<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 Suzuki Swift Facelift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: danielk</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-94997</link>
		<dc:creator>danielk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-94997</guid>
		<description>3 years ago when I saw the tail lights on the swift I thought they were just begging for led&#039;s. If anything the rounded style taillight on the swift sport would have looked better and they could have tinted the sports to differentiate them like they did with the Astra. The indicators on the mirrors are a nice touch though. The thing that annoys me about the swift that hasnâ€™t changed is the arm rests on the doors. They look like an afterthought that was clipped onto the door jutting outwards with no attempt to integrate them. They&#039;re hard, too small and uncomfortable. Overall the car is great and sells like hotcakes in Australia. Problem is that if I bought one Iâ€™d probably spend $2000 on accessories like cruise control, premium sound etc. With all the other kit available like automatic air conditioning and upgraded trims and highlights we miss out on they really should consider a 3rd grade to sit above the Swift S. A 6-stack in-dash CD player with MP3 playback and chunkier black buttons would also be nice. The silver and blue buttons look out of place which is odd since I swear Iâ€™ve seen interior shots with an all black head unit before!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 years ago when I saw the tail lights on the swift I thought they were just begging for led&#8217;s. If anything the rounded style taillight on the swift sport would have looked better and they could have tinted the sports to differentiate them like they did with the Astra. The indicators on the mirrors are a nice touch though. The thing that annoys me about the swift that hasnâ€™t changed is the arm rests on the doors. They look like an afterthought that was clipped onto the door jutting outwards with no attempt to integrate them. They&#8217;re hard, too small and uncomfortable. Overall the car is great and sells like hotcakes in Australia. Problem is that if I bought one Iâ€™d probably spend $2000 on accessories like cruise control, premium sound etc. With all the other kit available like automatic air conditioning and upgraded trims and highlights we miss out on they really should consider a 3rd grade to sit above the Swift S. A 6-stack in-dash CD player with MP3 playback and chunkier black buttons would also be nice. The silver and blue buttons look out of place which is odd since I swear Iâ€™ve seen interior shots with an all black head unit before!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sxe10r</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-90697</link>
		<dc:creator>sxe10r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-90697</guid>
		<description>demio121 said,
May 30, 2007 @ 11:50 pm 

looks good and this K12B can do 20.5km/l. not that is impressive.


R u sure this engine can make it 20.5km/L ?? where u get this information ?? this more save fuel then 660 viva ? even the P2 cars ?? but the price not tat cheep eh i think ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>demio121 said,<br />
May 30, 2007 @ 11:50 pm </p>
<p>looks good and this K12B can do 20.5km/l. not that is impressive.</p>
<p>R u sure this engine can make it 20.5km/L ?? where u get this information ?? this more save fuel then 660 viva ? even the P2 cars ?? but the price not tat cheep eh i think &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-90498</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-90498</guid>
		<description>proton12vauto...yalah...agree with u also..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>proton12vauto&#8230;yalah&#8230;agree with u also..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton12vauto</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-90311</link>
		<dc:creator>proton12vauto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 14:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-90311</guid>
		<description>BanyakMasukWorkshop said proton12vauto = swift sells for over RM80,000. savvy sells for RM45,000 below.. please do the maths.

