<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006 Honda Civic in depth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:59:39 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sean_siew</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-84179</link>
		<dc:creator>sean_siew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-84179</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m driving a 1.8 version since Apr 2006, when i driving, it feels like driving a supercar as it made (makes) head turns even after 1yr, so much has been said about the car. fuel consumption not really impressive 8.5km/l in short a full tank can only last around 460km. (RM90). If possible, go for the 2.0 version. as you get all tons of stuffs like leather seat, HID, Paddle shift, cushion air bag, side mirror with indicator and not to mention the BHP......lastly no matter 1.8 or 2.0 it is still a great car to own. 

A proud civic owner............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m driving a 1.8 version since Apr 2006, when i driving, it feels like driving a supercar as it made (makes) head turns even after 1yr, so much has been said about the car. fuel consumption not really impressive 8.5km/l in short a full tank can only last around 460km. (RM90). If possible, go for the 2.0 version. as you get all tons of stuffs like leather seat, HID, Paddle shift, cushion air bag, side mirror with indicator and not to mention the BHP&#8230;&#8230;lastly no matter 1.8 or 2.0 it is still a great car to own. </p>
<p>A proud civic owner&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zurey</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-70875</link>
		<dc:creator>zurey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 05:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-70875</guid>
		<description>this is the car i waiting so long...really2 love the shape especially the front head lamp n round shape lamp at rear. But i still consider between this honda civic n toyota celica which is the best for money value? i actually can afford to get one...i can decide myself because i really like both them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the car i waiting so long&#8230;really2 love the shape especially the front head lamp n round shape lamp at rear. But i still consider between this honda civic n toyota celica which is the best for money value? i actually can afford to get one&#8230;i can decide myself because i really like both them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tressele</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-69892</link>
		<dc:creator>tressele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 04:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-69892</guid>
		<description>paul.. normally how much our income to get a loan to buy this 1.8 civicc?? quite a big price..aiyaa... hey..did they give option to buy 1.8 and with leather seat like 2.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paul.. normally how much our income to get a loan to buy this 1.8 civicc?? quite a big price..aiyaa&#8230; hey..did they give option to buy 1.8 and with leather seat like 2.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brunch @ BMW Photo Gallery</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-48444</link>
		<dc:creator>Brunch @ BMW Photo Gallery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-48444</guid>
		<description>[...] After the short run on the highway, we rolled back into the venue. The BMW felt horrible at low speeds. I didn&#8217;t believe this was how the car was supposed to feel like. So I went through the whole test drive sign up thing again and picked a 525i instead to see if the engine and transmission was supposed to feel like that. Strange, when I want to test drive a 3-series, they just pointed me to the test drive counter, but when I wanted to test drive the 5-series, they had a cute girl escort me. I recognised her as one of the models that usually grace car events. She was one of the girls at the Honda Civic launch. Back to the car. The BMW 525i felt totally different. Throttle response was exactly what I imagined it to be. I am convinced that there was something wrong with the BMW 325i that I tested. I was there pretty late in the evening so perhaps it was trashed earlier in the day, so something had gone wrong with the transmission. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After the short run on the highway, we rolled back into the venue. The BMW felt horrible at low speeds. I didn&#8217;t believe this was how the car was supposed to feel like. So I went through the whole test drive sign up thing again and picked a 525i instead to see if the engine and transmission was supposed to feel like that. Strange, when I want to test drive a 3-series, they just pointed me to the test drive counter, but when I wanted to test drive the 5-series, they had a cute girl escort me. I recognised her as one of the models that usually grace car events. She was one of the girls at the Honda Civic launch. Back to the car. The BMW 525i felt totally different. Throttle response was exactly what I imagined it to be. I am convinced that there was something wrong with the BMW 325i that I tested. I was there pretty late in the evening so perhaps it was trashed earlier in the day, so something had gone wrong with the transmission. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007 Honda Stream Interior Photos</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-43504</link>
		<dc:creator>2007 Honda Stream Interior Photos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 15:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-43504</guid>
		<description>[...] A very nice interior with typical MPV design cues such as having the shift lever on the dashboard instead of between the two front seats. Some have speculated that the new 2007 Honda Stream would have the same Multiplex dashboard meter layout as the 2006 Honda Civic, since it does share the same platform but it looks like the new Stream takes on a more conservative meter layout. But the steering wheel is similiar to the three spoke design used on the 2006 Honda Civic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A very nice interior with typical MPV design cues such as having the shift lever on the dashboard instead of between the two front seats. Some have speculated that the new 2007 Honda Stream would have the same Multiplex dashboard meter layout as the 2006 Honda Civic, since it does share the same platform but it looks like the new Stream takes on a more conservative meter layout. But the steering wheel is similiar to the three spoke design used on the 2006 Honda Civic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2006 Honda Civic Test Drive - Part 3 &#187;</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-42075</link>
		<dc:creator>2006 Honda Civic Test Drive - Part 3 &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-42075</guid>
		<description>[...] Related Posts: 2006 Honda Civic In-depth Technical Specifications 2006 Honda Civic 1.8 SOHC i-VTEC engine - R18A1 2006 Honda Civic Test Drive - Part 1 2006 Honda Civic Test Drive - Part 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related Posts: 2006 Honda Civic In-depth Technical Specifications 2006 Honda Civic 1.8 SOHC i-VTEC engine &#8211; R18A1 2006 Honda Civic Test Drive &#8211; Part 1 2006 Honda Civic Test Drive &#8211; Part 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2006 Honda Civic Test Drive - Part 2 &#187;</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-41167</link>
		<dc:creator>2006 Honda Civic Test Drive - Part 2 &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-41167</guid>
		<description>[...] Related Posts: 2006 Honda Civic In-depth Technical Specifications 2006 Honda Civic 1.8 SOHC i-VTEC engine - R18A1 2006 Honda Civic Test Drive - Part 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related Posts: 2006 Honda Civic In-depth Technical Specifications 2006 Honda Civic 1.8 SOHC i-VTEC engine &#8211; R18A1 2006 Honda Civic Test Drive &#8211; Part 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2006 Honda Civic Test Drive - Part 1 &#187;</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-40861</link>
		<dc:creator>2006 Honda Civic Test Drive - Part 1 &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 07:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-40861</guid>
		<description>[...] Related Posts: 2006 Honda Civic In-depth Technical Specifications 2006 Honda Civic 1.8 SOHC i-VTEC engine - R18A1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related Posts: 2006 Honda Civic In-depth Technical Specifications 2006 Honda Civic 1.8 SOHC i-VTEC engine &#8211; R18A1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alamak</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-36419</link>
		<dc:creator>alamak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 02:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-36419</guid>
		<description>Altis drives like a whale. It is unresponsive, to get from 80km/h to 120km/h on highway to overtake lorry with Altis 1.8E is like slow motion acceleration... unless you floor the pedal 100%, all the way, then only the engine wake up abit...

