<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proton back to black for this quarter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: azrai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131819</link>
		<dc:creator>azrai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 08:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131819</guid>
		<description>4.9m profit compared to almost 500m loss before. Hmm...1% right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4.9m profit compared to almost 500m loss before. Hmm&#8230;1% right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common-sensor</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131771</link>
		<dc:creator>common-sensor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 02:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131771</guid>
		<description>mystvearn said,
December 2, 2007 @ 1:04 am 

Since proton has Lotus, why not make a luxury brand from it? Like Lexus-Toyota. Acura-Honda.
then sell Lotus here.

&quot;LOTUS PANDAI BUAT KERETA &quot;KARTUN&quot; MAAA ... stop dreaming bro&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mystvearn said,<br />
December 2, 2007 @ 1:04 am </p>
<p>Since proton has Lotus, why not make a luxury brand from it? Like Lexus-Toyota. Acura-Honda.<br />
then sell Lotus here.</p>
<p>&#8220;LOTUS PANDAI BUAT KERETA &#8220;KARTUN&#8221; MAAA &#8230; stop dreaming bro&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: auctioncenter2u</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131740</link>
		<dc:creator>auctioncenter2u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131740</guid>
		<description>Proton&#039;s Share Price still LOW, RM3 might be the RIGHT deal soon.

BLACK for a while, RED might be BACK. like playing CASINO ROLLET</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proton&#8217;s Share Price still LOW, RM3 might be the RIGHT deal soon.</p>
<p>BLACK for a while, RED might be BACK. like playing CASINO ROLLET</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neo2</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131684</link>
		<dc:creator>neo2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131684</guid>
		<description>Arguably, like P1 MD said, it just a quarterly profit, the figure is not even 1 year yet. The profit might be triggered by new model Persona and cheap sales of due model Iswara. The next quarter, that is 2008 Q1 will evidence the sustainability of P1 when it introduces BLM. There&#039;s not too much victory to celebrate as things only gets much and much more difficult and tougher, not the other way round. Surviving at our very own homeland is one thing, competing outside the protected safe playground is another thing. When all these things add up, it might just become an intereting opera soap drama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arguably, like P1 MD said, it just a quarterly profit, the figure is not even 1 year yet. The profit might be triggered by new model Persona and cheap sales of due model Iswara. The next quarter, that is 2008 Q1 will evidence the sustainability of P1 when it introduces BLM. There&#8217;s not too much victory to celebrate as things only gets much and much more difficult and tougher, not the other way round. Surviving at our very own homeland is one thing, competing outside the protected safe playground is another thing. When all these things add up, it might just become an intereting opera soap drama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knowledgecentre</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131642</link>
		<dc:creator>knowledgecentre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131642</guid>
		<description>I think we should just wait for the new Proton BLM and then look at the quality of the car and that will give us a good gauge on where Proton is heading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should just wait for the new Proton BLM and then look at the quality of the car and that will give us a good gauge on where Proton is heading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmx</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131636</link>
		<dc:creator>bmx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131636</guid>
		<description>BigFish said,
December 2, 2007 @ 2:41 pm 

This is alternative view to Proton â€œprofitsâ€, accounting profits not operating/sales profits.

http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/letter.php?itemid=758

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


This behaviour is very common in this Bolehland, no shame at all, CROOKS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigFish said,<br />
December 2, 2007 @ 2:41 pm </p>
<p>This is alternative view to Proton â€œprofitsâ€, accounting profits not operating/sales profits.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/letter.php?itemid=758" rel="nofollow">http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/letter.php?itemid=758</a></p>
<p>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>This behaviour is very common in this Bolehland, no shame at all, CROOKS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton GL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131631</link>
		<dc:creator>proton GL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131631</guid>
		<description>sorry torque max 3500 to 6000 roughly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry torque max 3500 to 6000 roughly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: are5th</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131611</link>
		<dc:creator>are5th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 12:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131611</guid>
		<description>viva proton! good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>viva proton! good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131608</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131608</guid>
		<description>i hope dis won&#039;t make proton over confidence .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope dis won&#8217;t make proton over confidence .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ob8</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131604</link>
		<dc:creator>ob8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 10:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131604</guid>
		<description>proton needs more beutifool cars. the age of producing &#039;cant sell&#039; cars must end. remove the cheap plastics. remove chronies. confirm untong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>proton needs more beutifool cars. the age of producing &#8216;cant sell&#8217; cars must end. remove the cheap plastics. remove chronies. confirm untong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131580</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 06:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131580</guid>
		<description>This is alternative view to Proton &quot;profits&quot;, accounting profits not operating/sales profits.

