<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volkswagen&#8217;s TSI Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:59:29 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-247189</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-247189</guid>
		<description>Hi guys 
Hope anyone can help.
I have seat leon 1.8 TSI and now I would like to compare the engines 1.4 TSI with my 1.8 TSI does anyone can tell me some web page or any info of this two engines as I am not able to find anything on web. I am sorry for my english i am from czech republic.
thank you all for any information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys<br />
Hope anyone can help.<br />
I have seat leon 1.8 TSI and now I would like to compare the engines 1.4 TSI with my 1.8 TSI does anyone can tell me some web page or any info of this two engines as I am not able to find anything on web. I am sorry for my english i am from czech republic.<br />
thank you all for any information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KL-ATR</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91834</link>
		<dc:creator>KL-ATR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 03:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91834</guid>
		<description>Great animation in this video. Man... 80% of torque at 1250rpm... gotta love this engine! If VW can bring this in at RM120k, I&#039;ll happily book one!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great animation in this video. Man&#8230; 80% of torque at 1250rpm&#8230; gotta love this engine! If VW can bring this in at RM120k, I&#8217;ll happily book one!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91815</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91815</guid>
		<description>Small turbocharged engines are very fun I&#039;d say, once you get used to the hardly noticable turbo lag you&#039;d hate to go back to the sub 2.0litre NAs again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small turbocharged engines are very fun I&#8217;d say, once you get used to the hardly noticable turbo lag you&#8217;d hate to go back to the sub 2.0litre NAs again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shooter</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91445</link>
		<dc:creator>shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 06:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91445</guid>
		<description>i know the twincharger produces 168hp, how much does the one with just a turbocharger makes? has VW brought in the Golf GT 1.4 TSI? and how much does it cost? any chance the Golf Plus will get the same engine?Also, will Suzuki assemble the Swift Sport here as well? will both cars be offered in the two door guise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know the twincharger produces 168hp, how much does the one with just a turbocharger makes? has VW brought in the Golf GT 1.4 TSI? and how much does it cost? any chance the Golf Plus will get the same engine?Also, will Suzuki assemble the Swift Sport here as well? will both cars be offered in the two door guise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleFire85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91373</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleFire85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91373</guid>
		<description>Err.. i doubt that the 1.4L TSI will drink more then the Japaneses Honda 1.8L I-Vtec engine.. Turbocharge in Europe normally using low pressure for normal used car, like volvo.. So If u read about turbocharge, it actually save more fuel then the 1.8L thx to its low torque and better combustion of the pressured provided.. The Europe are not same with Japanese who want more preformance and does using high pressure turbo like Evo or WRX Sti.. Eventually If ur car can move under 2000rpm with 7-speed DSG or 6-speed manual even climbing a hill is a breeze for turbo.. For N/A car the torque and HP band are higher then Turbocharge so u need to rev to overtake or climb hills.. I own a L502 turbo kancil and the FC is more save then my old caburated kancil.. That why i know the advantage of turbo.. Try asking those people who drive turbo cars.. not all are worst FC as u think.. Only those hardcore modifiers who want more power will suck more FC..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err.. i doubt that the 1.4L TSI will drink more then the Japaneses Honda 1.8L I-Vtec engine.. Turbocharge in Europe normally using low pressure for normal used car, like volvo.. So If u read about turbocharge, it actually save more fuel then the 1.8L thx to its low torque and better combustion of the pressured provided.. The Europe are not same with Japanese who want more preformance and does using high pressure turbo like Evo or WRX Sti.. Eventually If ur car can move under 2000rpm with 7-speed DSG or 6-speed manual even climbing a hill is a breeze for turbo.. For N/A car the torque and HP band are higher then Turbocharge so u need to rev to overtake or climb hills.. I own a L502 turbo kancil and the FC is more save then my old caburated kancil.. That why i know the advantage of turbo.. Try asking those people who drive turbo cars.. not all are worst FC as u think.. Only those hardcore modifiers who want more power will suck more FC..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azolkipl</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91365</link>
		<dc:creator>azolkipl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91365</guid>
		<description>ooops... wrong post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooops&#8230; wrong post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azolkipl</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91364</link>
		<dc:creator>azolkipl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91364</guid>
		<description>Come on, don&#039;t be a cracker nut. The TSI line of engines all have higher horsepower and torque than any similar displacement VTEC/iDSI/VVT engine. That means they will definitely burn extra more fuel than the japanese engines to give that much more extra gain in performance. The better way is to compare similar horsepower engine&#039;s fuel consumption. Take for example a Honda Civics 1.8l engine at 140 PS, and 174NM. I bet you the fuel consumption isn&#039;t as impressive as the TSI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, don&#8217;t be a cracker nut. The TSI line of engines all have higher horsepower and torque than any similar displacement VTEC/iDSI/VVT engine. That means they will definitely burn extra more fuel than the japanese engines to give that much more extra gain in performance. The better way is to compare similar horsepower engine&#8217;s fuel consumption. Take for example a Honda Civics 1.8l engine at 140 PS, and 174NM. I bet you the fuel consumption isn&#8217;t as impressive as the TSI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sxe10r</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91330</link>
		<dc:creator>sxe10r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91330</guid>
		<description>Cool Engine ~ 1.4 Baby with 170ps + 7 speed ..... soon 200Ps !!!! I like the engine performance ... really extream design .... Supercharge + Turbo charge the 1st car in the world ... someday i also think to have a 4A91 + supercharge n Turbo lol ... will be mivec + turbo + supercharge 250ps ... dreaming ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool Engine ~ 1.4 Baby with 170ps + 7 speed &#8230;.. soon 200Ps !!!! I like the engine performance &#8230; really extream design &#8230;. Supercharge + Turbo charge the 1st car in the world &#8230; someday i also think to have a 4A91 + supercharge n Turbo lol &#8230; will be mivec + turbo + supercharge 250ps &#8230; dreaming &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTAllTheBest</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91275</link>
		<dc:creator>PTAllTheBest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91275</guid>
		<description>we want reasonable and quality cars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we want reasonable and quality cars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton GL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91203</link>
		<dc:creator>proton GL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91203</guid>
		<description>i remember the Acura moto &#039;precision crafted performance&#039;.

