<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volkswagen CrossPolo 1.6 Test Drive Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:59:39 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sanook365</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-236821</link>
		<dc:creator>sanook365</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-236821</guid>
		<description>saw a black one from singapore. damn damn pretty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saw a black one from singapore. damn damn pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bebelon</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-157874</link>
		<dc:creator>Bebelon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-157874</guid>
		<description>i like this car. i think this car is worth to buy if you wan to buy an entry level continental car. better than B class, jazz and yaris. people of suzuki can upgarde to this if they can afford...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like this car. i think this car is worth to buy if you wan to buy an entry level continental car. better than B class, jazz and yaris. people of suzuki can upgarde to this if they can afford&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton GL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-157097</link>
		<dc:creator>proton GL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-157097</guid>
		<description>how about theophilus photoshops the saga (black bumper one) dress in crosser style,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about theophilus photoshops the saga (black bumper one) dress in crosser style,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-157017</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-157017</guid>
		<description>The CrossPolo&#039;s kerb weight is 1138kg, that&#039;s quite far from 1.6 tonnes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CrossPolo&#8217;s kerb weight is 1138kg, that&#8217;s quite far from 1.6 tonnes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: king</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-157016</link>
		<dc:creator>king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-157016</guid>
		<description>bobdbilder said,
March 19, 2008 @ 1:12 am 

Is it just me? Or is everybody here missing the point?

1)Less power than a Waja - you wont hit above 3000rpm AND maintain with Auto. My dead grandma will do cartwheels around it.

2)Bitchin 17in 40 profiles, YES its gonna hurt. I thought SUVs got huge rubbers

3)What nearly 1.6Tonnes (without spare tyre)? 0-100 at 12.8 with 4 speeder (+2 OD) - Camry wannabe

_____

i think this car at 100k+ is better value than a jazz or yaris. those cars aren&#039;t exactly powerful as well. roughtly 12 seconds to the century sprint, but the spec of this car is so much better.

anyway, i thought the camry came in only either 4 speed or 5 speed for the 2.4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bobdbilder said,<br />
March 19, 2008 @ 1:12 am </p>
<p>Is it just me? Or is everybody here missing the point?</p>
<p>1)Less power than a Waja &#8211; you wont hit above 3000rpm AND maintain with Auto. My dead grandma will do cartwheels around it.</p>
<p>2)Bitchin 17in 40 profiles, YES its gonna hurt. I thought SUVs got huge rubbers</p>
<p>3)What nearly 1.6Tonnes (without spare tyre)? 0-100 at 12.8 with 4 speeder (+2 OD) &#8211; Camry wannabe</p>
<p>_____</p>
<p>i think this car at 100k+ is better value than a jazz or yaris. those cars aren&#8217;t exactly powerful as well. roughtly 12 seconds to the century sprint, but the spec of this car is so much better.</p>
<p>anyway, i thought the camry came in only either 4 speed or 5 speed for the 2.4?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: king</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-157015</link>
		<dc:creator>king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-157015</guid>
		<description>Paul Tan said,
March 17, 2008 @ 12:30 pm 

For reference, the Skoda is RM101K for the 1.4 liter model.

_____

thats why i always thought the skoda was overpriced compared to the polo. IT should at least be 20 grand cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Tan said,<br />
March 17, 2008 @ 12:30 pm </p>
<p>For reference, the Skoda is RM101K for the 1.4 liter model.</p>
<p>_____</p>
<p>thats why i always thought the skoda was overpriced compared to the polo. IT should at least be 20 grand cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobdbilder</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156896</link>
		<dc:creator>bobdbilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156896</guid>
		<description>Is it just me? Or is everybody here missing the point?

1)Less power than a Waja - you wont hit above 3000rpm AND maintain with Auto.  My dead grandma will do cartwheels around it.

2)Bitchin 17in 40 profiles, YES its gonna hurt. I thought SUVs got huge rubbers

3)What nearly 1.6Tonnes (without spare tyre)? 0-100 at 12.8 with 4 speeder (+2 OD) - Camry wannabe

Its a slow bitchin expensive ride this!  Told you DRB can&#039;t do proper market positioning.  They can&#039;t sell value added concepts. They have no understanding of the word &#039;value proposition&#039;.  Sure, you see GTi around.  But you don&#039;t see Polos or Passats.  Maybe the odd A4 and A6.  Are the Germans here daft or what?  You don&#039;t see these models being on shopping malls do you?  So what if you have a showroom next to Ikea?  Pretty snobish aren&#039;t you?  By being snobish you&#039;d think it will only attract people with money.

