<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government proposes subsidised RON95 and unsubsidised RON99</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ammar 9w2ccp</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-284901</link>
		<dc:creator>ammar 9w2ccp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-284901</guid>
		<description>Tak abis2 ngan subsidi minyak..... 
 
Mengapa tak minta RON 99 cuma RM0.50 seliter je? Hehehe.... org malaysia tak kira cina, india dan melayu semua nak murah dan bersubsidi... 
 
Just run with RON 95 dude. If you&#039;re not satisfy, live at singapore or Thailand. End of story.  
 
I spend 3 yrs live at Bangkok. i learn something here. Petrol is a gold. Expensive. So just pump whatever fuel u get as long as cheap and it can run ur vehicle. RON 99? forget it! Enjin rosak? so buy cheap car instead of civic type r. Kuat telan minyak? so buy low cc cars. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tak abis2 ngan subsidi minyak&#8230;..</p>
<p>Mengapa tak minta RON 99 cuma RM0.50 seliter je? Hehehe&#8230;. org malaysia tak kira cina, india dan melayu semua nak murah dan bersubsidi&#8230;</p>
<p>Just run with RON 95 dude. If you&#039;re not satisfy, live at singapore or Thailand. End of story. </p>
<p>I spend 3 yrs live at Bangkok. i learn something here. Petrol is a gold. Expensive. So just pump whatever fuel u get as long as cheap and it can run ur vehicle. RON 99? forget it! Enjin rosak? so buy cheap car instead of civic type r. Kuat telan minyak? so buy low cc cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putra Turbo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-256864</link>
		<dc:creator>Putra Turbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-256864</guid>
		<description>I use RON92 on my old Kancil, now I change it to RON95 as it was not in SALE anymore. Not much different. Then I try this RON95 on my Toyota Unser, also working fine, no knocking on my engine. For me no problem if Government want to change the RON number but the only hope from 1 Malaysia Government, can change this new RON95 price to the lower than current price RM1.75. :) :) :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use RON92 on my old Kancil, now I change it to RON95 as it was not in SALE anymore. Not much different. Then I try this RON95 on my Toyota Unser, also working fine, no knocking on my engine. For me no problem if Government want to change the RON number but the only hope from 1 Malaysia Government, can change this new RON95 price to the lower than current price RM1.75. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuni</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-256388</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-256388</guid>
		<description>well... RON95 should be cheap than RM1.75 because RON97 will be sold at higher price. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230; RON95 should be cheap than RM1.75 because RON97 will be sold at higher price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedracer</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-238425</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedracer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-238425</guid>
		<description>untuk buat masa ini , Vpower berharga RM2.05 sen seliter,Super RM1.80 dan bakal muncul ialah Super 95 dan mungkin dalam harga RM1.75 sen seliter...rasanya tidak perlulah kerajaan Malaysia menaikkan harga minyak RON97 kerana sebagai pengguna , kami ada hak untuk menentukan pembelian minyak... 
 
Cadangan saya , untuk minyak RON95 adalah untuk golongan berpendapatan rendah dan sederhana khasnya bagi pemilik motosikal dan kenderaan kecil tapi itu terpulang kepada pengguna kerana pengguna adalah kuasa pembeli.Pembeli adalah berhak untuk menentukannya sementara bagi pihak pengeluar dan penjual adalah untuk memasarkan produk mereka. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>untuk buat masa ini , Vpower berharga RM2.05 sen seliter,Super RM1.80 dan bakal muncul ialah Super 95 dan mungkin dalam harga RM1.75 sen seliter&#8230;rasanya tidak perlulah kerajaan Malaysia menaikkan harga minyak RON97 kerana sebagai pengguna , kami ada hak untuk menentukan pembelian minyak&#8230;</p>
<p>Cadangan saya , untuk minyak RON95 adalah untuk golongan berpendapatan rendah dan sederhana khasnya bagi pemilik motosikal dan kenderaan kecil tapi itu terpulang kepada pengguna kerana pengguna adalah kuasa pembeli.Pembeli adalah berhak untuk menentukannya sementara bagi pihak pengeluar dan penjual adalah untuk memasarkan produk mereka.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyborgx</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-160618</link>
		<dc:creator>cyborgx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-160618</guid>
		<description>Words from our ministers and news from our newspapers are NOT always the truth. Judge and investigate it yourself. Those that can afford high-end SUV or MPV can afford RON99 obviously.

