<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Spyshots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:18:04 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KingKong</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48517</link>
		<dc:creator>KingKong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48517</guid>
		<description>Evo will be equipped with dual-clutch gearbox just what u found in VW.
what a great news, hope they will launch EvoX earlier than Summer 2007.

but as usual, a lot of people will buy normal Lancer and mod it into Evo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evo will be equipped with dual-clutch gearbox just what u found in VW.<br />
what a great news, hope they will launch EvoX earlier than Summer 2007.</p>
<p>but as usual, a lot of people will buy normal Lancer and mod it into Evo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingKong</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48349</link>
		<dc:creator>KingKong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48349</guid>
		<description>for Evo version, confirmed will be new engine with 300+ horsepower.
normal Lancer, also new engine (upgrade version of old one probably)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for Evo version, confirmed will be new engine with 300+ horsepower.<br />
normal Lancer, also new engine (upgrade version of old one probably)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoMeOnE</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48344</link>
		<dc:creator>SoMeOnE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48344</guid>
		<description>oh QUEST.... if u actually read my comment carefully i never did compare WAJA&#039;s quality wit  MITSU.....or and other jap cbu for tat matter.....plz read carefully b4 correctin me..all i said is they share simiar mecahnics and the waja looks better..PLZ READ CAREFULLY...:) I DRVE A JAP CBU TOO MAN...UR NOT ALONE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh QUEST&#8230;. if u actually read my comment carefully i never did compare WAJA&#8217;s quality wit  MITSU&#8230;..or and other jap cbu for tat matter&#8230;..plz read carefully b4 correctin me..all i said is they share simiar mecahnics and the waja looks better..PLZ READ CAREFULLY&#8230;:) I DRVE A JAP CBU TOO MAN&#8230;UR NOT ALONE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topgunthang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48325</link>
		<dc:creator>topgunthang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48325</guid>
		<description>i doubt the lancer will be better than an impreza(even with the big price diff)...let alone corolla and civic.
the only reason the lancer is still existing is because it is supported by the evo(even though the same could be said the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i doubt the lancer will be better than an impreza(even with the big price diff)&#8230;let alone corolla and civic.<br />
the only reason the lancer is still existing is because it is supported by the evo(even though the same could be said the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: renyeo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48256</link>
		<dc:creator>renyeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48256</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait for it, man! Bet it is gonna look more exciting than the New Corolla :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait for it, man! Bet it is gonna look more exciting than the New Corolla <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xoomie</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48208</link>
		<dc:creator>Xoomie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48208</guid>
		<description>I went to EON Glenamrie last weekend.
Sat in the Lancer and &quot;played&quot; around with all buttons, trying out the back seat, eventually the salesman offered me a test drive. 

Here&#039;s my verdict. NVH is 1 step behind CIvic 1.8 I tested few month back.
Engine noise kindah loud as I can hear it in the cabin.
The interior quality is not so great but still better than our local cars.
Even though it&#039;s a CBU from Japan but it&#039;s fits &amp; fitting are just average to me.

It&#039;s miles behind the Civics &amp; Corollas. Maybe it&#039;s closer to Waja. Not in the same league but Waja could &quot;catch up&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to EON Glenamrie last weekend.<br />
Sat in the Lancer and &#8220;played&#8221; around with all buttons, trying out the back seat, eventually the salesman offered me a test drive. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my verdict. NVH is 1 step behind CIvic 1.8 I tested few month back.<br />
Engine noise kindah loud as I can hear it in the cabin.<br />
The interior quality is not so great but still better than our local cars.<br />
Even though it&#8217;s a CBU from Japan but it&#8217;s fits &amp; fitting are just average to me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s miles behind the Civics &amp; Corollas. Maybe it&#8217;s closer to Waja. Not in the same league but Waja could &#8220;catch up&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarawakguy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48176</link>
		<dc:creator>sarawakguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48176</guid>
		<description>anybody have been in an old Colt Lancer? My family used to have one back in early 80s(CBU one wooo...).Bet this new Lancer is as tough as the old one....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anybody have been in an old Colt Lancer? My family used to have one back in early 80s(CBU one wooo&#8230;).Bet this new Lancer is as tough as the old one&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mits27</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48161</link>
		<dc:creator>mits27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48161</guid>
		<description>Maybe the new engine 4G19 with MIVEC, or maybe higher compression ratio, it added up another 10 hp for the current engine. But MIVEC is really efficeint, high hp and high torque.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the new engine 4G19 with MIVEC, or maybe higher compression ratio, it added up another 10 hp for the current engine. But MIVEC is really efficeint, high hp and high torque.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitlanevo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48155</link>
		<dc:creator>mitlanevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48155</guid>
		<description>Share platform with company like Dodge? Sounds great! As a diehard fan and supporter of Lancer Evolution, this a really a good news for me, hope that the upcoming new Lancer will be better than Impreza( both current model and upcoming model).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Share platform with company like Dodge? Sounds great! As a diehard fan and supporter of Lancer Evolution, this a really a good news for me, hope that the upcoming new Lancer will be better than Impreza( both current model and upcoming model).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingKong</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48148</link>
		<dc:creator>KingKong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48148</guid>
		<description>the 2007 Lancer shared same platform with Dodge compact MPV.
not really a new platform.

the engine could be new, possibility about 70% that Mitsu will put new engine with more power under the bay.

hope they use the same headlights as the concept car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 2007 Lancer shared same platform with Dodge compact MPV.<br />
not really a new platform.</p>
<p>the engine could be new, possibility about 70% that Mitsu will put new engine with more power under the bay.</p>
<p>hope they use the same headlights as the concept car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quest</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48135</link>
		<dc:creator>quest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48135</guid>
		<description>SoMeOnE said, I disagree with you.  Let&#039;s get 2 things straight.  