Elegance? it&#039;s a car, not a ballet dance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Altis drives like a whale. It is unresponsive, to get from 80km/h to 120km/h on highway to overtake lorry with Altis 1.8E is like slow motion acceleration&#8230; unless you floor the pedal 100%, all the way, then only the engine wake up abit&#8230;</p>
<p>Elegance? it&#8217;s a car, not a ballet dance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2006 Honda Civic in Malaysia - Front Spyshot &#187;</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-36259</link>
		<dc:creator>2006 Honda Civic in Malaysia - Front Spyshot &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-36259</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: The new 2006 Honda Civic has already been launched, have a look at the 2006 Honda Civic in-depth post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: The new 2006 Honda Civic has already been launched, have a look at the 2006 Honda Civic in-depth post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altis_fan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-35892</link>
		<dc:creator>altis_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-35892</guid>
		<description>After close viewing of new Civic, I still believe it cannot compete the Altis.
Altis is so elegance. Comparing power to weight ratio, Altis is still better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After close viewing of new Civic, I still believe it cannot compete the Altis.<br />
Altis is so elegance. Comparing power to weight ratio, Altis is still better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edgeff</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-35252</link>
		<dc:creator>edgeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-35252</guid>
		<description>yeah, agree with u alamak...RM 45,630 for excise duty..it&#039;s really cruel. our G so cruel to us, rakyat malaysia. they just care about their P1 and their cronies instead of us, their rakyat. WTF to our G!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, agree with u alamak&#8230;RM 45,630 for excise duty..it&#8217;s really cruel. our G so cruel to us, rakyat malaysia. they just care about their P1 and their cronies instead of us, their rakyat. WTF to our G!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cj1768</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-35129</link>
		<dc:creator>cj1768</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 06:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-35129</guid>
		<description>Nice piece of machine compare to previous Honda Civic.... But as other told before, the tax included in is too high... What to do? We are in Malaysia. We need to pay extra for better car. IF not, buy proton then... poor malaysian...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice piece of machine compare to previous Honda Civic&#8230;. But as other told before, the tax included in is too high&#8230; What to do? We are in Malaysia. We need to pay extra for better car. IF not, buy proton then&#8230; poor malaysian&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alamak</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-35034</link>
		<dc:creator>alamak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-35034</guid>
		<description>Yes we are being robbed. In fact around RM 45,630.00 ! That is the difference of pricing comparing Peninsula (RM 117,800 to Langkawi RM 72,170).

