<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proton Updates: Q3 Profitable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pendek</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34312</link>
		<dc:creator>pendek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 15:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34312</guid>
		<description>i didn&#039;t mean 125Z is new models. its a replacement for RXZ. 
 
and yes, RXZ sales is not based on thier price.....   
 
the way i see this, people will keep on buying iswara, not because its cheap 
but its does deliver its purpose. 
 
and like ajis said, he love his 95&#039;s  iswara, just like me (96&#039;s).  Iswara cater for its own market segment. 
 
and obviously the lower income type choose iswara because it can deliver all thier need. work, sent children to school, balik kampung, tak kena hujan. blah blah...  
when the middle income group who do not wish to spent money on cars choose iswara, they felt disapointed, if they choose to toying with thier 2nd car, don&#039;t choose local budgect car. choose japanese makes. 
 
with local&#039;s don&#039;t expect to be shifting at 7K rpm and doughnut spin without all the part bergegar like osim chair after that,  
 
for models like GEN 2 and Waja,  i never try to trash those before, so i can&#039;t complaint whether if they can hold or not. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#039;t mean 125Z is new models. its a replacement for RXZ.</p>
<p>and yes, RXZ sales is not based on thier price&#8230;..  </p>
<p>the way i see this, people will keep on buying iswara, not because its cheap</p>
<p>but its does deliver its purpose.</p>
<p>and like ajis said, he love his 95&#039;s  iswara, just like me (96&#039;s).  Iswara cater for its own market segment.</p>
<p>and obviously the lower income type choose iswara because it can deliver all thier need. work, sent children to school, balik kampung, tak kena hujan. blah blah&#8230; </p>
<p>when the middle income group who do not wish to spent money on cars choose iswara, they felt disapointed, if they choose to toying with thier 2nd car, don&#039;t choose local budgect car. choose japanese makes.</p>
<p>with local&#039;s don&#039;t expect to be shifting at 7K rpm and doughnut spin without all the part bergegar like osim chair after that, </p>
<p>for models like GEN 2 and Waja,  i never try to trash those before, so i can&#039;t complaint whether if they can hold or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mycar_stolen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34271</link>
		<dc:creator>mycar_stolen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34271</guid>
		<description>RXZ is not cheap what, if Msian always looking for their pocket they will only buys those china make photocopy bikes, price around 2k.Yamaha RXZ is reliable motorbike, people have trust in it, you buy one you wont regret you buy twice in space of 10 years also you wont regret, you buy one later you give to your younger bro also he will like it.Please dont compare Yamaha RXZ with Proton.Proton is one thing that a turn off for Msia it is like our national soccer team, it is like a tumor and killing us. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RXZ is not cheap what, if Msian always looking for their pocket they will only buys those china make photocopy bikes, price around 2k.Yamaha RXZ is reliable motorbike, people have trust in it, you buy one you wont regret you buy twice in space of 10 years also you wont regret, you buy one later you give to your younger bro also he will like it.Please dont compare Yamaha RXZ with Proton.Proton is one thing that a turn off for Msia it is like our national soccer team, it is like a tumor and killing us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dzulx</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34270</link>
		<dc:creator>dzulx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34270</guid>
		<description>Way to go proton. But lot of things to improve!! 
 
Higher quality please!! I have test drive gen2 before. 
Handling is superb for stock car. Even better compare to my car, accord euro-r. 
Not so comfortable though. But quality poor.. Everything tercabut cabut.. 
What a waste.. such a nice car, design, handiling etc.. buat quality bad. everything look too plastic.. 
 
Hopefully new CEO will listen to customer&#039;s voice. He is a businessman. Hope he can perform. 
 
Anyway i always hoping petronas and proton can cooperate. petronas engine is an example of proton&#039;s stupidity and arrogance. Come on, 2 government own company not cooperating.. Rugi besar </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go proton. But lot of things to improve!!</p>
<p>Higher quality please!! I have test drive gen2 before.</p>
<p>Handling is superb for stock car. Even better compare to my car, accord euro-r.</p>
<p>Not so comfortable though. But quality poor.. Everything tercabut cabut..</p>
<p>What a waste.. such a nice car, design, handiling etc.. buat quality bad. everything look too plastic..</p>
<p>Hopefully new CEO will listen to customer&#039;s voice. He is a businessman. Hope he can perform.</p>
<p>Anyway i always hoping petronas and proton can cooperate. petronas engine is an example of proton&#039;s stupidity and arrogance. Come on, 2 government own company not cooperating.. Rugi besar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driven2020</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34251</link>
		<dc:creator>Driven2020</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34251</guid>
		<description>honda_driver, sharing common platform of course is not new. Like Honda Stream &amp; Toyota Wish both using the same platform. At least the platforms are new.  
 
