<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No timeframe for Proton turnaround?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:58:17 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JULIANLEE2</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-130242</link>
		<dc:creator>JULIANLEE2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-130242</guid>
		<description>yea, boycott proton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea, boycott proton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTAllTheBest</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-130093</link>
		<dc:creator>PTAllTheBest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-130093</guid>
		<description>no way i will let them do it again. no support from G. no money from tax payers. no time to play around. NO!!!
just go close shop...!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no way i will let them do it again. no support from G. no money from tax payers. no time to play around. NO!!!<br />
just go close shop&#8230;!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JULIANLEE2</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129943</link>
		<dc:creator>JULIANLEE2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129943</guid>
		<description>get rid of this company</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>get rid of this company</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MicroKiller</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129723</link>
		<dc:creator>MicroKiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129723</guid>
		<description>Even if there would be a time frame.. i dare to say that chances are .. proton cant meet the time frame then wht else... get rid of the ceo and bring in another  one.. probably which would be someone thts rather familiar in their circle.. then another round of all this drama..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if there would be a time frame.. i dare to say that chances are .. proton cant meet the time frame then wht else&#8230; get rid of the ceo and bring in another  one.. probably which would be someone thts rather familiar in their circle.. then another round of all this drama..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JULIANLEE2</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129259</link>
		<dc:creator>JULIANLEE2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 02:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129259</guid>
		<description>china has roewe, &quot;modern gentleman&quot; MG, cheap audi&#039;s(special AUDI A6L for china), cheap bmw&#039;s(bmw 540 Li, special for china), volkswagen, GM, cadillac, geely, chery, the fake smart car etc etc, how can a stupid car from malaysia work there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>china has roewe, &#8220;modern gentleman&#8221; MG, cheap audi&#8217;s(special AUDI A6L for china), cheap bmw&#8217;s(bmw 540 Li, special for china), volkswagen, GM, cadillac, geely, chery, the fake smart car etc etc, how can a stupid car from malaysia work there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: limsk</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129230</link>
		<dc:creator>limsk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129230</guid>
		<description>&quot;no time frame turn around...&quot; let me thinks about this hidden message here??

OK..that mean further reduction of oil subsidies and increase of road tolls,  channel it for penalty to be paid another delay for AFTA and bail-out of Proton financial problems...when that happens again.. which can be possible if China Youngman partnership turn sour or bad sales happens we have yet to here know about the sale performance there.. Youngman core business has been on commercial vehicle  so back to &quot;square-one&quot; business then..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;no time frame turn around&#8230;&#8221; let me thinks about this hidden message here??</p>
<p>OK..that mean further reduction of oil subsidies and increase of road tolls,  channel it for penalty to be paid another delay for AFTA and bail-out of Proton financial problems&#8230;when that happens again.. which can be possible if China Youngman partnership turn sour or bad sales happens we have yet to here know about the sale performance there.. Youngman core business has been on commercial vehicle  so back to &#8220;square-one&#8221; business then..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129120</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129120</guid>
		<description>aiyoâ€¦what is so difficult, time frame laâ€¦this laâ€¦that laâ€¦
no money to turn around, ask from â€˜daddyâ€™ again la, â€˜daddyâ€™ got money maâ€¦no worry!
---------
Sugar daddy - don&#039;t forget G&#039;s $$$ is from tax payer monies.

Sugar mummy - NAP - Import duty, Excise duty and Sales tax also sux poor rakyats.

Never in the &quot;history of mankind&quot; it is double-parallel one way ticket to put rakyat in such a very disadvantage position for the sake of acquiring commercial products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aiyoâ€¦what is so difficult, time frame laâ€¦this laâ€¦that laâ€¦<br />
no money to turn around, ask from â€˜daddyâ€™ again la, â€˜daddyâ€™ got money maâ€¦no worry!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Sugar daddy &#8211; don&#8217;t forget G&#8217;s $$$ is from tax payer monies.</p>
<p>Sugar mummy &#8211; NAP &#8211; Import duty, Excise duty and Sales tax also sux poor rakyats.</p>
<p>Never in the &#8220;history of mankind&#8221; it is double-parallel one way ticket to put rakyat in such a very disadvantage position for the sake of acquiring commercial products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129119</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129119</guid>
		<description>or it really is one in a million of malaysians who actually does support proton. 
---------------
If this is true, then the chap must be &quot;infected by severe-attention-deficit syndrome&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or it really is one in a million of malaysians who actually does support proton.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
If this is true, then the chap must be &#8220;infected by severe-attention-deficit syndrome&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129114</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129114</guid>
		<description>&quot;spread the love&quot; - I love Milo but not Milo tin on the wheel! He, he, he, ............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;spread the love&#8221; &#8211; I love Milo but not Milo tin on the wheel! He, he, he, &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topgunthang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129095</link>
		<dc:creator>topgunthang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-129095</guid>
		<description>i would like to think that 25 years have taught us that even if the deal with VW was successful....you wouldnt be seeing any golf r32,phaeton,touareg or gti on the cheap in malaysia. just think mitsu and lotus. 

