<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW 335i has 350hp instead of 302hp?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMW 335i Convertible Test Drive Report</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-63553</link>
		<dc:creator>BMW 335i Convertible Test Drive Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 08:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-63553</guid>
		<description>[...] muscle on the road now. The quoted 302hp and 400Nm (although there has been suggestions that it is in fact much more &#8216;thrust&#8217;worthy an engine) propels the car to the edge of its handling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] muscle on the road now. The quoted 302hp and 400Nm (although there has been suggestions that it is in fact much more &#8216;thrust&#8217;worthy an engine) propels the car to the edge of its handling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMW 335xi in March 2007</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-55778</link>
		<dc:creator>BMW 335xi in March 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-55778</guid>
		<description>[...] The E90 335xi will boast the same 3.0 liter twin turbocharged inline-6 cylinder engine putting out 302hp and 400Nm of torque (sometimes even higher!) introduced with the E92 3 Coupe, with all that massive torque punishing the ground through all four wheels. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The E90 335xi will boast the same 3.0 liter twin turbocharged inline-6 cylinder engine putting out 302hp and 400Nm of torque (sometimes even higher!) introduced with the E92 3 Coupe, with all that massive torque punishing the ground through all four wheels. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingKong</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47517</link>
		<dc:creator>KingKong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47517</guid>
		<description>&quot;but its not an everyday car&quot; 
 
completely wrong! u should ask those EvoIX owner. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;but its not an everyday car&quot;</p>
<p>completely wrong! u should ask those EvoIX owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E90 BMW M3 Possible Specifications</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47452</link>
		<dc:creator>E90 BMW M3 Possible Specifications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47452</guid>
		<description>[...] 307 kilowatts of power would be approximately 412 horsepower. The engine has a peak torque of 420Nm. That&#8217;s only 20Nm of torque higher than the BMW 335i&#8217;s figures! Looking at the high horsepower to displacement ratio and the relatively lower torque figures as compared to the horsepower, this is likely a normally aspirated engine that makes its high power from sky high revving like it&#8217;s older brother the 5.0 V10. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 307 kilowatts of power would be approximately 412 horsepower. The engine has a peak torque of 420Nm. That&#8217;s only 20Nm of torque higher than the BMW 335i&#8217;s figures! Looking at the high horsepower to displacement ratio and the relatively lower torque figures as compared to the horsepower, this is likely a normally aspirated engine that makes its high power from sky high revving like it&#8217;s older brother the 5.0 V10. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topgunthang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47413</link>
		<dc:creator>topgunthang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 14:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47413</guid>
		<description>evo 9 is a great car for its price. but its not an everyday car. i think they will change that in the evo 10. but from your list the best would be the f430 and gallardo spyder. even if you&#039;re filthy rich, there is no need to go beyond these entry level supercars. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>evo 9 is a great car for its price. but its not an everyday car. i think they will change that in the evo 10. but from your list the best would be the f430 and gallardo spyder. even if you&#039;re filthy rich, there is no need to go beyond these entry level supercars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitlanevo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47382</link>
		<dc:creator>mitlanevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47382</guid>
		<description>350bhp sounds great, but if speaking about BMW, i prefer the 5-series &quot;hawk-eye&quot;, M6, 645Ci and 7-series (both 730Li &amp; 760Li). But if really into a great car, i would go for either Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX, Lamborghini Gallardo, Ferrari F430, Porsche Cayenne or Mercedes-Benz CLS350. But anyway, Evo IX is in my top-list, at least not so expensive compared to others that I mentioned above. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>350bhp sounds great, but if speaking about BMW, i prefer the 5-series &quot;hawk-eye&quot;, M6, 645Ci and 7-series (both 730Li &amp; 760Li). But if really into a great car, i would go for either Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX, Lamborghini Gallardo, Ferrari F430, Porsche Cayenne or Mercedes-Benz CLS350. But anyway, Evo IX is in my top-list, at least not so expensive compared to others that I mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingKong</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47381</link>
		<dc:creator>KingKong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47381</guid>
		<description>just like 530i &amp; 525i.. 
 
the 525i just a turn down version of 530i with less 40bhp even both 3 litres engine. 
 
glad that 335i now with 350bhp.. 302bhp too little for me.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just like 530i &amp; 525i..</p>
<p>the 525i just a turn down version of 530i with less 40bhp even both 3 litres engine.</p>
<p>glad that 335i now with 350bhp.. 302bhp too little for me..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topgunthang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47368</link>
		<dc:creator>topgunthang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47368</guid>
		<description>wats that thing going on with toyota ipsum2.0? google the thing.  
 