Face-time. That&#039;s what they need.  But they&#039;re not doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me? Or is everybody here missing the point?</p>
<p>1)Less power than a Waja &#8211; you wont hit above 3000rpm AND maintain with Auto.  My dead grandma will do cartwheels around it.</p>
<p>2)Bitchin 17in 40 profiles, YES its gonna hurt. I thought SUVs got huge rubbers</p>
<p>3)What nearly 1.6Tonnes (without spare tyre)? 0-100 at 12.8 with 4 speeder (+2 OD) &#8211; Camry wannabe</p>
<p>Its a slow bitchin expensive ride this!  Told you DRB can&#8217;t do proper market positioning.  They can&#8217;t sell value added concepts. They have no understanding of the word &#8216;value proposition&#8217;.  Sure, you see GTi around.  But you don&#8217;t see Polos or Passats.  Maybe the odd A4 and A6.  Are the Germans here daft or what?  You don&#8217;t see these models being on shopping malls do you?  So what if you have a showroom next to Ikea?  Pretty snobish aren&#8217;t you?  By being snobish you&#8217;d think it will only attract people with money.</p>
<p>Face-time. That&#8217;s what they need.  But they&#8217;re not doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyberkayu</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156887</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyberkayu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156887</guid>
		<description>photographed in prestint 2 putrajaya~~nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>photographed in prestint 2 putrajaya~~nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156849</link>
		<dc:creator>nmh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156849</guid>
		<description>Toyota better watch out...VW is going to be the world&#039;s local brand in near future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toyota better watch out&#8230;VW is going to be the world&#8217;s local brand in near future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton GL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156844</link>
		<dc:creator>proton GL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156844</guid>
		<description>what if proton try this kind of variant ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what if proton try this kind of variant ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raybrig85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156839</link>
		<dc:creator>raybrig85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156839</guid>
		<description>those who still failed to c d image...mabe u need to upgrade ur pc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those who still failed to c d image&#8230;mabe u need to upgrade ur pc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hamster</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156790</link>
		<dc:creator>hamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156790</guid>
		<description>change ur computer la brotha..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>change ur computer la brotha..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pOckeTbOcoR</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156787</link>
		<dc:creator>pOckeTbOcoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156787</guid>
		<description>still, cant view the images
is it only me?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still, cant view the images<br />
is it only me?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156727</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156727</guid>
		<description>The blue light indicators are a strain. Looks like same color as the previous saga model. Overtime, I might not want to look at the dash board as well. That goes for red too. Green, orange is ok within limits. White is best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blue light indicators are a strain. Looks like same color as the previous saga model. Overtime, I might not want to look at the dash board as well. That goes for red too. Green, orange is ok within limits. White is best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xenith</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156698</link>
		<dc:creator>xenith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156698</guid>
		<description>I like it. Looks like an SUV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it. Looks like an SUV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolipop88</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156684</link>
		<dc:creator>lolipop88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156684</guid>
		<description>i felt vios is more comfort compare to the polo in some bad road (suspension setting), and the cabin is a bit noisy after reach 110KM/hr (~3300rpm), unlikely vios just ~3000rpm. but for sure the solid body will let you forget other dismerit compare to other japanese car you own.. I own polo 2007 1.6AT.

Anyhow, not everyone really need this solid rock with small space, and somebody will spray it like god car GTi (just modified the rim and front grill).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i felt vios is more comfort compare to the polo in some bad road (suspension setting), and the cabin is a bit noisy after reach 110KM/hr (~3300rpm), unlikely vios just ~3000rpm. but for sure the solid body will let you forget other dismerit compare to other japanese car you own.. I own polo 2007 1.6AT.</p>
<p>Anyhow, not everyone really need this solid rock with small space, and somebody will spray it like god car GTi (just modified the rim and front grill).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tokmoh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156682</link>
		<dc:creator>tokmoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156682</guid>
		<description>I saw a Nat Geo...or Disc Channel before, there was an episode they tried on what color is best for aeroplane&#039;s track light (at the edge of the track), they discovered yellow is best.

So IMHO, yellow is best matched with black for the meter panel.

