Comments on: BMW Malaysia launches new BMW 320i Sports

By: ratka

ratka — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:48:35 +0000

Enough with all the talking la wehhh….Drive it than you know la. I just smoke few civics and accords on the PLUS highway and the speed was 215km/hr. The fuel paddle still has space for more. But the adrenalin ask me to stop. What a superb performance with the price tag. The sound of the engine…cair wa cakap lu….

0 0

By: erye

erye — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:01:20 +0000

now saya pakai kereta ni…mmg power dari mercedes benz c200!

0 0

By: Mcdiey

Mcdiey — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:11:33 +0000

I will go for Audi A4, looks nicer and more power….

0 0

By: zaidi Othman

zaidi Othman — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:13:13 +0000

i just bought the second hand 320i 2007 and i think it lighter thanmy last 318 2000 model. i really miiss my e36 328..with pure bm spirit..i wish i could get back my e36..now i just let my wife driving the 2007 32oi..

0 0

By: JackAss

JackAss — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:27:58 +0000

wow..it's a nice car for the young generations..but i dun think young generations could afford it..

0 0

By: topgunthang

topgunthang — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:24:23 +0000

mfg030380 said,

April 21, 2008 @ 5:10 pm

If Ford really lost their mind, made a 150hp-4 pot putting a Mustang badge on it. And you still think that is pure muscle car. What can I say.

3er is just an entry class sedan for BMW. We all know which one to choose btw 320 and 325 if money is not an issue. We already heard abt how well-balanced n refine that BMW 6 pot is. Do you think BMW can survive by just selling their Mâ€™s? Donâ€™t get brain-washed by those American lifestyle.

————————————-

the way u think like that no wonder toyota, bmw and the rest are like selling you a 2.0litre bmw 3 series for 2.5litre or 3 litre prices. toyota selling the camry with a 2.0litre engine is just absurd when thier 3.5litre engine is just as fuel efficient.

4G63T DSM said,

the 2.5litre bmw is underpowered. but its the absolute minimum. not ideal

0 0

By: mfg030380

mfg030380 — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:10:32 +0000

If Ford really lost their mind, made a 150hp-4 pot putting a Mustang badge on it. And you still think that is pure muscle car. What can I say.

3er is just an entry class sedan for BMW. We all know which one to choose btw 320 and 325 if money is not an issue. We already heard abt how well-balanced n refine that BMW 6 pot is. Do you think BMW can survive by just selling their M’s? Don’t get brain-washed by those American lifestyle.

0 0

By: bobdbilder

bobdbilder — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 03:16:30 +0000

Well they’ve got to add more pizzaz to this model to sell more of it don’t they? But admittedly they’ve gone the local camp and did bodykits like the local Japanese car operation here to bring up the value.

I’ll be a lowlifer and be proud that my house is 10 times more expensive than the current value of my locally produced car and it’ll appreciate in value. Hell! My 7000sqft land with 4500sqft built up area bungalow is more expensive than this BMW.

Am I happy? You bet.

0 0

By: 4G63T DSM

4G63T DSM — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:33:57 +0000

mfg030380 said,
April 21, 2008 @ 1:01 am

the point isâ€¦.not everyone need that much of power for a car.

—

right….if Ford sold you a Mustang with a 4 cyc and only 150hp, you’d scoff at Ford for a “watered down” pony car.

The E90 is a heavy car. It feels lethargic anyway you put in. Even the 325 we drove at the BMW Drivers Intructor selection felt underpowered when it was put through its paces.

0 0

By: mfg030380

mfg030380 — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:01:36 +0000

the point is….not everyone need that much of power for a car.

0 0

By: topgunthang

topgunthang — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:26:23 +0000

who cares how it looks. its a 2 litre. just as bad a choice as buying a 1.6litre bmw 1 series.

wats the point?

2.5litre is the minimum.

0 0

By: mfg030380

mfg030380 — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:34:08 +0000

Actually, having 17″ on a 2.0L car is nothing nowadays…most latest model comes with 18″ stock.

0 0

By: mfg030380

mfg030380 — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:44:32 +0000

Okay, I get what u mean…just that we have different “size” of dream….;)

0 0

By: knight_templar

knight_templar — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:03:09 +0000

mfg030380, i was expecting someone to ask that sometime. Yes, why settle for less? Why aim for the roof, when u can reach the stars? Of course if cant afford a C63, work n save uplah. Otherwise just be a lame lowlifer n drive a local make.
I rest my case.

0 0

By: mfg030380

mfg030380 — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:23:24 +0000

Btw I rather wait for d facelift version.

0 0

By: mfg030380

mfg030380 — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:17:20 +0000

>>>nah, id js go for d C63 AMG. Not this M3 pretender.

320 sport = M3 pretender?
Comparing 320 with C63?

0 0

By: Kevin Lee

Kevin Lee — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:29:28 +0000

2k lesser than mercedes c-class, the horsepower and torque is a hell lesser than the mercedes c-class. seriously bmw needs to rethink its position

0 0

By: knight_templar

knight_templar — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:45:47 +0000

nah, id js go for d C63 AMG. Not this M3 pretender.

0 0

By: jimbet

jimbet — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:26:51 +0000

What’s the problem with people who own e46 with big wheelers?

0 0

By: szw

szw — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:33:34 +0000

dis is one hell of a car…

0 0

By: Javanese

Javanese — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:51:30 +0000

Ahhh…. Finally, car for the “wannabes”. I guess it compliments the waves of 318 E46 with 18″-20″s on M’sian road today. A natural upgrade for ahbengs from their hondas I suppose.

0 0

By: mystvearn

mystvearn — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:26:59 +0000

Correct me if I am wrong.
RM 9k more.
additional 6 hp higher than current engine.
So for 6hp you pay 9k extra is it?!

So expansive for such a small amount of power

0 0

By: charles27

charles27 — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:24:08 +0000

nice look and sporty.. love the design.
not enough power is the concern.. beside the low 200NM as well.

0 0

By: whodz

whodz — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:14:55 +0000

Have already seen it at Brunei..Niceee man.

0 0

By: nobodyatuk

nobodyatuk — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:04:36 +0000

This is drop dead gorgeous, the picture I mean. SLR or your phone camera Paul?

0 0

By: mitlanevo

mitlanevo — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:23:54 +0000

for the COOL factor, I will go for Audi A4….

for the slightly-richer-than-you image, C-Class is the car……

0 0

By: juanbeibei

juanbeibei — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:11:30 +0000

sorry for double post, btw, the interior finishings looks the same as the current 320i i think.. juz wondering whether there r optional for beige like the normal 320i/325i..

0 0

By: juanbeibei

juanbeibei — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:09:45 +0000

frm the pic i think its auto..

0 0

By: ThienWu

ThienWu — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:13:50 +0000

This Car is Manual ??? Its look Nice anyway…

0 0

By: moonier

moonier — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 04:58:45 +0000

exterior modification to keep attractive and up to date..

0 0