<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proton to announce strategic tie-up by end April</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proton, PSA Peugeot Citroen and Volkswagen &#187;</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-38170</link>
		<dc:creator>Proton, PSA Peugeot Citroen and Volkswagen &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 19:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-38170</guid>
		<description>[...] Proton previously announced their new partnerships will be revealed by the end of April. It&#8217;s a week into May now, but The Edge has reported quoting unnamed sources that Proton&#8217;s new partner will be French automobile company PSA Peugeot Citroen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Proton previously announced their new partnerships will be revealed by the end of April. It&#8217;s a week into May now, but The Edge has reported quoting unnamed sources that Proton&#8217;s new partner will be French automobile company PSA Peugeot Citroen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proton and Mahindra strategic alliance &#187;</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-37052</link>
		<dc:creator>Proton and Mahindra strategic alliance &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-37052</guid>
		<description>[...] Is this the strategic partner that&#8217;s to be announced by the end of month or is this a new development? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is this the strategic partner that&#8217;s to be announced by the end of month or is this a new development? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nkhhenry</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36548</link>
		<dc:creator>nkhhenry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36548</guid>
		<description>what stupid game P1 try to play?? 1st say VW partner talk but fail cos no stake selling n now come again smart partner alliance core... padai pakai wording... i hope P1 dun try to fool people around n u think who u r?? joker...if compare to world automotive , P1 useless n hopeless n always hoping to buy or share other people technology...pls come yr own innovation product like big bro toyota or honda, engine w VVT-i or V-Tec!!! try to independentlahh, dun let G to &quot;hadiah&quot; u &quot;tongkat + wheel chair&quot; P1 always do thing to &quot;malu&quot; us Malaysia.... stupid investment in MV Agusta lost Million..but r yr people really think that $$ invested lost or going other places.... try think???? P1 pls stop whatever planlah </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what stupid game P1 try to play?? 1st say VW partner talk but fail cos no stake selling n now come again smart partner alliance core&#8230; padai pakai wording&#8230; i hope P1 dun try to fool people around n u think who u r?? joker&#8230;if compare to world automotive , P1 useless n hopeless n always hoping to buy or share other people technology&#8230;pls come yr own innovation product like big bro toyota or honda, engine w VVT-i or V-Tec!!! try to independentlahh, dun let G to &quot;hadiah&quot; u &quot;tongkat + wheel chair&quot; P1 always do thing to &quot;malu&quot; us Malaysia&#8230;. stupid investment in MV Agusta lost Million..but r yr people really think that $$ invested lost or going other places&#8230;. try think???? P1 pls stop whatever planlah </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mycar_stolen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36518</link>
		<dc:creator>mycar_stolen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 10:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36518</guid>
		<description>hai people... 
why are you people so concern about BIG FLOP PROTON? this BIG FLOP PROTON never care about you...they only want your money, squueze you dry. 
 
1. if the tax is so high no money, maybe can buy a good second hand car let the rich poeple or people earning SingDollars/USD buy new car and play around with depreciation.Throw away some ego save lots of money buying 2nd hand cars.which ever you want except P1.dont buy P1 anyhow. 
2.if you are paying for your own car dont compare people with company car/car allowance/potong car/stolen car..because they dont care.they are in different situation.but our G dont care they &quot;squeeze; the whole nation.rich people poor people all have to buy expensive car and expenxive fuel that not tally with economy perfomance. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hai people&#8230;</p>
<p>why are you people so concern about BIG FLOP PROTON? this BIG FLOP PROTON never care about you&#8230;they only want your money, squueze you dry.</p>
<p>1. if the tax is so high no money, maybe can buy a good second hand car let the rich poeple or people earning SingDollars/USD buy new car and play around with depreciation.Throw away some ego save lots of money buying 2nd hand cars.which ever you want except P1.dont buy P1 anyhow.</p>
<p>2.if you are paying for your own car dont compare people with company car/car allowance/potong car/stolen car..because they dont care.they are in different situation.but our G dont care they &quot;squeeze; the whole nation.rich people poor people all have to buy expensive car and expenxive fuel that not tally with economy perfomance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acbc</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36494</link>
		<dc:creator>acbc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36494</guid>
		<description>1st thing... sack the &#039;nyanyok&#039; advicer. No use keeping him around. Always criticise P1 for the Agusta sale. Without him, new management can work better. 
 
