<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China rips off smart fortwo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:18:04 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: honda_driver</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-62652</link>
		<dc:creator>honda_driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-62652</guid>
		<description>PGlang:  what you said about comparing proton to china car makers is pretty narrowminded.. 

unlike china, malaysia respects international law, and we do enforce IP laws.. yes.. true, we have a large market for pirated products in malaysia, but not as large as many other asian countries..  but more importantly, there is visible enforcement. if our govt. does not care about it, there will be no enforcement at all.

at the very least.. i&#039;m still proud that proton took the hard way to design and build their own car.. not everything worked out fine and dandy, but at least they didnt have to resort to blatant copying.  Its because of amount of time and money spent to build up a credible manufacturing business and R&amp;D facility, there are now several large foreign companies who want to buy into proton.   If there is no value there as many people on this forum claim, these large companies wouldn&#039;t even bother to come here, and put in a bid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PGlang:  what you said about comparing proton to china car makers is pretty narrowminded.. </p>
<p>unlike china, malaysia respects international law, and we do enforce IP laws.. yes.. true, we have a large market for pirated products in malaysia, but not as large as many other asian countries..  but more importantly, there is visible enforcement. if our govt. does not care about it, there will be no enforcement at all.</p>
<p>at the very least.. i&#8217;m still proud that proton took the hard way to design and build their own car.. not everything worked out fine and dandy, but at least they didnt have to resort to blatant copying.  Its because of amount of time and money spent to build up a credible manufacturing business and R&amp;D facility, there are now several large foreign companies who want to buy into proton.   If there is no value there as many people on this forum claim, these large companies wouldn&#8217;t even bother to come here, and put in a bid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PGlang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-62070</link>
		<dc:creator>PGlang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-62070</guid>
		<description>Chinese are smart for everything...They will make it to be number ONE eventually...Although the quality is not up to our expectation, they are improving because of their openess, competitiveness, and ceratinly the smartest way to be successful.  Malu eh.. Proton !!!  Malaysia tak boleh!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese are smart for everything&#8230;They will make it to be number ONE eventually&#8230;Although the quality is not up to our expectation, they are improving because of their openess, competitiveness, and ceratinly the smartest way to be successful.  Malu eh.. Proton !!!  Malaysia tak boleh!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intermilan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-62017</link>
		<dc:creator>intermilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-62017</guid>
		<description>agree.. whatever the arguement.. open your eyes.. 
who&#039;s in their sane mine would say this is NOT a blatant rip-off?

if they &#039;terror&#039;, try la build car with similar dimension (HxWxL) to the smartfortwo... see how it will turn out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree.. whatever the arguement.. open your eyes..<br />
who&#8217;s in their sane mine would say this is NOT a blatant rip-off?</p>
<p>if they &#8216;terror&#8217;, try la build car with similar dimension (HxWxL) to the smartfortwo&#8230; see how it will turn out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61998</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 09:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61998</guid>
		<description>the smart fortwo takes the ease of parking city car concept further, supposedly in the space that you can park one car, you can park TWO smart fortwos. can you park two kancils in the space of one car?

i had already stated that this is not so much of an engineering clone but more of a concept clone, cos the concept and outlook is copied but not the engineering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the smart fortwo takes the ease of parking city car concept further, supposedly in the space that you can park one car, you can park TWO smart fortwos. can you park two kancils in the space of one car?</p>
<p>i had already stated that this is not so much of an engineering clone but more of a concept clone, cos the concept and outlook is copied but not the engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamannegara</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61992</link>
		<dc:creator>tamannegara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 09:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61992</guid>
		<description>Paul Tan said,
(KY: what do you mean they didnt rip off the whole concept? the exterior design, the two seats, the size for ease of parking? isnâ€™t that the whole concept of the smart fortwo?)

