<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Mercedes Benz SL-Class Details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:03:39 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nmh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-149071</link>
		<dc:creator>nmh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 08:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-149071</guid>
		<description>WTF another facelift ...its ugly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF another facelift &#8230;its ugly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sxe10r</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148971</link>
		<dc:creator>sxe10r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148971</guid>
		<description>Rich ppl toys ~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich ppl toys ~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phas3r</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148967</link>
		<dc:creator>phas3r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148967</guid>
		<description>hmm.. usually SL has very long lifespan like the 1971 one which last till 1989..almost 20 years..then 1989 to 2001 which is 12 years.. now the current model only 7 years old.... but im confused in this facelift or new model ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm.. usually SL has very long lifespan like the 1971 one which last till 1989..almost 20 years..then 1989 to 2001 which is 12 years.. now the current model only 7 years old&#8230;. but im confused in this facelift or new model ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148884</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148884</guid>
		<description>certainly the only thing you need to get used to is the front lamps which look very weird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>certainly the only thing you need to get used to is the front lamps which look very weird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148822</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148822</guid>
		<description>the vents at da back is 4 ETs...
hahaha !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the vents at da back is 4 ETs&#8230;<br />
hahaha !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hsbc</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148785</link>
		<dc:creator>hsbc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148785</guid>
		<description>Yeah, agree. Looks like a facelift. Wonder why Merc is so lazy in coming out with an all-new design. Even the interior looks the same as the old one (except for steering, headrest &amp; some trims).############

its not about lazy..its about cost to produce an all-new platform....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, agree. Looks like a facelift. Wonder why Merc is so lazy in coming out with an all-new design. Even the interior looks the same as the old one (except for steering, headrest &amp; some trims).############</p>
<p>its not about lazy..its about cost to produce an all-new platform&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hikaru</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148767</link>
		<dc:creator>Hikaru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148767</guid>
		<description>The front end does indeed need a bit of getting used to. I think the air intake and the emblem is a tad too big. The headlights are  a copy of the sleek CLS but that&#039;s not a bad thing. 

Overall, the air intake and the emblem needs some revamping. I think will go for a CLS or a SLK over this new SL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The front end does indeed need a bit of getting used to. I think the air intake and the emblem is a tad too big. The headlights are  a copy of the sleek CLS but that&#8217;s not a bad thing. </p>
<p>Overall, the air intake and the emblem needs some revamping. I think will go for a CLS or a SLK over this new SL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hasif63</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148759</link>
		<dc:creator>hasif63</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148759</guid>
		<description>grr... i hate those headlights!!! it doesn&#039;t match the SL&#039;s profile at all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>grr&#8230; i hate those headlights!!! it doesn&#8217;t match the SL&#8217;s profile at all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normaluser</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148692</link>
		<dc:creator>normaluser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148692</guid>
		<description>Yeah, agree. Looks like a facelift. Wonder why Merc is so lazy in coming out with an all-new design. Even the interior looks the same as the old one (except for steering, headrest &amp; some trims).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, agree. Looks like a facelift. Wonder why Merc is so lazy in coming out with an all-new design. Even the interior looks the same as the old one (except for steering, headrest &amp; some trims).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jehutyz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148676</link>
		<dc:creator>jehutyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148676</guid>
		<description>Not much change.
The rear just like the same. The front i prefer the old one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much change.<br />
The rear just like the same. The front i prefer the old one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Samurai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148664</link>
		<dc:creator>King Samurai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148664</guid>
		<description>Looks like a facelift la...tail lamp same as previous model. Front seat headrest macam ET head. Inspired by spielberg.... Whatever it is I still cant afford.Tengok saja laa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a facelift la&#8230;tail lamp same as previous model. Front seat headrest macam ET head. Inspired by spielberg&#8230;. Whatever it is I still cant afford.Tengok saja laa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: narrowband</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148650</link>
		<dc:creator>narrowband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/02/01/2009-mercedes-benz-sl-class-details/#comment-148650</guid>
		<description>Hmm. The front-end takes a little getting used to. The taillights however, we&#039;ve pretty much gotten used to them - so much so that they look kinda boring.

I wonder what&#039;s with the razor-straight geometrics all around. The most glaring one is just beneath the rear bumper - some squarish-looking lines there.

Most of us can&#039;t afford such a ride anyway so we can only comment here and there lol. &quot;Doube-declutching&quot; sounds techy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. The front-end takes a little getting used to. The taillights however, we&#8217;ve pretty much gotten used to them &#8211; so much so that they look kinda boring.</p>
<p>I wonder what&#8217;s with the razor-straight geometrics all around. The most glaring one is just beneath the rear bumper &#8211; some squarish-looking lines there.</p>
<p>Most of us can&#8217;t afford such a ride anyway so we can only comment here and there lol. &#8220;Doube-declutching&#8221; sounds techy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
