Comments on: F1 cars to use 2.2 liter turbocharged V6 in 2011? http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/ Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:58:17 +0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Christian Pandolfi http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-234307 Christian Pandolfi Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:41:32 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-234307 [quote comment="87994"]The turbo advantage is probably of getting the max torque at lower RPMs & better acceleration, but compromised with turbo lag. I'm not sure if turbo engines consumes more fuel per km compared to the N.A. ones. But I like the idea of having the turbo boost like the A1 GP.. make it some kinda of NOS boost like those underground sprint races.[/quote] Variable Turbine Geometry VTG, kicks the Turbo lag Less flow the intake gets smaller, the gas flux is constant. so there is no noticeable Turbo lag anymore, VTG are used in Porsches and such cars. [quote comment="87994"]The turbo advantage is probably of getting the max torque at lower RPMs & better acceleration, but compromised with turbo lag. I’m not sure if turbo engines consumes more fuel per km compared to the N.A. ones. But I like the idea of having the turbo boost like the A1 GP.. make it some kinda of NOS boost like those underground sprint races.[/quote]

Variable Turbine Geometry VTG, kicks the Turbo lag
Less flow the intake gets smaller, the gas flux is constant. so there is no noticeable Turbo lag anymore,
VTG are used in Porsches and such cars.

]]> By: LittleFire85 http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88535 LittleFire85 Thu, 24 May 2007 11:10:27 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88535 Err.. i mean the rotary engine durability is not as well as V6.. and the new rules u see 1 engine for 5 races... So anything spoils on the engine must be replace with spare parts or repair it.. Rotary is not an easy thing to do with, so with the expertise of man power is less.. and the fuel rotary using in race, i think is not the same petrol other racer used. I think they use aeroplane / helicopter fuel, since rotary is from air craft.. the expenses is more then V6.. And i think the F1 team management wont allowed other kind of engine to compete, becoz it is unfair for others who don't have this technology to race.. Err.. i mean the rotary engine durability is not as well as V6.. and the new rules u see 1 engine for 5 races… So anything spoils on the engine must be replace with spare parts or repair it.. Rotary is not an easy thing to do with, so with the expertise of man power is less.. and the fuel rotary using in race, i think is not the same petrol other racer used. I think they use aeroplane / helicopter fuel, since rotary is from air craft.. the expenses is more then V6.. And i think the F1 team management wont allowed other kind of engine to compete, becoz it is unfair for others who don’t have this technology to race..

]]> By: Illuminate http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88514 Illuminate Thu, 24 May 2007 09:06:54 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88514 Seriously, bring back the ground effect cars.. xD Nah.. Not possible they'll grant this.. Maybe we should hope that some genius comes around and suggests a great idea to make the sport more competitive.. It is just too boring now. Seriously, bring back the ground effect cars.. xD

Nah.. Not possible they’ll grant this.. Maybe we should hope that some genius comes around and suggests a great idea to make the sport more competitive..

It is just too boring now.

]]> By: PTAllTheBest http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88400 PTAllTheBest Wed, 23 May 2007 20:54:15 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88400 they will use high efficient turbocharger and supercharger in the future. at the same time elimination on ABS and also traction control so the f1 car will be more depend on the driver's skill. and also the tyres will be using 5 groove instead of current 4. back to the 80s era when the honda turbo engine was dominating the whole f1 season before it was banned they will use high efficient turbocharger and supercharger in the future.
at the same time elimination on ABS and also traction control so the f1 car will be more depend on the driver’s skill.
and also the tyres will be using 5 groove instead of current 4.

back to the 80s era when the honda turbo engine was dominating the whole f1 season before it was banned

]]> By: w_lighter http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88232 w_lighter Tue, 22 May 2007 11:28:47 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88232 Erm.. i dun think in F1 they will hav spare part problem ... hahahaha Erm.. i dun think in F1 they will hav spare part problem … hahahaha

]]> By: LittleFire85 http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88156 LittleFire85 Tue, 22 May 2007 02:15:29 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88156 But the rotary FC might be worst then the V6.. rotary are famous for worst FC.. if too much time on fueling.. i think it will still loss compare to V6.. And the rotary engine is hard to fix compare to V6, spare parts are hard to replace.. But the rotary FC might be worst then the V6.. rotary are famous for worst FC.. if too much time on fueling.. i think it will still loss compare to V6.. And the rotary engine is hard to fix compare to V6, spare parts are hard to replace..

