<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Ford Flex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:17:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hksp</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-194738</link>
		<dc:creator>hksp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-194738</guid>
		<description>this is good, the next escalade

i want 1 and pimp it out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is good, the next escalade</p>
<p>i want 1 and pimp it out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ingolstadt</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-84243</link>
		<dc:creator>ingolstadt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-84243</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice, but that&#039;s like a complete rip off of Land Rover..... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s nice, but that&#039;s like a complete rip off of Land Rover&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83892</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83892</guid>
		<description>JUst imagine u make it white on white..........extremely awesome!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JUst imagine u make it white on white&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.extremely awesome!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hameed koyakuti</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83891</link>
		<dc:creator>hameed koyakuti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83891</guid>
		<description>Just imagine u make it black on black.........awesome!!!!!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just imagine u make it black on black&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;awesome!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infinitt</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83884</link>
		<dc:creator>Infinitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83884</guid>
		<description>Nice !! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mad_guy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83878</link>
		<dc:creator>mad_guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83878</guid>
		<description>it doesn&#039;t attract me in the 1st place...........coz look like a coffin car........but the more u look at it........the more u like it (although look like coffin car)...........interior is spacious.........hihi.....i don think we r able to own it........coz the engine capacity oledi told us......... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it doesn&#039;t attract me in the 1st place&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..coz look like a coffin car&#8230;&#8230;..but the more u look at it&#8230;&#8230;..the more u like it (although look like coffin car)&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..interior is spacious&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;hihi&#8230;..i don think we r able to own it&#8230;&#8230;..coz the engine capacity oledi told us&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haroldz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83873</link>
		<dc:creator>haroldz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83873</guid>
		<description>so boxy n very big engine 
those american.......pollute our earth but nvr admit </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so boxy n very big engine</p>
<p>those american&#8230;&#8230;.pollute our earth but nvr admit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hameed koyakuti</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83852</link>
		<dc:creator>hameed koyakuti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83852</guid>
		<description>Actually, im pimping my Ford Escape to follow this. Hehehe.........comel tak........??? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, im pimping my Ford Escape to follow this. Hehehe&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;comel tak&#8230;&#8230;..???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dj_VaniLLa</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83847</link>
		<dc:creator>Dj_VaniLLa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83847</guid>
		<description>No comment, but this is right damned good looking car... 
just imagine if i take a ride with my parent, ooohh...musti happy meh..forever..ever... 
heh...do Proton try to get along with Ford org;) just kidding... 
Hopefully soon our proton mpv will look like this...i&#039;ll buy 1 meh:) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No comment, but this is right damned good looking car&#8230;</p>
<p>just imagine if i take a ride with my parent, ooohh&#8230;musti happy meh..forever..ever&#8230;</p>
<p>heh&#8230;do Proton try to get along with Ford org;) just kidding&#8230;</p>
<p>Hopefully soon our proton mpv will look like this&#8230;i&#039;ll buy 1 meh:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normaluser</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83827</link>
		<dc:creator>normaluser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83827</guid>
		<description>Looks like a Scion xB on steroids. Overall, good effort from the designers. The interior looks very upmarket and premium. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a Scion xB on steroids. Overall, good effort from the designers. The interior looks very upmarket and premium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jazz1011</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83819</link>
		<dc:creator>jazz1011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83819</guid>
		<description>Interesting design. 
 
Very spacious interior - and loved the steering wheel. 
 
Looks more like a mutated version of between an MPV and SUV. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting design.</p>
<p>Very spacious interior &#8211; and loved the steering wheel.</p>
<p>Looks more like a mutated version of between an MPV and SUV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azrai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83811</link>
		<dc:creator>azrai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83811</guid>
		<description>Very masculine and macho. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very masculine and macho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4G63T DSM</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83803</link>
		<dc:creator>4G63T DSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83803</guid>
		<description>LOL 
 
&quot;armandd said, 
April 27, 2007 @ 12:17 am  
 
~ kereta mayat ~&quot; 
 
What sort of mentality is this? 
 
 
Manufacturers are going back to Wagons as a more practical means of people carriers. The fashion of SUVs were so yesterday, as people learn the reality of poor driving dynamics, horrendous fuel consumption, expensive maintenance and to be honest, not that much more space than a hatchback or wagon.  
 
Sport/performance wagons are en vogue nowadays (credit to be given to the Volvo 850T5). Unfortunately just not in Malaysia, as as our friend puts it, quite clearly does not see or appreciate the utility and practicality of a wagon. 
 
As for the number of seats, I&#039;m sure Ford has bench seat options for the 2nd row on other trim levels. Following standard Ford modle nomenclature, the &quot;captains&quot; chairs are for the &quot;Limited&quot; trim level, SE Trims will probably have bench for the 2nd row. 
 
 And yes, it does look like an upsized Mini, or a downsized Range Rover depending on how you look at it. 
 