concept with the small size for the ease of parking? 
isn&#039;t kancil also use this small size concept for the ease of 
parking?
just like we said the car concept for four, with four wheel?
so, rip off the same concept is illegal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Tan said,<br />
(KY: what do you mean they didnt rip off the whole concept? the exterior design, the two seats, the size for ease of parking? isnâ€™t that the whole concept of the smart fortwo?)</p>
<p>concept with the small size for the ease of parking?<br />
isn&#8217;t kancil also use this small size concept for the ease of<br />
parking?<br />
just like we said the car concept for four, with four wheel?<br />
so, rip off the same concept is illegal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamannegara</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61989</link>
		<dc:creator>tamannegara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 09:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61989</guid>
		<description>(again, this time with a clone of the smart fortwo, not so much of an complete engineering clone with matching doors but more of a complete rip-off of the concept.
)

complete rip-off the concept?
i though when we said copy or clone, we are talking about enginnering clone.
so if the smart fortwo is the first to come out the concept for the two,
than other maker must pay the fee for them to come out the same 
concept car for two person?
and i think many sport car also design for two person only,
isn&#039;t smart fortwo not the first to had this for two concept?
i just confuse, any one can explain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(again, this time with a clone of the smart fortwo, not so much of an complete engineering clone with matching doors but more of a complete rip-off of the concept.<br />
)</p>
<p>complete rip-off the concept?<br />
i though when we said copy or clone, we are talking about enginnering clone.<br />
so if the smart fortwo is the first to come out the concept for the two,<br />
than other maker must pay the fee for them to come out the same<br />
concept car for two person?<br />
and i think many sport car also design for two person only,<br />
isn&#8217;t smart fortwo not the first to had this for two concept?<br />
i just confuse, any one can explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pkimalaysia</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61983</link>
		<dc:creator>pkimalaysia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61983</guid>
		<description>stupid china,always pirating others product.i think they would pirate proton in the future..why not?..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stupid china,always pirating others product.i think they would pirate proton in the future..why not?..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matmoto_5125</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61958</link>
		<dc:creator>matmoto_5125</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61958</guid>
		<description>wei!

they juz copy blindly everything seyh..

back on those days i remember how they copy the motocycle design..

sigh..now it&#039;s 4 wheel&#039;s turn..

no akta hakcipta ka kt sana?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wei!</p>
<p>they juz copy blindly everything seyh..</p>
<p>back on those days i remember how they copy the motocycle design..</p>
<p>sigh..now it&#8217;s 4 wheel&#8217;s turn..</p>
<p>no akta hakcipta ka kt sana?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bolo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61957</link>
		<dc:creator>bolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61957</guid>
		<description>If they can bring it in and sell it below 20K, there will be a market for this. By the way BMW used to copy design wholesale from British Austin, the word &quot;Jerry built&quot; was a term to describe cheap and low quality German products befire WW1. And now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they can bring it in and sell it below 20K, there will be a market for this. By the way BMW used to copy design wholesale from British Austin, the word &#8220;Jerry built&#8221; was a term to describe cheap and low quality German products befire WW1. And now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transformer</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61952</link>
		<dc:creator>transformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 05:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61952</guid>
		<description>if this makes is serious copy cat, then it would come with some kind of Tridion shell...   (i mean the copy cat version of Tridion shell....may be weaker version)

