<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CitroÃ«n C-Crosser SUV announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:12:29 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xoomie</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54314</link>
		<dc:creator>Xoomie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54314</guid>
		<description>At least it looked way better than Peugeot 4007 !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least it looked way better than Peugeot 4007 !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protonGL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54302</link>
		<dc:creator>protonGL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54302</guid>
		<description>paul....
next, the c4 picasso.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paul&#8230;.<br />
next, the c4 picasso.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KL-ATR</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54264</link>
		<dc:creator>KL-ATR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54264</guid>
		<description>Outlander looks the cleanest, C-Crosser looks futuristic and 4007 is just plain ugly.

I wonder why Mitsu didn&#039;t come up with a replacement for the Airtrek Turbo. That still looks good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outlander looks the cleanest, C-Crosser looks futuristic and 4007 is just plain ugly.</p>
<p>I wonder why Mitsu didn&#8217;t come up with a replacement for the Airtrek Turbo. That still looks good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raybrig85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54219</link>
		<dc:creator>raybrig85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54219</guid>
		<description>same comment like the 4007...jijik...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same comment like the 4007&#8230;jijik&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protonGL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54214</link>
		<dc:creator>protonGL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54214</guid>
		<description>i tellin yah, people who bought this,knows what they want, they want &#039;citroen&#039;, nothin less then a citroen.

sadly on the molested mitsu body, ............but its a common practice to have this kind of cloning nowadays..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i tellin yah, people who bought this,knows what they want, they want &#8216;citroen&#8217;, nothin less then a citroen.</p>
<p>sadly on the molested mitsu body, &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;but its a common practice to have this kind of cloning nowadays..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmar_453</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54208</link>
		<dc:creator>msmar_453</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 04:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54208</guid>
		<description>I think there must be a Photoshop contest to see how many dumb variants of this Mitsubishi can be dreamed up.
Phooey!
sick!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there must be a Photoshop contest to see how many dumb variants of this Mitsubishi can be dreamed up.<br />
Phooey!<br />
sick!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarawakguy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54203</link>
		<dc:creator>sarawakguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 02:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54203</guid>
		<description>as usual...I&#039;d say...When is this bloke going to be NAZArized..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as usual&#8230;I&#8217;d say&#8230;When is this bloke going to be NAZArized..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protonGL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54202</link>
		<dc:creator>protonGL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54202</guid>
		<description>UGLY ...........yes 
mercdedes wannabe....NO
audi wannabe..............NO
bmw wannabe ............NO
immitation ..................NO

at least ugly in a fernch way, in a citroen way. (no stereotype of a common suv)

only to the fan of a citroen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UGLY &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..yes<br />
mercdedes wannabe&#8230;.NO<br />
audi wannabe&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..NO<br />
bmw wannabe &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;NO<br />
immitation &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;NO</p>
<p>at least ugly in a fernch way, in a citroen way. (no stereotype of a common suv)</p>
<p>only to the fan of a citroen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenfresh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54196</link>
		<dc:creator>kenfresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54196</guid>
		<description>Is it a trend to design ugly SUVs nowadays?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it a trend to design ugly SUVs nowadays?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wmzhaffran</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54178</link>
		<dc:creator>wmzhaffran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54178</guid>
		<description>looks better than peugeot 4007 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks better than peugeot 4007 <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DtG</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54173</link>
		<dc:creator>DtG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54173</guid>
		<description>u know, come to think of it, this car looks like a bigger and more mature (but still ugly) Berlingo. reminds me of Pokemon. Berlingo evolves into C-Crosser!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u know, come to think of it, this car looks like a bigger and more mature (but still ugly) Berlingo. reminds me of Pokemon. Berlingo evolves into C-Crosser!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54171</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54171</guid>
		<description>anyone wanna comment wat does it looks like ?
stupid ppl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone wanna comment wat does it looks like ?<br />
stupid ppl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protonGL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54168</link>
		<dc:creator>protonGL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54168</guid>
		<description>well.... that the citroen today, modern CITROEN. 
smooth and sharp,(but wide face? .......who cares its citroen)

anyway, mitsu body seemed to be well composed all around here with the CITROEN rather than the PUG (paper shredder front). 

love to see a slightly straight edge rear wheel wheel arch (rear lambo wheel arch, kinda)  as part of a strong character of citroen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230;. that the citroen today, modern CITROEN.<br />
smooth and sharp,(but wide face? &#8230;&#8230;.who cares its citroen)</p>
<p>anyway, mitsu body seemed to be well composed all around here with the CITROEN rather than the PUG (paper shredder front). </p>
<p>love to see a slightly straight edge rear wheel wheel arch (rear lambo wheel arch, kinda)  as part of a strong character of citroen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris_the_germ</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54165</link>
		<dc:creator>chris_the_germ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 05:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54165</guid>
		<description>Is there any alternative to Streamyx? I am completely fed up with it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any alternative to Streamyx? I am completely fed up with it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt Shopalot</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54164</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt Shopalot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 05:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54164</guid>
		<description>I guess the Europens should stick to what they do the best in sedan and compact car department</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the Europens should stick to what they do the best in sedan and compact car department</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SatriaGuy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54160</link>
		<dc:creator>SatriaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54160</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon man, you gotta be kidding. The Japs can&#039;t possibly design a car better than the Europeans!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon man, you gotta be kidding. The Japs can&#8217;t possibly design a car better than the Europeans!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54155</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 02:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54155</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen pics of all 3 variants; Mitsubishi Outlander looks best, C-Crosser a close second, with the 4007 at third in the looks department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen pics of all 3 variants; Mitsubishi Outlander looks best, C-Crosser a close second, with the 4007 at third in the looks department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54151</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54151</guid>
		<description>Yes, I fully agree with you DtG that the looks department have to go for the side and rear end of the car......it looks too normal.......b&#039;cos there are too many toyota, mitsubishi and other japanese cars around the market......plus some european model of SUV&#039;s and 4xwheels are all similar looking.......yuckxxx...... hope the designer department of both peug and citreon can both able to get to their boss nuckle heads that people are beginning to look at the future of cars just like hyundai is doing now on the looks department.......*way to go South Koreans!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I fully agree with you DtG that the looks department have to go for the side and rear end of the car&#8230;&#8230;it looks too normal&#8230;&#8230;.b&#8217;cos there are too many toyota, mitsubishi and other japanese cars around the market&#8230;&#8230;plus some european model of SUV&#8217;s and 4xwheels are all similar looking&#8230;&#8230;.yuckxxx&#8230;&#8230; hope the designer department of both peug and citreon can both able to get to their boss nuckle heads that people are beginning to look at the future of cars just like hyundai is doing now on the looks department&#8230;&#8230;.*way to go South Koreans!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DtG</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54146</link>
		<dc:creator>DtG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54146</guid>
		<description>this car&#039;s built on the same platform as the ugly 4007 right? because i see only minor differences... anyway this is not AS bad in the looks department. still nothing impressive though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this car&#8217;s built on the same platform as the ugly 4007 right? because i see only minor differences&#8230; anyway this is not AS bad in the looks department. still nothing impressive though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChipS</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54145</link>
		<dc:creator>ChipS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/10/28/citroen-c-crosser-suv-announced/#comment-54145</guid>
		<description>Like the color. Strong looking SUV but is the 2.2L Turbo Diesel big enough for this baby....

Paul,  similar problems over in the East with our broadband service.  *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the color. Strong looking SUV but is the 2.2L Turbo Diesel big enough for this baby&#8230;.</p>
<p>Paul,  similar problems over in the East with our broadband service.  *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