2nd, pump more money to Lotus for them to develope more new technology which can benefit P1. 
 
3rd, for God&#039;s sake... stop producing Sagas, Iswaras, Wiras, Satrias &amp; Perdanas! Come up with something new! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st thing&#8230; sack the &#039;nyanyok&#039; advicer. No use keeping him around. Always criticise P1 for the Agusta sale. Without him, new management can work better.</p>
<p>2nd, pump more money to Lotus for them to develope more new technology which can benefit P1.</p>
<p>3rd, for God&#039;s sake&#8230; stop producing Sagas, Iswaras, Wiras, Satrias &amp; Perdanas! Come up with something new! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: accordmania</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36492</link>
		<dc:creator>accordmania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36492</guid>
		<description>hello altis_fan, are u still living in stone age era? .. then only u can claim that toyota or altis is elegant and sophiticated. they only can produce flinstone&#039;s car </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello altis_fan, are u still living in stone age era? .. then only u can claim that toyota or altis is elegant and sophiticated. they only can produce flinstone&#039;s car </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intermilan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36489</link>
		<dc:creator>intermilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 22:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36489</guid>
		<description>Emm.. sure china one lah.. or izzit Mitsu?  
Balik-balik Mitsu 2x.. old flame die hard eh?  
if materialise, guess it would not be great by any way. 
But this clearly signal that they dah desperate dah ni.. hantam la .. asal can use the term potong, smart and strategic in one sentence for real. 
 
Malu la sbb dah pernah kena &#039;tale&#039; dgn balak Jepun sebelum ni, pastu &#039;clash&#039; and &#039;putus tunang&#039; dengan balak omputih pulak. Omputih tu tak nak &#039;tale&#039; punn... Banyak cekadak katanya. Now nak carik balik balak jepun dulu.. tak pun apek main land pun apek mainland la..  
 
Macam kisah benar bohsia pun ada ni..   
 
About the QUALITY campaign..... 
Savvy kan TUV certified (still lagi ke or marketing gimmick je?, anyone).  
 
Apa proton staff / management tak boleh nak continue adapting and spreading the spirit, culture and work ethics yg sepatutunya diwujudkan semasa program TUV tu ke? Apa staff tak &#039;nampak&#039; apa itu Quality, Continuous Improvement etc.. 
 
Ntah-ntah working culture potong ni sarat dgn penyakit &#039;M&#039; and &#039;aiman tak kesah&#039; ? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emm.. sure china one lah.. or izzit Mitsu? </p>
<p>Balik-balik Mitsu 2x.. old flame die hard eh? </p>
<p>if materialise, guess it would not be great by any way.</p>
<p>But this clearly signal that they dah desperate dah ni.. hantam la .. asal can use the term potong, smart and strategic in one sentence for real.</p>
<p>Malu la sbb dah pernah kena &#039;tale&#039; dgn balak Jepun sebelum ni, pastu &#039;clash&#039; and &#039;putus tunang&#039; dengan balak omputih pulak. Omputih tu tak nak &#039;tale&#039; punn&#8230; Banyak cekadak katanya. Now nak carik balik balak jepun dulu.. tak pun apek main land pun apek mainland la.. </p>
<p>Macam kisah benar bohsia pun ada ni..  </p>
<p>About the QUALITY campaign&#8230;..</p>
<p>Savvy kan TUV certified (still lagi ke or marketing gimmick je?, anyone). </p>
<p>Apa proton staff / management tak boleh nak continue adapting and spreading the spirit, culture and work ethics yg sepatutunya diwujudkan semasa program TUV tu ke? Apa staff tak &#039;nampak&#039; apa itu Quality, Continuous Improvement etc..</p>
<p>Ntah-ntah working culture potong ni sarat dgn penyakit &#039;M&#039; and &#039;aiman tak kesah&#039; ? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kendo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36484</link>
		<dc:creator>kendo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36484</guid>
		<description>who else will be interested in PROTON? 
don&#039;t tell me 
that is china chery deal! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who else will be interested in PROTON?</p>
<p>don&#039;t tell me</p>
<p>that is china chery deal! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ooi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36478</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ooi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36478</guid>
		<description>Initial D - be realistic, say you are CEO of Toyota or Merc, from commercial perspective, are you take and make decisions on the following: - 
 
1. You waste your time take flight to this Bolehland and talk to P1 or G (NAP) on strategic tie up. 
 
2. Why should you put your self in trouble (if collaboration take place) by pump in money, transfer technology, train the P1&#039;s &quot;monkey&quot;, or do everything and anything on the ground, but don&#039;t have a say and management control! So you put in the effort like &quot;you cook the rice, P1 eat it, later you wash the plate&quot;! Is it a partnership! Indeed it is bullshit! That is the main reason why until now tie-up never take place for P1 nego with so many parties. 
 