the proton supporters u see in forums is problably just a hired hand or an employee in the marketing dept dedicated to &#039;spread the love&#039; in the forums. He&#039;s problably on holiday in switzerland or something.

or it really is one in a million of malaysians who actually does support proton.  whatever the real situation is nobody knows....all i need to know is that i am not a supporter of proton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to think that 25 years have taught us that even if the deal with VW was successful&#8230;.you wouldnt be seeing any golf r32,phaeton,touareg or gti on the cheap in malaysia. just think mitsu and lotus. </p>
<p>the proton supporters u see in forums is problably just a hired hand or an employee in the marketing dept dedicated to &#8217;spread the love&#8217; in the forums. He&#8217;s problably on holiday in switzerland or something.</p>
<p>or it really is one in a million of malaysians who actually does support proton.  whatever the real situation is nobody knows&#8230;.all i need to know is that i am not a supporter of proton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vandenlye</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128978</link>
		<dc:creator>vandenlye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128978</guid>
		<description>aiyo...what is so difficult, time frame la...this la...that la...
no money to turn around, ask from &#039;daddy&#039; again la, &#039;daddy&#039; got money ma...no worry! already 20 years old, this is not the first time to ask money, dont be shy...even if &#039;daddy&#039; known the &#039;baby&#039; got no money to spend, &#039;daddy&#039; will automatic give &#039;some&#039; money, no problem, dont even bother to ask...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aiyo&#8230;what is so difficult, time frame la&#8230;this la&#8230;that la&#8230;<br />
no money to turn around, ask from &#8216;daddy&#8217; again la, &#8216;daddy&#8217; got money ma&#8230;no worry! already 20 years old, this is not the first time to ask money, dont be shy&#8230;even if &#8216;daddy&#8217; known the &#8216;baby&#8217; got no money to spend, &#8216;daddy&#8217; will automatic give &#8217;some&#8217; money, no problem, dont even bother to ask&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JULIANLEE2</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128972</link>
		<dc:creator>JULIANLEE2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128972</guid>
		<description>where is my golf r32?my phaeton?touareg?
they were all supposed to be here for cheap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is my golf r32?my phaeton?touareg?<br />
they were all supposed to be here for cheap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128959</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128959</guid>
		<description>we want VW...!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we want VW&#8230;!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles27</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128918</link>
		<dc:creator>charles27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128918</guid>
		<description>told them already... quickly sell the P... get the money.. go build another factory, hire many many. See laa.. now share drop, already lost 18%... use your brain laa.

rejecting the vw .. sure means the P is not turnaround. Will you expect the share to remain or grow with that decision?

it will keep falling... soon later, share holder will piss off. Then G take out money buy those paper.. what a waste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>told them already&#8230; quickly sell the P&#8230; get the money.. go build another factory, hire many many. See laa.. now share drop, already lost 18%&#8230; use your brain laa.</p>
<p>rejecting the vw .. sure means the P is not turnaround. Will you expect the share to remain or grow with that decision?</p>
<p>it will keep falling&#8230; soon later, share holder will piss off. Then G take out money buy those paper.. what a waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheDuck</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128899</link>
		<dc:creator>TheDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128899</guid>
		<description>You are right! Where are they?

