<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New alternative transmission technologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton.GL.</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99315</link>
		<dc:creator>proton.GL.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99315</guid>
		<description>well we can always talk about new invention, different tech,-and its good,  
rotary engine, miller cycle, self ignited petrol engine, hybrid,  innovative gearbox 
 
but actually car is not much evolves, from its starts, 
4 wheel 4 stroke engine, syncromesh gearbox, and proven its relability, 
 
we alway welcome technologies as  they are brilliant but, sometimes what matters is cost and maitainability,  
 
i never opposed to technology, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well we can always talk about new invention, different tech,-and its good, </p>
<p>rotary engine, miller cycle, self ignited petrol engine, hybrid,  innovative gearbox</p>
<p>but actually car is not much evolves, from its starts,</p>
<p>4 wheel 4 stroke engine, syncromesh gearbox, and proven its relability,</p>
<p>we alway welcome technologies as  they are brilliant but, sometimes what matters is cost and maitainability, </p>
<p>i never opposed to technology,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exodust</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99277</link>
		<dc:creator>exodust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99277</guid>
		<description>Simply unbelieveable.. I can&#039;t believe that even in a post like this would someone think of mentioning Proton. Seriously, the rest of us are not retarded, we know it&#039;ll be ages before Proton uses any of these transmissions; we don&#039;t need someone to bring it up. 
 
Back to the post, I&#039;ve only previously heard of the Antonov transmission and I never understood why it isnt more commonly applied. The rest sound like good alternatives to the usual transmissions too </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply unbelieveable.. I can&#039;t believe that even in a post like this would someone think of mentioning Proton. Seriously, the rest of us are not retarded, we know it&#039;ll be ages before Proton uses any of these transmissions; we don&#039;t need someone to bring it up.</p>
<p>Back to the post, I&#039;ve only previously heard of the Antonov transmission and I never understood why it isnt more commonly applied. The rest sound like good alternatives to the usual transmissions too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99197</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99197</guid>
		<description>what are they comparing ? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what are they comparing ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99186</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99186</guid>
		<description>nice article, good job </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article, good job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton.GL.</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99155</link>
		<dc:creator>proton.GL.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99155</guid>
		<description>cvt  
-no rythm- (bored) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cvt </p>
<p>-no rythm- (bored)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transformer</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99120</link>
		<dc:creator>transformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99120</guid>
		<description>hopes it improve FC ! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hopes it improve FC !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleFire85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99104</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleFire85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99104</guid>
		<description>Wow this is good, we got more better and faster gear transmission.. but even u post this, i dont think P1 will ever use this in his production.. Mainly coz, expensive, need pay royalty bla bla bla.. So dream on.. Only Europeans, Americans n japanese who have the guts to try.. while we always follow their back.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow this is good, we got more better and faster gear transmission.. but even u post this, i dont think P1 will ever use this in his production.. Mainly coz, expensive, need pay royalty bla bla bla.. So dream on.. Only Europeans, Americans n japanese who have the guts to try.. while we always follow their back..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sxe10r</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99079</link>
		<dc:creator>sxe10r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99079</guid>
		<description>dual final drive ?? ... means gear ration 1:2 = 1:4 ?? any video how the this IVT works ?? i only know CVT ..... this will increase speed , torque &amp; save fuel ??? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dual final drive ?? &#8230; means gear ration 1:2 = 1:4 ?? any video how the this IVT works ?? i only know CVT &#8230;.. this will increase speed , torque &amp; save fuel ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nizam80</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99066</link>
		<dc:creator>nizam80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/12/new-alternative-transmission-technologies/#comment-99066</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. Paul, I&#039;ve read your article regarding Proton&#039;s CPS in the New Straits Times yesterday (11/7).... nice article!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. Paul, I&#039;ve read your article regarding Proton&#039;s CPS in the New Straits Times yesterday (11/7)&#8230;. nice article!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