3. You have global outlook, P1 is &quot;xenophobia&quot;, are you dare to dump in money knowing very well P1 will go no where. Furthermore, You make tonne of money, why bother about P1, outside Bolehland P1 is &quot;nothing&quot; and no more than churning out outmoded inventory with ridiculous price - never in its history able to compete in open market! 
 
4. P1 is economically not viable since it inception! So you are wise investor won&#039;t invest on it! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Initial D &#8211; be realistic, say you are CEO of Toyota or Merc, from commercial perspective, are you take and make decisions on the following: -</p>
<p>1. You waste your time take flight to this Bolehland and talk to P1 or G (NAP) on strategic tie up.</p>
<p>2. Why should you put your self in trouble (if collaboration take place) by pump in money, transfer technology, train the P1&#039;s &quot;monkey&quot;, or do everything and anything on the ground, but don&#039;t have a say and management control! So you put in the effort like &quot;you cook the rice, P1 eat it, later you wash the plate&quot;! Is it a partnership! Indeed it is bullshit! That is the main reason why until now tie-up never take place for P1 nego with so many parties.</p>
<p>3. You have global outlook, P1 is &quot;xenophobia&quot;, are you dare to dump in money knowing very well P1 will go no where. Furthermore, You make tonne of money, why bother about P1, outside Bolehland P1 is &quot;nothing&quot; and no more than churning out outmoded inventory with ridiculous price &#8211; never in its history able to compete in open market!</p>
<p>4. P1 is economically not viable since it inception! So you are wise investor won&#039;t invest on it! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motorhead</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36477</link>
		<dc:creator>motorhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36477</guid>
		<description>Ohh no.. kody.. kody u r too mean.. let P1 die??.. then where u want to find yr wira&#039;s part???.. hahaha.. poorla other poton owners... cannotlah.. dont la like that... i still think poton can be repaired... like cars oso la.. can overhaul....like marriage oso..just never met the right wife yet.... if poton finds good wife, good la..... may be i can drive their kids.. like VW GTI ka, or EVo ka or Alonso&#039;s F1.. hahaha... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohh no.. kody.. kody u r too mean.. let P1 die??.. then where u want to find yr wira&#039;s part???.. hahaha.. poorla other poton owners&#8230; cannotlah.. dont la like that&#8230; i still think poton can be repaired&#8230; like cars oso la.. can overhaul&#8230;.like marriage oso..just never met the right wife yet&#8230;. if poton finds good wife, good la&#8230;.. may be i can drive their kids.. like VW GTI ka, or EVo ka or Alonso&#039;s F1.. hahaha&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Initial D</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36474</link>
		<dc:creator>Initial D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36474</guid>
		<description>now i just hope any collaboration will materialize........at least they will learn things faster......if the partner will teach them. 
 
regarding the quality, i read several reports.....forgot where liao.....some cars r good...i mean new batch.....well, agree, should start a anual proton quality survey forum here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now i just hope any collaboration will materialize&#8230;&#8230;..at least they will learn things faster&#8230;&#8230;if the partner will teach them.</p>
<p>regarding the quality, i read several reports&#8230;..forgot where liao&#8230;..some cars r good&#8230;i mean new batch&#8230;..well, agree, should start a anual proton quality survey forum here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kody</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36472</link>
		<dc:creator>kody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36472</guid>
		<description>exactly.... let p1.... died..... stop the sub-standard cars on the market... 
 