this bmw coupe is one beautiful machine. at least now can compete in terms of looks with the lexus IS. you got to see the lexus live especially when it drives past you. very nice lines and muscular. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wats that thing going on with toyota ipsum2.0? google the thing. </p>
<p>this bmw coupe is one beautiful machine. at least now can compete in terms of looks with the lexus IS. you got to see the lexus live especially when it drives past you. very nice lines and muscular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobdbilder</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47331</link>
		<dc:creator>bobdbilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47331</guid>
		<description>There is another possibility.  Engine ratings and test that you get officially in typical German Engineering is based either on average test in various conditions (humidity/temperature) or on a worst case basis, sampling taken from a few testbenches.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if these published figures were of worst case basis because of American legal issues.  North America is a big market which they really need to capitalise. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is another possibility.  Engine ratings and test that you get officially in typical German Engineering is based either on average test in various conditions (humidity/temperature) or on a worst case basis, sampling taken from a few testbenches.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if these published figures were of worst case basis because of American legal issues.  North America is a big market which they really need to capitalise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47315</link>
		<dc:creator>Wai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47315</guid>
		<description>What DSM said is kinda logic once u think of it....prevent canabilise of internal sales due to power and price difference between their car lineup 
 
oh well underquoting is good as well...u definitely know it will produce that kinda power at the very least..if ur lucky u get alot more haha </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What DSM said is kinda logic once u think of it&#8230;.prevent canabilise of internal sales due to power and price difference between their car lineup</p>
<p>oh well underquoting is good as well&#8230;u definitely know it will produce that kinda power at the very least..if ur lucky u get alot more haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47304</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47304</guid>
		<description>but could there be differences in the types of dyno used? 
 
i mean, i&#039;ve heard of some dynos being more ermm.. stingy in giving the right output of power.. such as the case in the US, where the mustang dyno (no relation to the car) is regarded as being more stringent and therefore most of the time giving a reading of a lower hp rating compared to other dynos.. 
 
is that true? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but could there be differences in the types of dyno used?</p>
<p>i mean, i&#039;ve heard of some dynos being more ermm.. stingy in giving the right output of power.. such as the case in the US, where the mustang dyno (no relation to the car) is regarded as being more stringent and therefore most of the time giving a reading of a lower hp rating compared to other dynos..</p>
<p>is that true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonkk</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47287</link>
		<dc:creator>jonkk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47287</guid>
		<description>Hi all. Anyone has any comment or review on Toyota Ipsum 2.0? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all. Anyone has any comment or review on Toyota Ipsum 2.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: assimo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47286</link>
		<dc:creator>assimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47286</guid>
		<description>I think one of thier marketing strategy...4G63T DSM,is for production model i guess..nice! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of thier marketing strategy&#8230;4G63T DSM,is for production model i guess..nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rexis</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47273</link>
		<dc:creator>rexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47273</guid>
		<description>But this is just assume that what the dyno meter received is about 20% less from the crank shaft, due to friction loss on the gear box, wheels, etc. But what if just that BMW 335i has made an efficient transmission that little energy were loss? 
 
Anyhow, it is very very impressive. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this is just assume that what the dyno meter received is about 20% less from the crank shaft, due to friction loss on the gear box, wheels, etc. But what if just that BMW 335i has made an efficient transmission that little energy were loss?</p>
<p>Anyhow, it is very very impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4G63T DSM</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47268</link>
		<dc:creator>4G63T DSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47268</guid>
		<description>Is this tested on a press car or production model? 
 
However, with experience in turbocharged cars, ambient temperature does have a lot to play with your power. On my Mitsu turbo 2.0L@18psi boost, I can get as much as 20% more power on a cool fall evening (ie. 10 degrees C) vs, a hot summer afternoon (28 degrees), which can equate to 40-50hp. My car can make anywhere from 250 to slightly over 300hp@crank just depending on ambient temperature. 
 
BWM might just have quoted the lower figure. 
 
Impressive figure regardless, especially max torque at only 2000rpm. It just shows that once you force feed something, you get hugh lumps of torque. 
 
However, if you look at the dyno chart carefully, you can see that it doen&#039;t really make that much power, especially given this is a modern turbocharged engine. BMW, could get another 20-40% more power fairly easily. 
 
