<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5th Gear smart fortwo Crash Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 07:10:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willard</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-265145</link>
		<dc:creator>Willard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-265145</guid>
		<description>Visual after crash inspection of the Smart would elicit a question about the occupant&#039;s legs--they&#039;re not retractable and it did appear that the damage caused considerable intrusion into the under dash area of the vehicle. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visual after crash inspection of the Smart would elicit a question about the occupant&#039;s legs&#8211;they&#039;re not retractable and it did appear that the damage caused considerable intrusion into the under dash area of the vehicle. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayTseng</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-120037</link>
		<dc:creator>JayTseng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-120037</guid>
		<description>Is Smart fortwo better or the  kelisa?
can u give me some comments and advices on..advantages and disadvantages on smart fortwo, kelisa and kancil...
which will be the best choise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Smart fortwo better or the  kelisa?<br />
can u give me some comments and advices on..advantages and disadvantages on smart fortwo, kelisa and kancil&#8230;<br />
which will be the best choise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: takeshi99</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-57195</link>
		<dc:creator>takeshi99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-57195</guid>
		<description>Strange, if its so safe, why din they test it themselve instead of remote control the car.... hehehehe... Further more, what if a bus or truck whack the car from side??? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange, if its so safe, why din they test it themselve instead of remote control the car&#8230;. hehehehe&#8230; Further more, what if a bus or truck whack the car from side??? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAN</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55434</link>
		<dc:creator>DAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55434</guid>
		<description>if p1 o p2 built up like smart technology do eye of us trust it in a first place if there come out??. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if p1 o p2 built up like smart technology do eye of us trust it in a first place if there come out??. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protonGL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55432</link>
		<dc:creator>protonGL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55432</guid>
		<description>just an extension of a motorbike.... 
dont expect much of a car, 
 
but STILL stuck ia a traffic jam. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just an extension of a motorbike&#8230;.</p>
<p>dont expect much of a car,</p>
<p>but STILL stuck ia a traffic jam. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruykava</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55407</link>
		<dc:creator>ruykava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55407</guid>
		<description>chiliq: not very sure if you were referring to my comment above, but just to make clear that 3g (or 33.6m/(s^2) deceleration refers to sudden stop, not to speed itself. F = m x a </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chiliq: not very sure if you were referring to my comment above, but just to make clear that 3g (or 33.6m/(s^2) deceleration refers to sudden stop, not to speed itself. F = m x a </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiliq</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55404</link>
		<dc:creator>chiliq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55404</guid>
		<description>like they said...speed doesnt kill...sudden stop does.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like they said&#8230;speed doesnt kill&#8230;sudden stop does&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruykava</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55403</link>
		<dc:creator>ruykava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55403</guid>
		<description>actually, how come so many people believe the human body can&#039;t survive a 75mph (121 kph)  deceleration just because the program said so? Assuming 75mph to 0mph in 1 second the acceleration is only 33.6metres per second squared: around 3g, which is easily survivable as long as you are wearing a seatbelt. 
 
also you will NOT get the full force of a 75mph - 0mph deceleration at all, because the car bounces away from the wall - it is still moving after the collission. hence, the force is actually smaller. 
 
notice that the engine did not intrude the cabin - although the cabin plastics dropped off, those are very light components - the real items that could cause damage were safely handled by the structure. 
 