whatsoever bro, people giving most comments to bash p1 because almost,,no no .... all of proton owners are suffered for their cheap, low quality &amp; high cost products. This is just a channel to release the unsatisfied mood, since whatever complaints from owners also transparent to p1. &amp; no initiatives to improve. Now p1 is sink to the nose than only they realise they are sinking &amp; hard to breath. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly&#8230;. let p1&#8230;. died&#8230;.. stop the sub-standard cars on the market&#8230;</p>
<p>whatsoever bro, people giving most comments to bash p1 because almost,,no no &#8230;. all of proton owners are suffered for their cheap, low quality &amp; high cost products. This is just a channel to release the unsatisfied mood, since whatever complaints from owners also transparent to p1. &amp; no initiatives to improve. Now p1 is sink to the nose than only they realise they are sinking &amp; hard to breath. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motorhead</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36471</link>
		<dc:creator>motorhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36471</guid>
		<description>Yeah kody!!!.. GOOD IDEA... &amp; speaking of survey.. Joe Ooi can do it... Survey for poton cars 2006 models, start from today... i oso keep looking for new gen2 owners... &amp; i will interview them.. &amp; share the stories with u guys... see if we can hear any horror or good news.. 
 
So Paul pls prepare one for poton feed back... as kody said, we r not so rich keep changing cars.. feedback can be very useful... can help or bash our national cars oso... hehehe... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah kody!!!.. GOOD IDEA&#8230; &amp; speaking of survey.. Joe Ooi can do it&#8230; Survey for poton cars 2006 models, start from today&#8230; i oso keep looking for new gen2 owners&#8230; &amp; i will interview them.. &amp; share the stories with u guys&#8230; see if we can hear any horror or good news..</p>
<p>So Paul pls prepare one for poton feed back&#8230; as kody said, we r not so rich keep changing cars.. feedback can be very useful&#8230; can help or bash our national cars oso&#8230; hehehe&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatsoever</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36468</link>
		<dc:creator>whatsoever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36468</guid>
		<description>even everyone(almost everyone) said boring and angry with proton. but seems like whenever proton news appear still the most people given comment.  
 
whatsoever la, just let the proton died it-self if they don&#039;t want to change. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even everyone(almost everyone) said boring and angry with proton. but seems like whenever proton news appear still the most people given comment. </p>
<p>whatsoever la, just let the proton died it-self if they don&#039;t want to change. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ooi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36463</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ooi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36463</guid>
		<description>How to check the quality maufacture after April 06, e.g. Proton Iswara Sedan and Aeroback, both models older than P1 itself (80s tech from Mit) and failed UK safety standard (even with certain upgrade), yet still selling in Malaysian market. Whatever P1 do on quality aspect for this model, it won&#039;t up to mark as a high quality and safety car? They should discontinue this model long ago! but still selling, what a shame! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to check the quality maufacture after April 06, e.g. Proton Iswara Sedan and Aeroback, both models older than P1 itself (80s tech from Mit) and failed UK safety standard (even with certain upgrade), yet still selling in Malaysian market. Whatever P1 do on quality aspect for this model, it won&#039;t up to mark as a high quality and safety car? They should discontinue this model long ago! but still selling, what a shame! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kody</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36462</link>
		<dc:creator>kody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36462</guid>
		<description>wahlaueh... 
 
may be after few months, Paul can set up to surveys &amp; check for new P1 owners feedback about the quality of new p1 cars that manufactured after month of April or year 2006 models. 
 
like motorhead stated, new gen2 with some upgrading... but we are not that rich to change the car too often to try the quality. So, any new P1 potential owners please help to raise some feedback for us to know how well the p1 is going for now. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wahlaueh&#8230;</p>
<p>may be after few months, Paul can set up to surveys &amp; check for new P1 owners feedback about the quality of new p1 cars that manufactured after month of April or year 2006 models.</p>
<p>like motorhead stated, new gen2 with some upgrading&#8230; but we are not that rich to change the car too often to try the quality. So, any new P1 potential owners please help to raise some feedback for us to know how well the p1 is going for now. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36460</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36460</guid>
		<description>The only difference 20 years ago and now is that Free trade and protection proton has. Yes, hopefully quality will be better.  
20 years is enough to make people detest. Maybe another 20 years to get recognize? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only difference 20 years ago and now is that Free trade and protection proton has. Yes, hopefully quality will be better. </p>
<p>20 years is enough to make people detest. Maybe another 20 years to get recognize? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waimak</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36459</link>
		<dc:creator>waimak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36459</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a quality standard been set in proton models. It may be gained through whatever collaboration or strategic partnership. Now what we usually see is someone telling, e.g., &quot; My Waja got window problem lar&quot; and someone else would reply &quot;Well that&#039;s quite &#039;standard&#039; for a proton&quot;, which definitely not the standard we want. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a quality standard been set in proton models. It may be gained through whatever collaboration or strategic partnership. Now what we usually see is someone telling, e.g., &quot; My Waja got window problem lar&quot; and someone else would reply &quot;Well that&#039;s quite &#039;standard&#039; for a proton&quot;, which definitely not the standard we want. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motorhead</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36457</link>
		<dc:creator>motorhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36457</guid>
		<description>Ala kody 20 year for car industry nothing la.. consider very2 young.. Joe Ooi knows this very well... i oso ve many2 frustration.. but what else to do?? i want to order brand new CITY, but later i paid more than 40k for the stupid taxes.. same like other brand oso.. but if we got the chance to buy good cars like VW or mitsu, even they r from POTON.. why not???... coz  for me engineering is more important, evethough we will never get the japs standard.. yet... but we dont ve many option.. since poton around, can use it as benchmark to get our dream cars... just like we get myvi from P2... 
 
