<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ssangyong Kyron gets a facelift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:50:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GNath</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-249423</link>
		<dc:creator>GNath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-249423</guid>
		<description>HI Paul,

I am thinking of getting the new Ssangyong Kyron. I am ashamed to say that I am one of the men who only know how to drive a car but knowing nothing else abt it. I mean, when I take my car for servicing, the mechanic says a lot of mumbo-jumbo and I nod my head knowingly while thinking what the hell is he saying.

My question is, is Kyron a good/satisfactory SUV to have? I have been reading conflicting reviews abt it from others and wonder if its a good car to have.

THanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Paul,</p>
<p>I am thinking of getting the new Ssangyong Kyron. I am ashamed to say that I am one of the men who only know how to drive a car but knowing nothing else abt it. I mean, when I take my car for servicing, the mechanic says a lot of mumbo-jumbo and I nod my head knowingly while thinking what the hell is he saying.</p>
<p>My question is, is Kyron a good/satisfactory SUV to have? I have been reading conflicting reviews abt it from others and wonder if its a good car to have.</p>
<p>THanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badsoulfly</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-101774</link>
		<dc:creator>badsoulfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-101774</guid>
		<description>wierd...very very wierd....but unique with some ugly shape...and always copy Mercedes front grill....like REXTON...maybe because they have a cooperation with Mercedes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wierd&#8230;very very wierd&#8230;.but unique with some ugly shape&#8230;and always copy Mercedes front grill&#8230;.like REXTON&#8230;maybe because they have a cooperation with Mercedes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100147</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100147</guid>
		<description>nnow the &#039;unique&#039; design is better looking.....the rearlight doesnt look like BMW&#039;s.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nnow the &#8216;unique&#8217; design is better looking&#8230;..the rearlight doesnt look like BMW&#8217;s&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sxe10r</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100140</link>
		<dc:creator>sxe10r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100140</guid>
		<description>still the sorento NOvus pretty ~ ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still the sorento NOvus pretty ~ &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-nabilll</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100056</link>
		<dc:creator>e-nabilll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100056</guid>
		<description>stil ugly looking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stil ugly looking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100035</link>
		<dc:creator>nmh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100035</guid>
		<description>Improve.....finally the learned from what happen to rexton.....but still not enuf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Improve&#8230;..finally the learned from what happen to rexton&#8230;..but still not enuf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eezarm</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100034</link>
		<dc:creator>eezarm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100034</guid>
		<description>kei9 said,
July 17, 2007 @ 10:13 pm 

now the back looks betterâ€¦like the stance also..sweet!
---------------------------------------------------------------

yup, agree with u.
the previous one looks ugly and mismatched.
although it looks like bmw&#039;s rear but still ok...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kei9 said,<br />
July 17, 2007 @ 10:13 pm </p>
<p>now the back looks betterâ€¦like the stance also..sweet!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>yup, agree with u.<br />
the previous one looks ugly and mismatched.<br />
although it looks like bmw&#8217;s rear but still ok&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100016</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100016</guid>
		<description>now the back looks better...like the stance also..sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now the back looks better&#8230;like the stance also..sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ingolstadt</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100011</link>
		<dc:creator>ingolstadt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-100011</guid>
		<description>wayyyyyyy boring-er than the previous one. I liked the previous one. not because it looked nicer to me (not that this one looked bad thou) it&#039;s just that i always reckon SsangYong to be a manufacturer with exquisite taste when it comes to their designs - Love it or hate it, they never leave themselves in greay areas.... 

Ugly is always better than bland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wayyyyyyy boring-er than the previous one. I liked the previous one. not because it looked nicer to me (not that this one looked bad thou) it&#8217;s just that i always reckon SsangYong to be a manufacturer with exquisite taste when it comes to their designs &#8211; Love it or hate it, they never leave themselves in greay areas&#8230;. </p>
<p>Ugly is always better than bland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DtG</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99993</link>
		<dc:creator>DtG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99993</guid>
		<description>waaaaaaay better than the previous one... wonder what designers they had doing the ugly one before this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>waaaaaaay better than the previous one&#8230; wonder what designers they had doing the ugly one before this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleFire85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99984</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleFire85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99984</guid>
		<description>Prem3377, u father is very good in taste.. My neighbor also get a kyron! Nice man! Yes, i also have this question in my head. Why their quality so good, but still selling in a very cheap price when after tax? While our local cars, Ehmm.. sell us at a relative high price, but give us low quality products..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prem3377, u father is very good in taste.. My neighbor also get a kyron! Nice man! Yes, i also have this question in my head. Why their quality so good, but still selling in a very cheap price when after tax? While our local cars, Ehmm.. sell us at a relative high price, but give us low quality products..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nizam80</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99972</link>
		<dc:creator>nizam80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99972</guid>
		<description>Btw, i love the interior. Looks european.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, i love the interior. Looks european.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timber8115</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99968</link>
		<dc:creator>timber8115</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99968</guid>
		<description>overall, look better than the previous model. About the buldge at the back, i guess they still retain it as they do not want the car look predictable like other cars. This is what we call the identity. Not everyone look the same and so do cars, right? 