i would feel extremely safe in a smart as long as i buckled up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, how come so many people believe the human body can&#039;t survive a 75mph (121 kph)  deceleration just because the program said so? Assuming 75mph to 0mph in 1 second the acceleration is only 33.6metres per second squared: around 3g, which is easily survivable as long as you are wearing a seatbelt.</p>
<p>also you will NOT get the full force of a 75mph &#8211; 0mph deceleration at all, because the car bounces away from the wall &#8211; it is still moving after the collission. hence, the force is actually smaller.</p>
<p>notice that the engine did not intrude the cabin &#8211; although the cabin plastics dropped off, those are very light components &#8211; the real items that could cause damage were safely handled by the structure.</p>
<p>i would feel extremely safe in a smart as long as i buckled up. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris_the_germ</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55400</link>
		<dc:creator>chris_the_germ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55400</guid>
		<description>acbc, I thought that princess DI was not buckled up and the car crashed at 200 km/h. Moreover, the guy sitting on the front seat was buckled up and survived. I guess there is a higher chance to survive in a larger car... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>acbc, I thought that princess DI was not buckled up and the car crashed at 200 km/h. Moreover, the guy sitting on the front seat was buckled up and survived. I guess there is a higher chance to survive in a larger car&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acbc</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55394</link>
		<dc:creator>acbc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55394</guid>
		<description>Silly idiot. Just because u survive a 130kph crash doesn&#039;t mean the car is safe neither will u next time. 
 
Myself survived 3 major accidents. In 1 case, the car was a total loss. Now, I call this pure luck. Both cars do not have any airbags or side impact bars. 
 
Plus, u may not have any injuries but it will show up after 2 days. Mine did, a broken rib and bruised knee and elbow. Think again b4 u boast. 
 
Hell, even Princess Di did not survive an accident in her Merc S280 some 9 years ago. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly idiot. Just because u survive a 130kph crash doesn&#039;t mean the car is safe neither will u next time.</p>
<p>Myself survived 3 major accidents. In 1 case, the car was a total loss. Now, I call this pure luck. Both cars do not have any airbags or side impact bars.</p>
<p>Plus, u may not have any injuries but it will show up after 2 days. Mine did, a broken rib and bruised knee and elbow. Think again b4 u boast.</p>
<p>Hell, even Princess Di did not survive an accident in her Merc S280 some 9 years ago. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honda_driver</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55393</link>
		<dc:creator>honda_driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55393</guid>
		<description>dont forget &quot;carenthusiast&quot;, euro NCAP doesnt crash cars at 75mph.  Sure,the smart has a crumple zone, but i think what they meant is, its too small to be significant in absorbing energy in a 75mph crash. 
 
btw &quot;&#195;&amp;sup2;mn&#195;&#173;cp&quot;.  speed alone doesnt kill.  by saying that, you are ignoring the hundreds of other factors that contribute to fatalities in an accident.  govt&#039;s love to say that, because it helps them ignore the fact that they havent done a good enough job at driver education, road design..etc. etc. etc.  &quot;reduce speed limits, put up more speed traps, give lots of summons, generate some revenue and accident rates will drop..etc.&quot;  does it work? 
 
In the UK, they have more than 3,000 speed trap cameras on their roads (we probably only have 20 at any one time in the country, or less), yet their rate of accidents increase every year. so is speed alone the culprit? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont forget &quot;carenthusiast&quot;, euro NCAP doesnt crash cars at 75mph.  Sure,the smart has a crumple zone, but i think what they meant is, its too small to be significant in absorbing energy in a 75mph crash.</p>
<p>btw &quot;&Atilde;&amp;sup2;mn&Atilde;&shy;cp&quot;.  speed alone doesnt kill.  by saying that, you are ignoring the hundreds of other factors that contribute to fatalities in an accident.  govt&#039;s love to say that, because it helps them ignore the fact that they havent done a good enough job at driver education, road design..etc. etc. etc.  &quot;reduce speed limits, put up more speed traps, give lots of summons, generate some revenue and accident rates will drop..etc.&quot;  does it work?</p>
<p>In the UK, they have more than 3,000 speed trap cameras on their roads (we probably only have 20 at any one time in the country, or less), yet their rate of accidents increase every year. so is speed alone the culprit? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carenthusiast</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55389</link>
		<dc:creator>carenthusiast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55389</guid>
		<description>Everything is just about Physics.  
 
&#226;&#8364;&#339;The car just too small. It the doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t have a crumple zone, which would absorb the energy during collusion. A car that have a crumple zone may look like a total wreck after a collusion, but the passenger inside it would survive. 
 