That&#039;s enough to buy a national car...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes we are being robbed. In fact around RM 45,630.00 ! That is the difference of pricing comparing Peninsula (RM 117,800 to Langkawi RM 72,170).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s enough to buy a national car&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PGlang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-35022</link>
		<dc:creator>PGlang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-35022</guid>
		<description>Taiwan and China will launch the new Civic in April.  The price tag for 1.8 is equivalent to RM 75000 - 80000.  So,  we pay 35000 more taxxxxx...And this extra taxxxx was not used in road improvement.  Penangites have been waiting for the outer link expressway and the second bridge to ease traffic jam for years.  But no action talk only.  Why we have to bear the extra tax?? Are we being robbed??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taiwan and China will launch the new Civic in April.  The price tag for 1.8 is equivalent to RM 75000 &#8211; 80000.  So,  we pay 35000 more taxxxxx&#8230;And this extra taxxxx was not used in road improvement.  Penangites have been waiting for the outer link expressway and the second bridge to ease traffic jam for years.  But no action talk only.  Why we have to bear the extra tax?? Are we being robbed??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tantun</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34979</link>
		<dc:creator>tantun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34979</guid>
		<description>being a civic fan for a while, i&#039;m not entirely impressed. even more so with the 2.0 version, here are my not-impressed points
HID lights - nice, but not so nice coz the rest of the lights clutter is not white, but yellow. looks like a boyracer who only has enough to change the main lights, but not the foglights or the intermediate lights
roof insulation - or lack of. the sound you get from knocking on the top is the same as from the bottom of the roof. and not to mention it&#039;s kindda soft.
2.0(A) - what? no manual? m&#039;sians can&#039;t drive a stick anymore?
155bhp - only, from a k20 engine. b18 engines are already giving 170hp. the 1.8 engine is better in this sense, imo.
RM138k - pricey. this is a civic.. bring back the 2dr hot hatch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>being a civic fan for a while, i&#8217;m not entirely impressed. even more so with the 2.0 version, here are my not-impressed points<br />
HID lights &#8211; nice, but not so nice coz the rest of the lights clutter is not white, but yellow. looks like a boyracer who only has enough to change the main lights, but not the foglights or the intermediate lights<br />
roof insulation &#8211; or lack of. the sound you get from knocking on the top is the same as from the bottom of the roof. and not to mention it&#8217;s kindda soft.<br />
2.0(A) &#8211; what? no manual? m&#8217;sians can&#8217;t drive a stick anymore?<br />
155bhp &#8211; only, from a k20 engine. b18 engines are already giving 170hp. the 1.8 engine is better in this sense, imo.<br />
RM138k &#8211; pricey. this is a civic.. bring back the 2dr hot hatch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aksMs</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34907</link>
		<dc:creator>aksMs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34907</guid>
		<description>Just about time la Paul. My dad was just talking to me about selling the C5. Since he&#039;s about to retire. It&#039;s about time for the car to go too. And I&#039;ve proposed to him this Civic as I&#039;ve been drooling over it since I read your post sometimes ago. Even showed him the pics. And he think this car looks nice too. (Pretty hard to impress that old guy when it comes to cars. I still wonder why he bought that C5 though...LOL!).

