<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inokom Getz 1.4 later this month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:57:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: n-drew</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-363921</link>
		<dc:creator>n-drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-363921</guid>
		<description>GETZ SE preformance wise is okay. The fitting of the sport rear and front bumper is poor. It does not fit well. It woul be much better to have it with the original bumper. Looking at the poor fitting I think RM60K plus is a bit too expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GETZ SE preformance wise is okay. The fitting of the sport rear and front bumper is poor. It does not fit well. It woul be much better to have it with the original bumper. Looking at the poor fitting I think RM60K plus is a bit too expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khairul</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-313191</link>
		<dc:creator>khairul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-313191</guid>
		<description>i already bought getz 1.4 only rm53000 on roadshow...i got GPS...getz is much better than waja...i already sold my waja for getz...although its a 1.4 engine, but the driving experience is much better than waja...getz is sound proof, the suspension is really smooth, accelaration is better, the body is much heavier and much safety than waja because the crash test NCAP is 4 star. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i already bought getz 1.4 only rm53000 on roadshow&#8230;i got GPS&#8230;getz is much better than waja&#8230;i already sold my waja for getz&#8230;although its a 1.4 engine, but the driving experience is much better than waja&#8230;getz is sound proof, the suspension is really smooth, accelaration is better, the body is much heavier and much safety than waja because the crash test NCAP is 4 star. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nextreme</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-220952</link>
		<dc:creator>nextreme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-220952</guid>
		<description>I saw this discussion in 2006. I&#039;m seeing on Getz 2008 model 1.4 GL Special Edition (SE) with no ABS and only front wheel disc break but the price RM63k++ OTR. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this discussion in 2006. I&#039;m seeing on Getz 2008 model 1.4 GL Special Edition (SE) with no ABS and only front wheel disc break but the price RM63k++ OTR. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbr900rr</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-52193</link>
		<dc:creator>cbr900rr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-52193</guid>
		<description>this car is not my cup of coffee w/o any bodykit..it will be nicer if inokom throw in a bodykit at RM58,888..hehe </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this car is not my cup of coffee w/o any bodykit..it will be nicer if inokom throw in a bodykit at RM58,888..hehe </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51502</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51502</guid>
		<description>dis car is not affordable, its expensive. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dis car is not affordable, its expensive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hazremi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51331</link>
		<dc:creator>hazremi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51331</guid>
		<description>haih,how i wish city is much more cheaper </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haih,how i wish city is much more cheaper </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domoteka</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51219</link>
		<dc:creator>domoteka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51219</guid>
		<description>of the locally rebadged foreign cars, i think inokom has done a good job at giving good quality cars at an affordable price.too bad inokom does not have the rights to the other hyundai models such as accent,sonata etc. if they rebadged the accent and sell at 40K, sure p1 p2 go bust. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of the locally rebadged foreign cars, i think inokom has done a good job at giving good quality cars at an affordable price.too bad inokom does not have the rights to the other hyundai models such as accent,sonata etc. if they rebadged the accent and sell at 40K, sure p1 p2 go bust. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan2006</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51195</link>
		<dc:creator>alan2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51195</guid>
		<description>Charger, I think the Rio is priced around RM 70K, right? 
 
Rio looks is fine with me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charger, I think the Rio is priced around RM 70K, right?</p>
<p>Rio looks is fine with me. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charger</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51188</link>
		<dc:creator>Charger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51188</guid>
		<description>alan2006, like I said, it DOES come with 4 disc brakes. Both the CBU &amp; CKD do. 
 
It&#039;s seemingly similar to the new Kia Rio already, except for the shell and minor interior. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alan2006, like I said, it DOES come with 4 disc brakes. Both the CBU &amp; CKD do.</p>
<p>It&#039;s seemingly similar to the new Kia Rio already, except for the shell and minor interior. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan2006</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51173</link>
		<dc:creator>alan2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51173</guid>
		<description>With MyVi priced at RM 50K and to protect national interests, the Getz should be priced around RM 58,888 as stated in the blog. 
 
Hopefully its not as noisy as the Daihatsu engine. Looks wise, its not as bulky too. Will certainly give MyVi a fight. 
 
I hope it comes with 4 disc brakes as the current 1.3 Getz has only two. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With MyVi priced at RM 50K and to protect national interests, the Getz should be priced around RM 58,888 as stated in the blog.</p>
<p>Hopefully its not as noisy as the Daihatsu engine. Looks wise, its not as bulky too. Will certainly give MyVi a fight.</p>
<p>I hope it comes with 4 disc brakes as the current 1.3 Getz has only two. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charger</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51168</link>
		<dc:creator>Charger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51168</guid>
		<description>Are you guys crazy? 
 