A stronger car alone doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t save your life during collusion, you need a crumple zone, airbags, to delay the collusion timing which would reduce the impulsive force and save your life.&#226;&#8364; 
 
I don&#039;t think this statement was right because all modern cars have crumple zone! Despite the front end of Smart ForTwo is short, but it does contain crumple zone. If it doesn&#039;t have any crumple zone, how could it score 4 stars in EuroNCAP? If the front end is a lot more longer and contain more crumple zone, it definetely can score 5 stars. 
 
&#039;Tridion&#039; safety cage works. Because of it, Smart and the passenger inside can survive at a very high speed collision. And about the crumple zone, does anyone knows that Smart ForTwo exterior bumper &amp; body panel is made of elastic plastic so that it won&#039;t easily break and maybe these plastic act as crumple zone too. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything is just about Physics. </p>
<p>&acirc;&euro;&oelig;The car just too small. It the doesn&acirc;&euro;&trade;t have a crumple zone, which would absorb the energy during collusion. A car that have a crumple zone may look like a total wreck after a collusion, but the passenger inside it would survive.</p>
<p>A stronger car alone doesn&acirc;&euro;&trade;t save your life during collusion, you need a crumple zone, airbags, to delay the collusion timing which would reduce the impulsive force and save your life.&acirc;&euro;</p>
<p>I don&#039;t think this statement was right because all modern cars have crumple zone! Despite the front end of Smart ForTwo is short, but it does contain crumple zone. If it doesn&#039;t have any crumple zone, how could it score 4 stars in EuroNCAP? If the front end is a lot more longer and contain more crumple zone, it definetely can score 5 stars.</p>
<p>&#039;Tridion&#039; safety cage works. Because of it, Smart and the passenger inside can survive at a very high speed collision. And about the crumple zone, does anyone knows that Smart ForTwo exterior bumper &amp; body panel is made of elastic plastic so that it won&#039;t easily break and maybe these plastic act as crumple zone too. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rexis</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55388</link>
		<dc:creator>rexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55388</guid>
		<description>Yeah, above 60-70mph, whatever you drive is really doesn&#039;t matter too much anymore... maybe just the difference of firemen need to chainsaw your dead body out from the wreckage of your car, or the polis need to collect/clean up your pieces all over the accident scene. 
 
But the smarty smart really impressed me, its seriously a tough nut. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, above 60-70mph, whatever you drive is really doesn&#039;t matter too much anymore&#8230; maybe just the difference of firemen need to chainsaw your dead body out from the wreckage of your car, or the polis need to collect/clean up your pieces all over the accident scene.</p>
<p>But the smarty smart really impressed me, its seriously a tough nut. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracks</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55387</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55387</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with what &quot;i&#039;m run&quot; said and requoting his statement. 
 
&quot;The car just too small. It the doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t have a crumple zone, which would absorb the energy during collusion. A car that have a crumple zone may look like a total wreck after a collusion, but the passenger inside it would survive. 
 
A stronger car alone doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t save your life during collusion, you need a crumple zone, airbags, to delay the collusion timing which would reduce the impulsive force and save your life.&quot; 
 
Cars like Smart has its good and practical points. However, lagging a substantial front end reduces its ability to effectively absorb enough energy. Imagine what would happen to our lungs hitting the ribs or our brain hitting the skull at that speed. Our organs wouldn&#039;t be able to take the impact. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with what &quot;i&#039;m run&quot; said and requoting his statement.</p>
<p>&quot;The car just too small. It the doesn&acirc;&euro;&trade;t have a crumple zone, which would absorb the energy during collusion. A car that have a crumple zone may look like a total wreck after a collusion, but the passenger inside it would survive.</p>
<p>A stronger car alone doesn&acirc;&euro;&trade;t save your life during collusion, you need a crumple zone, airbags, to delay the collusion timing which would reduce the impulsive force and save your life.&quot;</p>
<p>Cars like Smart has its good and practical points. However, lagging a substantial front end reduces its ability to effectively absorb enough energy. Imagine what would happen to our lungs hitting the ribs or our brain hitting the skull at that speed. Our organs wouldn&#039;t be able to take the impact. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55379</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55379</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m watched the ForTwo-E Class colllission clip before, but watching this one amazes me more; I expected the ForTwo to come out of it worse. Anyway, just goes to show how hardy the car is, but I get the idea now, the car may survive, but the passengers might not. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m watched the ForTwo-E Class colllission clip before, but watching this one amazes me more; I expected the ForTwo to come out of it worse. Anyway, just goes to show how hardy the car is, but I get the idea now, the car may survive, but the passengers might not. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kacman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55376</link>
		<dc:creator>kacman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55376</guid>
		<description>man that must be hurt!  
 
