Any Comment?

so what exactly is your point? What has proton parts failing under mininum quality standards got to do with recalling a vehicle?

besides, i still dont think any manufacturer will “recall” a car for a non-life threatening issues.. thats supposed to be taken care of by the warranty system, which in proton’s case, doesn’t mean anything, because a defective power window is replaced under warranty by yet another power window. If they did recall a car for a Massively high incident of power window failure, the above will still happen.

But to honda_driver, you argue on what you termed in your previous comment under “siaran tergendala” thread as “thin air” as in the event P1 recall to fix any faulty parts/components, no one in a sound mind will “condemn” P1. Your last statement look like make a comment without justification.

If P1 anounce in the public or through mass media to recall all P1 car to fix faulty window power, I am the first to praise this effort and will try to be te first as well to fix my faulty Waja power window.

When mentioned about warranty (normally apply to “minor component”) or guarantee (normally apply to “major component”), this principle apply is to gain customer confident and to show to the market that they committed to high quality products. In any manufacturing process for any products, there must be “failure” component that may defined under “normal distribution @ 95 +- 5%”, part per million (PPM) or the like that bespoke in statistician/engineering/management science principle. Warranty or guarantee is to address these “exceptional but negligible failures” that in any manufacturing process, practically there are no 100% success rate in production.

In P1 case, the rate of failure for their certain component like door handle, power window, absorber, etc is NOT fall under stringent quality control as above-mentioned but fall under minimum quality as normally practice in auto industy! Therefore, these components normally function within warranty period (i.e. 1 year) rather than design to highest quality with maximum life span (e.g. absorber or power window can be easily last more than 5 years).

those items mentioned, like power windows, door handles, gearbox..etc.. are usually problems solved by warranty claims..etc. (which of course was handled badly in proton’s case)

but of course, when proton does a recall, its condemned, but when another manufacturer does it, its “responsible”.

i think P1 did done some sort of “soft recall” before, on WAJA brakes/handbrake issues when its initial launched and also the recent SportRims issue(certain lot no. have problem)…. they just said, they will check when owner send back to do service… P1 advert a notice and also post mail to notify owners about it…

BUT for Power Window issues NEVER!!! Fragile Door Handle NEVER!!! & etc…
BUT for PERDANA Gear Box issue NEVER!!!

What else ?