You guys should worry about low to middle income people. Ppl riding on motorbike, driving Proton and Perodua are the main concern. If the govt implement this, by right, RON95 is supposed to be cheaper than RON97. I m afraid that older Proton cars need RON97 and above because of outdated engine technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words from our ministers and news from our newspapers are NOT always the truth. Judge and investigate it yourself. Those that can afford high-end SUV or MPV can afford RON99 obviously.</p>
<p>You guys should worry about low to middle income people. Ppl riding on motorbike, driving Proton and Perodua are the main concern. If the govt implement this, by right, RON95 is supposed to be cheaper than RON97. I m afraid that older Proton cars need RON97 and above because of outdated engine technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mybp2a</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159892</link>
		<dc:creator>mybp2a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159892</guid>
		<description>poor ppls pump cheaper 95 oil for their motorbikes
normal ppls pump cheaper 95 oil for their cars
rich ppls pump cheaper 95 oil for their SUV or MPV and sell it before the engine come to problematic, they can afford to change car within 3~5 yrs what....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>poor ppls pump cheaper 95 oil for their motorbikes<br />
normal ppls pump cheaper 95 oil for their cars<br />
rich ppls pump cheaper 95 oil for their SUV or MPV and sell it before the engine come to problematic, they can afford to change car within 3~5 yrs what&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esong82</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159791</link>
		<dc:creator>esong82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159791</guid>
		<description>Government shall waive the road tax for proton &amp; perodua to encourage people to buy barang buatan Malaysia.

I think the price for RON95 will still RM1.92 and government will saying that they will bankrupt if reduce price because all the while government is reducing their revenue (tax) collection from us and increasing subsidiaries.

We shall ban all the racing event in the world because it burns up the fuel that will be finished within 30years just for entertaining us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government shall waive the road tax for proton &amp; perodua to encourage people to buy barang buatan Malaysia.</p>
<p>I think the price for RON95 will still RM1.92 and government will saying that they will bankrupt if reduce price because all the while government is reducing their revenue (tax) collection from us and increasing subsidiaries.</p>
<p>We shall ban all the racing event in the world because it burns up the fuel that will be finished within 30years just for entertaining us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bumfart</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159721</link>
		<dc:creator>bumfart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159721</guid>
		<description>My Nissan Sunny 130Y requires a minimum fuel rating of RON95. And my car definitely does not have any knock sensor, or active ignition timing control. RON92 will basically destroy the engine.

The higher the RON number, the higher the resistance the fuel has to knock. Knock basically means premature uncontrolled combustion of the fuel in the chamber. If the compression ratio of the engine is too high for the fuel, it will start burning before the spark plug activates. The mixture will explode while the piston is moving up, and this will seriously damage the chamber walls and valves and piston.

Note that the RON standard is used primarily in Europe. Other countries use other standards, which usually average out the difference between the RON number and other numbers. In a country like Malaysia, there should only be fuels above RON95.

The government should take more time to research this, because we are not a big player in the automotive industry. In fact we are quite insignificant. This means that our fuel has to follow whatever the general trend is for cars being produced and imported here. They must also know that the national car maker is making cars with outdated technology, thus needing outdated fuels. Look at the Waja and Perdana for instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Nissan Sunny 130Y requires a minimum fuel rating of RON95. And my car definitely does not have any knock sensor, or active ignition timing control. RON92 will basically destroy the engine.</p>
<p>The higher the RON number, the higher the resistance the fuel has to knock. Knock basically means premature uncontrolled combustion of the fuel in the chamber. If the compression ratio of the engine is too high for the fuel, it will start burning before the spark plug activates. The mixture will explode while the piston is moving up, and this will seriously damage the chamber walls and valves and piston.</p>
<p>Note that the RON standard is used primarily in Europe. Other countries use other standards, which usually average out the difference between the RON number and other numbers. In a country like Malaysia, there should only be fuels above RON95.</p>
<p>The government should take more time to research this, because we are not a big player in the automotive industry. In fact we are quite insignificant. This means that our fuel has to follow whatever the general trend is for cars being produced and imported here. They must also know that the national car maker is making cars with outdated technology, thus needing outdated fuels. Look at the Waja and Perdana for instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr_carz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159659</link>
		<dc:creator>dr_carz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159659</guid>
		<description>ron 95 = 1.50 
ron 99 = 2.20 

