<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Subaru Impreza STi compared to S-GT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102654</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102654</guid>
		<description>Still ugly.... The yellow color scheme with black rims reminds me of Civic EK Type Rs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still ugly&#8230;. The yellow color scheme with black rims reminds me of Civic EK Type Rs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transformer</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102437</link>
		<dc:creator>transformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102437</guid>
		<description>its looks fail to atttact most!
the S204 looks better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its looks fail to atttact most!<br />
the S204 looks better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102431</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102431</guid>
		<description>us like chrome v much..... :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>us like chrome v much&#8230;.. :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2k</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102279</link>
		<dc:creator>h2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102279</guid>
		<description>for more pics of this new impreza...check out nihoncar.com...grille looks improved with less chrome...(the chrome version might be for US market :P)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for more pics of this new impreza&#8230;check out nihoncar.com&#8230;grille looks improved with less chrome&#8230;(the chrome version might be for US market <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mzfnd</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102278</link>
		<dc:creator>mzfnd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102278</guid>
		<description>The forever hideous Subaru. There&#039;s really no point discussing which Subaru is better looking. But, hey, beauty comes from within right eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The forever hideous Subaru. There&#8217;s really no point discussing which Subaru is better looking. But, hey, beauty comes from within right eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mza02</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102270</link>
		<dc:creator>mza02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102270</guid>
		<description>haha...subaru ran out of ideas...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha&#8230;subaru ran out of ideas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102267</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102267</guid>
		<description>copy civic headlights....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>copy civic headlights&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton.GL..</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102225</link>
		<dc:creator>proton.GL..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102225</guid>
		<description>problem with some japanese designer they are to much on details, too much time spent n designing grille, too much time spent dash board, making thing much too elaborate,

forgetting designing the basic shape of whole car is which capable of a great impact visually,

the evo 10 for example they concentrate on how the whole shape look like,
that what makes it different</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>problem with some japanese designer they are to much on details, too much time spent n designing grille, too much time spent dash board, making thing much too elaborate,</p>
<p>forgetting designing the basic shape of whole car is which capable of a great impact visually,</p>
<p>the evo 10 for example they concentrate on how the whole shape look like,<br />
that what makes it different</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitlanevo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102223</link>
		<dc:creator>mitlanevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102223</guid>
		<description>the current impreza is much much better looking.... (even the Evo X is better)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the current impreza is much much better looking&#8230;. (even the Evo X is better)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petulance</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102215</link>
		<dc:creator>petulance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102215</guid>
		<description>There is more to the car than looks. It could be a really good car to drive.

2 important things to note
- the NA engine Impreza gets a useful power increase to 103KW from 92kW.  The previous generation models were a bit underpowered. 92kW to haul a 1320kg+ car around is asking a bit.
- they have got rid of the SportsWagon &quot;hatch&quot; and replaced it with a Euro-style hatch. I like the wagon-like hatch as it was a very useful car to move things in. I guess Subaru is trying to move people who want a small wagon onto the Forester.

Am I the only one who likes the bug-eyed model? I have one in the form of the RV hatch and I think it looks better than the model that replaced it. IMHO only the current model Impreza with the koala-nose grill looks as good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is more to the car than looks. It could be a really good car to drive.</p>
<p>2 important things to note<br />
- the NA engine Impreza gets a useful power increase to 103KW from 92kW.  The previous generation models were a bit underpowered. 92kW to haul a 1320kg+ car around is asking a bit.<br />
- they have got rid of the SportsWagon &#8220;hatch&#8221; and replaced it with a Euro-style hatch. I like the wagon-like hatch as it was a very useful car to move things in. I guess Subaru is trying to move people who want a small wagon onto the Forester.</p>
<p>Am I the only one who likes the bug-eyed model? I have one in the form of the RV hatch and I think it looks better than the model that replaced it. IMHO only the current model Impreza with the koala-nose grill looks as good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sxe10r</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102211</link>
		<dc:creator>sxe10r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102211</guid>
		<description>destory impreza fans ~ .... no more rally cars feel ~ like street sedan ~ ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>destory impreza fans ~ &#8230;. no more rally cars feel ~ like street sedan ~ &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtmaniac</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102208</link>
		<dc:creator>gtmaniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102208</guid>
		<description>Looks like an everyday hatch, with ah-beng&#039;s touch..

Still find the previous (pre &amp; post-bugeye) better looking. This one is trying to hard to looks good. In looks department, Evo X wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like an everyday hatch, with ah-beng&#8217;s touch..</p>
<p>Still find the previous (pre &amp; post-bugeye) better looking. This one is trying to hard to looks good. In looks department, Evo X wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albagmane</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102184</link>
		<dc:creator>albagmane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102184</guid>
		<description>ooo... i miss the gold rims on imprezas... but undeniable, the headlights are sexy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooo&#8230; i miss the gold rims on imprezas&#8230; but undeniable, the headlights are sexy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riderx</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102178</link>
		<dc:creator>riderx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102178</guid>
		<description>subaru is going fugly these days.. i rather get the previous model but without the aeroplane grill la..

i think subaru got some problem with it marketing n produt portpotioning, i never heard a model from subaru that could sell out load in the market like KIA, TOYOTA or HONDA... something is really2 wrong with subaru this day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>subaru is going fugly these days.. i rather get the previous model but without the aeroplane grill la..</p>
<p>i think subaru got some problem with it marketing n produt portpotioning, i never heard a model from subaru that could sell out load in the market like KIA, TOYOTA or HONDA&#8230; something is really2 wrong with subaru this day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102162</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102162</guid>
		<description>it still looks ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it still looks ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleFire85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102148</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleFire85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102148</guid>
		<description>I think the design is ok, just the front grill suxs.. If they change the grill into more aggressive, maybe can sale a bit..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the design is ok, just the front grill suxs.. If they change the grill into more aggressive, maybe can sale a bit..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ab</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102140</link>
		<dc:creator>ab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102140</guid>
		<description>the impreza is dead, long live the evo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the impreza is dead, long live the evo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unicons</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102132</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unicons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102132</guid>
		<description>Really nice and can&#039;t wait for it. I&#039;m sure it will compete with Mitsubishi&#039;s Evo X.

Cheers all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice and can&#8217;t wait for it. I&#8217;m sure it will compete with Mitsubishi&#8217;s Evo X.</p>
<p>Cheers all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbet</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102120</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102120</guid>
		<description>It ain&#039;t a Subaru. Believe me, it&#039;s a facelift for old Kia Rio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It ain&#8217;t a Subaru. Believe me, it&#8217;s a facelift for old Kia Rio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azrai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102119</link>
		<dc:creator>azrai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/07/27/2008-subaru-impreza-sti-compared-to-s-gt/#comment-102119</guid>
		<description>Looks good but no previous Impreza&#039;s DNA. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good but no previous Impreza&#8217;s DNA. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