All &#039;MALU&#039; to face the onslaught of MALAYSIANs getting together and bashing that pathetic company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right! Where are they?</p>
<p>All &#8216;MALU&#8217; to face the onslaught of MALAYSIANs getting together and bashing that pathetic company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128895</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128895</guid>
		<description>Optimistics vs. Pessimistics

Optimistics

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/23/business/19553026&amp;sec=business

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/23/business/19554133&amp;sec=business

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/23/business/19557465&amp;sec=business

Pessimistics

http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/news2007.php?itemid=497

http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/news2007.php?itemid=483

http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/news2007.php?itemid=481

Both have their points but the weightage if apply Pareto principle (20:80)are: -

In term of weightage, the optimistics comprise at most 20% CHANCES for success but pessimistics comprise at least 80% of PROBABLE failure.

Pathetic, there are still ill informed and misinform blind protonian defender out there give &quot;patriotic congratulatory&quot; statements!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Optimistics vs. Pessimistics</p>
<p>Optimistics</p>
<p><a href="http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/23/business/19553026&amp;sec=business" rel="nofollow">http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/23/business/19553026&amp;sec=business</a></p>
<p><a href="http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/23/business/19554133&amp;sec=business" rel="nofollow">http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/23/business/19554133&amp;sec=business</a></p>
<p><a href="http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/23/business/19557465&amp;sec=business" rel="nofollow">http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/11/23/business/19557465&amp;sec=business</a></p>
<p>Pessimistics</p>
<p><a href="http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/news2007.php?itemid=497" rel="nofollow">http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/news2007.php?itemid=497</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/news2007.php?itemid=483" rel="nofollow">http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/news2007.php?itemid=483</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/news2007.php?itemid=481" rel="nofollow">http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/news2007.php?itemid=481</a></p>
<p>Both have their points but the weightage if apply Pareto principle (20:80)are: -</p>
<p>In term of weightage, the optimistics comprise at most 20% CHANCES for success but pessimistics comprise at least 80% of PROBABLE failure.</p>
<p>Pathetic, there are still ill informed and misinform blind protonian defender out there give &#8220;patriotic congratulatory&#8221; statements!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2ST</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128859</link>
		<dc:creator>2ST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128859</guid>
		<description>Whre are all the protong cheerboys...?
Silent only?protong+gov+media+supporter=no brain what so ever! their knees also no functional brain.
Tq,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whre are all the protong cheerboys&#8230;?<br />
Silent only?protong+gov+media+supporter=no brain what so ever! their knees also no functional brain.<br />
Tq,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JULIANLEE2</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128857</link>
		<dc:creator>JULIANLEE2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128857</guid>
		<description>it will be the same, kahzanah very shite company that is, fully sponsored by our &quot;goverment&quot;(the tax money we pay by working so hard in order to buy overselves a better car like a bmw 530i where we can buy a lamborghni gallardo in italy for the same value of money there)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it will be the same, kahzanah very shite company that is, fully sponsored by our &#8220;goverment&#8221;(the tax money we pay by working so hard in order to buy overselves a better car like a bmw 530i where we can buy a lamborghni gallardo in italy for the same value of money there)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sQew</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128843</link>
		<dc:creator>sQew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128843</guid>
		<description>Proton should become non GLC company if they want to market their car globally. I think this is mistake, Japan car also have collaboration with europe car comp to get their euro style design. Still dissapointment for me, wait until its collapse again then another CEO will be appointed the bla bla bla</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proton should become non GLC company if they want to market their car globally. I think this is mistake, Japan car also have collaboration with europe car comp to get their euro style design. Still dissapointment for me, wait until its collapse again then another CEO will be appointed the bla bla bla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: in_put</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128839</link>
		<dc:creator>in_put</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128839</guid>
		<description>The screws have been turning on P1 for quite some time, but I guess they don&#039;t really feel the squeeze because they chose to ignore it. Perhaps if P1 shares drop quickly...much like Satria&#039;s faulty automatic windows, then maybe some noise will be heard...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The screws have been turning on P1 for quite some time, but I guess they don&#8217;t really feel the squeeze because they chose to ignore it. Perhaps if P1 shares drop quickly&#8230;much like Satria&#8217;s faulty automatic windows, then maybe some noise will be heard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raybrig85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128830</link>
		<dc:creator>raybrig85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128830</guid>
		<description>TO MITLANEVO AND NMH,