]]> By: w_lighter http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88120 w_lighter Mon, 21 May 2007 20:25:56 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88120 Let turbocharged rotary engine in and i bet it will pwn all... Let turbocharged rotary engine in and i bet it will pwn all…

]]> By: aksMs http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88118 aksMs Mon, 21 May 2007 17:37:04 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88118 They use to have 1.5 litre engines so what's wrong with the 2.2 V6? It doesn't matter really. Those engineers would still manage to make the car go faster every year. Engine is not an issue. F1 gets bored because it only went down to pit strategy to win a race. I'm going along with Illuminate on this. They should stop limiting the drivers. Banning the electronics is another way to go. Heck, I miss the day when drivers use their driving skills launching off the starting grid instead of launch control. They use to have 1.5 litre engines so what’s wrong with the 2.2 V6? It doesn’t matter really. Those engineers would still manage to make the car go faster every year.

Engine is not an issue. F1 gets bored because it only went down to pit strategy to win a race. I’m going along with Illuminate on this. They should stop limiting the drivers.

Banning the electronics is another way to go. Heck, I miss the day when drivers use their driving skills launching off the starting grid instead of launch control.

]]> By: Illuminate http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88114 Illuminate Mon, 21 May 2007 14:02:53 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88114 Ridiculous. The teams should just abandon FIA and create their own series, I'd support them, Bernie and Mad Max is truly idiotic. A1GP is the alternative if we are talking about boost button's and limited engine power, F1 is never truly safe, even with all sorts of protection. And to limit the cars is totally defeating the purpose of F1, I can't stop cursing, but then, I'm not in a position to say anything at all.. What to do? - Aihz.. Turbos are welcome but please don't limit the cars anymore, sure, set a rule and that's it. Further improvements are unstoppable, and it is only inevitable that the rules cannot make the cars slower, but speed aside, we need competition! - The current aerodynamics rule in F1 is limiting the driver's overtaking chances, and making the show boring, bring back the slicks, abolish the grooves, or provide an even better competitive tyre for the drivers to race in.. Limit aerodynamic developments yes, but please give the drivers more mechanical grip so they can do their job which we want to see, overtaking, defensive driving, wheel to wheel driving. - I don't want to see races won by pit stop strategies alone, although that plays a major part too.. But one thing, the banning of electronics, is what I fully support, and I really wanna see the 1979 French GP relived, too bad Gilles Villeneuve passed away before my time.. Ridiculous. The teams should just abandon FIA and create their own series, I’d support them, Bernie and Mad Max is truly idiotic.

A1GP is the alternative if we are talking about boost button’s and limited engine power, F1 is never truly safe, even with all sorts of protection. And to limit the cars is totally defeating the purpose of F1, I can’t stop cursing, but then, I’m not in a position to say anything at all.. What to do? – Aihz..

Turbos are welcome but please don’t limit the cars anymore, sure, set a rule and that’s it. Further improvements are unstoppable, and it is only inevitable that the rules cannot make the cars slower, but speed aside, we need competition! – The current aerodynamics rule in F1 is limiting the driver’s overtaking chances, and making the show boring, bring back the slicks, abolish the grooves, or provide an even better competitive tyre for the drivers to race in..

Limit aerodynamic developments yes, but please give the drivers more mechanical grip so they can do their job which we want to see, overtaking, defensive driving, wheel to wheel driving. – I don’t want to see races won by pit stop strategies alone, although that plays a major part too..

But one thing, the banning of electronics, is what I fully support, and I really wanna see the 1979 French GP relived, too bad Gilles Villeneuve passed away before my time..

]]> By: mystvearn http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88109 mystvearn Mon, 21 May 2007 12:54:57 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88109 Will this mean the cars will be more slower than usual? 2020 the cars will run on batteries? I understand what he is thinking, but I am not sure I like it. V6 2.2l is relevent with normal cars, maybe honda will just put i-vtech engine in it, but unline seeing a car blistering pass you, you will look the safety car being faster than the race cars... Will this mean the cars will be more slower than usual? 2020 the cars will run on batteries? I understand what he is thinking, but I am not sure I like it. V6 2.2l is relevent with normal cars, maybe honda will just put i-vtech engine in it, but unline seeing a car blistering pass you, you will look the safety car being faster than the race cars…

]]> By: transformer http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88107 transformer Mon, 21 May 2007 12:40:08 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88107 for the earth, BIO FUEL would be used for the next coming engine! BRAVO FIA!!! Turbo / Supercharged also welcome!!! for the earth, BIO FUEL would be used for the next coming engine!