still i think its shell would much stronger than a Kancil.... Kelisa.....
or Myvi ?   need to tried out one first....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if this makes is serious copy cat, then it would come with some kind of Tridion shell&#8230;   (i mean the copy cat version of Tridion shell&#8230;.may be weaker version)</p>
<p>still i think its shell would much stronger than a Kancil&#8230;. Kelisa&#8230;..<br />
or Myvi ?   need to tried out one first&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GlowJo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61933</link>
		<dc:creator>GlowJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61933</guid>
		<description>He he he... Just wonder, will Naza bring in this model to Malaysia. Smart ass ... Coffinfortwo... Anybody dare to buy? of course Malaysian like tamannegara will buy one just to commit suicide..... I don&#039;t trust China authority.. Too corrupted. If this model is available here in Malaysia, I think our car accident ranking will rise from third to first laaaa Surekecoh!!! Malaysia Boleh!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He he he&#8230; Just wonder, will Naza bring in this model to Malaysia. Smart ass &#8230; Coffinfortwo&#8230; Anybody dare to buy? of course Malaysian like tamannegara will buy one just to commit suicide&#8230;.. I don&#8217;t trust China authority.. Too corrupted. If this model is available here in Malaysia, I think our car accident ranking will rise from third to first laaaa Surekecoh!!! Malaysia Boleh!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61921</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61921</guid>
		<description>KY: what do you mean they didnt rip off the whole concept? the exterior design, the two seats, the size for ease of parking? isn&#039;t that the whole concept of the smart fortwo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KY: what do you mean they didnt rip off the whole concept? the exterior design, the two seats, the size for ease of parking? isn&#8217;t that the whole concept of the smart fortwo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtaokia</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61912</link>
		<dc:creator>engtaokia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61912</guid>
		<description>ok, let me voluntary translate some of the information there, only a few parts....
1) its powered by a 0.8L engine similar to the one found in Chery QQ, and another variant is 1.1L engine with DOHC, with multipoint fuel injection, from Bosch (memang cetak rompak Smart punya nih...)
2) this car has large full tank, FC is 4L/100km, one full tank can go nearly 1000km (wow, can fight D-Max liaw...)
3) it has pass QC test in China with 50km/h crash test....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, let me voluntary translate some of the information there, only a few parts&#8230;.<br />
1) its powered by a 0.8L engine similar to the one found in Chery QQ, and another variant is 1.1L engine with DOHC, with multipoint fuel injection, from Bosch (memang cetak rompak Smart punya nih&#8230;)<br />
2) this car has large full tank, FC is 4L/100km, one full tank can go nearly 1000km (wow, can fight D-Max liaw&#8230;)<br />
3) it has pass QC test in China with 50km/h crash test&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haroldz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61908</link>
		<dc:creator>haroldz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61908</guid>
		<description>aiyah, i can read chinese lor.
can som1 summarize 4 me,pls?
we r among top movie pirate in d world,u know dat?
malaysia boleh...
some vcd n dvd copying machine with valid license have been found to be involved in this syndicate (read it in d news ages ago).
if not 4 them, where 2 get cheap vcd n dvd?
sometime the censorship board r bunch of morons...
we have the rating so implement it..
opss, out of topic plak....
soree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aiyah, i can read chinese lor.<br />
can som1 summarize 4 me,pls?<br />
we r among top movie pirate in d world,u know dat?<br />
malaysia boleh&#8230;<br />
some vcd n dvd copying machine with valid license have been found to be involved in this syndicate (read it in d news ages ago).<br />
if not 4 them, where 2 get cheap vcd n dvd?<br />
sometime the censorship board r bunch of morons&#8230;<br />
we have the rating so implement it..<br />
opss, out of topic plak&#8230;.<br />
soree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61905</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61905</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind to own one if it is similar price as Kancil too. haha
http://www.autohome.com.cn/market/200701/17686-4.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind to own one if it is similar price as Kancil too. haha<br />
<a href="http://www.autohome.com.cn/market/200701/17686-4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.autohome.com.cn/market/200701/17686-4.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61903</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61903</guid>
		<description>hey, found this car crash test pictures with 50km/h hitting.
http://www.autohome.com.cn/news/200701/17569.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, found this car crash test pictures with 50km/h hitting.<br />
<a href="http://www.autohome.com.cn/news/200701/17569.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.autohome.com.cn/news/200701/17569.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albagmane</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61888</link>
		<dc:creator>albagmane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61888</guid>
		<description>well, i don mind to own one... if its a free one for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, i don mind to own one&#8230; if its a free one for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamannegara</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61883</link>
		<dc:creator>tamannegara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61883</guid>
		<description>some press in  china said this car  may just sale 25k yuan or about RM12k,
and it had pass the chinese crash test.

if sale in malaysia less than RM20K, sure will sale one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some press in  china said this car  may just sale 25k yuan or about RM12k,<br />
and it had pass the chinese crash test.</p>
<p>if sale in malaysia less than RM20K, sure will sale one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61876</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61876</guid>
		<description>cannot saaman those companies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cannot saaman those companies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maibatsu_thunder</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61873</link>
		<dc:creator>maibatsu_thunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61873</guid>
		<description>I thought DaimlerChrysler was selling off the Smart brand. There was news that the Smart Roadster would be produced by Nanjing as the new MG Midget, with some small changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought DaimlerChrysler was selling off the Smart brand. There was news that the Smart Roadster would be produced by Nanjing as the new MG Midget, with some small changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey1977</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey1977</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61861</guid>
		<description>Wonder will our gov allow the import of this car.

If they do, means they are supporting pirates.

