<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W204 Mercedes-Benz C200K Test Drive Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:34:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wan2</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-623882</link>
		<dc:creator>wan2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-623882</guid>
		<description>edzahrin , 

its true for folks older prefer mercedes ratter than beemers because its has tons of acknowledgement of big tycoons in a merc but rather to old women such as ur parents i would offer or should i encourage u to buy bmw 5 series for such a budget .. bear u in mind mercedes c class is a compact category and would give much space n comfort when u in journey and quiet little bumping when u cross over potholes n un-even roads

mercedes C class
1.sporty looks
2.more power
3.good for average person age between 20-40
4.nice cornering

bmw 5 series
1.comfort and spacious
2.power almost the same
3.good for people age 40 above(due to their bones)
4.more space in boot area

this comment i post is base on ur budget and i do own a w204 c200k its nice to ride n superb on highway but when i drive long journey with my wife n children their feel a lil bit light headache due to lower gravity in the car before i own this car i drove a camry 2007 and my family always says their much prefer do driving in the camry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>edzahrin , </p>
<p>its true for folks older prefer mercedes ratter than beemers because its has tons of acknowledgement of big tycoons in a merc but rather to old women such as ur parents i would offer or should i encourage u to buy bmw 5 series for such a budget .. bear u in mind mercedes c class is a compact category and would give much space n comfort when u in journey and quiet little bumping when u cross over potholes n un-even roads</p>
<p>mercedes C class<br />
1.sporty looks<br />
2.more power<br />
3.good for average person age between 20-40<br />
4.nice cornering</p>
<p>bmw 5 series<br />
1.comfort and spacious<br />
2.power almost the same<br />
3.good for people age 40 above(due to their bones)<br />
4.more space in boot area</p>
<p>this comment i post is base on ur budget and i do own a w204 c200k its nice to ride n superb on highway but when i drive long journey with my wife n children their feel a lil bit light headache due to lower gravity in the car before i own this car i drove a camry 2007 and my family always says their much prefer do driving in the camry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edzahrin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-575903</link>
		<dc:creator>edzahrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-575903</guid>
		<description>Hi guys, forgive me for being naive...I am just doing some survey here because my mom is planning to purchase the exact model (Recon)..so she asked what is the average cost like for maintenance??....The salesman been pushing her to take this model comparing to 320 model which was slightly cheaper, he said the maintenance wise is cheaper for Merc because 320 used major computer chip. For old women, she prefer mercedes. The price is about RM 195k on the road...Help me please..Btw to the page owner thank you for the informative review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys, forgive me for being naive&#8230;I am just doing some survey here because my mom is planning to purchase the exact model (Recon)..so she asked what is the average cost like for maintenance??&#8230;.The salesman been pushing her to take this model comparing to 320 model which was slightly cheaper, he said the maintenance wise is cheaper for Merc because 320 used major computer chip. For old women, she prefer mercedes. The price is about RM 195k on the road&#8230;Help me please..Btw to the page owner thank you for the informative review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrleo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-408976</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-408976</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to point out about the AvantGarde not having the folding side mirror button.  The Avant Garde model folding function is controlled via the on-board computer system where you can set whether: 1. to fold them automatically when you lock the car, or 2. to leave it as it is....  

FYI, I am one of the owner of the W204 Avant Garde AMG Package model and had no regret of choosing it over the E90 3 series....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to point out about the AvantGarde not having the folding side mirror button.  The Avant Garde model folding function is controlled via the on-board computer system where you can set whether: 1. to fold them automatically when you lock the car, or 2. to leave it as it is&#8230;.  </p>
<p>FYI, I am one of the owner of the W204 Avant Garde AMG Package model and had no regret of choosing it over the E90 3 series&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KusKus</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-242191</link>
		<dc:creator>KusKus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 04:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-242191</guid>
		<description>Need some input.... 
I&#039;ve bought a C220 CDI year 2004 in UK and are planning to take this back to Malaysia soon. Is it a good thing to use a diesel car in Malaysia? Which petrol station offers the best diesel in Malaysia. How about the car price for second hand diesel? 
 