BRAVO FIA!!!

Turbo / Supercharged also welcome!!!

]]> By: cbljkkj http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88097 cbljkkj Mon, 21 May 2007 09:26:39 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88097 Support turbocharging, support recycling wasted exhaust gases to spin fins to force induct air into engines lol. Turbocharging is a great way of utilizing fuel in comparison to NA methods. Thats why they were built in the first place, to aid heavy vehicles such as trucks, lorries buses to make more power, not for powering race cars at the beginning. It so happened that it was the cheapest and most conventional way that car makers began applying turbochargers to cars to maximize fuel efficiency in cars such as Volvos and Mercedes Benz's Support turbocharging, support recycling wasted exhaust gases to spin fins to force induct air into engines lol.

Turbocharging is a great way of utilizing fuel in comparison to NA methods. Thats why they were built in the first place, to aid heavy vehicles such as trucks, lorries buses to make more power, not for powering race cars at the beginning.

It so happened that it was the cheapest and most conventional way that car makers began applying turbochargers to cars to maximize fuel efficiency in cars such as Volvos and Mercedes Benz’s

]]> By: cosmohybrid http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88094 cosmohybrid Mon, 21 May 2007 09:05:11 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88094 i remember back in 1987, the honda f1 team was using a 1.5L six cylinder turbocharged engine running 4 bar boost which generate close to 1000hp... in fact by using the turbo, fuel efficiency actually improved because of higher density of o2 in the airflow forced feed by the turbo which leads to better combustion in which translate to better power output.. eventually FIA decided to ban those turboed engine because even by restricting the boost and fuel to bring the turboed engine down to 600hp, it still beat a 3L NA engine with no air or fuel restriction by a distance.. yeah.. TURBO POWER...! i remember back in 1987, the honda f1 team was using a 1.5L six cylinder turbocharged engine running 4 bar boost which generate close to 1000hp…
in fact by using the turbo, fuel efficiency actually improved because of higher density of o2 in the airflow forced feed by the turbo which leads to better combustion in which translate to better power output.. eventually FIA decided to ban those turboed engine because even by restricting the boost and fuel to bring the turboed engine down to 600hp, it still beat a 3L NA engine with no air or fuel restriction by a distance.. yeah.. TURBO POWER…!

]]> By: osh_kosh http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88093 osh_kosh Mon, 21 May 2007 09:00:00 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88093 btw, all wheel drive F1 cars??? that's interesting... hmmm... btw, all wheel drive F1 cars??? that’s interesting… hmmm…

]]> By: osh_kosh http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88092 osh_kosh Mon, 21 May 2007 08:56:30 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88092 hondadriver said, May 21, 2007 @ 12:04 pm "the 1.5litre turbo cars of the past used to make more than 1000bhp in qualifying trim. no matter what the regulations are, F1 will never really be a “win today, sell tommorow” concept. I’m pretty sure they will still continue to push the boundaries of technology regardless of the restrictions. Even with tyre, testing, engine, etc. restrictions today, F1 cars are still lapping faster and faster than before." u r absolutely right.... I'm totally agree with u on that :) hondadriver said,
May 21, 2007 @ 12:04 pm

“the 1.5litre turbo cars of the past used to make more than 1000bhp in qualifying trim.

no matter what the regulations are, F1 will never really be a “win today, sell tommorow” concept. I’m pretty sure they will still continue to push the boundaries of technology regardless of the restrictions. Even with tyre, testing, engine, etc. restrictions today, F1 cars are still lapping faster and faster than before.”

u r absolutely right…. I’m totally agree with u on that :)

]]> By: hondadriver http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88087 hondadriver Mon, 21 May 2007 07:49:12 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88087 The article is about future technical regulations governing F1.. No comparison whatsoever with A1GP has been drawn, what has those things mentioned in the article have anything to do with A1GP??!!?, they are totally different types of racing. PUshing the boundaries of technology will always be a hallmark of F1. if the F1 bosses say all cars will use battery powered cars, I'm pretty darned sure the engineers will come up with the fastest most radical battery powered cars the world has seen and it would probably be as quick as F1 cars of the past. Thats the difference with the other race formula as compared with F1. They will always come up with new things to adapt to the rules. The article is about future technical regulations governing F1.. No comparison whatsoever with A1GP has been drawn, what has those things mentioned in the article have anything to do with A1GP??!!?, they are totally different types of racing.

