<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Mazda 6 Details and Specifications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:12:07 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rsrulz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-188049</link>
		<dc:creator>rsrulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-188049</guid>
		<description>sorry i mean the 1.8L not 2.0L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry i mean the 1.8L not 2.0L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsrulz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-188048</link>
		<dc:creator>rsrulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-188048</guid>
		<description>how come the 2.0L petrol has so little horsepower? 120hp is less than campro cps. or is there an error in typing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how come the 2.0L petrol has so little horsepower? 120hp is less than campro cps. or is there an error in typing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOKYO 2007 LIVE: second generation Mazda Atenza</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-117665</link>
		<dc:creator>TOKYO 2007 LIVE: second generation Mazda Atenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-117665</guid>
		<description>[...] Mazda 6. I&#8217;ve already blogged about the car, so please check out the car&#8217;s details in this previous post to find out more about available engine options and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mazda 6. I&#8217;ve already blogged about the car, so please check out the car&#8217;s details in this previous post to find out more about available engine options and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US$500 million Mazda-Ford plant in Thailand</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-114603</link>
		<dc:creator>US$500 million Mazda-Ford plant in Thailand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-114603</guid>
		<description>[...] might just be getting the next generation CBU Mazda 6 from Thailand instead of Japan, once Mazda and Ford&#8217;s second plant in Thailand goes online in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] might just be getting the next generation CBU Mazda 6 from Thailand instead of Japan, once Mazda and Ford&#8217;s second plant in Thailand goes online in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raybrig85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-112167</link>
		<dc:creator>raybrig85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-112167</guid>
		<description>mazda6 still b my fav among accord and camry...thumbs up to mazda...another great car frm them...btw...mazda...when u wanna bring d cx-7 to m&#039;sia???eye catchy ma...im sure cx-7 will compete with murano and harrier here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mazda6 still b my fav among accord and camry&#8230;thumbs up to mazda&#8230;another great car frm them&#8230;btw&#8230;mazda&#8230;when u wanna bring d cx-7 to m&#8217;sia???eye catchy ma&#8230;im sure cx-7 will compete with murano and harrier here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoMeOnE</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-112081</link>
		<dc:creator>SoMeOnE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-112081</guid>
		<description>mazda&#039;s designs are CONSERVATIVE?.??..i dunno what u guys imply by sayin that but among the jap companies their designs (zoom zoom era) are the most daring and eye catching..believe me..when i say tat..in my mazda6 even a chic in a mercedes kompressor gave me a thumbs up ..not too mention the looks and smiles i get everywhere..it mite sound boastfull but i just wana stress the fact tat they so far from being CONSERVATIVE...the drivetrain may not be at potent and honda or toyota but im damn sure the chasis and driving dynamics are years ahead..and what matters is how the car puts the power it has down to the road rather than how much power it has on paper .....cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mazda&#8217;s designs are CONSERVATIVE?.??..i dunno what u guys imply by sayin that but among the jap companies their designs (zoom zoom era) are the most daring and eye catching..believe me..when i say tat..in my mazda6 even a chic in a mercedes kompressor gave me a thumbs up ..not too mention the looks and smiles i get everywhere..it mite sound boastfull but i just wana stress the fact tat they so far from being CONSERVATIVE&#8230;the drivetrain may not be at potent and honda or toyota but im damn sure the chasis and driving dynamics are years ahead..and what matters is how the car puts the power it has down to the road rather than how much power it has on paper &#8230;..cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msmar_453</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111922</link>
		<dc:creator>msmar_453</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111922</guid>
		<description>Wow! bring it here fast C&amp;C! no need to wait for US design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! bring it here fast C&amp;C! no need to wait for US design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton.GL..</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111823</link>
		<dc:creator>proton.GL..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111823</guid>
		<description>not saying that its not good,not saying that pushing the limit of design or being radically dynamic is not good,  but personally i would some what found that the non radical design ,for instance the new audi a4 is &#039;pleasing&#039; - why ? ..probally its just a matter, who like pop art , techno, or neo classic, or classical revival, 