thats my suggestion 

1. Just tax 1000 ringgit for impoted car
2. No tax at all for hybrid car 
3. No for APs i mean all including sugar, rice etc
4. Bonus for civil servants
5. Increase the salary of Cabinet Ministers and all MPS 
6. Increase Corporate tax 
7. Decrease Income Tax 
8. Elect me as the Penasihat to The PM and all is settle !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ron 95 = 1.50<br />
ron 99 = 2.20 </p>
<p>thats my suggestion </p>
<p>1. Just tax 1000 ringgit for impoted car<br />
2. No tax at all for hybrid car<br />
3. No for APs i mean all including sugar, rice etc<br />
4. Bonus for civil servants<br />
5. Increase the salary of Cabinet Ministers and all MPS<br />
6. Increase Corporate tax<br />
7. Decrease Income Tax<br />
8. Elect me as the Penasihat to The PM and all is settle !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topgunthang</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159642</link>
		<dc:creator>topgunthang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159642</guid>
		<description>my experience and fuel consumption test tell me that you the cost of premium petrol is worth it. they work out to be about the same. i.e distance travelled with the same amount of money. but you do save money by using the premium petrol. all the cars ive owned ive found premium petrol gives you more distance for the same money while giving a better drive. more responsive and less rough/vibrate. regardless what the minimum requirement is for the different type of engines. 

of course premium ulp may differ for different countries and diff companies but my calculations are for the difference of 8-16cents AUD difference between PULP and normal ULP. the savings increase exponentially when you are doing fluctuating and constant high speeds of 130-180kmh. normal city/highway driving PULP has the slight upper hand. 

the only advantage ULP has is that u get to &#039;see&#039; that u get more litres for the same amount of money (which usually plays with the minds of people with lower income groups as its cheaper for refineries to make or government to buy or at least thats what i think).  

anyway my tests were done using normal ron92 ULP vs Ron98 BP ultimate and shell premium which is about ron97. caltex premium at ron97 gives the same results. civic 1.8 8th gen, 2001 corolla and a 1997 vtir integra and a 1988 nissan. other one timer tests were a 2001 and 2005 camrys. 


prometheus
it is interesting the k20z requires minimum of ron91. i&#039;d just stick with the premium if i were you. especially when it works out cheaper. 

do away with the marketing hype or what the car mags complain when the cars dont accept lower octane fuel (and they have to pay more or premium) and perform your own tests. if they want to help lower economic class citizens save money then subsidize ron97 or more. dont just look for the cheapest fuel u can get your hands on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my experience and fuel consumption test tell me that you the cost of premium petrol is worth it. they work out to be about the same. i.e distance travelled with the same amount of money. but you do save money by using the premium petrol. all the cars ive owned ive found premium petrol gives you more distance for the same money while giving a better drive. more responsive and less rough/vibrate. regardless what the minimum requirement is for the different type of engines. </p>
<p>of course premium ulp may differ for different countries and diff companies but my calculations are for the difference of 8-16cents AUD difference between PULP and normal ULP. the savings increase exponentially when you are doing fluctuating and constant high speeds of 130-180kmh. normal city/highway driving PULP has the slight upper hand. </p>
<p>the only advantage ULP has is that u get to &#8216;see&#8217; that u get more litres for the same amount of money (which usually plays with the minds of people with lower income groups as its cheaper for refineries to make or government to buy or at least thats what i think).  </p>
<p>anyway my tests were done using normal ron92 ULP vs Ron98 BP ultimate and shell premium which is about ron97. caltex premium at ron97 gives the same results. civic 1.8 8th gen, 2001 corolla and a 1997 vtir integra and a 1988 nissan. other one timer tests were a 2001 and 2005 camrys. </p>
<p>prometheus<br />
it is interesting the k20z requires minimum of ron91. i&#8217;d just stick with the premium if i were you. especially when it works out cheaper. </p>
<p>do away with the marketing hype or what the car mags complain when the cars dont accept lower octane fuel (and they have to pay more or premium) and perform your own tests. if they want to help lower economic class citizens save money then subsidize ron97 or more. dont just look for the cheapest fuel u can get your hands on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osh_kosh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159641</link>
		<dc:creator>osh_kosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 06:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159641</guid>
		<description>i imagine RON95 will be priced slightly higher than current RON92 but cheaper than RON97... it&#039;s common sense.. so people who r currently using RON92 will have to pay more? in other way, the fuel price actually increase (for them).. :)