PUshing the boundaries of technology will always be a hallmark of F1. if the F1 bosses say all cars will use battery powered cars, I’m pretty darned sure the engineers will come up with the fastest most radical battery powered cars the world has seen and it would probably be as quick as F1 cars of the past. Thats the difference with the other race formula as compared with F1. They will always come up with new things to adapt to the rules.

]]> By: nmh http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88081 nmh Mon, 21 May 2007 07:21:52 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88081 2.0 is enuf i think for turbo or supercharger or maybe twincharger.....and make it V8, sounds cool.....add some rule to manufacture long lasting engine components....we can get F1 halfcut after each season hehe 2.0 is enuf i think for turbo or supercharger or maybe twincharger…..and make it V8, sounds cool…..add some rule to manufacture long lasting engine components….we can get F1 halfcut after each season hehe

]]> By: StingRayINC http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88074 StingRayINC Mon, 21 May 2007 07:04:27 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88074 Hmm i think it is good for the environment, but when we mention about F1 in my mind "SPEED and POWER" come first. If they gonna make F1 almost similar to A1GP. I think i'll switch to WTCC instead. Hmm i think it is good for the environment, but when we mention about F1 in my mind “SPEED and POWER” come first. If they gonna make F1 almost similar to A1GP. I think i’ll switch to WTCC instead.

]]> By: armandd http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88051 armandd Mon, 21 May 2007 04:49:45 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88051 with 2.2l turbocharged motor and AWD the cars will be too fast to be seen by anyone.. with 2.2l turbocharged motor and AWD the cars will be too fast to be seen by anyone..

]]> By: ybng http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88050 ybng Mon, 21 May 2007 04:48:13 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88050 If that is the case, we have A1GP already. Why ? If that is the case, we have A1GP already. Why ?

]]> By: hondadriver http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88045 hondadriver Mon, 21 May 2007 04:04:46 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88045 the 1.5litre turbo cars of the past used to make more than 1000bhp in qualifying trim. no matter what the regulations are, F1 will never really be a "win today, sell tommorow" concept. I'm pretty sure they will still continue to push the boundaries of technology regardless of the restrictions. Even with tyre, testing, engine, etc. restrictions today, F1 cars are still lapping faster and faster than before. the 1.5litre turbo cars of the past used to make more than 1000bhp in qualifying trim.

no matter what the regulations are, F1 will never really be a “win today, sell tommorow” concept. I’m pretty sure they will still continue to push the boundaries of technology regardless of the restrictions. Even with tyre, testing, engine, etc. restrictions today, F1 cars are still lapping faster and faster than before.

]]> By: proton GL http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88043 proton GL Mon, 21 May 2007 03:59:44 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88043 one of the challange, to design a long tiny lightweight superstrong nortn to south shaft. one of the challange, to design a long tiny lightweight superstrong nortn to south shaft.

]]> By: Hikaru http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88032 Hikaru Mon, 21 May 2007 03:10:32 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88032 ab has a point. How do u keep the car low and still have a drive shaft to the front to spin the front wheels? The engineers ingenuinity should have a solution to that but what's this all about "win today, sell tomorrow?". Why is F1 bowing down to the marketing boffins? We need the sound and the technical excellence to attract us to watch the sport and not the "I can buy one too" attraction or "this is what my car can do" because ur car can't unless u shell out exhorbitant amount of money. What is the point of making the engine smaller?Oh so Max Mosley can make more money out of commercials.......wait isn't that Bernie ? ab has a point. How do u keep the car low and still have a drive shaft to the front to spin the front wheels? The engineers ingenuinity should have a solution to that but what’s this all about “win today, sell tomorrow?”. Why is F1 bowing down to the marketing boffins? We need the sound and the technical excellence to attract us to watch the sport and not the “I can buy one too” attraction or “this is what my car can do” because ur car can’t unless u shell out exhorbitant amount of money.

What is the point of making the engine smaller?Oh so Max Mosley can make more money out of commercials…….wait isn’t that Bernie ?