really wish it gonna be VW... i want VW GTI.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ala kody 20 year for car industry nothing la.. consider very2 young.. Joe Ooi knows this very well&#8230; i oso ve many2 frustration.. but what else to do?? i want to order brand new CITY, but later i paid more than 40k for the stupid taxes.. same like other brand oso.. but if we got the chance to buy good cars like VW or mitsu, even they r from POTON.. why not???&#8230; coz  for me engineering is more important, evethough we will never get the japs standard.. yet&#8230; but we dont ve many option.. since poton around, can use it as benchmark to get our dream cars&#8230; just like we get myvi from P2&#8230;</p>
<p>really wish it gonna be VW&#8230; i want VW GTI&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigjoe</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36456</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigjoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36456</guid>
		<description>I think its too late for Proton even with a strategic tie-up. Unless the tie up is with the top few (and they have said no already), I think its too late. The problem is that new competitors from China, India and Korea will ensure brutal competition in the business for the next 10 to 20 years and in that environment, many companies will not survive. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its too late for Proton even with a strategic tie-up. Unless the tie up is with the top few (and they have said no already), I think its too late. The problem is that new competitors from China, India and Korea will ensure brutal competition in the business for the next 10 to 20 years and in that environment, many companies will not survive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: go_go</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36454</link>
		<dc:creator>go_go</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36454</guid>
		<description>Yes, lets see how the new management goes... i think they did pretty good since recently they announce zero defects campaign.. i dunno about the effectiveness about the campaign, hope the quality dosent stay the same... 
 
my opinion is, proton should joint venture or have strategic tie-ups with reliable local companies, such as PETRONAS. Maybe if they joint together they would develop more fuel efficient campro or anything that beneficial to them. And, proton also should have some level of strategic collabration with all their suppliers (Componenets etc.) this will benefit in a way that quality supply materials and componenets can be further justified and can be controlled.  
 
Im not saying that Proton should never joint with foreign automakers, but what i emphasis here is try to control things here first than go get foreign help.  
 
These are just my opinion... :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, lets see how the new management goes&#8230; i think they did pretty good since recently they announce zero defects campaign.. i dunno about the effectiveness about the campaign, hope the quality dosent stay the same&#8230;</p>
<p>my opinion is, proton should joint venture or have strategic tie-ups with reliable local companies, such as PETRONAS. Maybe if they joint together they would develop more fuel efficient campro or anything that beneficial to them. And, proton also should have some level of strategic collabration with all their suppliers (Componenets etc.) this will benefit in a way that quality supply materials and componenets can be further justified and can be controlled. </p>
<p>Im not saying that Proton should never joint with foreign automakers, but what i emphasis here is try to control things here first than go get foreign help. </p>
<p>These are just my opinion&#8230; <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ar</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36453</link>
		<dc:creator>ar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36453</guid>
		<description>in my opinion selling our stake to other foreign company is not very wise. 
bcoz so many malaysian already sell their own stake to others. 
so what&#039;s left for malaysia is doom... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in my opinion selling our stake to other foreign company is not very wise.</p>
<p>bcoz so many malaysian already sell their own stake to others.</p>
<p>so what&#039;s left for malaysia is doom&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kody</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36451</link>
		<dc:creator>kody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36451</guid>
		<description>outspoken, may be u r right... But we also already give them chance for ~ 20years already. Why only last minutes.... only realise &amp; want to compete for survive. I am sure early the p1 top management know their quality extremely sucks... but...&#039; it&#039;s proton mah&#039; altitude.  
 