but, as mentioned by others earlier, what about Diesel? it&#039;s actually the most important fuel for economy &amp; &#039;price&#039; sensitive as we all know, fuel increase (diesel actually) mean other goods will also go up.. foods, road transport etc..

p/s: i know what PM said earlier.. no fuel price increase &#039;so soon&#039;.. but, to tell the truth, i don&#039;t really  trust that guy.. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i imagine RON95 will be priced slightly higher than current RON92 but cheaper than RON97&#8230; it&#8217;s common sense.. so people who r currently using RON92 will have to pay more? in other way, the fuel price actually increase (for them).. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>but, as mentioned by others earlier, what about Diesel? it&#8217;s actually the most important fuel for economy &amp; &#8216;price&#8217; sensitive as we all know, fuel increase (diesel actually) mean other goods will also go up.. foods, road transport etc..</p>
<p>p/s: i know what PM said earlier.. no fuel price increase &#8216;so soon&#8217;.. but, to tell the truth, i don&#8217;t really  trust that guy.. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azrai</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159632</link>
		<dc:creator>azrai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159632</guid>
		<description>Back then when they introduce the unleaded petrol there is a fuss about knocking. Shell even suggest mixed between the 97 ron and 92 ron petrol for older cars. Hey, those riches can do this too. Mixed it together. Save. Diesel is a problem. Even luxury cars use Diesel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back then when they introduce the unleaded petrol there is a fuss about knocking. Shell even suggest mixed between the 97 ron and 92 ron petrol for older cars. Hey, those riches can do this too. Mixed it together. Save. Diesel is a problem. Even luxury cars use Diesel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4G63T DSM</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159626</link>
		<dc:creator>4G63T DSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159626</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul, thanks for highlighting my points. Its important for consumers to understand the implications of such policies.

We should also stress that unless your car comes with knock sensors, the engine can only run a &quot;fixed&quot; octane level. Most older protons dont come with one - ie. 4G13/4G15/4G92 and even my 4G93 SOHC.

Older cars and cars not equipped with knock sensors will be stuck using very expensive fuel if this is passed. low to middle income families will be affected the most, since its unlikely they will be able to change cars on the onset of such policies.

However, you could retard the ignition timing (ie. up to 3-5 degrees BTDC - stock on protons/mitsu should be about 5-8 degrees) to run lower octane fuel (perhaps up to 2-3 points) but you will get a serius hit on power and fuel economy.


As per the Mazda, I haven&#039;t crossed checked my data, but does it really run on RON87 or does it run on PON87?. Pump octane rating (PON) system is used on North america and its a few points down (ie. RON92 ~ PON87, RON97 ~ PON93)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul, thanks for highlighting my points. Its important for consumers to understand the implications of such policies.</p>
<p>We should also stress that unless your car comes with knock sensors, the engine can only run a &#8220;fixed&#8221; octane level. Most older protons dont come with one &#8211; ie. 4G13/4G15/4G92 and even my 4G93 SOHC.</p>
<p>Older cars and cars not equipped with knock sensors will be stuck using very expensive fuel if this is passed. low to middle income families will be affected the most, since its unlikely they will be able to change cars on the onset of such policies.</p>
<p>However, you could retard the ignition timing (ie. up to 3-5 degrees BTDC &#8211; stock on protons/mitsu should be about 5-8 degrees) to run lower octane fuel (perhaps up to 2-3 points) but you will get a serius hit on power and fuel economy.</p>
<p>As per the Mazda, I haven&#8217;t crossed checked my data, but does it really run on RON87 or does it run on PON87?. Pump octane rating (PON) system is used on North america and its a few points down (ie. RON92 ~ PON87, RON97 ~ PON93)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intermilan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159613</link>
		<dc:creator>intermilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159613</guid>
		<description>its a good thinking but still too many flaws. everybody will just downgrade to RON95 en masse and that might result in higher subsidy amount in the end.

