<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rear-wheel drive BMW SUVs to carry sDrive suffix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2008/11/29/rear-wheel-drive-bmw-suvs-to-carry-sdrive-suffix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2008/11/29/rear-wheel-drive-bmw-suvs-to-carry-sdrive-suffix/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALPINA Burkard Bovensiepen GMBH + Co. KG</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/11/29/rear-wheel-drive-bmw-suvs-to-carry-sdrive-suffix/#comment-192916</link>
		<dc:creator>ALPINA Burkard Bovensiepen GMBH + Co. KG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10123#comment-192916</guid>
		<description>ingolstadt said,

December 4, 2008 @ 12:01 pm

At least the X1 looked better than the X3, which IMO are amongst the ranks as the ugliest vehicles in the world.

sDrive BMWs? Gosh. BMW is synonymous with RWD perfection, why bother stressing it?

The more BMW bashes FWD, the more it’ll contradict with Mini.

WheelsWeekly
---------------------------
the x3 is ugly. malaysia should put orange coloured indicators like hong kong bmw instead of the clear indicators, makes it look a lot better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ingolstadt said,</p>
<p>December 4, 2008 @ 12:01 pm</p>
<p>At least the X1 looked better than the X3, which IMO are amongst the ranks as the ugliest vehicles in the world.</p>
<p>sDrive BMWs? Gosh. BMW is synonymous with RWD perfection, why bother stressing it?</p>
<p>The more BMW bashes FWD, the more it’ll contradict with Mini.</p>
<p>WheelsWeekly<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
the x3 is ugly. malaysia should put orange coloured indicators like hong kong bmw instead of the clear indicators, makes it look a lot better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ingolstadt</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/11/29/rear-wheel-drive-bmw-suvs-to-carry-sdrive-suffix/#comment-192680</link>
		<dc:creator>ingolstadt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10123#comment-192680</guid>
		<description>At least the X1 looked better than the X3, which IMO are amongst the ranks as the ugliest vehicles in the world. 

sDrive BMWs? Gosh. BMW is synonymous with RWD perfection, why bother stressing it? 

The more BMW bashes FWD, the more it&#039;ll contradict with Mini. 

WheelsWeekly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least the X1 looked better than the X3, which IMO are amongst the ranks as the ugliest vehicles in the world. </p>
<p>sDrive BMWs? Gosh. BMW is synonymous with RWD perfection, why bother stressing it? </p>
<p>The more BMW bashes FWD, the more it&#8217;ll contradict with Mini. </p>
<p>WheelsWeekly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALPINA Burkard Bovensiepen GMBH + Co. KG</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/11/29/rear-wheel-drive-bmw-suvs-to-carry-sdrive-suffix/#comment-192472</link>
		<dc:creator>ALPINA Burkard Bovensiepen GMBH + Co. KG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10123#comment-192472</guid>
		<description>RWD RULZ, this looks a lot better than that x3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RWD RULZ, this looks a lot better than that x3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: droll</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/11/29/rear-wheel-drive-bmw-suvs-to-carry-sdrive-suffix/#comment-191778</link>
		<dc:creator>droll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10123#comment-191778</guid>
		<description>oh man, the nose looks like a pig. what were they thinking?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh man, the nose looks like a pig. what were they thinking?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/11/29/rear-wheel-drive-bmw-suvs-to-carry-sdrive-suffix/#comment-191611</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10123#comment-191611</guid>
		<description>Aww.. it looks sad. :(

i&#039;m not gonna touch on the design part. I&#039;ve said it already, &amp; i think some as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww.. it looks sad. <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>i&#8217;m not gonna touch on the design part. I&#8217;ve said it already, &amp; i think some as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tHe CuLpRit</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/11/29/rear-wheel-drive-bmw-suvs-to-carry-sdrive-suffix/#comment-191579</link>
		<dc:creator>tHe CuLpRit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10123#comment-191579</guid>
		<description>sDrive.... Yokohama tyre.

Ugly cars tend to grow on you (Panamera, 7-series etc etc....) but this one, has yet to do so....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sDrive&#8230;. Yokohama tyre.</p>
<p>Ugly cars tend to grow on you (Panamera, 7-series etc etc&#8230;.) but this one, has yet to do so&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

