Comments on: E92 BMW M3 Possible Specifications

By: szw

szw — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:14:00 +0000

M3's engine is getting bigger d .

By: Kaboda

Kaboda — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:37:19 +0000

I fell in love with the M3 when driving an Auto E30 M3, for such an old car it was totally brilliant. After then owning an E36 M3 all I can say is the car is a great second car but parts and maintenance just kills you in the end.

By: Hikaru

Hikaru — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:36:33 +0000

I have seen a singapore registered RS4 parked between two F430 at Mandrin Oriental and a Meserati once. I think it was the F1 gala sometime back before.

I am rather confused (or is this the point of contention) as to the powerplant of the upcoming M3. Is it confirmed to be N/A or twin turbo charged? I agree with the above comments that the target for M3 is more towards RS4 as oppose to AMG products which are more focused on power/engine.

By: mycar_stolen

mycar_stolen — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:23:36 +0000

what happen to the BENZ C32 AMG/KLEEMANN?this one is not the M3 rivals?…

have anybody seen the RS4 on Msian road?I everyday drive for 100++km also never saw one…

By: topgunthang

topgunthang — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:59:12 +0000

i think main rival of M3 is the audis. RS4 as someone said. the amg machines are indeed powerful, but other than that got nothing much to compare to the M3 and M5 in terms of driving.

By: KingKong

KingKong — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:53:02 +0000

SG,

Merce having 6.5 litra AMG only in CL.

CL 6.5L AMG rival is M6, not M3.

By: SatriaGuy

SatriaGuy — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 05:46:32 +0000

Judging from the kind of power they are able to offer in the twin-turbo 335i, the all-new M3 should be a stormer.

With Merc having 6.5-litre AMG-tuned engines, the power rating just goes up and up, ain't it?

When will fast be too fast?

By: KingKong

KingKong — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:48:53 +0000

but i heard they going to give this E92 M3 about 450bhp instead of little 412bhp.

By: KingKong

KingKong — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:47:47 +0000

Paul, not E90 but E92.

the design much much better than old M3, BMW buddy should make this car better than M5..

yeaa… and they should put better comfort seat than the old M3.

By: e-nabilll

e-nabilll — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:14:01 +0000

specs wise ..should atleast rival the audi rs4 which is the direct competitor…the rs4 is has awesome spec sheet…bt the m3 being wat it is…anything less than 10/10 wil be a disapointment…but it wont…bcos its the legendary M3!

By: Paul Tan

Paul Tan — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:22:33 +0000

The M3 has no twin turbo. It's naturally aspirated.

By: maxtek

maxtek — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:15:56 +0000

As I was looking through the M3's history, the M3 has always been a fast coupe for enthusiasts. But here, the M3 now looks less mean with the new front look.

Overall, the M3 is still worth driving thanks to it's twin-turbo and also the fun 7 speed sequential manual gearbox…