<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honda files Advanced VTEC patent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:20:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mits27</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82461</link>
		<dc:creator>mits27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82461</guid>
		<description>From vtec, i-vtec, now it is AVtec, maybe the next honda city going to use 
i-vtec since i-vtec is considered normal tech for honda. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From vtec, i-vtec, now it is AVtec, maybe the next honda city going to use</p>
<p>i-vtec since i-vtec is considered normal tech for honda. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topgunthang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82455</link>
		<dc:creator>topgunthang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82455</guid>
		<description>i see. hopefully the rumoured 2.5 litre vtec unit of the new integra R uses this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i see. hopefully the rumoured 2.5 litre vtec unit of the new integra R uses this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton GL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82427</link>
		<dc:creator>proton GL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82427</guid>
		<description>just before the valve lifted, 
 
--cam hit another adjustable cammer (for throtteling) then rocker arm and lastly the valve, 
 
--compare to, cam hit tappet and valve,(butterfly throttled) 
 
which is lighter, less mechanical ?,  
 
this is why M Power never use valvetronic, 
instant responce? -individual butterfly is the answer. 
 
anyway i dont see variable lift is bad, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just before the valve lifted,</p>
<p>&#8211;cam hit another adjustable cammer (for throtteling) then rocker arm and lastly the valve,</p>
<p>&#8211;compare to, cam hit tappet and valve,(butterfly throttled)</p>
<p>which is lighter, less mechanical ?, </p>
<p>this is why M Power never use valvetronic,</p>
<p>instant responce? -individual butterfly is the answer.</p>
<p>anyway i dont see variable lift is bad, </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happymeal</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82421</link>
		<dc:creator>happymeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82421</guid>
		<description>ask bmw  regardiing the camless valves. 
i think was something to do with the electrical load for so many actuators, so there need to be a total revamp to the automotive electrical system as well. 
 
Valeo and Ricardo is the keyword...i think paul did a report on this before.  
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/14/camless-solenoid-valve-engines/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/14/camless-so...&lt;/a&gt;    
 
habuk pun tade on the new C - class... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ask bmw  regardiing the camless valves.</p>
<p>i think was something to do with the electrical load for so many actuators, so there need to be a total revamp to the automotive electrical system as well.</p>
<p>Valeo and Ricardo is the keyword&#8230;i think paul did a report on this before. </p>
<p>  <a href="http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/14/camless-solenoid-valve-engines/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/14/camless-so" rel="nofollow">http://paultan.org/archives/2005/07/14/camless-so</a>&#8230;   </p>
<p>habuk pun tade on the new C &#8211; class&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charger</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82419</link>
		<dc:creator>Charger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82419</guid>
		<description>What happened to the research on camless valves? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the research on camless valves? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82410</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82410</guid>
		<description>Gosh, I&#039;ll skip the technicalities, I&#039;m interested in the results though. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, I&#039;ll skip the technicalities, I&#039;m interested in the results though. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transformer</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82400</link>
		<dc:creator>transformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82400</guid>
		<description>for an average joe, i just want to know how much EFFICIENT is this engine(power and consumption) and RELIABILITY(include maintenance cost).... 
 
and most importantly its pricing factor percentage into the car! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for an average joe, i just want to know how much EFFICIENT is this engine(power and consumption) and RELIABILITY(include maintenance cost)&#8230;.</p>
<p>and most importantly its pricing factor percentage into the car! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82392</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82392</guid>
		<description>too damn lots of tech specs! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too damn lots of tech specs! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happymeal</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82380</link>
		<dc:creator>happymeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82380</guid>
		<description>technical mumbo jumbo... nice 
 
paul, is it legal to copy n paste articles here?  
 
a lot of complex systems just to improve fuel economy and refinement. this totally removes the VTC mechanism at the pulley end, and also the hydraulic pins to engage the hot cam profile. instead replaced by electric motor actuation.  
 
this is 1 high tech single cam drivetrain...... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>technical mumbo jumbo&#8230; nice</p>
<p>paul, is it legal to copy n paste articles here? </p>
<p>a lot of complex systems just to improve fuel economy and refinement. this totally removes the VTC mechanism at the pulley end, and also the hydraulic pins to engage the hot cam profile. instead replaced by electric motor actuation. </p>
<p>this is 1 high tech single cam drivetrain&#8230;&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pheonix_comet</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82332</link>
		<dc:creator>pheonix_comet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82332</guid>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.celicas.co.uk/VVTLi.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.celicas.co.uk/VVTLi.htm&lt;/a&gt;  
 
found some info from this page </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.celicas.co.uk/VVTLi.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.celicas.co.uk/VVTLi.htm</a>  </p>
<p>found some info from this page </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pheonix_comet</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82326</link>
		<dc:creator>pheonix_comet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82326</guid>
		<description>last time i did read about TYT VVTL-i they have the moving graphic on the parts. 
at the time being the things look the same, it makes the valve open more wide. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>last time i did read about TYT VVTL-i they have the moving graphic on the parts.</p>
<p>at the time being the things look the same, it makes the valve open more wide. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exodust</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82313</link>
		<dc:creator>exodust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/17/honda-files-advanced-vtec-patent/#comment-82313</guid>
		<description>Haha, not thats some advanced stuff right there! I can&#039;t understand half of what was said </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, not thats some advanced stuff right there! I can&#039;t understand half of what was said </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 1012/1016 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via s4.paultan.org

Served from: _ @ 2012-05-26 11:27:32 -->