RON99? emmm.. no benefit? why offer this product all over the country just to serve the rich n super rich?

why not maintain with current RON92 &amp; RON97 but increase the price of RON97 and decrease RON92. RON99 is up to petrol station whether they want it or not, kinda like v-power, not available everywhere. on-demand item.

In addition, at the same time upgrade the diesel to AT LEAST Euro4 compliance and price the diesel, as cheap as possible.

so normal rakyat can either go for RON92 or diesel. 
of course the new diesel might be the loophole coz there are rich people that use premium / luxury diesel vehicles. but if the new subsidy amount for RON97 and the new diesel is quite near then ok la.  

Or perhaps Govt. need to think another strategy for diesel - its a must, many countries are moving to diesel - coz the demand is there, ppl just waiting for it.. (example what can be done --&gt; introduce 2 grade of diesel.. Euro 2 and Euro 4 - where Euro 4 sell at premium), but whatever it is, Govt. need to polish their thinking some more, you r in the right track so dont waste it while u r there. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its a good thinking but still too many flaws. everybody will just downgrade to RON95 en masse and that might result in higher subsidy amount in the end.</p>
<p>RON99? emmm.. no benefit? why offer this product all over the country just to serve the rich n super rich?</p>
<p>why not maintain with current RON92 &amp; RON97 but increase the price of RON97 and decrease RON92. RON99 is up to petrol station whether they want it or not, kinda like v-power, not available everywhere. on-demand item.</p>
<p>In addition, at the same time upgrade the diesel to AT LEAST Euro4 compliance and price the diesel, as cheap as possible.</p>
<p>so normal rakyat can either go for RON92 or diesel.<br />
of course the new diesel might be the loophole coz there are rich people that use premium / luxury diesel vehicles. but if the new subsidy amount for RON97 and the new diesel is quite near then ok la.  </p>
<p>Or perhaps Govt. need to think another strategy for diesel &#8211; its a must, many countries are moving to diesel &#8211; coz the demand is there, ppl just waiting for it.. (example what can be done &#8211;&gt; introduce 2 grade of diesel.. Euro 2 and Euro 4 &#8211; where Euro 4 sell at premium), but whatever it is, Govt. need to polish their thinking some more, you r in the right track so dont waste it while u r there. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altimi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159568</link>
		<dc:creator>altimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159568</guid>
		<description>I think the GOV should remove all petrol subsidies and then introduce a cleaner diesel fuel at 1/2 the price of petrol.......diesel is the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the GOV should remove all petrol subsidies and then introduce a cleaner diesel fuel at 1/2 the price of petrol&#8230;&#8230;.diesel is the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobdbilder</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159567</link>
		<dc:creator>bobdbilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159567</guid>
		<description>40k barels is from our own fields dude. 90% of the rest is coming from outside!  Duh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40k barels is from our own fields dude. 90% of the rest is coming from outside!  Duh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobdbilder</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159566</link>
		<dc:creator>bobdbilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159566</guid>
		<description>Oh sorry, didn&#039;t mention that the barrels per day is the capacity of crude being processed and not petrol production.  Terengganu Refinery also provide raw material for the plastics petrochemical plants such as Aromatics, VCM and Petlin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh sorry, didn&#8217;t mention that the barrels per day is the capacity of crude being processed and not petrol production.  Terengganu Refinery also provide raw material for the plastics petrochemical plants such as Aromatics, VCM and Petlin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrong-turn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159565</link>
		<dc:creator>wrong-turn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159565</guid>
		<description>so, you give us the facts but what is your point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, you give us the facts but what is your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobdbilder</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159564</link>
		<dc:creator>bobdbilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159564</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why people think that our oil is enough to sustain our own consumption.  I am in Oil and Gas.  Been so for 18 years, so lend me your ears.  We have 4 refineries.