yupp Amir, you&#039;re just plain lucky, someone didn&#039;t make it at 80km/h in a same model as yours, happened in front of my eyes!! so don&#039;t be too sure or cocky dude </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man that must be hurt! </p>
<p>yupp Amir, you&#039;re just plain lucky, someone didn&#039;t make it at 80km/h in a same model as yours, happened in front of my eyes!! so don&#039;t be too sure or cocky dude </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmpower</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55373</link>
		<dc:creator>bmpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55373</guid>
		<description>SMART is not so SMART. :D .. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SMART is not so SMART. <img src='http://vcdn2.paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  .. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armandd</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55370</link>
		<dc:creator>armandd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55370</guid>
		<description>at least the car frame stays intact, and that may increase the passengers&#039; chance of survival. that little car bangs into a concrete barrier which weights a few tons, of course the barrier wins hands down. if it hits a kancil, which one do u think will survive? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at least the car frame stays intact, and that may increase the passengers&#039; chance of survival. that little car bangs into a concrete barrier which weights a few tons, of course the barrier wins hands down. if it hits a kancil, which one do u think will survive? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55362</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55362</guid>
		<description>Erm, you don&#039;t normally bring a SMART to 75 mph and ram it into concrete wall now do you?  Even if conditions are right, the driver wouldn&#039;t want to bring it to such speeds on a clear road. I know I wouldn&#039;t. I wouldn&#039;t even hit 80kph in a Kancil. 
 
Bottom line; 
 
1. don&#039;t drive into walls 
2. advanced car body structures are to give you a *chance* of survival, not a guarantee </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, you don&#039;t normally bring a SMART to 75 mph and ram it into concrete wall now do you?  Even if conditions are right, the driver wouldn&#039;t want to bring it to such speeds on a clear road. I know I wouldn&#039;t. I wouldn&#039;t even hit 80kph in a Kancil.</p>
<p>Bottom line;</p>
<p>1. don&#039;t drive into walls</p>
<p>2. advanced car body structures are to give you a *chance* of survival, not a guarantee </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vague</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55355</link>
		<dc:creator>vague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55355</guid>
		<description>Amir... your time is not up yet... don&#039;t be so cocky. The Mighty might not be that forgiving next time though. congratulation btw... u were given a second chance. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amir&#8230; your time is not up yet&#8230; don&#039;t be so cocky. The Mighty might not be that forgiving next time though. congratulation btw&#8230; u were given a second chance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbljkkj</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55351</link>
		<dc:creator>cbljkkj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55351</guid>
		<description>I guess its not just the job of one safety feature to save a person&#039;s life but the combination of them all. The rigid structure of the ForTwo may be solid but the crumple zone area is still insufficient. To little mass to take away the shock impact of the crash, going around the passenger and into the rear. 
 
