Comments on: Tata Indica Silhouette Concept: 330 PS 3.5 liter V6 http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/ Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:44:15 +0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Sunny Anand http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-254517 Sunny Anand Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:24:13 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-254517 3.5L 270kmph do u need a driver to break records here in india or anywhere , contact me if it matters to H.O.D. 3.5L 270kmph do u need a driver to break records here in india or anywhere , contact me if it matters to H.O.D.

]]> By: Auto_crat http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-161407 Auto_crat Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:04:52 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-161407 It's a concept. Not suitable for the Indian. They better stick on the Nano. It's a bold effort though. It’s a concept. Not suitable for the Indian. They better stick on the Nano. It’s a bold effort though.

]]> By: raybrig85 http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160739 raybrig85 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:52:50 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160739 stingracnc think dat he can produce a better car than dis...dats y he said like dat...actually he is rubbish coz said other ppl's effort is rubbish...mind ur word...eventho it is nt good...bt still acceptable for me...not impressive bt still ok... at least they hv sumthing... stingracnc think dat he can produce a better car than dis…dats y he said like dat…actually he is rubbish coz said other ppl’s effort is rubbish…mind ur word…eventho it is nt good…bt still acceptable for me…not impressive bt still ok… at least they hv sumthing…

]]> By: fastcx http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160736 fastcx Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:37:43 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160736 roti canai not bad ma, taste good, well fed, still consider cheap also! what is it for u to say they produce rubbish StingRayINC? they create opportunities for ppl to owns car! rather than u typing rubbish comments that create nothing but attention to urself, useless loud talker roti canai not bad ma, taste good, well fed, still consider cheap also!

what is it for u to say they produce rubbish StingRayINC? they create opportunities for ppl to owns car! rather than u typing rubbish comments that create nothing but attention to urself, useless loud talker

]]> By: BanyakMasukWorkshop http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160719 BanyakMasukWorkshop Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:24:10 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160719 its actually quite impressive.. especially this part "uses the engine as a stress member" thats like open wheeler race car technology. it takes quite a bit of decent engineering work to get things like that right. on styling, i guess thats totally subjective and up to ones own taste. its actually quite impressive.. especially this part “uses the engine as a stress member” thats like open wheeler race car technology. it takes quite a bit of decent engineering work to get things like that right.

on styling, i guess thats totally subjective and up to ones own taste.

]]> By: StingRayINC http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160692 StingRayINC Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:31:59 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160692 Yeah whatever makes u happy "fastcx", the thing is that TATA is making rubbish car, and good luck to you "Roti canai Car" fan. Yeah whatever makes u happy “fastcx”, the thing is that TATA is making rubbish car, and good luck to you “Roti canai Car” fan.

]]> By: cbljkkj http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160666 cbljkkj Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:06:37 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160666 StingRayINC said, April 15, 2008 @ 1:59 pm WTF is this? even those experts in Bandar Sunway can modify a hot hatch to become this crap, if they want to…..and I don’t think so…. Concept, Yeah Right, go learn more abt concept first before shouting and exhibiting concept car, no relation to environment friendliness, daily convenience and other benefits. In my opinion this car only makes the world even worse, more reckless MTFKs driver. Concept car from TATA, don’t make me throw up yesterday’s food ____________________________________________________________________________ I think you totally missed the point of this car. Excerpt from original article "this isn’t exactly a production road car". It is through R&D that you have today VVT-I, VTEC, I-DSI, suspension settings, aerodynamics and misc. StingRayINC said,

April 15, 2008 @ 1:59 pm

WTF is this? even those experts in Bandar Sunway can modify a hot hatch to become this crap, if they want to…..and I don’t think so…. Concept, Yeah Right, go learn more abt concept first before shouting and exhibiting concept car, no relation to environment friendliness, daily convenience and other benefits. In my opinion this car only makes the world even worse, more reckless MTFKs driver.

