<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hyundai i30 CW Station Wagon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/hyundai-i30-wagon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/hyundai-i30-wagon/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:23:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilson</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/hyundai-i30-wagon/#comment-252601</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/16/hyundai-fd-wagon/#comment-252601</guid>
		<description>U are all wrong. The hyundai i30cw is worth a look as it is very pleasantly different! I&#039;ve test driven the car myself. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U are all wrong. The hyundai i30cw is worth a look as it is very pleasantly different! I&#039;ve test driven the car myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Hyundai Elantra Wagon to be based off i30 CW</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/hyundai-i30-wagon/#comment-83645</link>
		<dc:creator>New Hyundai Elantra Wagon to be based off i30 CW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/16/hyundai-fd-wagon/#comment-83645</guid>
		<description>[...] Related Posts: Hyundai i30 CW Station Wagon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related Posts: Hyundai i30 CW Station Wagon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrakeFader</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/hyundai-i30-wagon/#comment-82253</link>
		<dc:creator>BrakeFader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/16/hyundai-fd-wagon/#comment-82253</guid>
		<description>Paul, I think you posted the wrong pic for the 3/4 shot. That is the 5 door non-wagon version. Look at the rear side glass. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I think you posted the wrong pic for the 3/4 shot. That is the 5 door non-wagon version. Look at the rear side glass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/hyundai-i30-wagon/#comment-82216</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/16/hyundai-fd-wagon/#comment-82216</guid>
		<description>radicle rearlight design.n its long n big. not my kind of style. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>radicle rearlight design.n its long n big. not my kind of style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 707</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/hyundai-i30-wagon/#comment-82172</link>
		<dc:creator>707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/16/hyundai-fd-wagon/#comment-82172</guid>
		<description>i guess its based on the Kia Ceed wagon. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess its based on the Kia Ceed wagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/hyundai-i30-wagon/#comment-82157</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/16/hyundai-fd-wagon/#comment-82157</guid>
		<description>I agree with 4G63T DSM, they could have added more space at the rear. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with 4G63T DSM, they could have added more space at the rear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4G63T DSM</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/hyundai-i30-wagon/#comment-82128</link>
		<dc:creator>4G63T DSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/16/hyundai-fd-wagon/#comment-82128</guid>
		<description>I wonder why they even bothered. 
 
Its not that much bigger (load space) than the 5 door. I mean if you ARE going to make a wagon, make it big. Hyundai can basically tack on another foot at the back without it looking weird. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why they even bothered.</p>
<p>Its not that much bigger (load space) than the 5 door. I mean if you ARE going to make a wagon, make it big. Hyundai can basically tack on another foot at the back without it looking weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChipS</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/16/hyundai-i30-wagon/#comment-82118</link>
		<dc:creator>ChipS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/16/hyundai-fd-wagon/#comment-82118</guid>
		<description>Kia Caren&#039;s Twins.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kia Caren&#039;s Twins&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