And I get to see it closely last week when two of the delivery trailers stop by my hometown on their delivery to the East coast.  Made me drool even more. Damn! Good looking car overall.

Btw Paul. Great post! This is a great improvement on your post. Keep it up! Bring us more news like this! You&#039;ll remain my favourite blog for a very long time. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about time la Paul. My dad was just talking to me about selling the C5. Since he&#8217;s about to retire. It&#8217;s about time for the car to go too. And I&#8217;ve proposed to him this Civic as I&#8217;ve been drooling over it since I read your post sometimes ago. Even showed him the pics. And he think this car looks nice too. (Pretty hard to impress that old guy when it comes to cars. I still wonder why he bought that C5 though&#8230;LOL!).</p>
<p>And I get to see it closely last week when two of the delivery trailers stop by my hometown on their delivery to the East coast.  Made me drool even more. Damn! Good looking car overall.</p>
<p>Btw Paul. Great post! This is a great improvement on your post. Keep it up! Bring us more news like this! You&#8217;ll remain my favourite blog for a very long time. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autoquartz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34864</link>
		<dc:creator>autoquartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34864</guid>
		<description>I was in the dilemma of waiting for the new Camry or getting the Civic and I&#039;m a big fan of Toyota.  I ended up getting the Civic 2.0 and made the booking last Friday.  The reasons are:

- No estimated date for Camry

- I figured that I don&#039;t need a big car like Camry since most of the time it is only me and my gf on the road.  Why waste gas on carrying the extra &quot;metal&quot; around?

- I believe the specs for Civic 2.0 will be better than Camry 2.0 and I cannot afford Camry 2.4.

and lastly....

- My Waja cannot &quot;tahan&quot; that long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in the dilemma of waiting for the new Camry or getting the Civic and I&#8217;m a big fan of Toyota.  I ended up getting the Civic 2.0 and made the booking last Friday.  The reasons are:</p>
<p>- No estimated date for Camry</p>
<p>- I figured that I don&#8217;t need a big car like Camry since most of the time it is only me and my gf on the road.  Why waste gas on carrying the extra &#8220;metal&#8221; around?</p>
<p>- I believe the specs for Civic 2.0 will be better than Camry 2.0 and I cannot afford Camry 2.4.</p>
<p>and lastly&#8230;.</p>
<p>- My Waja cannot &#8220;tahan&#8221; that long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34849</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 06:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34849</guid>
		<description>burn: that&#039;s exactly what i did in the post, don&#039;t worry. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>burn: that&#8217;s exactly what i did in the post, don&#8217;t worry. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34845</link>
		<dc:creator>burn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34845</guid>
		<description>paul,

sooner or later car manufacturers are going to notice that this blog is quite popular and influential in car purchase-decision making. They&#039;ll tempt you with money to write only good things about their cars. Please don&#039;t. If the glove box is hard to close, just say it&#039;s hard to close!