By the way..rm80k for 1.5cc then with extra2 thing...so the competitor for Savvy is 1.2cc with CVT then somwhow, malaysian got more money maa..nowdays..willing to pay more... if not why still people pay for vios (1.5) Accent (1.5) etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BanyakMasukWorkshop said proton12vauto = swift sells for over RM80,000. savvy sells for RM45,000 below.. please do the maths.</p>
<p>By the way..rm80k for 1.5cc then with extra2 thing&#8230;so the competitor for Savvy is 1.2cc with CVT then somwhow, malaysian got more money maa..nowdays..willing to pay more&#8230; if not why still people pay for vios (1.5) Accent (1.5) etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89641</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 08:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89641</guid>
		<description>have yall seen the sx4?....seen a brunei num plate in miri...kinda good looking, saw 2 of em! in one day! a lot of bruneians go to miri........the carpark is full with brunei cars!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have yall seen the sx4?&#8230;.seen a brunei num plate in miri&#8230;kinda good looking, saw 2 of em! in one day! a lot of bruneians go to miri&#8230;&#8230;..the carpark is full with brunei cars!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arjun1991</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89631</link>
		<dc:creator>arjun1991</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 08:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89631</guid>
		<description>looks more sophisticated than the previous swift, 
althught the face-lift is&#039;nt &quot;all that&quot; but it looks younger and the suits the name... swift, the tail light looks better.
how i wish they&#039;d do something dynamic to the interior,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks more sophisticated than the previous swift,<br />
althught the face-lift is&#8217;nt &#8220;all that&#8221; but it looks younger and the suits the name&#8230; swift, the tail light looks better.<br />
how i wish they&#8217;d do something dynamic to the interior,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowprofile</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89626</link>
		<dc:creator>lowprofile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 08:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89626</guid>
		<description>the swift sport is here oredi in malaysia. i know as my office is near their hq and i hv seen the car running around. but, for some reason or other, they are not launching it yet. maybe it&#039;s too expensive after taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the swift sport is here oredi in malaysia. i know as my office is near their hq and i hv seen the car running around. but, for some reason or other, they are not launching it yet. maybe it&#8217;s too expensive after taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demio121</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89386</link>
		<dc:creator>demio121</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89386</guid>
		<description>looks good and  this K12B can do 20.5km/l.  not that is impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks good and  this K12B can do 20.5km/l.  not that is impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzuki to unveil new D-segment car </title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89382</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzuki to unveil new D-segment car </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89382</guid>
		<description>[...] Epica, as new Suzuki models have moved away from GM rebadging - these are models like the Suzuki Swift, SX4, and Grand [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Epica, as new Suzuki models have moved away from GM rebadging &#8211; these are models like the Suzuki Swift, SX4, and Grand [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BanyakMasukWorkshop</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89245</link>
		<dc:creator>BanyakMasukWorkshop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 06:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89245</guid>
		<description>proton12vauto = swift sells for over RM80,000.  savvy sells for RM45,000 below.. please do the maths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>proton12vauto = swift sells for over RM80,000.  savvy sells for RM45,000 below.. please do the maths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89238</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 06:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89238</guid>
		<description>Still looks boring. Don&#039;t really notice much change apart from the rear lamp, and the stylo STYLE badge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still looks boring. Don&#8217;t really notice much change apart from the rear lamp, and the stylo STYLE badge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton12vauto</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89237</link>
		<dc:creator>proton12vauto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 05:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89237</guid>
		<description>1.2 with CVT? whoaa..Savvy can get killed....Savvy..u are Doom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.2 with CVT? whoaa..Savvy can get killed&#8230;.Savvy..u are Doom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89226</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 05:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89226</guid>
		<description>&quot;.. 90PS at 6,000rpm and 118Nm of torque a 4,400rpm, pretty respectable for a tiny 1.2 liter engine..&quot;

And you want to rev your poor little car to 6000rpm? You must be crazy, poor swift will die in no time LOL. 
In reality you&#039;d drive at 2000-3500rpm most of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;.. 90PS at 6,000rpm and 118Nm of torque a 4,400rpm, pretty respectable for a tiny 1.2 liter engine..&#8221;</p>
<p>And you want to rev your poor little car to 6000rpm? You must be crazy, poor swift will die in no time LOL.<br />
In reality you&#8217;d drive at 2000-3500rpm most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zombie07</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89223</link>
		<dc:creator>zombie07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 04:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89223</guid>
		<description>Is the Swift Sport really coming? It&#039;s like waiting till the cows come home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Swift Sport really coming? It&#8217;s like waiting till the cows come home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tec96248</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89218</link>
		<dc:creator>tec96248</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 03:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89218</guid>
		<description>transformer said,
May 29, 2007 @ 8:32 pm 

rear lamp are sucksâ€¦ reminds me of Chevy Optra
both Suzuki nd Chevy are under GM

