<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 Honda Civic Type R Concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:35:37 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cuoreboy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-42238</link>
		<dc:creator>cuoreboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-42238</guid>
		<description>the rear is look abit like caldina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the rear is look abit like caldina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMG</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-41864</link>
		<dc:creator>AMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-41864</guid>
		<description>What the Honda think.... It is diffrence from the older R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the Honda think&#8230;. It is diffrence from the older R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007 Honda Civic Type R Spyshots &#187;</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-41816</link>
		<dc:creator>2007 Honda Civic Type R Spyshots &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-41816</guid>
		<description>[...] Honda has been seen testing it&#8217;s 2007 Honda Civic Type R on German grounds. The 2007 Honda Civic Type R will be based on the three-door version of the Honda Civic Euro. Previously, Honda showcased a 2007 Honda Civic Type R Concept at the Geneva Motor Show, a stunning kitted out yellow speed demon. The 2007 Honda Civic Type R will likely feature a 220hp i-VTEC engine similiar to the one found in the Acura RSX. The car will be front-wheel drive, no SH-AWD (Superior Handling All Wheel Drive) for this little speed demon. Two more photos after the jump. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Honda has been seen testing it&#8217;s 2007 Honda Civic Type R on German grounds. The 2007 Honda Civic Type R will be based on the three-door version of the Honda Civic Euro. Previously, Honda showcased a 2007 Honda Civic Type R Concept at the Geneva Motor Show, a stunning kitted out yellow speed demon. The 2007 Honda Civic Type R will likely feature a 220hp i-VTEC engine similiar to the one found in the Acura RSX. The car will be front-wheel drive, no SH-AWD (Superior Handling All Wheel Drive) for this little speed demon. Two more photos after the jump. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarmizi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34364</link>
		<dc:creator>tarmizi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 02:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34364</guid>
		<description>Look quite shiok. I wonder if they bring to Spore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look quite shiok. I wonder if they bring to Spore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dd</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34310</link>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 07:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34310</guid>
		<description>dam kau cun... one of a kind rear...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dam kau cun&#8230; one of a kind rear&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34209</link>
		<dc:creator>vai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34209</guid>
		<description>Beng ah...Beng....how many time i told you not to waste your money modifying your car....sigh sigh...double sigh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beng ah&#8230;Beng&#8230;.how many time i told you not to waste your money modifying your car&#8230;.sigh sigh&#8230;double sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PGlang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34194</link>
		<dc:creator>PGlang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34194</guid>
		<description>Hehe...cool design ! No comments and certainly just dream about it for we Malaysia Boleh!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe&#8230;cool design ! No comments and certainly just dream about it for we Malaysia Boleh!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikoy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34181</link>
		<dc:creator>nikoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34181</guid>
		<description>Bad =Too tall, too fat. Rear very ugly.. Good = Lamp design, sport rim. Overall = Not nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad =Too tall, too fat. Rear very ugly.. Good = Lamp design, sport rim. Overall = Not nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the_hives</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34116</link>
		<dc:creator>the_hives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34116</guid>
		<description>wow! ugly nya!! another gaban car from honda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! ugly nya!! another gaban car from honda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raptorclans</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34051</link>
		<dc:creator>raptorclans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34051</guid>
		<description>but i do agree the bodykit wasn&#039;t well-designed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but i do agree the bodykit wasn&#8217;t well-designed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raptorclans</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34050</link>
		<dc:creator>raptorclans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34050</guid>
		<description>anyone notice that the bonnet has the ridge that leads to the nose, mimicking an F1 car&#039;s nose? maybe getting some links to it&#039;s F1 herritage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone notice that the bonnet has the ridge that leads to the nose, mimicking an F1 car&#8217;s nose? maybe getting some links to it&#8217;s F1 herritage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honda_driver</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34049</link>
		<dc:creator>honda_driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34049</guid>
		<description>looks like the car was designed in the spirit of comic book Japanese-ultraman style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like the car was designed in the spirit of comic book Japanese-ultraman style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAN</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34045</link>
		<dc:creator>DAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34045</guid>
		<description>the concept is like old CRX whit dabble layer at the back eye vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the concept is like old CRX whit dabble layer at the back eye vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyrixMX</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34044</link>
		<dc:creator>cyrixMX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34044</guid>
		<description>if i can remember properly, there was an article saying the new Type-R will come in turbocharged form.