]]> By: siputt http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88030 siputt Mon, 21 May 2007 03:08:08 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88030 at the end of the day...f1 will using flinstone tech hahahaha at the end of the day…f1 will using flinstone tech hahahaha

]]> By: BrakeFader http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88027 BrakeFader Mon, 21 May 2007 02:30:36 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88027 What a regulation. I guess it will challange manufacturers to crack their heads again with the new engine restrictions. In future, we might expect 1.8L I4, 1.4L I4 then who knows 0.6L I3? Can't imagine if they impose K-car restrictions on F1 in future. 660cc Ferrari? What a regulation. I guess it will challange manufacturers to crack their heads again with the new engine restrictions. In future, we might expect 1.8L I4, 1.4L I4 then who knows 0.6L I3? Can’t imagine if they impose K-car restrictions on F1 in future. 660cc Ferrari?

]]> By: sxe10r http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88022 sxe10r Mon, 21 May 2007 01:59:55 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88022 The F1 using the V6 2.2 Turbocharge ??? enough to race ??? actually the F1 now using what type of engine ??? i really dunno ?? it is V12 engine in ferrali ? woh 2.5 bars ... sure large turbo man ..... It is the Mitsubishi 6A10 1.6 V6 nice to tune it up wif supercharge or Twin turbo ??? ... think to try it ... The F1 using the V6 2.2 Turbocharge ??? enough to race ??? actually the F1 now using what type of engine ??? i really dunno ?? it is V12 engine in ferrali ?
woh 2.5 bars … sure large turbo man ….. It is the Mitsubishi 6A10 1.6 V6 nice to tune it up wif supercharge or Twin turbo ??? … think to try it …

]]> By: cbljkkj http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88020 cbljkkj Mon, 21 May 2007 01:57:01 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88020 Its will be good to see that F1 is finally going back to turbo-charging their cars. normaluser: They would probably implement such technologies to the turbine such as VTG (Variable Turbine Geometry) available in such cars as the new Porsche 911 Turbo. Ricc: They would probably limit the rev limit to 10,000RPM due to the fact that they are running high compression pistons with turbochargers. Too high an RPM pull will cause unsurmountable engine and turbine damage over prolonged periods of time. Plus i think at 10,000 RPM and turbocharging, it would achieve the same amount or even exceed torque and horsepower than revving 12,000 RPM on the current 2.5Litre V8s. Its will be good to see that F1 is finally going back to turbo-charging their cars.

normaluser:

They would probably implement such technologies to the turbine such as VTG (Variable Turbine Geometry) available in such cars as the new Porsche 911 Turbo.

Ricc:

They would probably limit the rev limit to 10,000RPM due to the fact that they are running high compression pistons with turbochargers. Too high an RPM pull will cause unsurmountable engine and turbine damage over prolonged periods of time.

Plus i think at 10,000 RPM and turbocharging, it would achieve the same amount or even exceed torque and horsepower than revving 12,000 RPM on the current 2.5Litre V8s.

]]> By: sxe10r http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88018 sxe10r Mon, 21 May 2007 01:51:37 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88018 The F1 using the V6 2.2 Turbocharge ??? enough to race ??? actually the F1 now using what type of engine ??? i really dunno ?? it is V12 engine in ferrali ? woh 2.5 bars ... sure large turbo man ..... It is the Mitsubishi 6A10 1.6 V6 nice to tune it up wif supercharge or Twin turbo ??? ... think to try it The F1 using the V6 2.2 Turbocharge ??? enough to race ??? actually the F1 now using what type of engine ??? i really dunno ?? it is V12 engine in ferrali ?
woh 2.5 bars … sure large turbo man ….. It is the Mitsubishi 6A10 1.6 V6 nice to tune it up wif supercharge or Twin turbo ??? … think to try it

]]> By: ab http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88017 ab Mon, 21 May 2007 01:46:24 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88017 all wheel drive? how do you get a driveshaft to the from wheels of a formula car??? all wheel drive? how do you get a driveshaft to the from wheels of a formula car???

]]> By: siputt http://paultan.org/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88016 siputt Mon, 21 May 2007 01:46:19 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/21/f1-cars-to-use-22-liter-turbocharged-v6-in-2011/#comment-88016 2.2 turbocharge with all wheel drive?...WTF, why just stop f1 and just bring rally car to the track...crazy max 2.2 turbocharge with all wheel drive?…WTF, why just stop f1 and just bring rally car to the track…crazy max

]]>