Oklah I agree I&#039;m putting myself on potential criticism. If my dribbles sound bashy I take everything back.  
 
Then I will put it this way, I&#039;ve noticed similarities but its not conclusive enough to say Gen2 is based on 95&#039; Renault Megane. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://static.paultan.org/white_gen2_s.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://static.paultan.org/white_gen2_s.jpg&lt;/a&gt;  
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/show_image.pl?bg=FFFFFF&amp;image=http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/2/web/2222000-2222999/2222542_6_full.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/show_image....&lt;/a&gt;  
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=123728&amp;Proton&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car...&lt;/a&gt;  
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=6424&amp;Renault&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
Can anyone please tell is this a form of bashing? If like still is then no point posting this at the first place. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>honda_driver, sharing common platform of course is not new. Like Honda Stream &amp; Toyota Wish both using the same platform. At least the platforms are new. </p>
<p>Oklah I agree I&#039;m putting myself on potential criticism. If my dribbles sound bashy I take everything back. </p>
<p>Then I will put it this way, I&#039;ve noticed similarities but its not conclusive enough to say Gen2 is based on 95&#039; Renault Megane.</p>
<p>  <a href="http://static.paultan.org/white_gen2_s.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://static.paultan.org/white_gen2_s.jpg</a>  </p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/show_image.pl?bg=FFFFFF&amp;image=http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/2/web/2222000-2222999/2222542_6_full.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/show_image&#8230;.</a>  </p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=123728&amp;Proton" rel="nofollow">http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=6424&amp;Renault" rel="nofollow">http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>Can anyone please tell is this a form of bashing? If like still is then no point posting this at the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catborg</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34250</link>
		<dc:creator>catborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34250</guid>
		<description>125Z is new? bullshit.. 125Z exist in 1999 you know! 
it&#039;s all about malaysian those still buying even it&#039;s an OLD model.  
 
im not comparing RXZ with proton.. but almost malaysian look into their pocket.. not look into new model and new tech!..  
 
it&#039;s all about CHEAP! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>125Z is new? bullshit.. 125Z exist in 1999 you know!</p>
<p>it&#039;s all about malaysian those still buying even it&#039;s an OLD model. </p>
<p>im not comparing RXZ with proton.. but almost malaysian look into their pocket.. not look into new model and new tech!.. </p>
<p>it&#039;s all about CHEAP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pendek</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34239</link>
		<dc:creator>pendek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34239</guid>
		<description>(out of topic) 
 
hey don&#039;t compared RXZ to proton&#039;s pls... 
 
coz its not something like a retro machine, its a beast in the city, eventho yahama come out with the new 125Z cub, still the legacy still can&#039;t be compared to legendary RXZ. 
 
that&#039;s how you produce vehicles. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(out of topic)</p>
<p>hey don&#039;t compared RXZ to proton&#039;s pls&#8230;</p>
<p>coz its not something like a retro machine, its a beast in the city, eventho yahama come out with the new 125Z cub, still the legacy still can&#039;t be compared to legendary RXZ.</p>
<p>that&#039;s how you produce vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Initial D</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34238</link>
		<dc:creator>Initial D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34238</guid>
		<description>aiyo, when they get profit, some pl bising, say tipu la, accountant cheat la, wat la ., blah blah blah.......... 
  
when they in red, some ppl say  aiyoh so terrible, should tapao liao, management&#039;s bad, blah blah blah....... 
 
