<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W204 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostbusters</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-320018</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghostbusters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-320018</guid>
		<description>Lol, looks like my prayer was answered. New 5.5L V8 Bi-turbo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, looks like my prayer was answered. New 5.5L V8 Bi-turbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostbusters</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-211840</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghostbusters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-211840</guid>
		<description>This car was built for two things specifically, speed and comfort. You can carry your mates and family members around AND still have enough juice in the car to make an M3 cry. A brilliant car in my opinion. Though, it wouldn&#039;t hurt to slap in a turbo I guess. AMG should have placed more thoughts into a turbo charged v8 engine rather than an naturally aspirated one. Gives the C class a better boost and a cooler look. V8-TURBOCHARGED. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This car was built for two things specifically, speed and comfort. You can carry your mates and family members around AND still have enough juice in the car to make an M3 cry. A brilliant car in my opinion. Though, it wouldn&#039;t hurt to slap in a turbo I guess. AMG should have placed more thoughts into a turbo charged v8 engine rather than an naturally aspirated one. Gives the C class a better boost and a cooler look. V8-TURBOCHARGED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teaser site for the W204 C-Class in Malaysia</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-112418</link>
		<dc:creator>Teaser site for the W204 C-Class in Malaysia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-112418</guid>
		<description>[...] Posts: New 2007 Mercedes Benz C-Class (W204) Unveiled W204 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Brabus tunes the W204 C-Class Kicherer K35 CS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posts: New 2007 Mercedes Benz C-Class (W204) Unveiled W204 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Brabus tunes the W204 C-Class Kicherer K35 CS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W204 Mercedes Benz C-Class spotted in Glenmarie</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-108300</link>
		<dc:creator>W204 Mercedes Benz C-Class spotted in Glenmarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-108300</guid>
		<description>[...] Posts: New 2007 Mercedes Benz C-Class (W204) Unveiled W204 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Brabus tunes the W204 C-Class Kicherer K35 CS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posts: New 2007 Mercedes Benz C-Class (W204) Unveiled W204 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Brabus tunes the W204 C-Class Kicherer K35 CS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverfish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98712</link>
		<dc:creator>silverfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98712</guid>
		<description>trustgtr; fret not. Mercedes has seen the light once again and have vowed to make bulletproof quality cars once again. You should read about the lengths they go to, to make sure the new C class is a proper Merc and not the joke we got in the late 90s and early 00s. 
 
Lots of customers have complained, they&#039;ve faltered in the JD Power ranking, and they sort of their lost their mojo a bit, especially in the States. And that has finally brought them to their senses. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trustgtr; fret not. Mercedes has seen the light once again and have vowed to make bulletproof quality cars once again. You should read about the lengths they go to, to make sure the new C class is a proper Merc and not the joke we got in the late 90s and early 00s.</p>
<p>Lots of customers have complained, they&#039;ve faltered in the JD Power ranking, and they sort of their lost their mojo a bit, especially in the States. And that has finally brought them to their senses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trustgtr</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98660</link>
		<dc:creator>trustgtr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98660</guid>
		<description>my family has owned MB&#039;s since i can remember, today my 02&#039;s320 is the worst MB i&#039;ve ever owned...its pratically falling to bits plus the air suspension gone bust twice already..now airbag ecu and instrument cluster gone..i&#039;m just about to break a family tradition and go &#039;LEXUS&#039;.. i still got my old 124 model which i trully believe is the last real M.Benz.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my family has owned MB&#039;s since i can remember, today my 02&#039;s320 is the worst MB i&#039;ve ever owned&#8230;its pratically falling to bits plus the air suspension gone bust twice already..now airbag ecu and instrument cluster gone..i&#039;m just about to break a family tradition and go &#039;LEXUS&#039;.. i still got my old 124 model which i trully believe is the last real M.Benz..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverfish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98560</link>
		<dc:creator>silverfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98560</guid>
		<description>layman; thank you for sharing your bias and ignorance with everybody. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>layman; thank you for sharing your bias and ignorance with everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raybrig85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98424</link>
		<dc:creator>raybrig85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98424</guid>
		<description>looks okla than the standard one...standard ma...standard 1 looks org tue...transform to amg..looks ganas...btw...rs4 n 159gta 4 me...nnn...i rather choose m3....m5 and dis car???this car cant beat the m5...u know wut...b4 m5 reach the speed of 250km/h...its already pass the ferrari f430...n...the conclusion is...m5 still fastest... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks okla than the standard one&#8230;standard ma&#8230;standard 1 looks org tue&#8230;transform to amg..looks ganas&#8230;btw&#8230;rs4 n 159gta 4 me&#8230;nnn&#8230;i rather choose m3&#8230;.m5 and dis car???this car cant beat the m5&#8230;u know wut&#8230;b4 m5 reach the speed of 250km/h&#8230;its already pass the ferrari f430&#8230;n&#8230;the conclusion is&#8230;m5 still fastest&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jitra motor</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98193</link>
		<dc:creator>jitra motor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98193</guid>
		<description>I like it, but.........no money la..... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it, but&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;no money la&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamsbong</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98192</link>
		<dc:creator>jamsbong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98192</guid>
		<description>I might be out of topic here but personally, I think the 1-series BMWs are the bests for driving thrills and speed. The 1-series coupe will be out soon, it will be even better. This car definitely beats any cars that is offered by Mercs. 
 