The 3 refineries; Petronas Melaka, Shell Port Dickson and Exxon Mobil Port Dickson, they process imported oil with a total of max production of 450,000 barrels/day.  These feed the requirements for West Coast where most of the consumption is.  Most of it is pumped to KVDT in Dengkil and it acts like a distribution centre.  We only have Terengganu Refinery at max 40,000 barrels/day that process the Tapis blend sweet crude from offshore Terengganu and supplies East Coast West M&#039;sia.

Please take into account that none of the refineries operate close to max production levels, ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why people think that our oil is enough to sustain our own consumption.  I am in Oil and Gas.  Been so for 18 years, so lend me your ears.  We have 4 refineries.</p>
<p>The 3 refineries; Petronas Melaka, Shell Port Dickson and Exxon Mobil Port Dickson, they process imported oil with a total of max production of 450,000 barrels/day.  These feed the requirements for West Coast where most of the consumption is.  Most of it is pumped to KVDT in Dengkil and it acts like a distribution centre.  We only have Terengganu Refinery at max 40,000 barrels/day that process the Tapis blend sweet crude from offshore Terengganu and supplies East Coast West M&#8217;sia.</p>
<p>Please take into account that none of the refineries operate close to max production levels, ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prometheus</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159551</link>
		<dc:creator>prometheus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159551</guid>
		<description>Just refered to my 8th Generation Civic&#039;s  Manual.. my K20Z engine (2.0L Civic) runs on a minimum of RON 91.. But i still fill up on V-power though.. me a typical consumer....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just refered to my 8th Generation Civic&#8217;s  Manual.. my K20Z engine (2.0L Civic) runs on a minimum of RON 91.. But i still fill up on V-power though.. me a typical consumer&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mits27</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159547</link>
		<dc:creator>mits27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159547</guid>
		<description>I think civic 2.0 should be okay with RON95...hope RON95 will be lower than RON97...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think civic 2.0 should be okay with RON95&#8230;hope RON95 will be lower than RON97&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raybrig85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159542</link>
		<dc:creator>raybrig85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159542</guid>
		<description>a pertly agree wit william,

jz let it b ron 95,97 n 98...its jz enough...but plz revise the fuel price...make it alot cheaper..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a pertly agree wit william,</p>
<p>jz let it b ron 95,97 n 98&#8230;its jz enough&#8230;but plz revise the fuel price&#8230;make it alot cheaper..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paparadzi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159538</link>
		<dc:creator>paparadzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159538</guid>
		<description>The whole thing should be looked at differently. Abolish AP, cars should be taxed minimally according to price and abolish the road tax. Petrol should then be sold at world market price, no need for subsidy.In fact it should be taxed slightly.

The rich who uses more fuel per km will pay more. The lower income people will use fuel saving vehicles and therefore pay less in fuel tax. In the current situation rich people uses fuel-guzzling vehicles therefore a lot of subsidy went to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thing should be looked at differently. Abolish AP, cars should be taxed minimally according to price and abolish the road tax. Petrol should then be sold at world market price, no need for subsidy.In fact it should be taxed slightly.</p>
<p>The rich who uses more fuel per km will pay more. The lower income people will use fuel saving vehicles and therefore pay less in fuel tax. In the current situation rich people uses fuel-guzzling vehicles therefore a lot of subsidy went to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: accordmania</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159531</link>
		<dc:creator>accordmania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159531</guid>
		<description>my best suggestion is...
rm1.50/litre for rakyat
rm3.00/litres for govt. vehicles 
such as Polis, Tentera, Kastam, Majlis Perbadanan, LHDN, all govt. dept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my best suggestion is&#8230;<br />
rm1.50/litre for rakyat<br />
rm3.00/litres for govt. vehicles<br />
such as Polis, Tentera, Kastam, Majlis Perbadanan, LHDN, all govt. dept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shamel</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159529</link>
		<dc:creator>shamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159529</guid>
		<description>Government ministries mostly blind! YES, the price in MALAYSIA cheaper in Malaysia than SG but their salary how many higher than us. Their prices drop substantially since 1998-2008. In 1998 Civic 1.6 around SGD110k now SGD70k! Malaysia scenario-opposite!

Quality of Diesel, one of the world dirtiest diesel.