http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/letter.php?itemid=758</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is alternative view to Proton &#8220;profits&#8221;, accounting profits not operating/sales profits.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/letter.php?itemid=758" rel="nofollow">http://www.malaysia-today.net/nuc2006/letter.php?itemid=758</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131510</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131510</guid>
		<description>Buy Proton share, nanti jadi duit pisang Jepun.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy Proton share, nanti jadi duit pisang Jepun&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torishimeyakuin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131499</link>
		<dc:creator>torishimeyakuin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131499</guid>
		<description>No doubt Proton is so confident. 
They are going to make big bucks next Spring dude..better to buy Proton share now since it&#039;s still low down. Hurry up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt Proton is so confident.<br />
They are going to make big bucks next Spring dude..better to buy Proton share now since it&#8217;s still low down. Hurry up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 90125</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131454</link>
		<dc:creator>90125</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131454</guid>
		<description>â€œNever say never. But in the meantime, things have moved on,â€ said Steve Carlisle, head of GM SEA.----------------------------------------------

Keep moving....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œNever say never. But in the meantime, things have moved on,â€ said Steve Carlisle, head of GM SEA.&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Keep moving&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: droll</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131439</link>
		<dc:creator>droll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131439</guid>
		<description>reasons why there is this sudden hoohah about Proton in our public media.
1. public media controlled by govt.
2. proton&#039;s boss needs to show he is boss and doing things right.
3. boost up share prices
4. show the world proton is hero and right by slamming the doors on VW i.e. damage control for dissing the germans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reasons why there is this sudden hoohah about Proton in our public media.<br />
1. public media controlled by govt.<br />
2. proton&#8217;s boss needs to show he is boss and doing things right.<br />
3. boost up share prices<br />
4. show the world proton is hero and right by slamming the doors on VW i.e. damage control for dissing the germans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131434</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131434</guid>
		<description>Since proton has Lotus, why not make a luxury brand from it? Like Lexus-Toyota. Acura-Honda. 
then sell Lotus here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since proton has Lotus, why not make a luxury brand from it? Like Lexus-Toyota. Acura-Honda.<br />
then sell Lotus here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giveachance</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131427</link>
		<dc:creator>giveachance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131427</guid>
		<description>KL-ATR said,
Last yearâ€™s quarter they lost 250M. This quarter they made 3.5M and theyâ€™re so excited. How many years do they need to recover 250M? 
--------------------------------------------------------