Just my 2cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>overall, look better than the previous model. About the buldge at the back, i guess they still retain it as they do not want the car look predictable like other cars. This is what we call the identity. Not everyone look the same and so do cars, right? </p>
<p>Just my 2cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmar_453</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99966</link>
		<dc:creator>msmar_453</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99966</guid>
		<description>MercSClass Front + BMW X5 rear = SangyongSUV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MercSClass Front + BMW X5 rear = SangyongSUV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albagmane</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99936</link>
		<dc:creator>albagmane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99936</guid>
		<description>i have no idea why the automakers are like tat... good quality built up but bad design... some good design but bad quality built up... or some are both good in quality and design but damn expensive... or even the worse, both poor quality built up and ridiculous design although the price is affordable... so far i still havent found a vehicle with ugly design, lousyt quality and cost a super rocket price yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have no idea why the automakers are like tat&#8230; good quality built up but bad design&#8230; some good design but bad quality built up&#8230; or some are both good in quality and design but damn expensive&#8230; or even the worse, both poor quality built up and ridiculous design although the price is affordable&#8230; so far i still havent found a vehicle with ugly design, lousyt quality and cost a super rocket price yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prem3377</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99934</link>
		<dc:creator>Prem3377</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99934</guid>
		<description>my friend&#039;s father own one of this...besides the weird and ugly design...its a superb car!!the interior design and features are great...and the quality i m telling you..is on par with the germans!!the buttons,swithes, and the thing inside the car is great!!i wonder how they are able to produce such a high quality interior and price it so low???the german car are almost 4 times more expensive!!paul can get some info bout the history of this company??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my friend&#8217;s father own one of this&#8230;besides the weird and ugly design&#8230;its a superb car!!the interior design and features are great&#8230;and the quality i m telling you..is on par with the germans!!the buttons,swithes, and the thing inside the car is great!!i wonder how they are able to produce such a high quality interior and price it so low???the german car are almost 4 times more expensive!!paul can get some info bout the history of this company??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ab</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99913</link>
		<dc:creator>ab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 05:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99913</guid>
		<description>Mercedes-Benz ciplak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mercedes-Benz ciplak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azrai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99910</link>
		<dc:creator>azrai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 05:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99910</guid>
		<description>This one looks better. The dashboard seems like it is &#039;melted&#039; under the sun. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one looks better. The dashboard seems like it is &#8216;melted&#8217; under the sun. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmcwei</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99905</link>
		<dc:creator>mmcwei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99905</guid>
		<description>the non-facelifted kyron look sucks at the rear....now i began love this new face lift model...nice the rear lamp....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the non-facelifted kyron look sucks at the rear&#8230;.now i began love this new face lift model&#8230;nice the rear lamp&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aril</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99901</link>
		<dc:creator>Aril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99901</guid>
		<description>not looking nice for exterior...But interior would be Okay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not looking nice for exterior&#8230;But interior would be Okay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nizam80</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99894</link>
		<dc:creator>nizam80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99894</guid>
		<description>Hmm... i think the tail lights look like a BMW X5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; i think the tail lights look like a BMW X5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toxicboy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99893</link>
		<dc:creator>toxicboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99893</guid>
		<description>Haha, the shield shaped tail lights are gone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, the shield shaped tail lights are gone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avanza</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99888</link>
		<dc:creator>avanza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99888</guid>
		<description>A whole lot better than the previous one. Phew!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A whole lot better than the previous one. Phew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transformer</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99882</link>
		<dc:creator>transformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99882</guid>
		<description>looks very much better than the earlier version!

but just why didn&#039;t the designer remove that &quot;bulge&quot; or &quot;creasing arch&quot; between the rear windscreen and taillight.... or just simply minimised it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks very much better than the earlier version!</p>
<p>but just why didn&#8217;t the designer remove that &#8220;bulge&#8221; or &#8220;creasing arch&#8221; between the rear windscreen and taillight&#8230;. or just simply minimised it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99876</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99876</guid>
		<description>still doesn&#039;t look nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still doesn&#8217;t look nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NiceCar</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99864</link>
		<dc:creator>NiceCar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99864</guid>
		<description>it look more smooth..
dislike the previous rear lamp design..

auctioncenter2u.. seem majority still prefer the new design.. 
mayb u fired a wrong designer liao..  hehe..kidding...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it look more smooth..<br />
dislike the previous rear lamp design..</p>
<p>auctioncenter2u.. seem majority still prefer the new design..<br />
mayb u fired a wrong designer liao..  hehe..kidding&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleFire85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99855</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleFire85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99855</guid>
		<description>Well is the engine still a 2.0L CDI diesel engine used by Merz? or petrol version? Well look nice is the back.. i think this will be a big hit if price good! Anywayz i heard a Exco tell me that next year if BN win the election, the AFTA or NAP issue will be fix.. Means open market by next year! Yahoo! He also told me he gonna get a BMW X5 next year..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well is the engine still a 2.0L CDI diesel engine used by Merz? or petrol version? Well look nice is the back.. i think this will be a big hit if price good! Anywayz i heard a Exco tell me that next year if BN win the election, the AFTA or NAP issue will be fix.. Means open market by next year! Yahoo! He also told me he gonna get a BMW X5 next year..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BB</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99846</link>
		<dc:creator>BB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99846</guid>
		<description>much better than b4, especially the rear light design.
but SY quality remain a big &quot;?&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>much better than b4, especially the rear light design.<br />
but SY quality remain a big &#8220;?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Lee</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99845</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99845</guid>
		<description>a cheaper and more feasible alternative to the honda crv

love the back lights, resembles more like an estima</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a cheaper and more feasible alternative to the honda crv</p>
<p>love the back lights, resembles more like an estima</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: narrowband</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99843</link>
		<dc:creator>narrowband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/17/ssangyong-kyron-gets-a-facelift/#comment-99843</guid>
		<description>The front headlights reminds me of the new S-class.

Agree that the facelift looks much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The front headlights reminds me of the new S-class.</p>
<p>Agree that the facelift looks much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
