Comments on: BMW unveils new BMW M3 Sedan

By: armandd

armandd — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:10:24 +0000

really?

By: ah liew

ah liew — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:54:54 +0000

In a humid country like Malaysia cars like BMW & other continentals won’t last.
BMW owners do you agree? In 3 to 5 years it’ll give you hell lots of problem.

Japanese cars is the best, tahan lasak!

By: phas3r

phas3r — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:53:21 +0000

i wonder why they use coupe front and sedan’s back.. the rear of the sedan is ugly, i mean they should use coupe’s back and sedan’s front then better..
anyway the interior isnt too luxurious.. i expect it to be much more luxurious than say evo x or latest sti.. maybe wanna protect the sales of M5

By: phas3r

phas3r — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:15:47 +0000

shut up lar u julian, 16 year old wanna dream of m3 and c63

By: JULIANLEE2

JULIANLEE2 — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:51:07 +0000

the evo may look fiercer, but its totally no match

By: JULIANLEE2

JULIANLEE2 — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:50:16 +0000

if they change that rear lamp i will buy 1,bmw m3 and mercedes c63 amg rear lights damn fugly, now most probably i will buy an audi rs4 now if audi malaysia sells it

By: kohbk

kohbk — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 04:19:44 +0000

no matter how it looks still cant able to afford it for the average dude.

By: narrowband

narrowband — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:11:03 +0000

I sense there will be many ‘M3 sedan’s on the road in months to come. Minus the side fins, and minus the coupe-like headlamp. Of course, minus the 414hp V8 growl. It’s so easy to imitate.

By: phas3r

phas3r — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:51:41 +0000

mitlanevo what the hell are you trying to say? this car can smoke ur evo

By: BanyakMasukWorkshop

BanyakMasukWorkshop — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:39:56 +0000

i dont know about the e90, but in the e36, the coupe did not share one single body panel with the 4dr. so everything is different, including the lights.

if the e90/e92 is similar, it would probably mean the lights from the coupe do not fit on the sedan.

in many respects, the 4dr M3, is a bit like the M5, they are quite understated.

the difference with the owners who make their cars up to look like an M3, is when you step on the loud pedal. looks dont always make up for no-go.

By: szw

szw — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:00:49 +0000

m5 colour…
stealth fighter

By: kei9

kei9 — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:43:30 +0000

HMM ANYONE KNOWS?

BMW= decrease in extended life

Merc = increase in extended life

By: feez98

feez98 — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:20:32 +0000

overall ok lar, but honestly this model ruins its own tradition n reputation as a sports car. now more normal E90 users would juz upgrades its styling like dis model. hahahaah…. plz correct me if i’m wrong…

By: wong

wong — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:21:11 +0000

Looks really nice,maybe wait for a few years and buy a secondhand..very much cheaper…even a 10 year old bmw is still veeery nice to drive…

By: hyundai

hyundai — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:20:23 +0000

The head lamp looks so good!

By: danoneism

danoneism — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:03:01 +0000

i think the rear lamp looks better if the signal were in white…:P
but yea…i hve to admit it…coupe rear lamp looks better….

By: mitlanevo

mitlanevo — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:01:25 +0000

useless and pointless…..

By: nmh

nmh — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 05:40:34 +0000

I think the rear light looks cooler if the white reverse lamp is replace by body colored metal

By: tokmoh

tokmoh — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 04:40:25 +0000

The exterior is too understated, it almost look like any other Hyundai-ish ie fugly 3-series. Compared to C63 AMG, the M3 looks too ‘tame’. The Merc at least distinguished its AMG from the normal C-class by adding twin bulge on the bonnet, smoked the headlamps, et cetera.

Sory M3, the AMG’s for me for both styling n power factor

By: kei9

kei9 — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 04:19:11 +0000

it got grumpy looking back..so mean..eww

By: drebar

drebar — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:04:20 +0000

don’t think the rear lights is ugly. perhaps it’s just not appealing enough, and looks tame.

anyway, no matter how it looks, i’m sure a lot of ppl will be damn proud to own one… wakakaz…

By: 4G63T DSM

4G63T DSM — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:23:24 +0000

The point of the M3 Sedan is having a M3 Sedan. Not a M3 coupe with 2 extra doors tacked on. I still think its still too easy to tell apart the M3 sedan from a regular 335. The old E36 M3 was better in that respect.

Somehow… Audi does Q-ships better with the S series.

By: tHe CuLpRit

tHe CuLpRit — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:56:01 +0000

they kept the rear lights…. why Bangle, why?!

By: kimmy

kimmy — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:48:48 +0000

Not liking the hole in the rear bumper.

By: aksMs

aksMs — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 21:48:10 +0000

F430CS, I think most of the general public were not really impressed by the tail light design. Personally, I think the overall design is fine but with the face of a bloated fish on the back. Why couldn’t they just carry the coupe’s design with the sedan M3 as a facelift exercise?

By: mystvearn

mystvearn — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:28:47 +0000

The rear lamps makes the M3 look stupid

By: F430CS

F430CS — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:39:35 +0000

Why dent on the bonnet? Everything looks fine for me, especially the rear! Four doors m3 always cool.

By: aksMs

aksMs — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:15:57 +0000

I don’t know…the rear lights has killed it for me. I agree MisterBenjo. I prefer the Coupe’s rear than this one. Paul, how about the high-res pix? Where can I view them? Didn’t seems to find any when I “Googled” it.

By: nmh

nmh — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 16:04:32 +0000

Now normal 3 series sedan can modified to beautiful M3 front face

By: MaverickNeo

MaverickNeo — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 16:00:07 +0000

back look abit funny to me..like they tried to mush everything together…too muscular..not sleek..typical BMW..pretty powerful engine tho.