well this from the VW is likely suitable for the moto above</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i remember the Acura moto &#8216;precision crafted performance&#8217;.</p>
<p>well this from the VW is likely suitable for the moto above</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleFire85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91202</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleFire85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91202</guid>
		<description>Not only VW going for smaller displament, PSA, citroen and renault also moving it to reduce emission and reducing the FC of current cars... Now in Europe they are also moving to made small and powerfull cars such like Mini, Clio, Panda and etc.. This is because their fuel price also quite high compare to us and they need less FC car to drive along city and highways... Turbo is a great way of reducing road tax and emission control.. Well think of it a 1.4 TSI engine in a Waja with 7-speed DSG gearbox.. Wow.. Roadtax already save then current and the HP and torque already kill that 1.6 louzy campro engine... Is killing 2 birds with one stone! Brilliant! VW mucks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only VW going for smaller displament, PSA, citroen and renault also moving it to reduce emission and reducing the FC of current cars&#8230; Now in Europe they are also moving to made small and powerfull cars such like Mini, Clio, Panda and etc.. This is because their fuel price also quite high compare to us and they need less FC car to drive along city and highways&#8230; Turbo is a great way of reducing road tax and emission control.. Well think of it a 1.4 TSI engine in a Waja with 7-speed DSG gearbox.. Wow.. Roadtax already save then current and the HP and torque already kill that 1.6 louzy campro engine&#8230; Is killing 2 birds with one stone! Brilliant! VW mucks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arcana</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91190</link>
		<dc:creator>arcana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91190</guid>
		<description>very informative indeed, VW for small displacement winners.....BMW for bigger displacement champions......europeans are really great in motor engineering. currently turbodiesels and VW&#039;s turbo and super charged engines are the best for city driving that provides ample torque and saves fuel.

come on japs....when are we gonna see such engineering in your lineups? although there are some great engines from the japs but most of em are not available here unless its imported. so far the only 1 close to those award winning engines will only be the civic 1.8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very informative indeed, VW for small displacement winners&#8230;..BMW for bigger displacement champions&#8230;&#8230;europeans are really great in motor engineering. currently turbodiesels and VW&#8217;s turbo and super charged engines are the best for city driving that provides ample torque and saves fuel.</p>
<p>come on japs&#8230;.when are we gonna see such engineering in your lineups? although there are some great engines from the japs but most of em are not available here unless its imported. so far the only 1 close to those award winning engines will only be the civic 1.8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digiman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91173</link>
		<dc:creator>digiman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91173</guid>
		<description>hhmm
wonder if they are gonna plug this into the polo...
hhmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hhmm<br />
wonder if they are gonna plug this into the polo&#8230;<br />
hhmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91168</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91168</guid>
		<description>so what they did is a lite version of the twincharger version which is better, and hopefully more smooth ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what they did is a lite version of the twincharger version which is better, and hopefully more smooth ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt Shopalot</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91163</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt Shopalot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91163</guid>
		<description>Suzuki already anounced 30% drop
When I expect same from VW?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suzuki already anounced 30% drop<br />
When I expect same from VW?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91148</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91148</guid>
		<description>proton? cannot imagine......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>proton? cannot imagine&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan_foong80</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91139</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan_foong80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91139</guid>
		<description>Lovely hmm... Protong what are you waiting for!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely hmm&#8230; Protong what are you waiting for!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91126</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/06/05/volkswagens-tsi-engine/#comment-91126</guid>
		<description>this is what i call European technology .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is what i call European technology .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