If not I might trade this for E90 or 5-series before i take it back? Pls gimme me some inputs...thanks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need some input&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#039;ve bought a C220 CDI year 2004 in UK and are planning to take this back to Malaysia soon. Is it a good thing to use a diesel car in Malaysia? Which petrol station offers the best diesel in Malaysia. How about the car price for second hand diesel?</p>
<p>If not I might trade this for E90 or 5-series before i take it back? Pls gimme me some inputs&#8230;thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenss</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-226607</link>
		<dc:creator>kenss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-226607</guid>
		<description>c200 with compressor w203 will be adequate. Avantgrade has mostly black interior with bigger wheel, while other trims has beige/grey  colour. Facelift model looks a lot better .The paint work came off easily when stone chipped. the car is assembly / made in south africa, not germany , so cbu or not is not important. some minor problems, no major. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>c200 with compressor w203 will be adequate. Avantgrade has mostly black interior with bigger wheel, while other trims has beige/grey  colour. Facelift model looks a lot better .The paint work came off easily when stone chipped. the car is assembly / made in south africa, not germany , so cbu or not is not important. some minor problems, no major.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azizi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-225758</link>
		<dc:creator>Azizi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-225758</guid>
		<description>Have similar problem with jeremy, where I&#039;m looking for C200 type of car. Which one is better Elegance or Avantgarde? UK or Japan spec? what are major problem? 
Thanks for your input. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have similar problem with jeremy, where I&#039;m looking for C200 type of car. Which one is better Elegance or Avantgarde? UK or Japan spec? what are major problem?</p>
<p>Thanks for your input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenss</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-219826</link>
		<dc:creator>kenss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-219826</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;219407&quot;]Would like to buy a C180 or C200 year 2002? Still not sure since there are so many models! Is there anybody kind enough to explain the different of those models and does it matter CKD or CBU? I&#039;m in the sales field, therefore is it wise to use this type of car? Is there any major problem that I should consider before purchasing this car? Thanks a lot![/quote] 
both c180 or c200 are good but  best with kompressor,otherwise a bit underpower. The car is solidly built but does have minor problems such as rattle in cabin, early model has more problems machnically.. Engine is very smooth and refine.  Good for long distance with automatic. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/owners-reviews/search.aspx?model=536&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/owners-reviews/sear...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment=&quot;219407&quot;]Would like to buy a C180 or C200 year 2002? Still not sure since there are so many models! Is there anybody kind enough to explain the different of those models and does it matter CKD or CBU? I&#039;m in the sales field, therefore is it wise to use this type of car? Is there any major problem that I should consider before purchasing this car? Thanks a lot![/quote]</p>
<p>both c180 or c200 are good but  best with kompressor,otherwise a bit underpower. The car is solidly built but does have minor problems such as rattle in cabin, early model has more problems machnically.. Engine is very smooth and refine.  Good for long distance with automatic.</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/owners-reviews/search.aspx?model=536" rel="nofollow">http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/owners-reviews/sear&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-219407</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-219407</guid>
		<description>Would like to buy a C180 or C200 year 2002? Still not sure since there are so many models! Is there anybody kind enough to explain the different of those models and does it matter CKD or CBU? I&#039;m in the sales field, therefore is it wise to use this type of car? Is there any major problem that I should consider before purchasing this car? Thanks a lot! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would like to buy a C180 or C200 year 2002? Still not sure since there are so many models! Is there anybody kind enough to explain the different of those models and does it matter CKD or CBU? I&#039;m in the sales field, therefore is it wise to use this type of car? Is there any major problem that I should consider before purchasing this car? Thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenss</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-168472</link>
		<dc:creator>kenss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-168472</guid>
		<description>fyi, 
the old c class has cd of 0.26. new class has higher headlight , larger side mirror due to safety regulations. a corolla has cd of 0.30 while proton satire has a malaysian record of cd 0.34!