some of u jz see at the scope of fast and handling but not overallâ€¦i do agree dat renault clio v6 is fast and handyâ€¦dun under estimate me bcoz i already drove dis car when i was in londonâ€¦it is my frenâ€™s with blue in colorâ€¦i know what im talking abtâ€¦yesâ€¦i agree it is fast and handyâ€¦but in term of practicallityâ€¦and compare to the other hot hatch available in dis current timeâ€¦4 me it is not affordable and uselessâ€¦it still gt a lot of car i can choose and buy rather than choose dis beauty.i can buy an affordable sport car and better than dis one with d same priceâ€¦.so guysâ€¦DUN TELL ME I DONT KNOW ABOUT THIS CAR AND HAVE TO REVIEW IT IN THE YOUTUBEâ€¦I ALREADY DROVE ITâ€¦â€¦it is jz my opinionâ€¦.and the other are not same like meâ€¦</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO MITLANEVO AND NMH,</p>
<p>some of u jz see at the scope of fast and handling but not overallâ€¦i do agree dat renault clio v6 is fast and handyâ€¦dun under estimate me bcoz i already drove dis car when i was in londonâ€¦it is my frenâ€™s with blue in colorâ€¦i know what im talking abtâ€¦yesâ€¦i agree it is fast and handyâ€¦but in term of practicallityâ€¦and compare to the other hot hatch available in dis current timeâ€¦4 me it is not affordable and uselessâ€¦it still gt a lot of car i can choose and buy rather than choose dis beauty.i can buy an affordable sport car and better than dis one with d same priceâ€¦.so guysâ€¦DUN TELL ME I DONT KNOW ABOUT THIS CAR AND HAVE TO REVIEW IT IN THE YOUTUBEâ€¦I ALREADY DROVE ITâ€¦â€¦it is jz my opinionâ€¦.and the other are not same like meâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raybrig85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128820</link>
		<dc:creator>raybrig85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128820</guid>
		<description>too many politics in proton...they will survive bcoz of their  car is so so cheap and  many ppl cant afford to buy other but if this still happen and happen...trust me...eventho they survive but they will never ever succeed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too many politics in proton&#8230;they will survive bcoz of their  car is so so cheap and  many ppl cant afford to buy other but if this still happen and happen&#8230;trust me&#8230;eventho they survive but they will never ever succeed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topgunthang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128783</link>
		<dc:creator>topgunthang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128783</guid>
		<description>they can go on and improve all they want. fact is proton will only sell in malaysia. all these deals with iran or china are just paper stats. which usually result in vapourware like the hydroxene technology. that professor even disgraced malaysia and our leader by proving himself to be a fake for the whole world to see. 

