<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Renault Clio Sport Tourer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-134401</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-134401</guid>
		<description>got renaultsport edition ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>got renaultsport edition ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khimfoh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-134058</link>
		<dc:creator>khimfoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-134058</guid>
		<description>Quite an odd shape this Clio Sport Tourer is I must say . It doesn&#039;t look cohesive at all. What&#039;s next ? Clio Sedan perhaps ?

BTW Paul, I reckon the 1.2L 16V Turbo charge engined could fit into the Savvy engine bay assuming the engine mounting points are the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite an odd shape this Clio Sport Tourer is I must say . It doesn&#8217;t look cohesive at all. What&#8217;s next ? Clio Sedan perhaps ?</p>
<p>BTW Paul, I reckon the 1.2L 16V Turbo charge engined could fit into the Savvy engine bay assuming the engine mounting points are the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: in_put</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133966</link>
		<dc:creator>in_put</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133966</guid>
		<description>Overall design not too bad...the1.2 liter 16V turbo will probably be top economy pick(non-diesel), with enough grunt for that weekend trip up Genting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall design not too bad&#8230;the1.2 liter 16V turbo will probably be top economy pick(non-diesel), with enough grunt for that weekend trip up Genting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raptorclans</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133918</link>
		<dc:creator>raptorclans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133918</guid>
		<description>Interesting... I like the rear... looks kinda cute :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; I like the rear&#8230; looks kinda cute <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abe</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133904</link>
		<dc:creator>abe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133904</guid>
		<description>but the 1.5 diesel got a lots of torque.

can we use minyak masak ser murni as replacement for diesel oil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but the 1.5 diesel got a lots of torque.</p>
<p>can we use minyak masak ser murni as replacement for diesel oil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abe</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133902</link>
		<dc:creator>abe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133902</guid>
		<description>i like wagon
klu proton blm jadik small wagon mcm nie kan bagus. 
3 box design boring beb

skali tgh dari tepi mcm logan.
interior quite simple. but still okeh for me.
kete mcm besar, tp 1.2ltr. cukup power ke?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like wagon<br />
klu proton blm jadik small wagon mcm nie kan bagus.<br />
3 box design boring beb</p>
<p>skali tgh dari tepi mcm logan.<br />
interior quite simple. but still okeh for me.<br />
kete mcm besar, tp 1.2ltr. cukup power ke?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolly_idiot</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133888</link>
		<dc:creator>jolly_idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133888</guid>
		<description>OMG! European LATIO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! European LATIO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133729</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133729</guid>
		<description>rear looks very very weird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rear looks very very weird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mel</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133720</link>
		<dc:creator>mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133720</guid>
		<description>ugly and boring</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ugly and boring</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitlanevo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133709</link>
		<dc:creator>mitlanevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133709</guid>
		<description>still prefer the Clio V6........

btw, the free magnets of Top Gear december issue are very nice!!! i just got my copy today.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still prefer the Clio V6&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>btw, the free magnets of Top Gear december issue are very nice!!! i just got my copy today&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nanashisan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133703</link>
		<dc:creator>nanashisan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133703</guid>
		<description>lol..
the video ad is just like 24 drama series. it starred by clio and not jack bauer.

anyway, the engines package is just fine except the rear end design. something missing and not proportional. perhaps the latest french design??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol..<br />
the video ad is just like 24 drama series. it starred by clio and not jack bauer.</p>
<p>anyway, the engines package is just fine except the rear end design. something missing and not proportional. perhaps the latest french design??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton GL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133701</link>
		<dc:creator>proton GL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133701</guid>
		<description>well lately french car design, probally what they mean &#039;design&#039; is to be different, well.. some may like it, some not,
for me not really, some citroen ok, 

apart from recaro seat which is for me superb, french car is very good at seat ,comfy but not sagging, citroen zx, renault 19, even the tiara 1.1(its gene), seats is soothing, but renaults car pedal is flatten bit, with smallish ballish contact bit like u step on a pebble, clonky gear,unspirited engine, crude plastic, 

not sure lately</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well lately french car design, probally what they mean &#8216;design&#8217; is to be different, well.. some may like it, some not,<br />
for me not really, some citroen ok, </p>
<p>apart from recaro seat which is for me superb, french car is very good at seat ,comfy but not sagging, citroen zx, renault 19, even the tiara 1.1(its gene), seats is soothing, but renaults car pedal is flatten bit, with smallish ballish contact bit like u step on a pebble, clonky gear,unspirited engine, crude plastic, </p>
<p>not sure lately</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transformer</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133700</link>
		<dc:creator>transformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133700</guid>
		<description>its a twins of Nissan Wingroad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its a twins of Nissan Wingroad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyundai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133691</link>
		<dc:creator>hyundai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133691</guid>
		<description>207SW is lot nicer looking than this car... The rear end is really ugly!! I sure will go for the 207SW...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>207SW is lot nicer looking than this car&#8230; The rear end is really ugly!! I sure will go for the 207SW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Lee</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133677</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133677</guid>
		<description>the last tune could be a turbo diesel variant, with that torque, overtaking seems effortless, wish proton would have got that engine instead, then savvy be selling like hot cakes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the last tune could be a turbo diesel variant, with that torque, overtaking seems effortless, wish proton would have got that engine instead, then savvy be selling like hot cakes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmiR</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133672</link>
		<dc:creator>AmiR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133672</guid>
		<description>one word....fugly..

the rear design totaly yucks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one word&#8230;.fugly..</p>
<p>the rear design totaly yucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleFire85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133660</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleFire85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2007/12/11/renault-clio-sport-tourer/#comment-133660</guid>
		<description>1.5 liter DCi engines - 105 horsepower with 240Nm of torque!!! 

If i am in France, i gonna get this 1... Damn torque! Wonder which local car can ever produce this kind of output in 1.5L category... Haiz...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.5 liter DCi engines &#8211; 105 horsepower with 240Nm of torque!!! </p>
<p>If i am in France, i gonna get this 1&#8230; Damn torque! Wonder which local car can ever produce this kind of output in 1.5L category&#8230; Haiz&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

