<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM plans turbocharged 1.4 liter Ecotec engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147939</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147939</guid>
		<description>1.4 is a very good capacity 4 everything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.4 is a very good capacity 4 everything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mohdjiman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147877</link>
		<dc:creator>mohdjiman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147877</guid>
		<description>No turbo for proton?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No turbo for proton?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147847</link>
		<dc:creator>nmh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147847</guid>
		<description>Just apply it to all new american car b4 throwing it to other countries. Save million gallon of gas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just apply it to all new american car b4 throwing it to other countries. Save million gallon of gas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcwk</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147810</link>
		<dc:creator>mcwk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147810</guid>
		<description>They should start introducing these cars here. A turbo engine at low RPM would definitely use less fuel than a larger cc engine, and also our yearly road tax would be less! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should start introducing these cars here. A turbo engine at low RPM would definitely use less fuel than a larger cc engine, and also our yearly road tax would be less! <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobdbilder</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147772</link>
		<dc:creator>bobdbilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147772</guid>
		<description>If there is a &#039;small car&#039; marque from the GM stable it would be Chevrolet Aveos which is referred to as &#039;sub-compact&#039;.  An Opel/Vauxhall/Holden/ Saturn-Astra would be a &#039;compact&#039;.  So it goes into Astras first before Aveos?  If so, then it can find friends in the UK market if there is still some brand presence there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is a &#8216;small car&#8217; marque from the GM stable it would be Chevrolet Aveos which is referred to as &#8216;sub-compact&#8217;.  An Opel/Vauxhall/Holden/ Saturn-Astra would be a &#8216;compact&#8217;.  So it goes into Astras first before Aveos?  If so, then it can find friends in the UK market if there is still some brand presence there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4G63T DSM</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147708</link>
		<dc:creator>4G63T DSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147708</guid>
		<description>Ecotec is just a name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ecotec is just a name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147678</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/01/29/gm-plans-turbocharged-14-liter-ecotec-engine/#comment-147678</guid>
		<description>Doe ecotec means saving the planet in some sort of way or its just small engine=big output?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doe ecotec means saving the planet in some sort of way or its just small engine=big output?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