But then, they might offer you one unit for each good review...wah..bestnya..forget what i said and take them cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paul,</p>
<p>sooner or later car manufacturers are going to notice that this blog is quite popular and influential in car purchase-decision making. They&#8217;ll tempt you with money to write only good things about their cars. Please don&#8217;t. If the glove box is hard to close, just say it&#8217;s hard to close!</p>
<p>But then, they might offer you one unit for each good review&#8230;wah..bestnya..forget what i said and take them cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isamu</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34799</link>
		<dc:creator>Isamu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34799</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s fair to say that Honda has upped the ante in a previously boring Malaysian automotive industry.

Let&#039;s see how Toyota will respond to the new Civic. I have never been a Toyota fan but nevertheless IMHO, it would be really nice to see Toyota bring in the UK Corolla Avensis.

As for Nissan, sorry, no comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s fair to say that Honda has upped the ante in a previously boring Malaysian automotive industry.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see how Toyota will respond to the new Civic. I have never been a Toyota fan but nevertheless IMHO, it would be really nice to see Toyota bring in the UK Corolla Avensis.</p>
<p>As for Nissan, sorry, no comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raptorclans</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34794</link>
		<dc:creator>raptorclans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34794</guid>
		<description>electronic power steering can be quite ok when u&#039;re used to it. it increases in weight as speed increases. and when parking, it&#039;s a blessing. the Juara comes with it... our family owns one, it&#039;s really nice to steer :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>electronic power steering can be quite ok when u&#8217;re used to it. it increases in weight as speed increases. and when parking, it&#8217;s a blessing. the Juara comes with it&#8230; our family owns one, it&#8217;s really nice to steer <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vague</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34793</link>
		<dc:creator>vague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34793</guid>
		<description>hemmmm...... it&#039;s nice and look very sleek... but for that price, i would go for a 2nd hand bmw E39.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hemmmm&#8230;&#8230; it&#8217;s nice and look very sleek&#8230; but for that price, i would go for a 2nd hand bmw E39.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: revver</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34778</link>
		<dc:creator>revver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 12:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34778</guid>
		<description>Hahahahaa... got a test drive. and my conclusion , put an altis beside and you&#039;ll be seeing an old man walking along his grand son. wow! 
Get a booking? i&#039;ll rather wait for the new camry first. Then final decision&#039;ll be done. Hey! toyota!still snoring?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahahaa&#8230; got a test drive. and my conclusion , put an altis beside and you&#8217;ll be seeing an old man walking along his grand son. wow!<br />
Get a booking? i&#8217;ll rather wait for the new camry first. Then final decision&#8217;ll be done. Hey! toyota!still snoring?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damion</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34769</link>
		<dc:creator>damion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34769</guid>
		<description>actually, i did a test drive for the 1.8 at the 3S centre near my area...
i&#039;ve typed the entire impression drive on my blog...
if you wanna know another opinion before considering buying, you might wanna take a look at my blog... :P
juz click on my nick to go there.. haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, i did a test drive for the 1.8 at the 3S centre near my area&#8230;<br />
i&#8217;ve typed the entire impression drive on my blog&#8230;<br />
if you wanna know another opinion before considering buying, you might wanna take a look at my blog&#8230; <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
juz click on my nick to go there.. haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLITZWAGEN</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34749</link>
		<dc:creator>BLITZWAGEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 02:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34749</guid>
		<description>I think this car is OK but they seem to be contradicting themselves - 

1) City VTEC has fixed seats &amp; dark interior to be sporty, i-DSI with beige interior has ULTRA seats to appeal to family man.
2) Civic 2.0 i-VTEC has fold-down seatbacks and blue leather upholstery to have sporty appeal, and the 1.8 has beige interior and FIXED seats??