motorhead, may be u r right...p1 is slowly....slowly inrease their quality when they realise customers are not compromise with their quality. 
 
if at the 1st place P1 already produce quality cars... now sure they can get more than 60% of new cars market shares. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>outspoken, may be u r right&#8230; But we also already give them chance for ~ 20years already. Why only last minutes&#8230;. only realise &amp; want to compete for survive. I am sure early the p1 top management know their quality extremely sucks&#8230; but&#8230;&#039; it&#039;s proton mah&#039; altitude. </p>
<p>motorhead, may be u r right&#8230;p1 is slowly&#8230;.slowly inrease their quality when they realise customers are not compromise with their quality.</p>
<p>if at the 1st place P1 already produce quality cars&#8230; now sure they can get more than 60% of new cars market shares. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outspoken</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36450</link>
		<dc:creator>outspoken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36450</guid>
		<description>new management hopefully will do their upmost to gain public confidence. i&#039;d give them 8 months to improve on quality, 2 years on new/facelift models. what do you all think? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new management hopefully will do their upmost to gain public confidence. i&#039;d give them 8 months to improve on quality, 2 years on new/facelift models. what do you all think? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ooi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36446</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ooi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36446</guid>
		<description>outspoken said, 
April 6, 2006 @ 1:27 pm  
 
&quot;i do not expect proton to change in the matter of months. let give these new management some room before we start bashing them.&quot; 
 
Joe Ooi - Give them not in a matter of mnoths, but 21 damn long years already lah! new management some room, what room/space they want somemore, the consumers are already get squeeze until to the nake and &quot;NO SPACE&quot; even to &quot;stand&quot;! &quot;SRM 90% done! Waht a big deal, 2 door remodified and likely rebadge from other manufacturer old model. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>outspoken said,</p>
<p>April 6, 2006 @ 1:27 pm </p>
<p>&quot;i do not expect proton to change in the matter of months. let give these new management some room before we start bashing them.&quot;</p>
<p>Joe Ooi &#8211; Give them not in a matter of mnoths, but 21 damn long years already lah! new management some room, what room/space they want somemore, the consumers are already get squeeze until to the nake and &quot;NO SPACE&quot; even to &quot;stand&quot;! &quot;SRM 90% done! Waht a big deal, 2 door remodified and likely rebadge from other manufacturer old model. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outspoken</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36445</link>
		<dc:creator>outspoken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36445</guid>
		<description>i do not expect proton to change in the matter of months. let give these new management some room before we start bashing them. They are facing lots of trouble, and every step is a crucial step towards their survival. Let us not be &quot;typically malaysian- bashers, pengutuk, pengkritik etc&quot;.. Even the new model, SRM is basically 90% done, so we would have to judge this new management for their future(?) models.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do not expect proton to change in the matter of months. let give these new management some room before we start bashing them. They are facing lots of trouble, and every step is a crucial step towards their survival. Let us not be &quot;typically malaysian- bashers, pengutuk, pengkritik etc&quot;.. Even the new model, SRM is basically 90% done, so we would have to judge this new management for their future(?) models.. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36444</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36444</guid>
		<description>Proton Strategic partnership: 
49% of controlling shares. 
Proton has the final word 
Transfer of technology will benefit proton 
Proton will locally manufacture whichever partner&#039;s product locally at its plant. 
Proton will market the cars at its showroom?  
Proton will set a base to market their cars.  
 
Sounds very fammiliar right? 
 
Outsiders version of strategic partnership: 
 
Control majority of proton shares/buy the company all together 
Control key decisions and administration possibly foreign people.  
Transfer technology to proton. 
Rebadging so that proton will be more respected by making a variant version of the partner&#039;s own car. Kind of like Volvo s40 and ford focus 
Make profit from NAP? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proton Strategic partnership:</p>
<p>49% of controlling shares.</p>
<p>Proton has the final word</p>
<p>Transfer of technology will benefit proton</p>
<p>Proton will locally manufacture whichever partner&#039;s product locally at its plant.</p>
<p>Proton will market the cars at its showroom? </p>
<p>Proton will set a base to market their cars. </p>
<p>Sounds very fammiliar right?</p>
<p>Outsiders version of strategic partnership:</p>
<p>Control majority of proton shares/buy the company all together</p>
<p>Control key decisions and administration possibly foreign people. </p>
<p>Transfer technology to proton.</p>
<p>Rebadging so that proton will be more respected by making a variant version of the partner&#039;s own car. Kind of like Volvo s40 and ford focus</p>
<p>Make profit from NAP? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ooi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36443</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ooi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36443</guid>
		<description>honda_driver said, 
April 5, 2006 @ 5:43 pm  
 
honda_driver - &quot;volks also in trouble now la.. china market collapsing for them.. big boss of volks also in danger of losing his job.. they losing more money than the rest of their subsidiaries can make.. any comment on that joe?&quot;  
 