Means they should allow pirated DVD as well. 

ha ha...... I wonder......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder will our gov allow the import of this car.</p>
<p>If they do, means they are supporting pirates.</p>
<p>Means they should allow pirated DVD as well. </p>
<p>ha ha&#8230;&#8230; I wonder&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICER</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61858</link>
		<dc:creator>ICER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61858</guid>
		<description>Does this China Smart For Two pass any crashing test?

Pirates Of China, look quite good... Wonder if closer look on it..the material nice or not... ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this China Smart For Two pass any crashing test?</p>
<p>Pirates Of China, look quite good&#8230; Wonder if closer look on it..the material nice or not&#8230; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protonGL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61846</link>
		<dc:creator>protonGL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61846</guid>
		<description>copy is bad and disrespectful, â€¦â€¦..but this lil, is a good city shopping roundabout, quite a boot space, if not seat at least after throwing the engine to the front,,,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>copy is bad and disrespectful, â€¦â€¦..but this lil, is a good city shopping roundabout, quite a boot space, if not seat at least after throwing the engine to the front,,,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protonGL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61845</link>
		<dc:creator>protonGL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61845</guid>
		<description>copy is bad and respectful, ........but this lil, is a good city shopping roundabout, quite a boot space, if not seat at least after throwing the engine to the front,,,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>copy is bad and respectful, &#8230;&#8230;..but this lil, is a good city shopping roundabout, quite a boot space, if not seat at least after throwing the engine to the front,,,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owaief</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61841</link>
		<dc:creator>owaief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61841</guid>
		<description>the chinese are so pathetic...crap, i am chinese...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the chinese are so pathetic&#8230;crap, i am chinese&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antaras</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61835</link>
		<dc:creator>antaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61835</guid>
		<description>ummm... what&#039;s with the rim? The PCD is definately not right for the rim design! hahaha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm&#8230; what&#8217;s with the rim? The PCD is definately not right for the rim design! hahaha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antaras</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61834</link>
		<dc:creator>antaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61834</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know bout you guys... but I think a nice &quot;copy-cat&quot; car will sell better than an all original ugly car. Marketing point of view, a success. That&#039;s why most ppl will stick to RM8 a piece DVD instead of RM100+ a piece even thought the higher end one will most definately be trouble free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know bout you guys&#8230; but I think a nice &#8220;copy-cat&#8221; car will sell better than an all original ugly car. Marketing point of view, a success. That&#8217;s why most ppl will stick to RM8 a piece DVD instead of RM100+ a piece even thought the higher end one will most definately be trouble free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bogan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61831</link>
		<dc:creator>bogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61831</guid>
		<description>ahhh the chinese did it again. i wonder when will they ever learn not to copy ppls idea or design. not only cars but everything!!!!!!! take a look around a supermarket...u see everything with weird brand name and u might mistaken it for another brand that u know of. Again at least Proton doesnt copy off ppl..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahhh the chinese did it again. i wonder when will they ever learn not to copy ppls idea or design. not only cars but everything!!!!!!! take a look around a supermarket&#8230;u see everything with weird brand name and u might mistaken it for another brand that u know of. Again at least Proton doesnt copy off ppl..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DtG</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61823</link>
		<dc:creator>DtG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61823</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t the rear lights stolen from the Hyundai Trajet??? Wow, the Chinese are SOOOO creative... Even the colour scheme is exactly thr same.... SO SAD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t the rear lights stolen from the Hyundai Trajet??? Wow, the Chinese are SOOOO creative&#8230; Even the colour scheme is exactly thr same&#8230;. SO SAD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RM</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61819</link>
		<dc:creator>RM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/01/26/china-rips-off-smart-fortwo/#comment-61819</guid>
		<description>Truth be said, it&#039;s because of the lack of IP enforcement which is why the world is flocking to China. Just the other day came by a claimed  BMW speciallist work shop (in KL) and was darned surprised to see them doing major repairs including diagnostics on a mini cooper, an E90 (new 5-Series) and E64 (new 6). The man said he gets his not so legal BMW source codes including updates from a BMW dealer cousin of his in China. I believe him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth be said, it&#8217;s because of the lack of IP enforcement which is why the world is flocking to China. Just the other day came by a claimed  BMW speciallist work shop (in KL) and was darned surprised to see them doing major repairs including diagnostics on a mini cooper, an E90 (new 5-Series) and E64 (new 6). The man said he gets his not so legal BMW source codes including updates from a BMW dealer cousin of his in China. I believe him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
