Comments on: Volkswagen Golf GTI Mk6 “Concept”

By: Kennedy Kenney

Kennedy Kenney — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:43:41 +0000

Waz up guyz! I still think the MK6 rocks-only problem is, it luks more like the old MK5. Whats happening to our designers are they getting lazy? I bought myself one (MK6)155KW-no regrets, but geez guyz! Lets get creative on a serious note. I have a funny feeling the Golf 6 R32 is gonna rock-shuld they design one. Gud Luck

By: majavaz

majavaz — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:08:10 +0000

boring design… mk5 is better

By: ALPINA BMW

ALPINA BMW — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:46:18 +0000

Reliability ….er questionable…..EPC light……

if u people have no problems driving protons, then u won’t have problems with these cars

By: Altezzar

Altezzar — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 03:38:12 +0000

Yes agree VW has better interior than Evo and STI.
Fuel consumption …. more power more fuel so no comparison.
Practical …hmm doesnt have a boot like a EVO or STI
but yes it is easier to drive…… hey ladies also can drive the car.
Not as hardcore as the EVO or STI.

er maybe not in the same category as EVO or STI.

Reliability ….er questionable…..EPC light……

By: kei9

kei9 — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:33:39 +0000

@ ALPINA BMW said,

September 28, 2008 @ 12:07 pm

quote “and most importantly the tyre wear is not as bad”

So care to explain more on that? sarcasm

I don’t think tyre wear it really influencing anything.

By: ALPINA BMW

ALPINA BMW — Sun, 28 Sep 2008 04:07:13 +0000

but the gti doesnt guzzle fuel like the evo and sti, more reliable, better interior, more practical and most importantly the tyre wear is not as bad

By: Altezzar

Altezzar — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:07:51 +0000

with 2.0 L turbo charger only manage 0-100 @ 7.2 sec. aahh
Some more only a FWD not a 4WD. Sure to have torque steer……
Not up to Evo and STi standard…….sigh…….

By: ALPINA BMW

ALPINA BMW — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:21:35 +0000

the front lights are ok, but the rear lights need a facelift

By: db8

db8 — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:15:15 +0000

if u look carefully,this mk6 looks like the old mk4..man…tooooo simple..better mk5 la..

By: ALPINA BMW

ALPINA BMW — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:50:46 +0000

yea, one fella in kl got his 1.6 golf changed into a abt, totally unrecognizable

By: csv

csv — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:31:34 +0000

UK different, their pricing scheme and etc is different. we got our stupid AP here.

i am sure abt will put a carbon fiber hood, bodykit, decals, and lambo doors like they did with the current mk5 gti. lol.

By: ALPINA BMW

ALPINA BMW — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:20:19 +0000

#
muharifz said,

September 26, 2008 @ 1:59 pm

The Mark 5 GTi still looks a lot better and sportier. Huhu…save some money and grab the current GTi before they replace it with this one..
#
csv said,

September 26, 2008 @ 2:33 pm

woo.

its here!

but looks not garang enough!

have it look somewhat like previous version, honeycomb grille. gaping mouth intake.

not to worry, i am sure there are few 2nd hand unit mark 5 around. 100k-150k. new one cost 188k. eurgh. damn ap.
________________________________________________________________________

uk can get a second hand model with sat nav for only 5000. malaysia so far cheapest i see in motor trader is rm 140,000. volkswagen has some pre-registered showroom units for rm 170,000. wonder wat ABT will do for the new golf…

By: Gabby

Gabby — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:35:43 +0000

Not Bad For this Golf GTi with Scirocco bumper design….sick man…

By: csv

csv — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:21:41 +0000

those seats look so….plain. leather la. wah lao. hot hatch version leh dey.

red pinstripe and dark leather interior la. metal paddles. chrome lining.

By: kei9

kei9 — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:19:08 +0000

Heyhey..
it seems to taken many cues from the scirocco eh?

Not bad though. But the back design a bit boring. Spice it up a ‘lil bit is better

By: maxtek

maxtek — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:05:01 +0000

Heh, the rear looks very similar to their touareg now… That kinda sucks. At least the interior’s sexier than the current dull one.

By: csv

csv — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:33:12 +0000

woo.

its here!

but looks not garang enough!

have it look somewhat like previous version, honeycomb grille. gaping mouth intake.

not to worry, i am sure there are few 2nd hand unit mark 5 around. 100k-150k. new one cost 188k. eurgh. damn ap.

By: muharifz

muharifz — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:59:27 +0000

The Mark 5 GTi still looks a lot better and sportier. Huhu…save some money and grab the current GTi before they replace it with this one..

By: ALPINA BMW

ALPINA BMW — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:31:59 +0000

tell volkswagen that 7.2 seconds isnt going to do, opel’s opc/vauxhall’s vxr astra can go much faster, plus there’s that ford focus RS coming soon….

By: abtm

abtm — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:26:43 +0000

Good, if the Scirocco had’nt exist….

By: azrai

azrai — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:26:28 +0000

Again, axis of white power.

By: cutester

cutester — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:26:14 +0000

Seat fabrics quite similar to one of my sarong at home! Hehe… Nice Golf anyway!

By: Prem3377

Prem3377 — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:39:21 +0000

this should have been mark 5 and mark 5 should have been mark 6…the car design is a step backward..not forward…mark 5 is still a beauty…

By: jolly_idiot

jolly_idiot — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:36:22 +0000

Nowdays Golf are more and more popular. I like it.

By: almattitude_v1

almattitude_v1 — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:22:00 +0000

I think the grille current-gen Golf GTI looks much better and more aggressive… But overall, I really like the car… The only problem is the grille… They should keep the car the same, and just change the grill like the current Golf GTI…

By: droll

droll — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:58:28 +0000

looks more cute than aggressive. other than the obvious change in exterior styling and the steering wheel, the rest of the parts look quite similar with the Mk5…..to keep costs down?

and 7.2s for the 0-100 time? surely this must be for the stick shift? i’ll hazard a guess that the DSG should shave off about 0.2s.

By: the stik

the stik — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:52:54 +0000

yeah i’m 2nd.. looks tame laa this one..
tak ganas langsung..

By: tananiki

tananiki — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:37:22 +0000

nice… that im 1st… hehe…