if those ppl duno how to give credit or praise, shut up when u read this post. duno how those ppl always can find a way to shoot down proton. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aiyo, when they get profit, some pl bising, say tipu la, accountant cheat la, wat la ., blah blah blah&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>when they in red, some ppl say  aiyoh so terrible, should tapao liao, management&#039;s bad, blah blah blah&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>if those ppl duno how to give credit or praise, shut up when u read this post. duno how those ppl always can find a way to shoot down proton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetruth12</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34203</link>
		<dc:creator>thetruth12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34203</guid>
		<description>no need to seelah y i was wondering with higher sales yet making net loses a differences of 400million during TM time even got rid of Agusta bikes as well. Anyone can figure out ? pls ring some bells. i guess i&#039;m tired of this nonsense guess u guys r not doing very good making the TMs looks bad more like they themselve the current mngmnt looks bad...politic kills the proton ! How much is the reserve funds in proton during the tm time and the current time if anyone can get some facts on this then we all know what is going onlah...??? lol 5 years old pun susah nak tipu ni. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no need to seelah y i was wondering with higher sales yet making net loses a differences of 400million during TM time even got rid of Agusta bikes as well. Anyone can figure out ? pls ring some bells. i guess i&#039;m tired of this nonsense guess u guys r not doing very good making the TMs looks bad more like they themselve the current mngmnt looks bad&#8230;politic kills the proton ! How much is the reserve funds in proton during the tm time and the current time if anyone can get some facts on this then we all know what is going onlah&#8230;??? lol 5 years old pun susah nak tipu ni.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PGlang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34199</link>
		<dc:creator>PGlang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34199</guid>
		<description>Well..well..well..I really don&#039;t want to make anymore contribution to poton 1 which suck our hard earned $$$ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well..well..well..I really don&#039;t want to make anymore contribution to poton 1 which suck our hard earned $$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HatukNgkau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34183</link>
		<dc:creator>HatukNgkau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34183</guid>
		<description>wait n see... wait n see... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait n see&#8230; wait n see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracks</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34172</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34172</guid>
		<description>Proton just announced that they are back in the black but for how long. New models coming out too slowly and released in a stupid manner. Worst launched is Savvy with its ridiculous advertisment. But the stupidest thing is to launch a new car without the 3 &quot;A&quot;s; Automatic gearbox, ABS and Airbags. 
 
I am guessing that Proton is going to repeat the same mistake with SRM launch schedule in May 2006. Hopefully they prove me wrong for their benefit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proton just announced that they are back in the black but for how long. New models coming out too slowly and released in a stupid manner. Worst launched is Savvy with its ridiculous advertisment. But the stupidest thing is to launch a new car without the 3 &quot;A&quot;s; Automatic gearbox, ABS and Airbags.</p>
<p>I am guessing that Proton is going to repeat the same mistake with SRM launch schedule in May 2006. Hopefully they prove me wrong for their benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honda_driver</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34164</link>
		<dc:creator>honda_driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34164</guid>
		<description>Driven2020, you are amazing. All you did was compare a photo of a megane, and a gen2, and concluded 100% that the gen2 is using a renault platform.  Please get your facts right before opening yourself up to criticism. 
 
the gen2 uses the exact same platform as the waja.  The waja uses a reengineered platform derived from the mitsubishi carisma/volvo S40.  The savvy uses a brand new platform built by proton and is the only car in the world currently using it. Contrary to popular belief, the savvy does not use a renault clio platform, only the engine.  
 
do you actually know how many car companies share platforms today?  There are easily up to 5-6 different models in the market, under 3 or 4 different brands sharing the one same platform. 
 
anyways.. proton doing well should be good news for all of us. The fact is, the govt. will never give up on proton, so hoping they will close down tommorow is not going to happen.  The quicker proton improves and grows, the better the chances for the local car industry to move to an even playing field, which will be good news for us. Regardless of what they sell, as long as they&#039;re not losing money, the govt doesnt have to pump in any money. good news again for us. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Driven2020, you are amazing. All you did was compare a photo of a megane, and a gen2, and concluded 100% that the gen2 is using a renault platform.  Please get your facts right before opening yourself up to criticism.</p>
<p>the gen2 uses the exact same platform as the waja.  The waja uses a reengineered platform derived from the mitsubishi carisma/volvo S40.  The savvy uses a brand new platform built by proton and is the only car in the world currently using it. Contrary to popular belief, the savvy does not use a renault clio platform, only the engine. </p>
<p>do you actually know how many car companies share platforms today?  There are easily up to 5-6 different models in the market, under 3 or 4 different brands sharing the one same platform.</p>
<p>anyways.. proton doing well should be good news for all of us. The fact is, the govt. will never give up on proton, so hoping they will close down tommorow is not going to happen.  The quicker proton improves and grows, the better the chances for the local car industry to move to an even playing field, which will be good news for us. Regardless of what they sell, as long as they&#039;re not losing money, the govt doesnt have to pump in any money. good news again for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honda_driver</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34162</link>
		<dc:creator>honda_driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34162</guid>
		<description>whatsoever, did petronas actually invest money in Proton?? just curious. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whatsoever, did petronas actually invest money in Proton?? just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HatukNgkau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34153</link>
		<dc:creator>HatukNgkau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34153</guid>
		<description>catborg said, 
February 28, 2006 @ 2:05 pm  
 
hatukngkau = bila la nak insaf.  
or basher still be basher sampai mati? ..  
============================================= 
 
catborg, my statement above are purely a joke, if u can read between the lines...  
 