already lost the automotive hub of south east asia to thailand and indo and these people still beleive proton has a chance. fact is there is no chance in hell they can improve themselves but just rely on a protected and desperate market (those that are forced to replace thier aging cars i.e saga and wiras) to produce a spike in profit in a long continous freefall market loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they can go on and improve all they want. fact is proton will only sell in malaysia. all these deals with iran or china are just paper stats. which usually result in vapourware like the hydroxene technology. that professor even disgraced malaysia and our leader by proving himself to be a fake for the whole world to see. </p>
<p>already lost the automotive hub of south east asia to thailand and indo and these people still beleive proton has a chance. fact is there is no chance in hell they can improve themselves but just rely on a protected and desperate market (those that are forced to replace thier aging cars i.e saga and wiras) to produce a spike in profit in a long continous freefall market loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunners4Life</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128767</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunners4Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128767</guid>
		<description>i akin this scenario to that of england&#039;s....the aftermath: we mourned, we cuss, we cursed, which is a natural reaction but above all we show that we care.....there is only one way to go...go up!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i akin this scenario to that of england&#8217;s&#8230;.the aftermath: we mourned, we cuss, we cursed, which is a natural reaction but above all we show that we care&#8230;..there is only one way to go&#8230;go up!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj3377</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128743</link>
		<dc:creator>aj3377</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 03:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128743</guid>
		<description>Proton is a dead meat now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proton is a dead meat now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xsaraloeb</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128679</link>
		<dc:creator>xsaraloeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128679</guid>
		<description>What a dumb dumb scenario....we as consumer are the dummest !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a dumb dumb scenario&#8230;.we as consumer are the dummest !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neo2</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128607</link>
		<dc:creator>neo2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128607</guid>
		<description>At least our share market is reacting against the talk-off efficiently, though might not positively. To certain extend, even economist do not entirely agree that share price reflects the actual profit per earnings (P/E ratio) of a PLC, but in P1 case, I guess the investors confidence is not that. This might attibuted to a few reasons, and from what I could summarize from a few financial analysts, most of them do not view optimistically of P1 long term and strategic sustainability and financial viability. Many would condemn the arrogance and even stupidity of P1 to standalone, and the most hideous part is it plans to goes along with the invincible protective umbrella granted by G. And worst of all, no timeframe is set up in order to compete in open free market. A typical mindset that is pledging the administration of our country. Or some would prefer to call it &quot;Juara Kampung&quot; (aka Village Champion). Please leave Nicole David or Datuk Michelle Yeoh out of out this nonsense. Globalisation is at doorstep, we are losing valuable talents to neigbouring countries (after we have spent so much on grooming the talents), emerging markets with even lower labour costs, such as Vietnam, China and even the brotherhood Indonesia are sweeping the world with its unbeatable cheap labour costs, and of course my favourite part, we are still relying mainly on oil (40% of our nation income comes from ever depleting oil reserve) when Dubai is already investing heavily in swifting its economic fundamentals. In short, P1 is like an expensive &quot;nation pride&quot; (bcoz we are paying the bills, aka forcing to buy cheap car, that merely brings you from point A to point B, no more than that, for the past 20 years, and for the next, let me see, may be forever, sadly) that sum up the operative of our country. So, you get the picture, right? Stop whinning around besides mocking, giving sarcastic comments and teasing, it&#039;s not helping. If you are really not agreeable about it, then you should do sth about it. For instance, make sure you are registered voter and do not come and tell me, sorry, guys, you cannot vote bcoz you are not registered yet. Btw, I&#039;m not representative or receiving any &quot;you-know-what&quot; from any parties, I&#039;m doing this country a favour, otherwise we are no more better than Thailand, Philliphines or even Taiwan. Trust me on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least our share market is reacting against the talk-off efficiently, though might not positively. To certain extend, even economist do not entirely agree that share price reflects the actual profit per earnings (P/E ratio) of a PLC, but in P1 case, I guess the investors confidence is not that. This might attibuted to a few reasons, and from what I could summarize from a few financial analysts, most of them do not view optimistically of P1 long term and strategic sustainability and financial viability. Many would condemn the arrogance and even stupidity of P1 to standalone, and the most hideous part is it plans to goes along with the invincible protective umbrella granted by G. And worst of all, no timeframe is set up in order to compete in open free market. A typical mindset that is pledging the administration of our country. Or some would prefer to call it &#8220;Juara Kampung&#8221; (aka Village Champion). Please leave Nicole David or Datuk Michelle Yeoh out of out this nonsense. Globalisation is at doorstep, we are losing valuable talents to neigbouring countries (after we have spent so much on grooming the talents), emerging markets with even lower labour costs, such as Vietnam, China and even the brotherhood Indonesia are sweeping the world with its unbeatable cheap labour costs, and of course my favourite part, we are still relying mainly on oil (40% of our nation income comes from ever depleting oil reserve) when Dubai is already investing heavily in swifting its economic fundamentals. In short, P1 is like an expensive &#8220;nation pride&#8221; (bcoz we are paying the bills, aka forcing to buy cheap car, that merely brings you from point A to point B, no more than that, for the past 20 years, and for the next, let me see, may be forever, sadly) that sum up the operative of our country. So, you get the picture, right? Stop whinning around besides mocking, giving sarcastic comments and teasing, it&#8217;s not helping. If you are really not agreeable about it, then you should do sth about it. For instance, make sure you are registered voter and do not come and tell me, sorry, guys, you cannot vote bcoz you are not registered yet. Btw, I&#8217;m not representative or receiving any &#8220;you-know-what&#8221; from any parties, I&#8217;m doing this country a favour, otherwise we are no more better than Thailand, Philliphines or even Taiwan. Trust me on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128583</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128583</guid>
		<description>Nex few days another chap from G may come out with another &quot;exciting&quot; statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nex few days another chap from G may come out with another &#8220;exciting&#8221; statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shamel</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128521</link>
		<dc:creator>shamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128521</guid>
		<description>I guess next year, Proton share must be below RM3 mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess next year, Proton share must be below RM3 mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128501</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/11/22/no-timeframe-for-proton-turnaround/#comment-128501</guid>
		<description>Wait another 3 years, then see if need partner or not. Rakyat will still have to suffer more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait another 3 years, then see if need partner or not. Rakyat will still have to suffer more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