Cmon man, -250M to +3.5 is a pretty big deal. It is a difference of +253.5Million. A complete turnaround in profit is impossible, but they are doing a good job. Impressive if I should say. Imagine if with this performance, next year&#039;s quater would be +257Million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KL-ATR said,<br />
Last yearâ€™s quarter they lost 250M. This quarter they made 3.5M and theyâ€™re so excited. How many years do they need to recover 250M?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Cmon man, -250M to +3.5 is a pretty big deal. It is a difference of +253.5Million. A complete turnaround in profit is impossible, but they are doing a good job. Impressive if I should say. Imagine if with this performance, next year&#8217;s quater would be +257Million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: droll</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131425</link>
		<dc:creator>droll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131425</guid>
		<description>read the fine line carefully. they made about 6.6 million from sale of land and recouped about 40+ million from costs that have been &quot;recovered&quot; because of R&amp;D they didn&#039;t do or something like that..... so they made profit by not doing anything which is fake profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read the fine line carefully. they made about 6.6 million from sale of land and recouped about 40+ million from costs that have been &#8220;recovered&#8221; because of R&amp;D they didn&#8217;t do or something like that&#8230;.. so they made profit by not doing anything which is fake profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131421</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131421</guid>
		<description>Based on this KPI, they call off talk with VW and request G give them a chance. That is &quot;beautiful&quot; in our country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on this KPI, they call off talk with VW and request G give them a chance. That is &#8220;beautiful&#8221; in our country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KL-ATR</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131417</link>
		<dc:creator>KL-ATR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131417</guid>
		<description>Last year&#039;s quarter they lost 250M. This quarter they made 3.5M and they&#039;re so excited. How many years do they need to recover 250M? The path is so clear but yet, so many chose to be blind to the fact and only wish to be in dreamland. What is the use of pride when you are poor? Why be proud of something lousy? This I can never understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year&#8217;s quarter they lost 250M. This quarter they made 3.5M and they&#8217;re so excited. How many years do they need to recover 250M? The path is so clear but yet, so many chose to be blind to the fact and only wish to be in dreamland. What is the use of pride when you are poor? Why be proud of something lousy? This I can never understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131410</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131410</guid>
		<description>Now the Proton talking is more realistic, despite turn to black again, &quot;much work need to be done&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the Proton talking is more realistic, despite turn to black again, &#8220;much work need to be done&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131409</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131409</guid>
		<description>Just wonder if without NAP in this country, who wanna interested to deal or partner with Proton except salvage their Tg. Malim spanking factory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wonder if without NAP in this country, who wanna interested to deal or partner with Proton except salvage their Tg. Malim spanking factory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFish</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131408</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131408</guid>
		<description>Now back in black again, a decent job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now back in black again, a decent job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4G63T DSM</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131403</link>
		<dc:creator>4G63T DSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131403</guid>
		<description>With NAP in place, only proton managed to eek into the black after 6 consecutive quaterly losses.

Without NAP in place Proton is toast, and then you can hear how &quot;proud&quot; they are with Proton &quot;fighting&quot; off foreign competition.

What a shame. 

As with most &quot;national projects&quot;, this is becoming to be another embarassment for the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With NAP in place, only proton managed to eek into the black after 6 consecutive quaterly losses.</p>
<p>Without NAP in place Proton is toast, and then you can hear how &#8220;proud&#8221; they are with Proton &#8220;fighting&#8221; off foreign competition.</p>
<p>What a shame. </p>
<p>As with most &#8220;national projects&#8221;, this is becoming to be another embarassment for the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w_lighter</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131385</link>
		<dc:creator>w_lighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131385</guid>
		<description>Probably they going to put NAP as &quot;hak orang melayu&quot; next........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably they going to put NAP as &#8220;hak orang melayu&#8221; next&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTAllTheBest</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131380</link>
		<dc:creator>PTAllTheBest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131380</guid>
		<description>yeah.. yeah.. lets scrap NAP and see how u gonna bring your market...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah.. yeah.. lets scrap NAP and see how u gonna bring your market&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acbc</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131378</link>
		<dc:creator>acbc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131378</guid>
		<description>If Proton can compete, the G must scrap NAP and AP immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Proton can compete, the G must scrap NAP and AP immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torishimeyakuin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131362</link>
		<dc:creator>torishimeyakuin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131362</guid>
		<description>Maibatsu dude, yeah you right. There is too much speculation and shite talk when it comes to Proton. Why can&#039;t they just do and focus on the bloody forking WORK. Bloody hell. I thought all these shite was over already !!!

Apparently they like to do the thing they good at most.....politicking and shitting. Helpless!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maibatsu dude, yeah you right. There is too much speculation and shite talk when it comes to Proton. Why can&#8217;t they just do and focus on the bloody forking WORK. Bloody hell. I thought all these shite was over already !!!</p>
<p>Apparently they like to do the thing they good at most&#8230;..politicking and shitting. Helpless!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131360</link>
		<dc:creator>nmh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 08:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131360</guid>
		<description>Proton is doin good, i hope its gettin better...its time to scrap NAP. Proton shud play in the same league with other manufacturer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proton is doin good, i hope its gettin better&#8230;its time to scrap NAP. Proton shud play in the same league with other manufacturer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wei_tsung</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131341</link>
		<dc:creator>wei_tsung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/01/proton-back-to-black-for-this-quarter/#comment-131341</guid>
		<description>let&#039;s see how long this lasts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s see how long this lasts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