just a personal point of view,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not saying that its not good,not saying that pushing the limit of design or being radically dynamic is not good,  but personally i would some what found that the non radical design ,for instance the new audi a4 is &#8216;pleasing&#8217; &#8211; why ? ..probally its just a matter, who like pop art , techno, or neo classic, or classical revival, </p>
<p>just a personal point of view,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaverickNeo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111777</link>
		<dc:creator>MaverickNeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111777</guid>
		<description>IMO, Mazda is the best among the three. My dream car is the RX-8, had the chance to drive it once, after that, I became a hardcore rotary engine fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, Mazda is the best among the three. My dream car is the RX-8, had the chance to drive it once, after that, I became a hardcore rotary engine fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: observerV</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111774</link>
		<dc:creator>observerV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111774</guid>
		<description>Among this 3 japanese company Mazda,Toyota and Honda, which is cheaper in terms of maintainance ? Mazda looks kinda expensive. Not sure. My instinct</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among this 3 japanese company Mazda,Toyota and Honda, which is cheaper in terms of maintainance ? Mazda looks kinda expensive. Not sure. My instinct</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitlanevo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111740</link>
		<dc:creator>mitlanevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111740</guid>
		<description>nice design, great handling and awesome specs :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice design, great handling and awesome specs <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111738</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111738</guid>
		<description>damn good looks..better than the camry..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn good looks..better than the camry..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KL-ATR</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111732</link>
		<dc:creator>KL-ATR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111732</guid>
		<description>Very nice shape!!! Good improvement over the previous 6. Well done, Mazda!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice shape!!! Good improvement over the previous 6. Well done, Mazda!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wong</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111730</link>
		<dc:creator>wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111730</guid>
		<description>yes much better than the usual Honda,Toyota....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes much better than the usual Honda,Toyota&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transformer</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111726</link>
		<dc:creator>transformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111726</guid>
		<description>Tired with T-Makes, H-Makes &amp; N-Makes Exec Sedan entries..

lets hope this Mazda6 able to make its way to bolehland...
and hope will Mitsu bring any ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tired with T-Makes, H-Makes &amp; N-Makes Exec Sedan entries..</p>
<p>lets hope this Mazda6 able to make its way to bolehland&#8230;<br />
and hope will Mitsu bring any ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longjaafar</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111722</link>
		<dc:creator>longjaafar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111722</guid>
		<description>Mazda has come a long way. I remember early 626 which boasted a cd of .42! Then they had the Capella and 808 and a few others. In Malaysia, the brand suffered because the local distributors did nothing to promote it. Those days it was Asia motors, but it had family and shareholder problems. Even now, under C&amp;C, Mazda is not their main brand, and although it is said that the brand has seperate management, it still does not get as much management attention as the Mercedes brand in C&amp;C&#039;s stable.
I have always admired the brand because of it&#039;s persistence in using the rotary Wankel engine, and making cars like the MX5 and the RX7 and later on RX8.
Their dynamism and good handling is not appreciated by the Malaysian public, because it is a fact that we have a herd mentality when buying cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mazda has come a long way. I remember early 626 which boasted a cd of .42! Then they had the Capella and 808 and a few others. In Malaysia, the brand suffered because the local distributors did nothing to promote it. Those days it was Asia motors, but it had family and shareholder problems. Even now, under C&amp;C, Mazda is not their main brand, and although it is said that the brand has seperate management, it still does not get as much management attention as the Mercedes brand in C&amp;C&#8217;s stable.<br />
I have always admired the brand because of it&#8217;s persistence in using the rotary Wankel engine, and making cars like the MX5 and the RX7 and later on RX8.<br />
Their dynamism and good handling is not appreciated by the Malaysian public, because it is a fact that we have a herd mentality when buying cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williaml</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111717</link>
		<dc:creator>williaml</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111717</guid>
		<description>Currently CBU from Japan Mazda6 2.3L sell at RM166K, so not far from local assembled Accord 2.4L and Thai made Camry 2.4L

New Mazda6 should available in 2.0L and 2.5L and most probably not the Euro spec.

Zoom Zoom...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently CBU from Japan Mazda6 2.3L sell at RM166K, so not far from local assembled Accord 2.4L and Thai made Camry 2.4L</p>
<p>New Mazda6 should available in 2.0L and 2.5L and most probably not the Euro spec.</p>
<p>Zoom Zoom&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: narrowband</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111716</link>
		<dc:creator>narrowband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111716</guid>
		<description>If this were to be priced in the range where Accord and Camry is... it will be interesting. So much sexier than those uncle-rides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this were to be priced in the range where Accord and Camry is&#8230; it will be interesting. So much sexier than those uncle-rides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arcana</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111712</link>
		<dc:creator>arcana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111712</guid>
		<description>160k probably can buy u the 2.5 version if we get 1 here.....since the 2.3 was sold around that price i guess.....bread and butter 2.0 should go for 140k region.