I guess the only moral we can really use from the story is drive safely even if there are safety features incorporated as nobody would want to go through the usage experience example in a car crash. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess its not just the job of one safety feature to save a person&#039;s life but the combination of them all. The rigid structure of the ForTwo may be solid but the crumple zone area is still insufficient. To little mass to take away the shock impact of the crash, going around the passenger and into the rear.</p>
<p>I guess the only moral we can really use from the story is drive safely even if there are safety features incorporated as nobody would want to go through the usage experience example in a car crash. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55338</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55338</guid>
		<description>buy a volvo, that box model, better </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buy a volvo, that box model, better </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmiR</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55327</link>
		<dc:creator>AmiR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55327</guid>
		<description>so the moral of this story is dont buy Smart car for RM75......just buy a Proton wira it really a good car....i have been in an accident last year on the higway with the speed of 130km/h ,  only a minor injury occured....BELIEVE ME! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so the moral of this story is dont buy Smart car for RM75&#8230;&#8230;just buy a Proton wira it really a good car&#8230;.i have been in an accident last year on the higway with the speed of 130km/h ,  only a minor injury occured&#8230;.BELIEVE ME! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-nabilll</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55323</link>
		<dc:creator>e-nabilll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55323</guid>
		<description>the end paragraph of the clip says it all...a human body cannot take such huge impacts...no mater wat solid cell ur into....ur whole body will be the crumble zone itself...can u even imagin how the driver looks like after an impact like this,,??his head probably 20meters aways from his body... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the end paragraph of the clip says it all&#8230;a human body cannot take such huge impacts&#8230;no mater wat solid cell ur into&#8230;.ur whole body will be the crumble zone itself&#8230;can u even imagin how the driver looks like after an impact like this,,??his head probably 20meters aways from his body&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megadisc</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55321</link>
		<dc:creator>megadisc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55321</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to get my self a kancil today !! !  
 
wooo hoo ! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m going to get my self a kancil today !! ! </p>
<p>wooo hoo ! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i&#039;m run</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55317</link>
		<dc:creator>i&#039;m run</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55317</guid>
		<description>The car just too small. It the doesn&#039;t have a crumple zone, which would absorb the energy during collusion. A car that have a crumple zone may look like a total wreck after a collusion, but the passenger inside it would survive. 
 
A stronger car alone doesn&#039;t save your life during collusion, you need a crumple zone, airbags, to delay the collusion timing which would reduce the impulsive force and save your life. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The car just too small. It the doesn&#039;t have a crumple zone, which would absorb the energy during collusion. A car that have a crumple zone may look like a total wreck after a collusion, but the passenger inside it would survive.</p>
<p>A stronger car alone doesn&#039;t save your life during collusion, you need a crumple zone, airbags, to delay the collusion timing which would reduce the impulsive force and save your life. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#195;&#38;sup2;mn&#38;Ati</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55311</link>
		<dc:creator>&#195;&#38;sup2;mn&#38;Ati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55311</guid>
		<description>the bottomline is speed kills! 
 
OZ gov says drop 5 save lives! and yes! its true... no matter how well the car is constructed, your body may not. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the bottomline is speed kills!</p>
<p>OZ gov says drop 5 save lives! and yes! its true&#8230; no matter how well the car is constructed, your body may not. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55308</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55308</guid>
		<description>i think airbags would be useless as well </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think airbags would be useless as well </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChipS</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55307</link>
		<dc:creator>ChipS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55307</guid>
		<description>Well Paul,  any normal passenger car going at 70mph/112kmH to 0 in 1 second would not survive unless you have a real good air-bag or if you&#039;re in a Formula 1 car.  I guess any car with a reinforce steel cage would withstand some substantial frontal impact force.  Anyways,  great illustration Paul. Thks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Paul,  any normal passenger car going at 70mph/112kmH to 0 in 1 second would not survive unless you have a real good air-bag or if you&#039;re in a Formula 1 car.  I guess any car with a reinforce steel cage would withstand some substantial frontal impact force.  Anyways,  great illustration Paul. Thks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55305</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2006/11/11/5th-gear-smart-fortwo-crash-test/#comment-55305</guid>
		<description>yes, but you as the driver and passenger would not have survived. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, but you as the driver and passenger would not have survived. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 2078/2082 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via vcdn1.paultan.org

Served from: _ @ 2012-05-25 15:57:22 -->