plus there is no wrong in bashing Proton for problems it has caused me in my previous postings. after all, u&#039;re not the one facing MY problems so i dont think there is a need for u to me MY moral guardian..  
 
i&#039;m not interested in making enemies with anyone so pls stop ur personal attacks... it&#039;s been a very peaceful times in here since the leaving of the spamming duo. let&#039;s keep it at that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>catborg said,</p>
<p>February 28, 2006 @ 2:05 pm </p>
<p>hatukngkau = bila la nak insaf. </p>
<p>or basher still be basher sampai mati? .. </p>
<p>=============================================</p>
<p>catborg, my statement above are purely a joke, if u can read between the lines&#8230; </p>
<p>plus there is no wrong in bashing Proton for problems it has caused me in my previous postings. after all, u&#039;re not the one facing MY problems so i dont think there is a need for u to me MY moral guardian.. </p>
<p>i&#039;m not interested in making enemies with anyone so pls stop ur personal attacks&#8230; it&#039;s been a very peaceful times in here since the leaving of the spamming duo. let&#039;s keep it at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatsoever</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34147</link>
		<dc:creator>whatsoever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34147</guid>
		<description>profitable or not is none of the most peoples issue. the bottom line is don&#039;t ask petronas to invest more money on proton. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>profitable or not is none of the most peoples issue. the bottom line is don&#039;t ask petronas to invest more money on proton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driven2020</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34144</link>
		<dc:creator>Driven2020</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34144</guid>
		<description>Sharfox said, 
February 28, 2006 @ 12:02 pm  
 
Allo Driven2020, 
 
Get the fact accurately. From where did U get &#226;&#8364;&#732;fact&#226;&#8364;&#8482; that the Gen.2 is built on Renault Megane platform?&#226;&#8364;&#166;.. Wont say much about the rest&#226;&#8364;&#166;. kinda agree with you.  
________________________________________________________________ 
 
Here u go: Just look at the outer features carefully especially the windows and wheel arches loooo..the rest the usual stufflah go to plastic surgeon get some cosmetic changes... 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.top-autobazar.cz/gallery/1119612323-autobazar.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.top-autobazar.cz/gallery/1119612323-au...&lt;/a&gt;  
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.carpages.co.uk/proton/proton_images/gen-2-side.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.carpages.co.uk/proton/proton_images/ge...&lt;/a&gt;  
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drivein24.ch/fotoauto/Renault/Renault%20Megane%20Initiale.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.drivein24.ch/fotoauto/Renault/Renault%...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
If u are curious u can print the picture and compare it to an actual gen2 model or something. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharfox said,</p>
<p>February 28, 2006 @ 12:02 pm </p>
<p>Allo Driven2020,</p>
<p>Get the fact accurately. From where did U get &acirc;&euro;&tilde;fact&acirc;&euro;&trade; that the Gen.2 is built on Renault Megane platform?&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;.. Wont say much about the rest&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;. kinda agree with you. </p>
<p>________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Here u go: Just look at the outer features carefully especially the windows and wheel arches loooo..the rest the usual stufflah go to plastic surgeon get some cosmetic changes&#8230;</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.top-autobazar.cz/gallery/1119612323-autobazar.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.top-autobazar.cz/gallery/1119612323-au&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.carpages.co.uk/proton/proton_images/gen-2-side.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.carpages.co.uk/proton/proton_images/ge&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.drivein24.ch/fotoauto/Renault/Renault%20Megane%20Initiale.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.drivein24.ch/fotoauto/Renault/Renault%&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>If u are curious u can print the picture and compare it to an actual gen2 model or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajis</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34142</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34142</guid>
		<description>i love to drive my 1995 iswara.... it&#039;s more reliable than the newer models... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love to drive my 1995 iswara&#8230;. it&#039;s more reliable than the newer models&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marmitecrab</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34137</link>
		<dc:creator>marmitecrab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34137</guid>
		<description>catborg, 
 
Actually, RX-Z available since 80&#039;s. I used to ride a second hand one to school in the 80&#039;s. 
 