its a very nice car indeed, time to check out the american version first....but i still think in the end the european models tend to look nicer....not the american taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>160k probably can buy u the 2.5 version if we get 1 here&#8230;..since the 2.3 was sold around that price i guess&#8230;..bread and butter 2.0 should go for 140k region.</p>
<p>its a very nice car indeed, time to check out the american version first&#8230;.but i still think in the end the european models tend to look nicer&#8230;.not the american taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthari</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111710</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111710</guid>
		<description>If there&#039;s one japanese sedan nicer than the Civic now, it&#039;s this. Beautiful design from Mazda, as always!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s one japanese sedan nicer than the Civic now, it&#8217;s this. Beautiful design from Mazda, as always!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legacy88</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111702</link>
		<dc:creator>legacy88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111702</guid>
		<description>Compared to the current hideous 5 Series, this M6 is much much better looking.  Very Good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compared to the current hideous 5 Series, this M6 is much much better looking.  Very Good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-by</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111700</link>
		<dc:creator>e-by</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111700</guid>
		<description>Current Mazda 3 already RM100++, this Mazda 6 must be at least RM160K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current Mazda 3 already RM100++, this Mazda 6 must be at least RM160K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funbox</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111699</link>
		<dc:creator>funbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111699</guid>
		<description>I always say Madza is the Japanese version of BMW. Superb handling and performance, as well as sportiness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always say Madza is the Japanese version of BMW. Superb handling and performance, as well as sportiness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razor_clawzz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111693</link>
		<dc:creator>razor_clawzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111693</guid>
		<description>Mazda&#039;s are always nice, funny y Malaysians discriminate this brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mazda&#8217;s are always nice, funny y Malaysians discriminate this brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javanese</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111691</link>
		<dc:creator>Javanese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111691</guid>
		<description>Awesome looking car... now price it like the current Mazda 6 and watch me rush to the showroom to book one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome looking car&#8230; now price it like the current Mazda 6 and watch me rush to the showroom to book one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azrai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111686</link>
		<dc:creator>azrai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111686</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a Honda unidentical twin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a Honda unidentical twin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111676</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111676</guid>
		<description>Specs that are almost on par as a BMW and Merc. This car also looks beautiful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Specs that are almost on par as a BMW and Merc. This car also looks beautiful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akshen_kamen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111667</link>
		<dc:creator>akshen_kamen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111667</guid>
		<description>#
unlogic said,

September 21, 2007 @ 1:14 am

Mazda designs are conservative but all things are balance and pretty. What I mean is the design flow (front, side and rear). For comparison, Honda cars always have weird proportion. Just look at Civic cab forward design with oversized rear lights. But people will buy more Honda because of the name, reliability, good drive train.

__________________________________________________________________________

don&#039;t forget Toyota....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#<br />
unlogic said,</p>
<p>September 21, 2007 @ 1:14 am</p>
<p>Mazda designs are conservative but all things are balance and pretty. What I mean is the design flow (front, side and rear). For comparison, Honda cars always have weird proportion. Just look at Civic cab forward design with oversized rear lights. But people will buy more Honda because of the name, reliability, good drive train.</p>
<p>__________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>don&#8217;t forget Toyota&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unlogic</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111665</link>
		<dc:creator>unlogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111665</guid>
		<description>Mazda designs are conservative but all things are balance and pretty. What I mean is the design flow (front, side and rear). For comparison, Honda cars always have weird proportion. Just look at Civic cab forward design with oversized rear lights. But people will buy more Honda because of the name, reliability, good drive train.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mazda designs are conservative but all things are balance and pretty. What I mean is the design flow (front, side and rear). For comparison, Honda cars always have weird proportion. Just look at Civic cab forward design with oversized rear lights. But people will buy more Honda because of the name, reliability, good drive train.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akshen_kamen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111661</link>
		<dc:creator>akshen_kamen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/09/20/2008-mazda-6-details-and-specifications/#comment-111661</guid>
		<description>#
LittleFire85 said,

September 20, 2007 @ 5:46 pm

I think i saw cycle &amp; carriage advertisement on tv, saying that they are going to bring the new Mazda 6 into Malaysia by this year to sellâ€¦

Zoom Zoom Zoomâ€¦ Actually i felt Mazda perform more better in styling &amp; design compare to Toyota &amp; Hondaâ€¦

__________________________________________________________________________

i totally agree..mazda new models always make people eye didn&#039;t blinking when they look mazda car...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#<br />
LittleFire85 said,</p>
<p>September 20, 2007 @ 5:46 pm</p>
<p>I think i saw cycle &amp; carriage advertisement on tv, saying that they are going to bring the new Mazda 6 into Malaysia by this year to sellâ€¦</p>
<p>Zoom Zoom Zoomâ€¦ Actually i felt Mazda perform more better in styling &amp; design compare to Toyota &amp; Hondaâ€¦</p>
<p>__________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>i totally agree..mazda new models always make people eye didn&#8217;t blinking when they look mazda car&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