A powerful twin turbo L6 on a tiny Coupe. Droool.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might be out of topic here but personally, I think the 1-series BMWs are the bests for driving thrills and speed. The 1-series coupe will be out soon, it will be even better. This car definitely beats any cars that is offered by Mercs.</p>
<p>A powerful twin turbo L6 on a tiny Coupe. Droool&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: layman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98186</link>
		<dc:creator>layman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 15:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98186</guid>
		<description>Sure M5 looks better. inside M5 is the award winning engine. This is a....... 
.....only an expensive junk. Just imagine 6.2l try to compete with 4.0l, is like a 25 years old man try to compete with a 15 years old boy ....and get beaten. 
The only advantage this has over BMW is comfort. But If I want comfort I will go for Lexus which is less expensive and better quality. The Lexus will eat this Mercedes for supper everynight. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure M5 looks better. inside M5 is the award winning engine. This is a&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230;..only an expensive junk. Just imagine 6.2l try to compete with 4.0l, is like a 25 years old man try to compete with a 15 years old boy &#8230;.and get beaten.</p>
<p>The only advantage this has over BMW is comfort. But If I want comfort I will go for Lexus which is less expensive and better quality. The Lexus will eat this Mercedes for supper everynight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danoneism</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98168</link>
		<dc:creator>danoneism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 12:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98168</guid>
		<description>huh...i think m5 looks better..... 
i think?...hoho </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh&#8230;i think m5 looks better&#8230;..</p>
<p>i think?&#8230;hoho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danoneism</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98167</link>
		<dc:creator>danoneism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 12:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98167</guid>
		<description>huh...wow...nice.... 
but i can only dream owning dis.... :( </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh&#8230;wow&#8230;nice&#8230;.</p>
<p>but i can only dream owning dis&#8230;. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phylixng</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98163</link>
		<dc:creator>phylixng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 12:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98163</guid>
		<description>i think this merc c class will not too expensive. maybe it wil be quite affortable to most middle classes.  
anw, she really look fierce and outstanding campare to other design in merc. i think this design is really launch to fight with bmw m3, base on the preformance and looks. with this design, is like a ice breaking for merc&#039;s impression that gave most m&#039;sian. which is old man only likes car. hahaha!! cuz is stable and comfort. now i feel this car is kinda young. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this merc c class will not too expensive. maybe it wil be quite affortable to most middle classes. </p>
<p>anw, she really look fierce and outstanding campare to other design in merc. i think this design is really launch to fight with bmw m3, base on the preformance and looks. with this design, is like a ice breaking for merc&#039;s impression that gave most m&#039;sian. which is old man only likes car. hahaha!! cuz is stable and comfort. now i feel this car is kinda young.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moto_moto</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98144</link>
		<dc:creator>moto_moto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98144</guid>
		<description>Not just in reality, in dream also i can&#039;t afford this..SO DO YOU! hahahuahuahua.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just in reality, in dream also i can&#039;t afford this..SO DO YOU! hahahuahuahua..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98138</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98138</guid>
		<description>Great looking car ! Like the front skirting. 
 
This is the new trendy color. It seems now every new car offer this color (dark silver grey ?) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great looking car ! Like the front skirting.</p>
<p>This is the new trendy color. It seems now every new car offer this color (dark silver grey ?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torishimeyakuin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98100</link>
		<dc:creator>torishimeyakuin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98100</guid>
		<description># 
jamsbong said, 
 
July 6, 2007 @ 2:38 pm 
 
++ 
 
Merc is one car which can provide no other car can. That is, be lazy, Take it Easy and still be Monstering FAST. This is the ultimate muscle machine. 
 
========================================== 
 
Dear James Bond, 
 
Concord ! You really got the point there..haha. Yeah i feel the same way about Merc. It seems slow and steady in its lazy mode, but when it comes speeding in &#039;amok&#039; from far away..it&#039;ll be the monster of tornado. ZeuuoooOOOOSSSSS !! 
 