CHEAP? Not really if we compare with other world producing states.

Better solution than this is:  Roadtax, gas prices based on MPG. The better the FC you pay lower, vice versa. Or calculated based on Co2 emission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government ministries mostly blind! YES, the price in MALAYSIA cheaper in Malaysia than SG but their salary how many higher than us. Their prices drop substantially since 1998-2008. In 1998 Civic 1.6 around SGD110k now SGD70k! Malaysia scenario-opposite!</p>
<p>Quality of Diesel, one of the world dirtiest diesel.</p>
<p>CHEAP? Not really if we compare with other world producing states.</p>
<p>Better solution than this is:  Roadtax, gas prices based on MPG. The better the FC you pay lower, vice versa. Or calculated based on Co2 emission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrong-turn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159528</link>
		<dc:creator>wrong-turn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159528</guid>
		<description>what a waste of juice...
why bother about RON99 fuel when the real demand for better fuel is really the DIESEL.... we need cleaner diesel not another petrol variations! Our diesels still at Euro2 stage and this is not at all environmental friendly nor turbo-diesel friendly either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a waste of juice&#8230;<br />
why bother about RON99 fuel when the real demand for better fuel is really the DIESEL&#8230;. we need cleaner diesel not another petrol variations! Our diesels still at Euro2 stage and this is not at all environmental friendly nor turbo-diesel friendly either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alifz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159522</link>
		<dc:creator>Alifz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159522</guid>
		<description>How about DIESEL....the main cause of INFLATIONS...???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about DIESEL&#8230;.the main cause of INFLATIONS&#8230;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intermilan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159520</link>
		<dc:creator>intermilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159520</guid>
		<description>how i wish ELF or Total will set up petrol stations hereâ€¦â€¦..

mitlanevo,

i second that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how i wish ELF or Total will set up petrol stations hereâ€¦â€¦..</p>
<p>mitlanevo,</p>
<p>i second that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tokmoh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159514</link>
		<dc:creator>tokmoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159514</guid>
		<description>introducing RON95 would be good if it costs in between RON92 and RON97, or even better, less than both, yohoho.

@harry potter

I think there&#039;s no harm if u pump higher RON fuel, but don&#039;t expect any significant performance boost.

@bobdbuilder

Haha, that is korek korek korek!! Seriously, if govt really gonna intro RON99, I&#039;d say sell it at unsubsidised price and focus the subsidies on the RON95 instead. Then less posers n losers can afford to show off edi, lol.

You know Adam Khoo? The youngest Singaporean millionaire IIANM, yet, he rides in economy class flight, shops at G2000, doesn&#039;t wear Rolex, shop at Gucci, Prada, etc. Wanna know why? Read his blog here: http://www.adam-khoo.com/22/are-you-living-like-a-prostitute/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>introducing RON95 would be good if it costs in between RON92 and RON97, or even better, less than both, yohoho.</p>
<p>@harry potter</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s no harm if u pump higher RON fuel, but don&#8217;t expect any significant performance boost.</p>
<p>@bobdbuilder</p>
<p>Haha, that is korek korek korek!! Seriously, if govt really gonna intro RON99, I&#8217;d say sell it at unsubsidised price and focus the subsidies on the RON95 instead. Then less posers n losers can afford to show off edi, lol.</p>
<p>You know Adam Khoo? The youngest Singaporean millionaire IIANM, yet, he rides in economy class flight, shops at G2000, doesn&#8217;t wear Rolex, shop at Gucci, Prada, etc. Wanna know why? Read his blog here: <a href="http://www.adam-khoo.com/22/are-you-living-like-a-prostitute/" rel="nofollow">http://www.adam-khoo.com/22/are-you-living-like-a-prostitute/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williaml</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159511</link>
		<dc:creator>williaml</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/07/government-proposes-subsidised-ron95-and-unsubsidised-ron99/#comment-159511</guid>
		<description>The best is we have RON95 at RM1.50, RON97 at RM1.80 and RON98 at RM2.25; not necessary to have RON99 as RON98 is sufficient for most of the performance cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best is we have RON95 at RM1.50, RON97 at RM1.80 and RON98 at RM2.25; not necessary to have RON99 as RON98 is sufficient for most of the performance cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