I believe the main reason to underqoute is not to canabilise internal sales. If your regular 335 gets 350+hp, would you pay double that to get a 400hp M3? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this tested on a press car or production model?</p>
<p>However, with experience in turbocharged cars, ambient temperature does have a lot to play with your power. On my Mitsu turbo 2.0L@18psi boost, I can get as much as 20% more power on a cool fall evening (ie. 10 degrees C) vs, a hot summer afternoon (28 degrees), which can equate to 40-50hp. My car can make anywhere from 250 to slightly over 300hp@crank just depending on ambient temperature.</p>
<p>BWM might just have quoted the lower figure.</p>
<p>Impressive figure regardless, especially max torque at only 2000rpm. It just shows that once you force feed something, you get hugh lumps of torque.</p>
<p>However, if you look at the dyno chart carefully, you can see that it doen&#039;t really make that much power, especially given this is a modern turbocharged engine. BMW, could get another 20-40% more power fairly easily.</p>
<p>I believe the main reason to underqoute is not to canabilise internal sales. If your regular 335 gets 350+hp, would you pay double that to get a 400hp M3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maibatsu_thunder</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47265</link>
		<dc:creator>maibatsu_thunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47265</guid>
		<description>Cats out of the bag - media car had a specially massaged engine I bet!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cats out of the bag &#8211; media car had a specially massaged engine I bet!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SatriaGuy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47264</link>
		<dc:creator>SatriaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47264</guid>
		<description>Manufacturers are always &#039;under quoting&#039; figures for power because it&#039;s always better to be conservative officially. But there are practical reasons why a manufacturer doesn&#039;t make their cars over-powerful like having ridiculous power rating like 1000Nm or something like that.    
 
They have to think responsibly and make the power accessible and useable, with the kind of reliability a production car should have.  
 
Automobile is an American magazine and the American-specced BMW could be different than that of Europe. I think the results is exaggerated and should be checked out by BMW themselves </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manufacturers are always &#039;under quoting&#039; figures for power because it&#039;s always better to be conservative officially. But there are practical reasons why a manufacturer doesn&#039;t make their cars over-powerful like having ridiculous power rating like 1000Nm or something like that.   </p>
<p>They have to think responsibly and make the power accessible and useable, with the kind of reliability a production car should have. </p>
<p>Automobile is an American magazine and the American-specced BMW could be different than that of Europe. I think the results is exaggerated and should be checked out by BMW themselves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armandd</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47236</link>
		<dc:creator>armandd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47236</guid>
		<description>the question is.. how reliable was the test done by Automobile Mag? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the question is.. how reliable was the test done by Automobile Mag?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: layman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47235</link>
		<dc:creator>layman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47235</guid>
		<description>UNDER PROMISE OVER DELIVER, this is what the leader should do. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UNDER PROMISE OVER DELIVER, this is what the leader should do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47225</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47225</guid>
		<description>nicest ! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nicest !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-nabilll</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47218</link>
		<dc:creator>e-nabilll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47218</guid>
		<description>or izzit like the evo...puposely under state their power figures due to european and japanese regulations on engine capacity power limit...everybody who drove evo 7 n above..clearly knows that the claimed power of 272 bhp is a complete bull ! it feels more like 300! but this kind of cheating..i like! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or izzit like the evo&#8230;puposely under state their power figures due to european and japanese regulations on engine capacity power limit&#8230;everybody who drove evo 7 n above..clearly knows that the claimed power of 272 bhp is a complete bull ! it feels more like 300! but this kind of cheating..i like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47213</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47213</guid>
		<description>the 335i is a 3.0 twin turbo </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 335i is a 3.0 twin turbo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topgunthang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47211</link>
		<dc:creator>topgunthang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/17/bmw-335i-has-350hp-instead-of-302hp/#comment-47211</guid>
		<description>350hp and 480nm at the cranks sounds more in line with a 3.5 litre 6cylinder turbo or is it 3 litres? if compare with all the newer turbo engines that came out recently.   
 
that is very nice...esp on a bmw. wish everybody underquoted thier engine power. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>350hp and 480nm at the cranks sounds more in line with a 3.5 litre 6cylinder turbo or is it 3 litres? if compare with all the newer turbo engines that came out recently.  </p>
<p>that is very nice&#8230;esp on a bmw. wish everybody underquoted thier engine power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