Still going strong now. But only because it&#039;s well-made and reliable. Can&#039;t say the same about cars and Proton in particular. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>catborg,</p>
<p>Actually, RX-Z available since 80&#039;s. I used to ride a second hand one to school in the 80&#039;s.</p>
<p>Still going strong now. But only because it&#039;s well-made and reliable. Can&#039;t say the same about cars and Proton in particular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cavino</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34132</link>
		<dc:creator>cavino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34132</guid>
		<description>Mentioned that the pricing of petrol now is nearer to global market. Can deny that but the problem is car price is way way above global market. If car price cheap, we could have bought Civic Hybrid and Prius at the price of City and VIOS. Would that not help much more to save fuel? 
 
However there is no doubt that Proton is one of the main cause for the ultra expensive &quot;budget car&quot; like City and VIOS (FC of City iDSI at 1.5cc =&gt; 1.3cc manual Iswara) . So it IS easy to blame them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mentioned that the pricing of petrol now is nearer to global market. Can deny that but the problem is car price is way way above global market. If car price cheap, we could have bought Civic Hybrid and Prius at the price of City and VIOS. Would that not help much more to save fuel?</p>
<p>However there is no doubt that Proton is one of the main cause for the ultra expensive &quot;budget car&quot; like City and VIOS (FC of City iDSI at 1.5cc =&gt; 1.3cc manual Iswara) . So it IS easy to blame them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catborg</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34131</link>
		<dc:creator>catborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34131</guid>
		<description>hatukngkau = bila la nak insaf. :D  
or basher still be basher sampai mati? ..  
 
For the time being, proton new management done wll.. at least.. perhaps.  
or the short term the recovery from WORST is ok.. Now let see f he had or not the Very Long Time Plan.. :D </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hatukngkau = bila la nak insaf. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>or basher still be basher sampai mati? .. </p>
<p>For the time being, proton new management done wll.. at least.. perhaps. </p>
<p>or the short term the recovery from WORST is ok.. Now let see f he had or not the Very Long Time Plan.. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Nabill</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34126</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Nabill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34126</guid>
		<description>thy make profit u guys all make noise,thy make losses thn all hell break loose ! anyway its improvment,thy lost 1xxmilion last quarter,n now thy r back to profits,its not their fault that thy are selling iswara/saga,y stop wen thr r so many buyers,the juara didnt sel so thy stoped it , i guess its easy to hate proton , bt gota give som credit....so bashers out thr..ur welcome to unleash! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thy make profit u guys all make noise,thy make losses thn all hell break loose ! anyway its improvment,thy lost 1xxmilion last quarter,n now thy r back to profits,its not their fault that thy are selling iswara/saga,y stop wen thr r so many buyers,the juara didnt sel so thy stoped it , i guess its easy to hate proton , bt gota give som credit&#8230;.so bashers out thr..ur welcome to unleash!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HatukNgkau</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34121</link>
		<dc:creator>HatukNgkau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34121</guid>
		<description>Proton profitable? BWAHAHAHAHAA!!! 
 
 
nay, they just happen to baru employ some very, very smart accountants... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proton profitable? BWAHAHAHAHAA!!!</p>
<p>nay, they just happen to baru employ some very, very smart accountants&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharfox</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34113</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34113</guid>
		<description>Allo Driven2020, 
 
Get the fact accurately. From where did U get &#039;fact&#039; that the Gen.2 is built on Renault Megane platform?..... Wont say much about the  rest.... kinda agree with you. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allo Driven2020,</p>
<p>Get the fact accurately. From where did U get &#039;fact&#039; that the Gen.2 is built on Renault Megane platform?&#8230;.. Wont say much about the  rest&#8230;. kinda agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SM4</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34110</link>
		<dc:creator>SM4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34110</guid>
		<description>Increased sales volume is actually due to &quot;Jualan Murah&quot;. Are we going to have sales carnival forever?? Sooner or later people with get fed up with the quality if it is not improved. By the way, is there any H2O powered car ar? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increased sales volume is actually due to &quot;Jualan Murah&quot;. Are we going to have sales carnival forever?? Sooner or later people with get fed up with the quality if it is not improved. By the way, is there any H2O powered car ar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catborg</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34109</link>
		<dc:creator>catborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34109</guid>
		<description>iswara is CHEAP.. no matter what, peoples still lookin their pockect..  
what the hell is QUALITY and OLD TECH?.  
 
Dont blame proton, blame poor citizen :D ..  
as long as i  can sell, i will!.  
 
