what we can see in the QQ pictures. So i guess they are both tipical . During what happened. ( for the driver ).

reply back :)

]]> By: solomon http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-34011 solomon Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:18:13 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-34011 this is an unfair test. As I know, Chevrolet Spark cannot even pass the China national crush test either! But Chery pass the national test. here's the webiste: <a href="http://www.qxtx.com/newsshow.asp?newsid=528" rel="nofollow">http://www.qxtx.com/newsshow.asp?newsid=528</a> it's obviously business trap from Chery's competitors in China, and GM is most possible the bad guy. Why these guys not to test with a Chevrolet Spark car? it's worse than Chery QQ! hehehe.... this is an unfair test. As I know, Chevrolet Spark cannot even pass the China national crush test either! But Chery pass the national test. here's the webiste:
http://www.qxtx.com/newsshow.asp?newsid=528
it's obviously business trap from Chery's competitors in China, and GM is most possible the bad guy.

Why these guys not to test with a Chevrolet Spark car? it's worse than Chery QQ! hehehe….

]]> By: james81 http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-33940 james81 Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:47:10 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-33940 here one point must be noted: The CHERY QQ in this test is the version WITHOUT AIR BAG,but the martiz equipped, so the compare is unfair.this test is preformed in Russia according to NCAP stardand. that is 64km/h.although QQ is NOT EQUIPPED with air bag,the passenger is safer than the one in Martiz.the QQ has the version with DUAL AIR BAGS, if QQ in the test is DUAL AIR BAG version, the result will be much better. here one point must be noted:

The CHERY QQ in this test is the version WITHOUT AIR BAG,but the martiz equipped, so the compare is unfair.this test is preformed in Russia according to NCAP stardand. that is 64km/h.although QQ is NOT EQUIPPED with air bag,the passenger is safer than the one in Martiz.the QQ has the version with DUAL AIR BAGS, if QQ in the test is DUAL AIR BAG version, the result will be much better.

]]> By: plumber2 http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-33818 plumber2 Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:48:42 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-33818 this kind of impact nobody can walk out without injure , i think China can make any specification that meet EuroNCAP want lah , just like China selling those shoes in Europe country, this is another pretext use to kick away China products , they will set-up another standard or ..somethings to tell evry ones .......just to protect thier themself and thier market this kind of impact nobody can walk out without injure , i think China can make any specification that meet EuroNCAP want lah , just like China selling

those shoes in Europe country, this is another pretext use to kick away China products , they will set-up another standard or ..somethings to tell evry ones …….just to protect thier themself and thier market

]]> By: BOYBOY http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-33756 BOYBOY Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:52:00 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-33756 hello everybody, I just have a question, the question is the crash test result for QQ is not published in the EuroNCAP official web! <a href="http://www.euroncap.com/content/safety_ratings/ratings.php?id1=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.euroncap.com/content/safety_ratings/ra...</a> So, I want ask, is the result valid? if yes, why the EuroNCAP never put the result to publish on their official web? does anyone give me the answer? I don't mean that QQ is good or not. i just want the truth. DO NOT cheat me anymore.. hello everybody, I just have a question, the question is the crash test result for QQ is not published in the EuroNCAP official web!
http://www.euroncap.com/content/safety_ratings/ra…

So, I want ask, is the result valid? if yes, why the EuroNCAP never put the result to publish on their official web?

does anyone give me the answer?

I don't mean that QQ is good or not. i just want the truth. DO NOT cheat me anymore..

]]> By: aksMs http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-33752 aksMs Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:30:44 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-33752 Oh my......HAHAHAHAA!!! Now, that's very-very ambitious. Has anyone notice the tachometer of this Cherry? Read the top speed. 220km/h???? WTF??!! A car that size doing 110km/h already feels like swinging from left to right on the highway. Who are they tryin to kid? Oh my……HAHAHAHAA!!!

Now, that's very-very ambitious. Has anyone notice the tachometer of this Cherry? Read the top speed. 220km/h???? WTF??!! A car that size doing 110km/h already feels like swinging from left to right on the highway. Who are they tryin to kid?

]]> By: clark_kent http://paultan.org/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-33705 clark_kent Tue, 21 Feb 2006 03:20:51 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/18/chery-qq-crash-test/#comment-33705 stevarac: i did not say that it IS a mamak stall. It's just an expression to show which part of the picture im refering to, coz of the painting. Of coz i know its not a back door garage or what ever u were thinking... like DuH~!!! What i would be interested is that what IF the test was taken with a direct head-on impact, that i believe would make difference to the entire 'injury- analysis graph' (dunno what's it called). stevarac:

i did not say that it IS a mamak stall. It's just an expression to show which part of the picture im refering to, coz of the painting. Of coz i know its not a back door garage or what ever u were thinking… like DuH~!!!

What i would be interested is that what IF the test was taken with a direct head-on impact, that i believe would make difference to the entire 'injury- analysis graph' (dunno what's it called).

]]>