Concept car from TATA, don’t make me throw up yesterday’s food
____________________________________________________________________________

I think you totally missed the point of this car. Excerpt from original article “this isn’t exactly a production road car”.

It is through R&D that you have today VVT-I, VTEC, I-DSI, suspension settings, aerodynamics and misc.

]]> By: szw http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160663 szw Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:48:56 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160663 so , do they have raods in india 4 such car ? so , do they have raods in india 4 such car ?

]]> By: faizfadil http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160656 faizfadil Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:00:46 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160656 Tata going performance???? Tata going performance????

]]> By: mystvearn http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160653 mystvearn Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:35:05 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160653 The doors look like they are incomplete? or side skirting to high? The doors look like they are incomplete? or side skirting to high?

]]> By: Roti Naan http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160646 Roti Naan Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:34:33 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160646 harry potter, I agree with you. I oso thought it was a RC car. If TATA put a whip antenna on the roof of the car, confirm ppl will think its a RC. My boy-boy will love to have his RC in 1:1 scale. harry potter,

I agree with you. I oso thought it was a RC car. If TATA put a whip antenna on the roof of the car, confirm ppl will think its a RC.

My boy-boy will love to have his RC in 1:1 scale.

]]> By: Realeyes http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160644 Realeyes Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:14:44 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160644 At last, Ah Beng met his match... At last, Ah Beng met his match…

]]> By: fastcx http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160637 fastcx Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:42:06 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160637 more n more commenter that dont know what they r talking about lately...read the article before give unrelated comment! to name a few, StingRayINC and Porkbutcher. it is a concept! every other major manufacturer do radical concept cars! or r any of u staying under the rock so that u dont seem to know what it means to be concept? anyway, do u get sunway garage to do a aerospace grade material as ur chassis for u? pls b a wise malaysian rather than loud talker but with brain capacity worse than retard more n more commenter that dont know what they r talking about lately…read the article before give unrelated comment! to name a few, StingRayINC and Porkbutcher. it is a concept! every other major manufacturer do radical concept cars! or r any of u staying under the rock so that u dont seem to know what it means to be concept? anyway, do u get sunway garage to do a aerospace grade material as ur chassis for u? pls b a wise malaysian rather than loud talker but with brain capacity worse than retard

]]> By: harry potter http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160635 harry potter Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:49:27 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160635 The picture above looks like a Radio Controlled car The picture above looks like a Radio Controlled car

]]> By: bavarian http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160633 bavarian Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:07:16 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160633 the figures are good but the car is too ugly the figures are good but the car is too ugly

]]> By: StingRayINC http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160627 StingRayINC Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:59:17 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160627 WTF is this? even those experts in Bandar Sunway can modify a hot hatch to become this crap, if they want to.....and I don't think so.... Concept, Yeah Right, go learn more abt concept first before shouting and exhibiting concept car, no relation to environment friendliness, daily convenience and other benefits. In my opinion this car only makes the world even worse, more reckless MTFKs driver. Concept car from TATA, don't make me throw up yesterday's food WTF is this? even those experts in Bandar Sunway can modify a hot hatch to become this crap, if they want to…..and I don’t think so…. Concept, Yeah Right, go learn more abt concept first before shouting and exhibiting concept car, no relation to environment friendliness, daily convenience and other benefits. In my opinion this car only makes the world even worse, more reckless MTFKs driver.

Concept car from TATA, don’t make me throw up yesterday’s food

]]> By: knight_templar http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160622 knight_templar Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:00:03 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160622 hmmm, interesting. Color should have been a bit more garang though. Btw what does 'uses the engine as a stress member' mean? The engine gives the structure rigidity? hmmm, interesting. Color should have been a bit more garang though. Btw what does ‘uses the engine as a stress member’ mean? The engine gives the structure rigidity?