RM50k or below, where do you think MyVi would stand? This is a 1.4 with 4-disc brake and the std safety accessories. Besides, it&#039;s not even National Car status, so don&#039;t expect lower price. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you guys crazy?</p>
<p>RM50k or below, where do you think MyVi would stand? This is a 1.4 with 4-disc brake and the std safety accessories. Besides, it&#039;s not even National Car status, so don&#039;t expect lower price. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mycar_stolen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51160</link>
		<dc:creator>mycar_stolen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51160</guid>
		<description>yes better get the Waja as Proton cars all comes with more accessories... 58k for Waja with power window problem at the same same time the salesman handover the carkeys. 
 
we cant blame the car becuase of the pricing, we should also consider second hand value, buy a Waja then afetr 1 year price going down like hell, my humble advice will be make longer list of consideration not only the price at initial buy.long terms short terms satisfaction global perception respect prestigious etc etc </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes better get the Waja as Proton cars all comes with more accessories&#8230; 58k for Waja with power window problem at the same same time the salesman handover the carkeys.</p>
<p>we cant blame the car becuase of the pricing, we should also consider second hand value, buy a Waja then afetr 1 year price going down like hell, my humble advice will be make longer list of consideration not only the price at initial buy.long terms short terms satisfaction global perception respect prestigious etc etc </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-nabilll</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51117</link>
		<dc:creator>e-nabilll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51117</guid>
		<description>ya i agree if its around rm5x,xxx ,thn its a beter deal to get the waja campro..interior is nicer..biger engine..in short its a proper car la...this one absolutly should be price below rm50k...to make it make sence..bt knowing our market...noting makes sence anymore... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya i agree if its around rm5x,xxx ,thn its a beter deal to get the waja campro..interior is nicer..biger engine..in short its a proper car la&#8230;this one absolutly should be price below rm50k&#8230;to make it make sence..bt knowing our market&#8230;noting makes sence anymore&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ck</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51112</link>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51112</guid>
		<description>If they go lower and fight head one with Neo, then it will be really interesting to see. Quite similar in size and also slightly better engine capacity. 
At 58k, it still give Waja to sell on 1.6 engine. At 1.4 (which almost make little difference to 1.3), even I a non Proton Supporter will go for Waja. Another consideration is also the size of the car. 
 
Anyway, good luck to Inokom. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they go lower and fight head one with Neo, then it will be really interesting to see. Quite similar in size and also slightly better engine capacity.</p>
<p>At 58k, it still give Waja to sell on 1.6 engine. At 1.4 (which almost make little difference to 1.3), even I a non Proton Supporter will go for Waja. Another consideration is also the size of the car.</p>
<p>Anyway, good luck to Inokom. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mits27</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51108</link>
		<dc:creator>mits27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51108</guid>
		<description>With RM58k and score third in J.D. Power Malaysia Quality Study 2005, standard ABS, and driver airbag. I probably will consider this car, the exterior is okay, but the car needs better interior... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With RM58k and score third in J.D. Power Malaysia Quality Study 2005, standard ABS, and driver airbag. I probably will consider this car, the exterior is okay, but the car needs better interior&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kody</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51100</link>
		<dc:creator>kody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51100</guid>
		<description>Wahlaueh... 
 
In..No..Kom...... lack of sporty spirit.... just copy blindly..... please have some more add on values to the car.... like sport version... aerokits.... The car&#039;s outlook doesn&#039;t attract me at all. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wahlaueh&#8230;</p>
<p>In..No..Kom&#8230;&#8230; lack of sporty spirit&#8230;. just copy blindly&#8230;.. please have some more add on values to the car&#8230;. like sport version&#8230; aerokits&#8230;. The car&#039;s outlook doesn&#039;t attract me at all. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nizam80</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51096</link>
		<dc:creator>nizam80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51096</guid>
		<description>&quot;at RM58k, i will probably consider Waja&#226;&#8364;&#166; yup&#226;&#8364;&#166;not a proton supporter but I still think Waja is a better buy compare to Getz in RM55k to RM60k price range&#226;&#8364;&#166; &quot; 
 
Agreed, u can get a Manual Waja Campro with dual airbags and ABS with EBD at RM59K. 
But, this facelifted Getz looks tempting. If i can remember, it scored 4 out of 5 stars in the Euro NCAP crash test. Amazing!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;at RM58k, i will probably consider Waja&acirc;&euro;&brvbar; yup&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;not a proton supporter but I still think Waja is a better buy compare to Getz in RM55k to RM60k price range&acirc;&euro;&brvbar; &quot;</p>
<p>Agreed, u can get a Manual Waja Campro with dual airbags and ABS with EBD at RM59K.</p>
<p>But, this facelifted Getz looks tempting. If i can remember, it scored 4 out of 5 stars in the Euro NCAP crash test. Amazing!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sewell</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51092</link>
		<dc:creator>sewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51092</guid>
		<description>this car already on sale in malaysia. my house here have one blue in color.... is a nice face life. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this car already on sale in malaysia. my house here have one blue in color&#8230;. is a nice face life. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarawakguy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51091</link>
		<dc:creator>sarawakguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51091</guid>
		<description>Paul Sir, 
 