1st, Mitsubishi may be in trouble but their troubles are no where close to where P1 is.  At least, if they need help, they&#039;d sell to some other co.s and merge into something more advanced.

2ndly, a Japanese CBU Mitsubishi IS NOT A WAJA.  In terms of quality, Waja or any P1 can only dream to compare to a CBU car.  To begin with, it&#039;s not a fair comparison at all, Waja is not even comparable to the cheapest  CKD Korean.  To compare to a Japanese CBU is a joke.

People who haven&#039;t driven a Jap CBU really MAY NOT have an idea how utterly well built their car is compared to our CKDs (whatever brand), least of all a Proton.  Their quality control is SO STRICT that anything below 99% of their standards will not be passed.  Even by that standards, when they need to, they will recall cars based on batches if they find something wrong down the road.

I do not drive a CBU Lancer, but I do drive a 12 year old CBU Galant which at its age, have no dashboard creaking sounds, power windows that works like new (without creaking).  Kicks Perdana V6&#039;s butt anyday I choose and even kick 1.8GTi&#039;s butt on the highway when I so choose.  That&#039;s because their fuzzy logic technology really works and knows exactly when I want gto kick butt, all 176ps of it.

The only cars better built than Japanese CBUs are the 2 main German brands.  The other continentals are at best comparable.

The only laughable thing here is comparing a Waja against a Jap CBU, Misubishi or otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SoMeOnE said, I disagree with you.  Let&#8217;s get 2 things straight.  </p>
<p>1st, Mitsubishi may be in trouble but their troubles are no where close to where P1 is.  At least, if they need help, they&#8217;d sell to some other co.s and merge into something more advanced.</p>
<p>2ndly, a Japanese CBU Mitsubishi IS NOT A WAJA.  In terms of quality, Waja or any P1 can only dream to compare to a CBU car.  To begin with, it&#8217;s not a fair comparison at all, Waja is not even comparable to the cheapest  CKD Korean.  To compare to a Japanese CBU is a joke.</p>
<p>People who haven&#8217;t driven a Jap CBU really MAY NOT have an idea how utterly well built their car is compared to our CKDs (whatever brand), least of all a Proton.  Their quality control is SO STRICT that anything below 99% of their standards will not be passed.  Even by that standards, when they need to, they will recall cars based on batches if they find something wrong down the road.</p>
<p>I do not drive a CBU Lancer, but I do drive a 12 year old CBU Galant which at its age, have no dashboard creaking sounds, power windows that works like new (without creaking).  Kicks Perdana V6&#8217;s butt anyday I choose and even kick 1.8GTi&#8217;s butt on the highway when I so choose.  That&#8217;s because their fuzzy logic technology really works and knows exactly when I want gto kick butt, all 176ps of it.</p>
<p>The only cars better built than Japanese CBUs are the 2 main German brands.  The other continentals are at best comparable.</p>
<p>The only laughable thing here is comparing a Waja against a Jap CBU, Misubishi or otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48122</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48122</guid>
		<description>nice rims....
hahaha !
hope da car has a better engine if dey wanna compete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice rims&#8230;.<br />
hahaha !<br />
hope da car has a better engine if dey wanna compete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoMeOnE</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48109</link>
		<dc:creator>SoMeOnE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48109</guid>
		<description>gosh....i cant believe poeple are still buying the current lancer..i mean its 100 k!...and itss mechanics are virtually the same as the waja....sorry uf anyone boutght tat but i have seen some on da road and each time i see one i just laugh my balls out!..there are stupid poeple out there tat still think its diffrent..the onli good thing is it is a cbu from japan...but mitsu&#039;s not the first name tat springs to mine on superior jap build quality anyway and i dare say da waja even look more menacing as well...gosh....this model better have a better engine and fiercer looks..but wait  a min....then the evo brand will lose its exclusiveness....so dont hope for it guys..a regular lancer will never look good...even evos are startin to look bland anways....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gosh&#8230;.i cant believe poeple are still buying the current lancer..i mean its 100 k!&#8230;and itss mechanics are virtually the same as the waja&#8230;.sorry uf anyone boutght tat but i have seen some on da road and each time i see one i just laugh my balls out!..there are stupid poeple out there tat still think its diffrent..the onli good thing is it is a cbu from japan&#8230;but mitsu&#8217;s not the first name tat springs to mine on superior jap build quality anyway and i dare say da waja even look more menacing as well&#8230;gosh&#8230;.this model better have a better engine and fiercer looks..but wait  a min&#8230;.then the evo brand will lose its exclusiveness&#8230;.so dont hope for it guys..a regular lancer will never look good&#8230;even evos are startin to look bland anways&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeze</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48108</link>
		<dc:creator>freeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48108</guid>
		<description>From what I see, I think the rear lights would be thin and long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I see, I think the rear lights would be thin and long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acbc</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48096</link>
		<dc:creator>acbc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48096</guid>
		<description>Mitsubishi lacked the necessary funding... so everything they design or use will be based on something old compared to Toyota or Honda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitsubishi lacked the necessary funding&#8230; so everything they design or use will be based on something old compared to Toyota or Honda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pirate</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48093</link>
		<dc:creator>pirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48093</guid>
		<description>Darn! Just missed becoming a first poster :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn! Just missed becoming a first poster <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracks</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48091</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/08/24/more-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-spyshots/#comment-48091</guid>
		<description>Hopefully it is really a better car to compete in its segment. Mitsubishi is an ailing company and needs a breakthrough to survive. Sounds just like our Proton. Perhaps, if the car is successful Proton should use the same platform as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully it is really a better car to compete in its segment. Mitsubishi is an ailing company and needs a breakthrough to survive. Sounds just like our Proton. Perhaps, if the car is successful Proton should use the same platform as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