Porsh, Merc, BM...&quot;the Germans R 2 DaMn GeniuS&quot; is proven. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#</p>
<p>jamsbong said,</p>
<p>July 6, 2007 @ 2:38 pm</p>
<p>++</p>
<p>Merc is one car which can provide no other car can. That is, be lazy, Take it Easy and still be Monstering FAST. This is the ultimate muscle machine.</p>
<p>==========================================</p>
<p>Dear James Bond,</p>
<p>Concord ! You really got the point there..haha. Yeah i feel the same way about Merc. It seems slow and steady in its lazy mode, but when it comes speeding in &#039;amok&#039; from far away..it&#039;ll be the monster of tornado. ZeuuoooOOOOSSSSS !!</p>
<p>Porsh, Merc, BM&#8230;&quot;the Germans R 2 DaMn GeniuS&quot; is proven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverfish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98086</link>
		<dc:creator>silverfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98086</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Z4M has more power and is faster in a straight line compared to the Cayman. But, the Cayman fights back with world class dynamic polish and clinical precision to everything it does. The Z4M on the other hand is a wild animal. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Z4M has more power and is faster in a straight line compared to the Cayman. But, the Cayman fights back with world class dynamic polish and clinical precision to everything it does. The Z4M on the other hand is a wild animal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BanyakMasukWorkshop</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98079</link>
		<dc:creator>BanyakMasukWorkshop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98079</guid>
		<description>jamsbong,  
 
porsche and bmw are 2 different types of cars la. please compare apples with apples.   
 
bmw and mercedes have always been traditional competitors. 
 
but even compared to a porsche directly or indirectly, bmw&#039;s are no slouch in the handling department.   
 
I would say a Z4M doesn&#039;t look too shabby even next to a cayman. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jamsbong, </p>
<p>porsche and bmw are 2 different types of cars la. please compare apples with apples.  </p>
<p>bmw and mercedes have always been traditional competitors.</p>
<p>but even compared to a porsche directly or indirectly, bmw&#039;s are no slouch in the handling department.  </p>
<p>I would say a Z4M doesn&#039;t look too shabby even next to a cayman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ab</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98075</link>
		<dc:creator>ab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98075</guid>
		<description>looks the business </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks the business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almattitude_v1</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98069</link>
		<dc:creator>almattitude_v1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98069</guid>
		<description>I LOVE what they&#039;ve done to the hood and also the fog lamps on the front bumper... This looks like the start of a new breed of AMG models, and it looks like they have done a fantastic job. I thought the BMW M3 was great, and I really liked the Audi RS4, and was even pretty impressed with the NEW M3... But this... This C63 AMG is just one awesome car... Anyday better than the M3! I absolutely cannot wait to see the future AMG models. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE what they&#039;ve done to the hood and also the fog lamps on the front bumper&#8230; This looks like the start of a new breed of AMG models, and it looks like they have done a fantastic job. I thought the BMW M3 was great, and I really liked the Audi RS4, and was even pretty impressed with the NEW M3&#8230; But this&#8230; This C63 AMG is just one awesome car&#8230; Anyday better than the M3! I absolutely cannot wait to see the future AMG models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamsbong</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98063</link>
		<dc:creator>jamsbong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98063</guid>
		<description>I agreed with silverfish 
 
The BMW is really ugly. The only advantage I can see is a more engaging drive as BMW always tune their cars that manner. The Merc is always gonna be more comfortable. IMO, If i want engaging drive, might as well go for a Porsche of the same price range. The Porsche will eat BMW for breakfast anyday. 
 
Merc is one car which can provide no other car can. That is, be lazy, Take it Easy and still be Monstering FAST. This is the ultimate muscle machine. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agreed with silverfish</p>
<p>The BMW is really ugly. The only advantage I can see is a more engaging drive as BMW always tune their cars that manner. The Merc is always gonna be more comfortable. IMO, If i want engaging drive, might as well go for a Porsche of the same price range. The Porsche will eat BMW for breakfast anyday.</p>
<p>Merc is one car which can provide no other car can. That is, be lazy, Take it Easy and still be Monstering FAST. This is the ultimate muscle machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coltrain</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98060</link>
		<dc:creator>Coltrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98060</guid>
		<description>This really a MONSTERRRRR...... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really a MONSTERRRRR&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverfish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98057</link>
		<dc:creator>silverfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98057</guid>
		<description>LoL, I&#039;m loving the opposing point of views. Just for the record, the 6 series is mighty ugly and no the C isn&#039;t copying the 6. 
 
BTW, BHP per litre is overrated. It doesn&#039;t tell you anything about overall performance or engine efficiency. In its full glory the 6.2 V8 easily exceeds 500bhp and weighs about the same (maybe less, forgot exactly) than the M5s 5.0 litre V10 thanks to its lightweight construction, with more torque to boot. 
 