I meant putting the HYDROXENE tech into THIS car..No offence guys..just my crazy thought to minimise fuel consumption... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Sir,</p>
<p>I meant putting the HYDROXENE tech into THIS car..No offence guys..just my crazy thought to minimise fuel consumption&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mschai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51084</link>
		<dc:creator>mschai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51084</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Somemore at 58k u get a 1.6 engine. Inokom need to work on the pricing strategy a bit more. Price it at 50k would be a better bet. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Somemore at 58k u get a 1.6 engine. Inokom need to work on the pricing strategy a bit more. Price it at 50k would be a better bet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevyeoh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51080</link>
		<dc:creator>kevyeoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51080</guid>
		<description>doesn&#039;t look nice at all to me... 
interior is dull also... 
 
at RM58k, i will probably consider Waja... yup...not a proton supporter but I still think Waja is a better buy compare to Getz in RM55k to RM60k price range... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doesn&#039;t look nice at all to me&#8230;</p>
<p>interior is dull also&#8230;</p>
<p>at RM58k, i will probably consider Waja&#8230; yup&#8230;not a proton supporter but I still think Waja is a better buy compare to Getz in RM55k to RM60k price range&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkL1ghT</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51079</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkL1ghT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51079</guid>
		<description>wonder how the local hyundai with their getz&#039;s gonna feel when this is in the showrooms :p </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wonder how the local hyundai with their getz&#039;s gonna feel when this is in the showrooms :p </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51078</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51078</guid>
		<description>please stay on topic. i dont want to read any hydroxene discussion here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please stay on topic. i dont want to read any hydroxene discussion here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarawakguy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51077</link>
		<dc:creator>sarawakguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51077</guid>
		<description>Eh....? How come nobody mentioned about the &quot;new and wonderfull&quot; HYDOXENE tech.Can put inside this one paa..then everybody benefit laaa..Just a crazy thought though...(Is it?) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh&#8230;.? How come nobody mentioned about the &quot;new and wonderfull&quot; HYDOXENE tech.Can put inside this one paa..then everybody benefit laaa..Just a crazy thought though&#8230;(Is it?) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablopabla</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51074</link>
		<dc:creator>pablopabla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51074</guid>
		<description>Ermm....kalau only one model, is it still called a variant? :P No offence. Just trying to sound silly. 
 
Anyway, and on a more serious note, I think it is still affordable at below RM60,000.00 and gives the Malaysian public more choices at that price range. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ermm&#8230;.kalau only one model, is it still called a variant? <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  No offence. Just trying to sound silly.</p>
<p>Anyway, and on a more serious note, I think it is still affordable at below RM60,000.00 and gives the Malaysian public more choices at that price range. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmar_453</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51069</link>
		<dc:creator>msmar_453</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51069</guid>
		<description>let see...ummph? 
chop here ..chop there, then you got new facelifted Hyundai Getz. 
then again, chop here.. chop there... = Inokom Getz 
then again, chop more.. BELIEVE IT OR NOT .. you got NAZA BESTARI 206 
WHUAALLAAH.. the very magic of sila mata. 
Paul, can you compare side by side these 2 &quot;MAGICIAN&quot;? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let see&#8230;ummph?</p>
<p>chop here ..chop there, then you got new facelifted Hyundai Getz.</p>
<p>then again, chop here.. chop there&#8230; = Inokom Getz</p>
<p>then again, chop more.. BELIEVE IT OR NOT .. you got NAZA BESTARI 206</p>
<p>WHUAALLAAH.. the very magic of sila mata.</p>
<p>Paul, can you compare side by side these 2 &quot;MAGICIAN&quot;? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarawakguy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51068</link>
		<dc:creator>sarawakguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51068</guid>
		<description>Hey guys?..How come no turbo-diesel version coming aaa? AAiyooo...hopefully next year no increase in oil price laa...then a bit lega....a bit lighter on my wallet...( am I the 2nd?...he he..) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys?..How come no turbo-diesel version coming aaa? AAiyooo&#8230;hopefully next year no increase in oil price laa&#8230;then a bit lega&#8230;.a bit lighter on my wallet&#8230;( am I the 2nd?&#8230;he he..) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drM</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51067</link>
		<dc:creator>drM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51067</guid>
		<description>although its kinda similar to its big bro Hyundai Getz, I notice several simple, but attractive additions and as far as I am concern, the Inokom Getz entry to the market is making things very exciting indeed..  
 
but the price of slightly below 60K...heemmm...?.....but lets give it the benefit of a doubt, shall we...? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>although its kinda similar to its big bro Hyundai Getz, I notice several simple, but attractive additions and as far as I am concern, the Inokom Getz entry to the market is making things very exciting indeed.. </p>
<p>but the price of slightly below 60K&#8230;heemmm&#8230;?&#8230;..but lets give it the benefit of a doubt, shall we&#8230;? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmar_453</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51066</link>
		<dc:creator>msmar_453</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/20/inokom-getz-14-later-this-month/#comment-51066</guid>
		<description>Be the 1st!! hahaha 
looks like peugot 306.. still copy maa..!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be the 1st!! hahaha</p>
<p>looks like peugot 306.. still copy maa..!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 2019/2023 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via vcdn1.paultan.org

Served from: _ @ 2012-05-25 13:32:09 -->