but a new bluetec c class has reduced cd from 0.27 to 0.25 by modifying side mirror and have a flatter cover underneath the car. Unlike most cars, c class has a near flat cover underneath the engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fyi,<br />
the old c class has cd of 0.26. new class has higher headlight , larger side mirror due to safety regulations. a corolla has cd of 0.30 while proton satire has a malaysian record of cd 0.34!</p>
<p>but a new bluetec c class has reduced cd from 0.27 to 0.25 by modifying side mirror and have a flatter cover underneath the car. Unlike most cars, c class has a near flat cover underneath the engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paparadzi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-167335</link>
		<dc:creator>paparadzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-167335</guid>
		<description>According to Malaysian government, this is a poor-man&#039;s car as it is well below 2000 cc displacement, therefore it is eligible for the RM625 fuel rebate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Malaysian government, this is a poor-man&#8217;s car as it is well below 2000 cc displacement, therefore it is eligible for the RM625 fuel rebate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mahs</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-166974</link>
		<dc:creator>mahs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 16:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-166974</guid>
		<description>technically said, it reduce the air resistance make the car run smooth and increase fuel efficiency</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>technically said, it reduce the air resistance make the car run smooth and increase fuel efficiency</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles27</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163550</link>
		<dc:creator>charles27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163550</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of course, in reality, we only got 7.7km.&quot; 
hai.. already expect this loo... 1.8 compressor
think the c230 will have better fuel economy.

cars maker always claim their compressor or turbo car giving far more torque and far more fuel economy. But fact is that, it will be driven by human.. and so, its super eat petrol. &quot;you take 1, you leave 1&quot;. Imagine a 1.8 car only do 7.7km per litre. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Of course, in reality, we only got 7.7km.&#8221;<br />
hai.. already expect this loo&#8230; 1.8 compressor<br />
think the c230 will have better fuel economy.</p>
<p>cars maker always claim their compressor or turbo car giving far more torque and far more fuel economy. But fact is that, it will be driven by human.. and so, its super eat petrol. &#8220;you take 1, you leave 1&#8243;. Imagine a 1.8 car only do 7.7km per litre. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leedehao</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163544</link>
		<dc:creator>leedehao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163544</guid>
		<description>The slits at the rear lights are desgined to reduce the wake behind the vehicle. As a car moves forward, the car leaves a air pressure difference behind the vehicle, producing a pressure drag. The slits acts like an air outlet to equalize the pressure difference and thus eliminating the pressure drag. Hope people can get the idea what i&#039;m trying to say</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The slits at the rear lights are desgined to reduce the wake behind the vehicle. As a car moves forward, the car leaves a air pressure difference behind the vehicle, producing a pressure drag. The slits acts like an air outlet to equalize the pressure difference and thus eliminating the pressure drag. Hope people can get the idea what i&#8217;m trying to say</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s60t</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163533</link>
		<dc:creator>s60t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163533</guid>
		<description>A few comparisons of Cd factors 

MB c class  0.27
BMW 3 series E90 0.30
Audi A4 0.28
Lexus IS 250 0.28
Volvo S60 0.28

So the 3 series seems to be the least aerodynamic of compact euro cars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few comparisons of Cd factors </p>
<p>MB c class  0.27<br />
BMW 3 series E90 0.30<br />
Audi A4 0.28<br />
Lexus IS 250 0.28<br />
Volvo S60 0.28</p>
<p>So the 3 series seems to be the least aerodynamic of compact euro cars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitlanevo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163499</link>
		<dc:creator>mitlanevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163499</guid>
		<description>IsaacVky, i agree with u!

or at least not so many on the road  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IsaacVky, i agree with u!</p>
<p>or at least not so many on the road  <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitlanevo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163498</link>
		<dc:creator>mitlanevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163498</guid>
		<description>will get this car after kena lottery....