Frankly speaking, their Melaka plant quality is not so good. I noticed huge gaps in the door panels, and the front cowl top to glass gap is huge. Furthermore the inner door handles look so cheaply painted. I wonder if they spent so much money on design, that the materials themselves became cheap-cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this car is OK but they seem to be contradicting themselves &#8211; </p>
<p>1) City VTEC has fixed seats &amp; dark interior to be sporty, i-DSI with beige interior has ULTRA seats to appeal to family man.<br />
2) Civic 2.0 i-VTEC has fold-down seatbacks and blue leather upholstery to have sporty appeal, and the 1.8 has beige interior and FIXED seats??</p>
<p>Frankly speaking, their Melaka plant quality is not so good. I noticed huge gaps in the door panels, and the front cowl top to glass gap is huge. Furthermore the inner door handles look so cheaply painted. I wonder if they spent so much money on design, that the materials themselves became cheap-cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esshige</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34737</link>
		<dc:creator>Esshige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34737</guid>
		<description>refering to my previous post, great butt is the hatchback version, the saloon one is ugly too. xD

additionally, its a 2 doors. another dream car to own. currently, owning a Mar05 siler vtec city and loving it to bits. upto today, i wash it myself weekly to fortnightly ,nvr wash outside. washing car nvr been so fulfilling and satisfaying.....uhm,sry if i m alittle carried away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>refering to my previous post, great butt is the hatchback version, the saloon one is ugly too. xD</p>
<p>additionally, its a 2 doors. another dream car to own. currently, owning a Mar05 siler vtec city and loving it to bits. upto today, i wash it myself weekly to fortnightly ,nvr wash outside. washing car nvr been so fulfilling and satisfaying&#8230;..uhm,sry if i m alittle carried away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esshige</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34736</link>
		<dc:creator>Esshige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34736</guid>
		<description>i dislike the rear light n design of tis civic. albeit the good performance, and space but i thik it looks abit too bulky to my liking.

i really love the civic hatchback SI concept. the saloon SI concept has the same rear design as tis one i think.

im not sure if the SI concept civic hatchback will be  available in msia or asia. u shld check it out. 

someone mention tht tis civic has quite similar head light design like the odyssey ,not quite id say, not the below headlight design but if u really love odyssey headlamps, ull get it perfectly in civic SI concept, n great butt design too. performance wise, i think its naturally born powerhouse roadrunner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dislike the rear light n design of tis civic. albeit the good performance, and space but i thik it looks abit too bulky to my liking.</p>
<p>i really love the civic hatchback SI concept. the saloon SI concept has the same rear design as tis one i think.</p>
<p>im not sure if the SI concept civic hatchback will be  available in msia or asia. u shld check it out. </p>
<p>someone mention tht tis civic has quite similar head light design like the odyssey ,not quite id say, not the below headlight design but if u really love odyssey headlamps, ull get it perfectly in civic SI concept, n great butt design too. performance wise, i think its naturally born powerhouse roadrunner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nm</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34734</link>
		<dc:creator>nm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34734</guid>
		<description>guys, it&#039;s a pity that Honda&#039;s not bringing in the hatchback version of the Civic into Malaysia... I&#039;m sure then that those who commented that the EK was their ultimate Civic would drool at the first sight of the hatch Civic - can&#039;t wait to get my hands on one...

see the UK honda site: www.honda.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guys, it&#8217;s a pity that Honda&#8217;s not bringing in the hatchback version of the Civic into Malaysia&#8230; I&#8217;m sure then that those who commented that the EK was their ultimate Civic would drool at the first sight of the hatch Civic &#8211; can&#8217;t wait to get my hands on one&#8230;</p>
<p>see the UK honda site: <a href="http://www.honda.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.honda.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtosupercharge</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34732</link>
		<dc:creator>gtosupercharge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/03/09/2006-honda-civic-in-depth/#comment-34732</guid>
		<description>Is it logic having a 1.8 i-VTEC engine with a fuel consumption of 1.5 liter but performance of 2.0? What is this?.....  Are they trying to compare tht this model is better thn previous Accord?.. With fuel consumption of Wira&#039;s? Can someone explain this situation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it logic having a 1.8 i-VTEC engine with a fuel consumption of 1.5 liter but performance of 2.0? What is this?&#8230;..  Are they trying to compare tht this model is better thn previous Accord?.. With fuel consumption of Wira&#8217;s? Can someone explain this situation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