Joe Ooi - what to comments except to say Proton are able to negotiate with all problematic car manufacturer or auto related companies only. Just to mention a few - VW, Mit, Geely, Chery, Delphy, Lotus, MV Augusta, etc. At the end the results all were failed misely, either fail in enter &quot;smart partnership&quot; or have to take burden like Lotus and MV Augusta, which in turn is tax payer money! P1 want &quot;smart partnership&quot; but their IQ level is &quot;below average&quot;! 
 
Say can P1 like P2 nego and tie up with worldclass players like Toyota or Merc, either directly or indirectly? Problematics foreign companies as above-mentioned already very scare at and &quot;runaway&quot; from &quot;much more problematic P1&quot;, what elase P1 can do. Perhaps after nego to all problematic car manufacturers P1 have the opportunity to nego, and all failed. Then the next likely scenario is to nego with &quot;local players&quot; and announce to the market successful &quot;strategic tie-up&quot; with the like of &quot;Ah Chong Kedai Basikal, Muthu Motor Workshop or Ahmad Kedai Ketuk dan Mengecat Kereta&quot;. Ha, Ha, Ha, ..... it is a joke,......... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>honda_driver said,</p>
<p>April 5, 2006 @ 5:43 pm </p>
<p>honda_driver &#8211; &quot;volks also in trouble now la.. china market collapsing for them.. big boss of volks also in danger of losing his job.. they losing more money than the rest of their subsidiaries can make.. any comment on that joe?&quot; </p>
<p>Joe Ooi &#8211; what to comments except to say Proton are able to negotiate with all problematic car manufacturer or auto related companies only. Just to mention a few &#8211; VW, Mit, Geely, Chery, Delphy, Lotus, MV Augusta, etc. At the end the results all were failed misely, either fail in enter &quot;smart partnership&quot; or have to take burden like Lotus and MV Augusta, which in turn is tax payer money! P1 want &quot;smart partnership&quot; but their IQ level is &quot;below average&quot;!</p>
<p>Say can P1 like P2 nego and tie up with worldclass players like Toyota or Merc, either directly or indirectly? Problematics foreign companies as above-mentioned already very scare at and &quot;runaway&quot; from &quot;much more problematic P1&quot;, what elase P1 can do. Perhaps after nego to all problematic car manufacturers P1 have the opportunity to nego, and all failed. Then the next likely scenario is to nego with &quot;local players&quot; and announce to the market successful &quot;strategic tie-up&quot; with the like of &quot;Ah Chong Kedai Basikal, Muthu Motor Workshop or Ahmad Kedai Ketuk dan Mengecat Kereta&quot;. Ha, Ha, Ha, &#8230;.. it is a joke,&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Nabill</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36438</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Nabill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 12:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36438</guid>
		<description>i dont tink its anyting more than either VW or MMC buying stake into proton...VW most probably...bcos thy hav a Quality Drive Campaing now in tanjung malim,from wat i know,its VWs condition to for proton to show commitment intro improving quality thn thy can be convinced into buying proton shares... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont tink its anyting more than either VW or MMC buying stake into proton&#8230;VW most probably&#8230;bcos thy hav a Quality Drive Campaing now in tanjung malim,from wat i know,its VWs condition to for proton to show commitment intro improving quality thn thy can be convinced into buying proton shares&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: go_go</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36435</link>
		<dc:creator>go_go</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 12:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/04/05/proton-to-announce-strategic-tie-up-by-end-april/#comment-36435</guid>
		<description>Yes, Proton and VW agreement fail because VW thinks that Malaysian G has too much control and interference over Proton. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Proton and VW agreement fail because VW thinks that Malaysian G has too much control and interference over Proton. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 2080/2080 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via vcdn1.paultan.org

Served from: _ @ 2012-05-24 21:55:22 -->