The meter panel on this Polo sure looked messy and complicated wit all those tiny markings, it&#039;s like, do we really need to know where exactly the needle points when it&#039;s doing 2100/2200/2300/2400 rpm and at 82.5/85/87.5 km/h? Some of the best ones I&#039;ve seen is Proton&#039;s meter panel in the original Waja, and Gen.2, and perhaps Merc&#039;s AMGs. They&#039;re clean and clear, just putting markings where it matters most (eg at 2000, 2500, 3000rpm, and 30, 40, 50kmph), the rest is just a long, big clean line (for the tachometer only) so it twitched me to see when Persona and Saga mk2&#039;s meter panel become just like this Polo&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a Nat Geo&#8230;or Disc Channel before, there was an episode they tried on what color is best for aeroplane&#8217;s track light (at the edge of the track), they discovered yellow is best.</p>
<p>So IMHO, yellow is best matched with black for the meter panel.</p>
<p>The meter panel on this Polo sure looked messy and complicated wit all those tiny markings, it&#8217;s like, do we really need to know where exactly the needle points when it&#8217;s doing 2100/2200/2300/2400 rpm and at 82.5/85/87.5 km/h? Some of the best ones I&#8217;ve seen is Proton&#8217;s meter panel in the original Waja, and Gen.2, and perhaps Merc&#8217;s AMGs. They&#8217;re clean and clear, just putting markings where it matters most (eg at 2000, 2500, 3000rpm, and 30, 40, 50kmph), the rest is just a long, big clean line (for the tachometer only) so it twitched me to see when Persona and Saga mk2&#8217;s meter panel become just like this Polo&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tikus</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156673</link>
		<dc:creator>tikus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156673</guid>
		<description>Paul,cant see the photo also lar ........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,cant see the photo also lar &#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azolkipl</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156659</link>
		<dc:creator>azolkipl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156659</guid>
		<description>Actually, I just got SMS from Quasar. They&#039;re selling pre-reg Skoda Fabia 1.4 at MYR66k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I just got SMS from Quasar. They&#8217;re selling pre-reg Skoda Fabia 1.4 at MYR66k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripvire</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156657</link>
		<dc:creator>tripvire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156657</guid>
		<description>since the cross polo they have revised the price, what will happen to the normal polo 1.4 and 1.6? will the price be revised as well?

eh... their website haven&#039;t even change their pricing for the cross polo yet :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since the cross polo they have revised the price, what will happen to the normal polo 1.4 and 1.6? will the price be revised as well?</p>
<p>eh&#8230; their website haven&#8217;t even change their pricing for the cross polo yet <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schmitter</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156655</link>
		<dc:creator>schmitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156655</guid>
		<description>Paul, I was shopping for cars recently and while dropping in at Quasar Carriage @ Glenmarie, they quoted the Fabia 1.4 at 77k new albeit a 2006 produced vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I was shopping for cars recently and while dropping in at Quasar Carriage @ Glenmarie, they quoted the Fabia 1.4 at 77k new albeit a 2006 produced vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pOckeTbOcoR</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156641</link>
		<dc:creator>pOckeTbOcoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156641</guid>
		<description>why cant i view the pics?
waited 1/2 hr alredi..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why cant i view the pics?<br />
waited 1/2 hr alredi..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156640</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156640</guid>
		<description>For reference, the Skoda is RM101K for the 1.4 liter model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For reference, the Skoda is RM101K for the 1.4 liter model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azolkipl</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156639</link>
		<dc:creator>azolkipl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156639</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather go for the Skoda. Fundamentally same technology. Matches most middle upper class income family. Equipment level still satisfactory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather go for the Skoda. Fundamentally same technology. Matches most middle upper class income family. Equipment level still satisfactory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V8</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156629</link>
		<dc:creator>V8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156629</guid>
		<description>so here is Volkswagen CrossPolo 1.6. can i assume the next is Golf R32?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so here is Volkswagen CrossPolo 1.6. can i assume the next is Golf R32?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holy_cow</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156627</link>
		<dc:creator>holy_cow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156627</guid>
		<description>Awesome pics. That first rolling shot is the shiznit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome pics. That first rolling shot is the shiznit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156617</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/17/volkswagen-crosspolo-16-test-drive-report/#comment-156617</guid>
		<description>Hmmm....the CrossPolo looks quite okay...but not a fan of the exterior colour though as it looks like a durian (without the shell) on wheels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.the CrossPolo looks quite okay&#8230;but not a fan of the exterior colour though as it looks like a durian (without the shell) on wheels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