next life, haha

well, I can see that many still comparing this with 3-series, but I think C-class is better, got more CLASS, lol~

the previous C200K is damn powerful (for rookie like me lah).....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will get this car after kena lottery&#8230;.</p>
<p>next life, haha</p>
<p>well, I can see that many still comparing this with 3-series, but I think C-class is better, got more CLASS, lol~</p>
<p>the previous C200K is damn powerful (for rookie like me lah)&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proton GL</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163485</link>
		<dc:creator>proton GL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 07:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163485</guid>
		<description>thanks sdan2

but i think MB need to convince more about the &#039;tail light&#039; slit vent in aerodinamic issue for normal people like to understand.

i can easily comprehend flat undertray or diffuser or vortex generator,

so.... i have my own theory, the shape of the rear light and the slits or grooves act diffusing air flow from the side body inwards as it leaves the car to fill the negative pressure or turbulance in reducing drag, for batter aero,

but correct me if im wrong,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks sdan2</p>
<p>but i think MB need to convince more about the &#8216;tail light&#8217; slit vent in aerodinamic issue for normal people like to understand.</p>
<p>i can easily comprehend flat undertray or diffuser or vortex generator,</p>
<p>so&#8230;. i have my own theory, the shape of the rear light and the slits or grooves act diffusing air flow from the side body inwards as it leaves the car to fill the negative pressure or turbulance in reducing drag, for batter aero,</p>
<p>but correct me if im wrong,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alifz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163473</link>
		<dc:creator>Alifz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 04:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163473</guid>
		<description>I still prefer the 6-cylinder engine...love the singing tone when you push hard on the engine..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still prefer the 6-cylinder engine&#8230;love the singing tone when you push hard on the engine..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarFreak</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163426</link>
		<dc:creator>CarFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163426</guid>
		<description>3 series, cabin size is so pathetic, model 320i has no power seat, can you imagine buying this at RM236,800 (Car Price) without this standard function for continental cars? 320i is just having very standard specs. To me, might as well I go for Volvo S40 (RM181,500), Toyota Camry 2.4V or Honda Accord 2.4 (RM167,169.80)?

Because of Mercedes Malaysia has brought in this new W204, thatâ€™s the reason why we have the new 320SE (Car price at RM245,800) in BMW show room (they know they must have this SE version which comes with all standard continental carsâ€™ accessories/features/functions?).

By the way, I am driving the C200 K Avantgarde, lol.

No offence for all Bimmer owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 series, cabin size is so pathetic, model 320i has no power seat, can you imagine buying this at RM236,800 (Car Price) without this standard function for continental cars? 320i is just having very standard specs. To me, might as well I go for Volvo S40 (RM181,500), Toyota Camry 2.4V or Honda Accord 2.4 (RM167,169.80)?</p>
<p>Because of Mercedes Malaysia has brought in this new W204, thatâ€™s the reason why we have the new 320SE (Car price at RM245,800) in BMW show room (they know they must have this SE version which comes with all standard continental carsâ€™ accessories/features/functions?).</p>
<p>By the way, I am driving the C200 K Avantgarde, lol.</p>
<p>No offence for all Bimmer owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the stik</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163421</link>
		<dc:creator>the stik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163421</guid>
		<description>i got the same cd holder.. hehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i got the same cd holder.. hehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sukekete</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163407</link>
		<dc:creator>sukekete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163407</guid>
		<description>really la,rear light looks like ct..nvm that, overall looks good..but i&#039;ll prefer 325i sport..heh..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really la,rear light looks like ct..nvm that, overall looks good..but i&#8217;ll prefer 325i sport..heh..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MisterBenjo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163397</link>
		<dc:creator>MisterBenjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163397</guid>
		<description>CD coefficient of just 0.27?
That&#039;s impressive for a big car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CD coefficient of just 0.27?<br />
That&#8217;s impressive for a big car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tokmoh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163393</link>
		<dc:creator>tokmoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163393</guid>
		<description>Shannon, what&#039;s with ur writing skills? This review has too much technical jargons which looked like they were copied and pasted from the manual book. That would&#039;ve been fine if the typical target buyers for the C-class are computer nerds. But these kinda ppl are usually too poor to bother with this car.