Even Yamaha TZM (1996) and RXZ exist since 1995 = Still can sell like hotcake now! What else you can say?..  
 
Anyway Proton, just dont forget to produce more new model this year.. Exspecially MPV.. or Die-lah! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iswara is CHEAP.. no matter what, peoples still lookin their pockect.. </p>
<p>what the hell is QUALITY and OLD TECH?. </p>
<p>Dont blame proton, blame poor citizen <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  .. </p>
<p>as long as i  can sell, i will!. </p>
<p>Even Yamaha TZM (1996) and RXZ exist since 1995 = Still can sell like hotcake now! What else you can say?.. </p>
<p>Anyway Proton, just dont forget to produce more new model this year.. Exspecially MPV.. or Die-lah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driven2020</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34108</link>
		<dc:creator>Driven2020</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34108</guid>
		<description>Just for info ppl dun just buy 4WD in East Malaysia due to rough terrains. They even have Porsches and Ferarris There. The road tax structure for 4WD in East Malaysia is different than West Malaysia.  
 
There are loads of Protons running around in East Malaysia but proton&#039;s image in East Malaysia is not very good. 
 
No doubt the road condition in East Malaysia is not as par as West Malaysia. But through experience Proton cars when new drives like a dream but after a year, their parts will start loosen and rattle like crazyif not maintained properly; nightmare. 
 
I&#039;m not sure about West Malaysia side. Probably due to better road conditions the rattles dun come as soon as East Malaysia lol~. 
 
My observation is that I dun see that much of Savvys and Gen2 in East Malaysia. People with lower income bracket whom need personal transportation can only afford Proton Iswara coz of 0% downpayment with 9 years replayment scheme. But LPPL after 9 years they will be paying ridiculous amount alot more than what the initial cost of the car were. 
 
I dun think P1 will be able to maintain this level of profit if without the Iswara as the low cost cash cow.  
 
P1 has always been using existing platforms to build their cars. 
Iswara/Saga = 80&#039;S lancer 
Wira = 90&#039;s Lancer 
perdana = eterna 
gen2 = 90&#039;s renault megane hatch 
tiara = 90&#039;s citroen ax 
etc etc 
 
if using existing platform should be cheaper on the production right? but still pricey for me for local made cars.. 
 
Say the government not protecting p1. y not just give them money instead? its another way of saying lol~ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for info ppl dun just buy 4WD in East Malaysia due to rough terrains. They even have Porsches and Ferarris There. The road tax structure for 4WD in East Malaysia is different than West Malaysia. </p>
<p>There are loads of Protons running around in East Malaysia but proton&#039;s image in East Malaysia is not very good.</p>
<p>No doubt the road condition in East Malaysia is not as par as West Malaysia. But through experience Proton cars when new drives like a dream but after a year, their parts will start loosen and rattle like crazyif not maintained properly; nightmare.</p>
<p>I&#039;m not sure about West Malaysia side. Probably due to better road conditions the rattles dun come as soon as East Malaysia lol~.</p>
<p>My observation is that I dun see that much of Savvys and Gen2 in East Malaysia. People with lower income bracket whom need personal transportation can only afford Proton Iswara coz of 0% downpayment with 9 years replayment scheme. But LPPL after 9 years they will be paying ridiculous amount alot more than what the initial cost of the car were.</p>
<p>I dun think P1 will be able to maintain this level of profit if without the Iswara as the low cost cash cow. </p>
<p>P1 has always been using existing platforms to build their cars.</p>
<p>Iswara/Saga = 80&#039;S lancer</p>
<p>Wira = 90&#039;s Lancer</p>
<p>perdana = eterna</p>
<p>gen2 = 90&#039;s renault megane hatch</p>
<p>tiara = 90&#039;s citroen ax</p>
<p>etc etc</p>
<p>if using existing platform should be cheaper on the production right? but still pricey for me for local made cars..</p>
<p>Say the government not protecting p1. y not just give them money instead? its another way of saying lol~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edwin2</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34091</link>
		<dc:creator>edwin2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34091</guid>
		<description>short term goal met.... what are your long term goal.... continue selling ISWARA facelif, protection from government, increase $$. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>short term goal met&#8230;. what are your long term goal&#8230;. continue selling ISWARA facelif, protection from government, increase $$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Initial D</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34077</link>
		<dc:creator>Initial D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/02/28/proton-updates-q3-profitable/#comment-34077</guid>
		<description>nothing to say, petrol alrdy giving much problem liao. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nothing to say, petrol alrdy giving much problem liao.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