==hahaha, u remind me of my friend that don&#039;t know how to appreciate arts or cars. hmm.........why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>transformer said,<br />
May 29, 2007 @ 8:32 pm </p>
<p>rear lamp are sucksâ€¦ reminds me of Chevy Optra<br />
both Suzuki nd Chevy are under GM</p>
<p>==hahaha, u remind me of my friend that don&#8217;t know how to appreciate arts or cars. hmm&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andre128</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89217</link>
		<dc:creator>andre128</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 02:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89217</guid>
		<description>will this model sell in malaysia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will this model sell in malaysia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normaluser</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89216</link>
		<dc:creator>normaluser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 02:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89216</guid>
		<description>Hicom (Suzuki Malaysia) should have released the CKD by now. Too long already since 2005, and the Swift is ageing and soon will be replaced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hicom (Suzuki Malaysia) should have released the CKD by now. Too long already since 2005, and the Swift is ageing and soon will be replaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I my</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89212</link>
		<dc:creator>I my</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 02:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89212</guid>
		<description>Will be a good car to run in town, ie KL jam....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will be a good car to run in town, ie KL jam&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowprofile</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89211</link>
		<dc:creator>lowprofile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 01:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89211</guid>
		<description>is this for malaysian market? i thought we only have the 1.5vvt here. even the 1.6 sport which has been long launched in singapore is not officially here yet. now there&#039;s a 1.2? hmmm, wonder wht is happening to the ckd plans for the swift.

Paul, can you dig a little for us when the ckd thing is happening and is the 1.2 really coming and will it be ckd and the 1million dollar question is, how much cheaper can they make it? the body seems kinda big n heavy for a 1.2 even with its 90bhp motor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this for malaysian market? i thought we only have the 1.5vvt here. even the 1.6 sport which has been long launched in singapore is not officially here yet. now there&#8217;s a 1.2? hmmm, wonder wht is happening to the ckd plans for the swift.</p>
<p>Paul, can you dig a little for us when the ckd thing is happening and is the 1.2 really coming and will it be ckd and the 1million dollar question is, how much cheaper can they make it? the body seems kinda big n heavy for a 1.2 even with its 90bhp motor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neurra</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89198</link>
		<dc:creator>neurra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89198</guid>
		<description>the wheels look very much smaller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the wheels look very much smaller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w_lighter</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89197</link>
		<dc:creator>w_lighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89197</guid>
		<description>Errr... it looks exactly the same~ swt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errr&#8230; it looks exactly the same~ swt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-nabilll</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89195</link>
		<dc:creator>e-nabilll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 18:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89195</guid>
		<description>i tink the swift needs an interior upgrade,the rear space is so terribly small....u sit there n ur knees will be hitting everyting....not good....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i tink the swift needs an interior upgrade,the rear space is so terribly small&#8230;.u sit there n ur knees will be hitting everyting&#8230;.not good&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avanza</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89185</link>
		<dc:creator>avanza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89185</guid>
		<description>I think the previous model with the honeycomb radiator grill looked more sporty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the previous model with the honeycomb radiator grill looked more sporty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89176</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89176</guid>
		<description>nice car, nice design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice car, nice design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mits27</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89173</link>
		<dc:creator>mits27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 14:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89173</guid>
		<description>wooo...1.2L for 90ps on 6000 rpm, 118Nm torque at 4400rpm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wooo&#8230;1.2L for 90ps on 6000 rpm, 118Nm torque at 4400rpm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyBoy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89167</link>
		<dc:creator>MyBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 13:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89167</guid>
		<description>mmcwei said,

1.2L engine with 90PSâ€¦quite impressiveâ€¦even better than myvi and savvyâ€¦
_______________________________________________

I reserved my comment on that matter till i see the power-torque graph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmcwei said,</p>
<p>1.2L engine with 90PSâ€¦quite impressiveâ€¦even better than myvi and savvyâ€¦<br />
_______________________________________________</p>
<p>I reserved my comment on that matter till i see the power-torque graph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmcwei</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89164</link>
		<dc:creator>mmcwei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 13:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89164</guid>
		<description>1.2L engine with 90PS...quite impressive...even better than myvi and savvy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.2L engine with 90PS&#8230;quite impressive&#8230;even better than myvi and savvy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ab</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89159</link>
		<dc:creator>ab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89159</guid>
		<description>my current best looking hatchback</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my current best looking hatchback</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transformer</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89153</link>
		<dc:creator>transformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 12:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89153</guid>
		<description>rear lamp are sucks... reminds me of Chevy Optra
both Suzuki nd Chevy are under GM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rear lamp are sucks&#8230; reminds me of Chevy Optra<br />
both Suzuki nd Chevy are under GM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jehutyz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89151</link>
		<dc:creator>jehutyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 12:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/05/29/2007-suzuki-swift-facelift/#comment-89151</guid>
		<description>Used to be nice. Now is even better.
Got new engine also.
1.2 then will it be cheaper?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Used to be nice. Now is even better.<br />
Got new engine also.<br />
1.2 then will it be cheaper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