And the lack of a proper conclusion, so in the end, is it justified to pay RM10k more so u can have aluminium decos and thrown out foldable mirror button? Does the Agi control makes the car drives better than its competitors?

And in what sense is the car Japanese influenced? The dials are inspired by chopsticks? Or, on a more serious note, the rear lights remind one of Honda City?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shannon, what&#8217;s with ur writing skills? This review has too much technical jargons which looked like they were copied and pasted from the manual book. That would&#8217;ve been fine if the typical target buyers for the C-class are computer nerds. But these kinda ppl are usually too poor to bother with this car.</p>
<p>And the lack of a proper conclusion, so in the end, is it justified to pay RM10k more so u can have aluminium decos and thrown out foldable mirror button? Does the Agi control makes the car drives better than its competitors?</p>
<p>And in what sense is the car Japanese influenced? The dials are inspired by chopsticks? Or, on a more serious note, the rear lights remind one of Honda City?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goddess</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163391</link>
		<dc:creator>Goddess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163391</guid>
		<description>NICE........................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NICE&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyviKiller</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163384</link>
		<dc:creator>MyviKiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163384</guid>
		<description>Oh...It&#039;s a CD holder, my bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;It&#8217;s a CD holder, my bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyviKiller</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163383</link>
		<dc:creator>MyviKiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163383</guid>
		<description>Mitsubishi speakers in the 2nd last picture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitsubishi speakers in the 2nd last picture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s60t</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163381</link>
		<dc:creator>s60t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163381</guid>
		<description>8.8 sec for the century sprint? that&#039;s waaay faster than the 320. can&#039;t compare with the 325 which is in a different price bracket.I don&#039;t quite like the sports rims which look too sedate.

&lt;strong&gt;Paul Tan says: things are different here in malaysia because of price, but in terms of specs the 320i&#039;s equal in the mercedes bandwagon seems to be a c180k, the c200k&#039;s equal being a 323i, and the c230k&#039;s equal being the 325i.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8.8 sec for the century sprint? that&#8217;s waaay faster than the 320. can&#8217;t compare with the 325 which is in a different price bracket.I don&#8217;t quite like the sports rims which look too sedate.</p>
<p><strong>Paul Tan says: things are different here in malaysia because of price, but in terms of specs the 320i&#8217;s equal in the mercedes bandwagon seems to be a c180k, the c200k&#8217;s equal being a 323i, and the c230k&#8217;s equal being the 325i.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raybrig85</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163380</link>
		<dc:creator>raybrig85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163380</guid>
		<description>hahhaa...me...still hate the dsg eventho it is a good car....same goes to 3 er...for me...a4 n 159 still my best bet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahhaa&#8230;me&#8230;still hate the dsg eventho it is a good car&#8230;.same goes to 3 er&#8230;for me&#8230;a4 n 159 still my best bet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: szw</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163377</link>
		<dc:creator>szw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163377</guid>
		<description>a 3 series will easily beat the merc if it was a diesel...
3 is more economical n more powerful...
can&#039;t believe ?
well , its true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a 3 series will easily beat the merc if it was a diesel&#8230;<br />
3 is more economical n more powerful&#8230;<br />
can&#8217;t believe ?<br />
well , its true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IsaacVky</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163376</link>
		<dc:creator>IsaacVky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/05/06/w204-mercedes-benz-c200k-test-drive-review/#comment-163376</guid>
		<description>A4 &amp; 3 over this anytime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A4 &amp; 3 over this anytime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