]]> By: 4G63T DSM http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160605 4G63T DSM Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:30:39 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160605 Porkbutcher said, April 15, 2008 @ 2:02 am Another fuel guzzle and an impractical under-engineered car. Engine placed at the rear and I suppose the compartment under the bonnet is for a large fuel tank? Awkward rear wheel arch and useless skirting that inhibits the doors from opening. --------- LOL. Wondering if thats sarcasm or a non-petrohead has stumbled on the blog... If anything its just a publicity stunt...however it should still go like a bat out of hell. Reminds me of those insane Group B cars. Oh how I wish they were still racing them. The extra wide fenders/mud guards are part of the workarounds for the Group 5 Silhouette class which limited body width to production spec but no limits were set on trackwidth. Therefore the cars were modified with extended tracks and wide tyres, which needed these extra wide fenders. Porkbutcher said,
April 15, 2008 @ 2:02 am

Another fuel guzzle and an impractical under-engineered car. Engine placed at the rear and I suppose the compartment under the bonnet is for a large fuel tank? Awkward rear wheel arch and useless skirting that inhibits the doors from opening.

———

LOL. Wondering if thats sarcasm or a non-petrohead has stumbled on the blog…

If anything its just a publicity stunt…however it should still go like a bat out of hell.

Reminds me of those insane Group B cars. Oh how I wish they were still racing them.

The extra wide fenders/mud guards are part of the workarounds for the Group 5 Silhouette class which limited body width to production spec but no limits were set on trackwidth. Therefore the cars were modified with extended tracks and wide tyres, which needed these extra wide fenders.

]]> By: Kevin Lee http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160604 Kevin Lee Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:28:40 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160604 well im sure if our proton satria neo comes with that, i'm sure it'll sell like hotcakes, considering the back space of the satria neo is rather useless well im sure if our proton satria neo comes with that, i’m sure it’ll sell like hotcakes, considering the back space of the satria neo is rather useless

]]> By: bahari http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160603 bahari Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:14:16 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160603 even it is a concept car, but it is an ugly car. Like OKU Daihatsu Charade. Very ugly. even it is a concept car, but it is an ugly car. Like OKU Daihatsu Charade.
Very ugly.

]]> By: azrai http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160591 azrai Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:27:20 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160591 This is just a concept car. Just like a Camry NASCAR which only have Camry shell but a totally different spec in it. This is just a concept car. Just like a Camry NASCAR which only have Camry shell but a totally different spec in it.

]]> By: tantragna http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160584 tantragna Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:42:27 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160584 Good initiative, but I feel the wheel arches is not suiting the curved body structure of the Indica. They should rework so that it matches the aerodynamics of the indica & look like a real silhouette! TATA's Think about it Seriously! Happy motoring.. Good initiative, but I feel the wheel arches is not suiting the curved body structure of the Indica. They should rework so that it matches the aerodynamics of the indica & look like a real silhouette!

TATA’s Think about it Seriously!

Happy motoring..

]]> By: jtshin http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160580 jtshin Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:07:08 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160580 Tata should have more of these designs though. Rather than the big body small slim tiny wheeled cars... hehe... Tata should have more of these designs though. Rather than the big body small slim tiny wheeled cars… hehe…

]]> By: Porkbutcher http://paultan.org/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160573 Porkbutcher Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:02:51 +0000 http://paultan.org/archives/2008/04/15/tata-indica-silhouette-concept-330-ps-35-liter-v6/#comment-160573 Another fuel guzzle and an impractical under-engineered car. Engine placed at the rear and I suppose the compartment under the bonnet is for a large fuel tank? Awkward rear wheel arch and useless skirting that inhibits the doors from opening. But it is a commendable achievement for Tata for bringing my attention to this showcase.. Another fuel guzzle and an impractical under-engineered car. Engine placed at the rear and I suppose the compartment under the bonnet is for a large fuel tank? Awkward rear wheel arch and useless skirting that inhibits the doors from opening. But it is a commendable achievement for Tata for bringing my attention to this showcase..

]]>