<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audi debuts new 2.8 FSI V6, 1.8 TFSI and 2.0 TFSI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:53:59 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52124</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52124</guid>
		<description>german technology rox !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>german technology rox !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cire</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52121</link>
		<dc:creator>Cire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52121</guid>
		<description>agreed. Sometimes this little monsters can out drag a fully mod civic in the qtr.mile run.

FSI is the way to go now especially with rocketing fuel prices.
Car to car comparison and similar driving style, the FSI engined Audi faired much better in fuel consumption as compared even with the A4 B6 variants with CVT Gbox.

Audi engines can be liken as the european version of Honda ,being able to compress more and more stallions into a tight engine block, and yet with only low fuel consumption needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed. Sometimes this little monsters can out drag a fully mod civic in the qtr.mile run.</p>
<p>FSI is the way to go now especially with rocketing fuel prices.<br />
Car to car comparison and similar driving style, the FSI engined Audi faired much better in fuel consumption as compared even with the A4 B6 variants with CVT Gbox.</p>
<p>Audi engines can be liken as the european version of Honda ,being able to compress more and more stallions into a tight engine block, and yet with only low fuel consumption needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleFire85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52082</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleFire85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52082</guid>
		<description>Well dont look down on kancil man.. If the kancil fitted wif a L2/L5 turbo inside.. I think it can win it in 100-300meter.. But after that loss loo.. Coz no top speed haha..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well dont look down on kancil man.. If the kancil fitted wif a L2/L5 turbo inside.. I think it can win it in 100-300meter.. But after that loss loo.. Coz no top speed haha..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtaokia</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52035</link>
		<dc:creator>engtaokia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52035</guid>
		<description>yesterday i saw a stoopid fella in kancil (with sepot ekzos) trying to race an Audi A4 at traffic light...i laugh all the way while driving home :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yesterday i saw a stoopid fella in kancil (with sepot ekzos) trying to race an Audi A4 at traffic light&#8230;i laugh all the way while driving home <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pirate</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52034</link>
		<dc:creator>pirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52034</guid>
		<description>Ingolstadt,

Your observation&#039;s right.
In Bolehland, there may be no place for the 1.8TFSI in the A4 unless it replaces the B7 1.8T (just introduced!) at the similar price level...

Whatever it may be, long live FSI + forced inductions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ingolstadt,</p>
<p>Your observation&#8217;s right.<br />
In Bolehland, there may be no place for the 1.8TFSI in the A4 unless it replaces the B7 1.8T (just introduced!) at the similar price level&#8230;</p>
<p>Whatever it may be, long live FSI + forced inductions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zgriffin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52033</link>
		<dc:creator>Zgriffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52033</guid>
		<description>You are right Charger, thanks for correcting me; myself had check several online America mag and they had stated that the engine runs smooth even putting 87 Octane fuel into it, though usage of 91 octane fuel it&#039;s advisible....it simply fasinating</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right Charger, thanks for correcting me; myself had check several online America mag and they had stated that the engine runs smooth even putting 87 Octane fuel into it, though usage of 91 octane fuel it&#8217;s advisible&#8230;.it simply fasinating</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soporific</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52032</link>
		<dc:creator>soporific</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52032</guid>
		<description>the outputs for 1.8t and 2.0t are so far apart, of course there&#039;s a justification. in fact, looking at the 2.0t figures, it&#039;s even more powerful than the 2.8 v6!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the outputs for 1.8t and 2.0t are so far apart, of course there&#8217;s a justification. in fact, looking at the 2.0t figures, it&#8217;s even more powerful than the 2.8 v6!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ingolstadt</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52026</link>
		<dc:creator>ingolstadt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52026</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Twin charged - 170hp for 1.4 liter road tax. Awesome. I wonder how the buyers of B7 1.8T would felt since the new 1,8TFSi will definitely be brought on later. But i wonder the justification over a 1.8TFSi and 2.0TFSi; ain&#039;t them a bit too close to each other?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Twin charged &#8211; 170hp for 1.4 liter road tax. Awesome. I wonder how the buyers of B7 1.8T would felt since the new 1,8TFSi will definitely be brought on later. But i wonder the justification over a 1.8TFSi and 2.0TFSi; ain&#8217;t them a bit too close to each other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pirate</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52021</link>
		<dc:creator>pirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52021</guid>
		<description>Awesome man!
But I am still drooling over VAG&#039;s 1.4L twin-charged FSI motor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome man!<br />
But I am still drooling over VAG&#8217;s 1.4L twin-charged FSI motor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charger</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52020</link>
		<dc:creator>Charger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52020</guid>
		<description>FSI has no worry of engine knocking, even without the usage of higher octane fuel. That&#039;s the beauty. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FSI has no worry of engine knocking, even without the usage of higher octane fuel. That&#8217;s the beauty. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zgriffin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52017</link>
		<dc:creator>Zgriffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/09/29/audi-debuts-new-28-fsi-v6-18-tfsi-and-20-tfsi/#comment-52017</guid>
		<description>With high compression ration of 12 to 1, usage of high octane fuel is a must. Sadly such car wouldn&#039;t happen to operate it&#039;s maximum performance here in Malaysia with lower rating of fuel octane....not to mention the shorter life span of the engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With high compression ration of 12 to 1, usage of high octane fuel is a must. Sadly such car wouldn&#8217;t happen to operate it&#8217;s maximum performance here in Malaysia with lower rating of fuel octane&#8230;.not to mention the shorter life span of the engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