I think most probably will be 7-9psi boost on the stock internals. Unless Honda wanna go head on with WRX or EVO at 280bhp stock engines. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if i can remember properly, there was an article saying the new Type-R will come in turbocharged form.</p>
<p>I think most probably will be 7-9psi boost on the stock internals. Unless Honda wanna go head on with WRX or EVO at 280bhp stock engines. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OvaBoost</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34040</link>
		<dc:creator>OvaBoost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34040</guid>
		<description>URRGGHHH...remind me of nd4spd...underground... where dis car belong...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>URRGGHHH&#8230;remind me of nd4spd&#8230;underground&#8230; where dis car belong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gepochai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34038</link>
		<dc:creator>gepochai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34038</guid>
		<description>why the heck did honda malaysia brought in the other version of honda civic instead of this one? sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why the heck did honda malaysia brought in the other version of honda civic instead of this one? sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neurra</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34030</link>
		<dc:creator>neurra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 03:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34030</guid>
		<description>prolly naza will import it.. well at least hopefully</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prolly naza will import it.. well at least hopefully</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34028</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 02:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34028</guid>
		<description>Frankly speaking...Honda is a very good model. The have achieved beyond their limits and yet they still strive harder. Thumbs up to them. Sometimes they lack interm of space &amp; design. I mean their civic is fantastic but the interior space so little. Of cause the dashboard is marvelous. Not even Altis or Sentra could come close for the nest coming years. 

I mean Honda must have some eye appealing design &amp; space  like the Accord (not bad), Oddysey (excellent), S200 (wow !)...the big brother NSX (the best looking anytime).....

But I&#039;m talking about their new Civic Type R.....little bit funny to accept the design of the future. I must admit that it is indeed a powerful car. Maybe they can adjust the rear a bit ? Hell they might not do it because it will be available in the coming months i guess.

So designers out there, you know what to do ! Thumbs up for Honda.....

Not even the Sentra &amp; Altis (2 boring cars) can even come close to the civic...doesn&#039;t matter if it&#039;s the old or new civic.

But i still prefer the Gen 2 R3. I think it would be affordable for the money. I know it is not the best. But it has that eye catching looks, with new bodykits, rims, power, interior seats, handling, most important it&#039;s engineered for thrill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly speaking&#8230;Honda is a very good model. The have achieved beyond their limits and yet they still strive harder. Thumbs up to them. Sometimes they lack interm of space &amp; design. I mean their civic is fantastic but the interior space so little. Of cause the dashboard is marvelous. Not even Altis or Sentra could come close for the nest coming years. </p>
<p>I mean Honda must have some eye appealing design &amp; space  like the Accord (not bad), Oddysey (excellent), S200 (wow !)&#8230;the big brother NSX (the best looking anytime)&#8230;..</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m talking about their new Civic Type R&#8230;..little bit funny to accept the design of the future. I must admit that it is indeed a powerful car. Maybe they can adjust the rear a bit ? Hell they might not do it because it will be available in the coming months i guess.</p>
<p>So designers out there, you know what to do ! Thumbs up for Honda&#8230;..</p>
<p>Not even the Sentra &amp; Altis (2 boring cars) can even come close to the civic&#8230;doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s the old or new civic.</p>
<p>But i still prefer the Gen 2 R3. I think it would be affordable for the money. I know it is not the best. But it has that eye catching looks, with new bodykits, rims, power, interior seats, handling, most important it&#8217;s engineered for thrill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: revver</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34025</link>
		<dc:creator>revver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34025</guid>
		<description>a head turner. ugly butt or not, i like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a head turner. ugly butt or not, i like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cratzelogy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34023</link>
		<dc:creator>cratzelogy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34023</guid>
		<description>it rythmns with &quot;Masculine little mice&quot;... dunno why.... just me thou.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it rythmns with &#8220;Masculine little mice&#8221;&#8230; dunno why&#8230;. just me thou.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarur</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34019</link>
		<dc:creator>sarur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34019</guid>
		<description>damn~ lovee the very aerodynamic design.. kinda looks derived from an airplane wing.. huhu~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn~ lovee the very aerodynamic design.. kinda looks derived from an airplane wing.. huhu~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Initial D</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34014</link>
		<dc:creator>Initial D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34014</guid>
		<description>vry ah beng style.......but i  beliee it is vry powerful on the inside.  cn they let me test drive it? 

hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vry ah beng style&#8230;&#8230;.but i  beliee it is vry powerful on the inside.  cn they let me test drive it? </p>
<p>hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Nabill</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34013</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Nabill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34013</guid>
		<description>looks ugly seriously , looks like some brother&#039;s body kit...dont like it at all...dont mind having one though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks ugly seriously , looks like some brother&#8217;s body kit&#8230;dont like it at all&#8230;dont mind having one though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34009</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34009</guid>
		<description>Coolness, like the tail, too bad we won&#039;t have this running on Malaysian roads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coolness, like the tail, too bad we won&#8217;t have this running on Malaysian roads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HatukNgkau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34007</link>
		<dc:creator>HatukNgkau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/26/honda-civic-type-r-concept/#comment-34007</guid>
		<description>Hmm... ok-ok lah, but i dont  like the butt&#039;s design... hey, just my personal opinion though... that&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; ok-ok lah, but i dont  like the butt&#8217;s design&#8230; hey, just my personal opinion though&#8230; that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