Weird that no one has mentioned the Chrysler Pacifica (although that is nowhere near low and sleek), which was one of the non-minivan passenger orientated vehicle. We also have the Mercedes R Class, and if we go further back, older station wagons from Volvo, Benz, Ford all had 3rd row options, (abeit rear facing) for thier Stationwagons. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL</p>
<p>&quot;armandd said,</p>
<p>April 27, 2007 @ 12:17 am </p>
<p>~ kereta mayat ~&quot;</p>
<p>What sort of mentality is this?</p>
<p>Manufacturers are going back to Wagons as a more practical means of people carriers. The fashion of SUVs were so yesterday, as people learn the reality of poor driving dynamics, horrendous fuel consumption, expensive maintenance and to be honest, not that much more space than a hatchback or wagon. </p>
<p>Sport/performance wagons are en vogue nowadays (credit to be given to the Volvo 850T5). Unfortunately just not in Malaysia, as as our friend puts it, quite clearly does not see or appreciate the utility and practicality of a wagon.</p>
<p>As for the number of seats, I&#039;m sure Ford has bench seat options for the 2nd row on other trim levels. Following standard Ford modle nomenclature, the &quot;captains&quot; chairs are for the &quot;Limited&quot; trim level, SE Trims will probably have bench for the 2nd row.</p>
<p> And yes, it does look like an upsized Mini, or a downsized Range Rover depending on how you look at it.</p>
<p>Weird that no one has mentioned the Chrysler Pacifica (although that is nowhere near low and sleek), which was one of the non-minivan passenger orientated vehicle. We also have the Mercedes R Class, and if we go further back, older station wagons from Volvo, Benz, Ford all had 3rd row options, (abeit rear facing) for thier Stationwagons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: familyman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83765</link>
		<dc:creator>familyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83765</guid>
		<description>hahahahaha 
 
sweet.... bling me on!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahahaha</p>
<p>sweet&#8230;. bling me on!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Lee</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83763</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83763</guid>
		<description>im getting bored with honda oddyseys&#039;s and estimas, we need something new 
 
i see this as a low-rider suv, like a wide range rover 
 
just not as boring as i see the japanese rides on the road </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im getting bored with honda oddyseys&#039;s and estimas, we need something new</p>
<p>i see this as a low-rider suv, like a wide range rover</p>
<p>just not as boring as i see the japanese rides on the road</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toxicboy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83757</link>
		<dc:creator>toxicboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83757</guid>
		<description>modern and also old skool! awesome.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>modern and also old skool! awesome..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armandd</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83756</link>
		<dc:creator>armandd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83756</guid>
		<description>~ kereta mayat ~ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~ kereta mayat ~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 707</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83754</link>
		<dc:creator>707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83754</guid>
		<description>very 70s </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very 70s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motherker</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83750</link>
		<dc:creator>motherker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83750</guid>
		<description>stretched range rover.. lolz.. 
the dash seems to sport a close resemblance to the volvo dash.. 
 
 
btw, is 3.5l gonna be enuff to pull that massive amount of metal?? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stretched range rover.. lolz..</p>
<p>the dash seems to sport a close resemblance to the volvo dash..</p>
<p>btw, is 3.5l gonna be enuff to pull that massive amount of metal??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transformer</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83746</link>
		<dc:creator>transformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83746</guid>
		<description>Its so grand!   So large! 
 
but still prefer a V70(boxy type).. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its so grand!   So large!</p>
<p>but still prefer a V70(boxy type)..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ukexpat</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83745</link>
		<dc:creator>ukexpat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83745</guid>
		<description>Ford heads back to the 50s - jeez that thing is ugly. One more nail in the coffin. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford heads back to the 50s &#8211; jeez that thing is ugly. One more nail in the coffin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83743</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83743</guid>
		<description>Is this an American model? Cause it looks like one. I like the interior a lot, really seems comfortable, I feel like hugging the thick B and C pillars to sleep :p Hope this gets here soon, we badly need variety here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this an American model? Cause it looks like one. I like the interior a lot, really seems comfortable, I feel like hugging the thick B and C pillars to sleep :p Hope this gets here soon, we badly need variety here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83740</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83740</guid>
		<description>i freaki&#039;n like it! adore the boxy look........wished it would come here...... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i freaki&#039;n like it! adore the boxy look&#8230;&#8230;..wished it would come here&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drM</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83732</link>
		<dc:creator>drM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83732</guid>
		<description>you know what this is, dont you? 
 
this is the next escalade.  
 
soon, all the black people, and footballers will buy that. another escalade. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know what this is, dont you?</p>
<p>this is the next escalade. </p>
<p>soon, all the black people, and footballers will buy that. another escalade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevyeoh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83724</link>
		<dc:creator>kevyeoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83724</guid>
		<description>wah lau eh...ugly ugly ugly !!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wah lau eh&#8230;ugly ugly ugly !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83721</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83721</guid>
		<description>looks nice, but I think drag coefficient is nothing like the honda :P </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks nice, but I think drag coefficient is nothing like the honda <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armandd</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83720</link>
		<dc:creator>armandd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83720</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m sceptical about the &#039;driving dynamics of a sedan&#039; claim.. heheh </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#039;m sceptical about the &#039;driving dynamics of a sedan&#039; claim.. heheh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eezarm</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83719</link>
		<dc:creator>eezarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83719</guid>
		<description>eh, i counted, there are only 6 seat in this car... 
where&#039;s the other one? 
thought this is a 7 seater car/mpv </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eh, i counted, there are only 6 seat in this car&#8230;</p>
<p>where&#039;s the other one?</p>
<p>thought this is a 7 seater car/mpv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverfish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83718</link>
		<dc:creator>silverfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83718</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a Range Rover design ripoff if I&#039;ve ever seen one. But, then again Ford do own Land Rover. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s a Range Rover design ripoff if I&#039;ve ever seen one. But, then again Ford do own Land Rover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eezarm</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83717</link>
		<dc:creator>eezarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/04/26/ford-flex/#comment-83717</guid>
		<description>To me, the design is good 
it looks like a Mini Cooper + Range Rover 
Interior is simple but elegance 
Pity, only 6 ppl can fit in it 
 
hey paul, saw an article bout u in a magazine just now. 
bout ur blog huh?  
cool... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, the design is good</p>
<p>it looks like a Mini Cooper + Range Rover</p>
<p>Interior is simple but elegance</p>
<p>Pity, only 6 ppl can fit in it</p>
<p>hey paul, saw an article bout u in a magazine just now.</p>
<p>bout ur blog huh? </p>
<p>cool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