The difference between more recent AMG models compared to ones in the past, is the emphasis on better driving dynamics. Take the engine, for example, is designed to be NA and high revving in nature, unlike the previous supercharged V8s or biturbo V12s feeling of lazy effortless power.  
 
IMHO, in terms of straightline speed at least, this C63 will spank the new M3. In terms of overall dynamic polish, the M3 will still probably be better. That said, it will be exciting to see how close Merc can get to BMW in that department with this car. 
 
Looking forward to the group tests. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LoL, I&#039;m loving the opposing point of views. Just for the record, the 6 series is mighty ugly and no the C isn&#039;t copying the 6.</p>
<p>BTW, BHP per litre is overrated. It doesn&#039;t tell you anything about overall performance or engine efficiency. In its full glory the 6.2 V8 easily exceeds 500bhp and weighs about the same (maybe less, forgot exactly) than the M5s 5.0 litre V10 thanks to its lightweight construction, with more torque to boot.</p>
<p>The difference between more recent AMG models compared to ones in the past, is the emphasis on better driving dynamics. Take the engine, for example, is designed to be NA and high revving in nature, unlike the previous supercharged V8s or biturbo V12s feeling of lazy effortless power. </p>
<p>IMHO, in terms of straightline speed at least, this C63 will spank the new M3. In terms of overall dynamic polish, the M3 will still probably be better. That said, it will be exciting to see how close Merc can get to BMW in that department with this car.</p>
<p>Looking forward to the group tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton GL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98053</link>
		<dc:creator>proton GL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98053</guid>
		<description>rear wheel arch is tamed, (not buldging like the m3) 
 like as if they havent got a huge torque at the rear, 
 
looks front drive, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rear wheel arch is tamed, (not buldging like the m3)</p>
<p> like as if they havent got a huge torque at the rear,</p>
<p>looks front drive,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: layman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98048</link>
		<dc:creator>layman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98048</guid>
		<description>And BTW, this car looks ugly, try to copy BMW 6 series sleepy eye, but out of proportion -an aggressive looks with an sleeping eye like a sick gangster!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And BTW, this car looks ugly, try to copy BMW 6 series sleepy eye, but out of proportion -an aggressive looks with an sleeping eye like a sick gangster!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: layman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98047</link>
		<dc:creator>layman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98047</guid>
		<description>Even a monkey knows how to build a high HP engine by increasing the engine capacity. If you have to build a 6.2l engine to compete with the 4.0l engine, that is useless, especially when global warming, high roadtax, oil prices ......are in the rise. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even a monkey knows how to build a high HP engine by increasing the engine capacity. If you have to build a 6.2l engine to compete with the 4.0l engine, that is useless, especially when global warming, high roadtax, oil prices &#8230;&#8230;are in the rise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98046</link>
		<dc:creator>superman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98046</guid>
		<description>The front bumper is similiar to other AMG cars. Look at the F1 CLK63 AMG Safety Car , and you&#039;ll see a similiar front end. 
 
Awesome aggresion from AMG &amp; Mercedes.The styling is truly BRUTAL!!! 
 
Having Brabus shoehorned a 6.1ltr V8 in the previous C-Class to make the CV8S  , MB/AMG decided to produce their own in hse effort.. 
 
The only tragedy is AMG don&#039;t make cars with a manual tranny. That&#039;s where they usually lose out to BMW M cars, in addition to the overall driving experience </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The front bumper is similiar to other AMG cars. Look at the F1 CLK63 AMG Safety Car , and you&#039;ll see a similiar front end.</p>
<p>Awesome aggresion from AMG &amp; Mercedes.The styling is truly BRUTAL!!!</p>
<p>Having Brabus shoehorned a 6.1ltr V8 in the previous C-Class to make the CV8S  , MB/AMG decided to produce their own in hse effort..</p>
<p>The only tragedy is AMG don&#039;t make cars with a manual tranny. That&#039;s where they usually lose out to BMW M cars, in addition to the overall driving experience</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sxe10r</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98040</link>
		<dc:creator>sxe10r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98040</guid>
		<description>CRAZY fuel sucker ~ .... the bumper like japan style ~ ... toyota altezza ~ ? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CRAZY fuel sucker ~ &#8230;. the bumper like japan style ~ &#8230; toyota altezza ~ ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikanasz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98037</link>
		<dc:creator>nikanasz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/05/w204-mercedes-benz-c63-amg/#comment-98037</guid>
		<description>oh yeah, in terms of BHP per litre, BMW is way ahead of Merc in terms of NA engines, just look at M5 and M3. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah, in terms of BHP per litre, BMW is way ahead of Merc in terms of NA engines, just look at M5 and M3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

