<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seatbelt fine of RM300 from 1st January 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sex is wonderful, but it's like cha</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-200596</link>
		<dc:creator>Sex is wonderful, but it's like cha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-200596</guid>
		<description>more duit kopi for the mata</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more duit kopi for the mata</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walksay</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199800</link>
		<dc:creator>walksay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199800</guid>
		<description>Joe v2.0,

if they upgrade to 2 lane road, more money to allocated the project and
less opportunity to make money from summons.

so, what they do? no need to upgrade the rodd, remain the same
opportunity to make money from overtaking summons + new opportunity
from buckle up summons. 

no money out, more money in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe v2.0,</p>
<p>if they upgrade to 2 lane road, more money to allocated the project and<br />
less opportunity to make money from summons.</p>
<p>so, what they do? no need to upgrade the rodd, remain the same<br />
opportunity to make money from overtaking summons + new opportunity<br />
from buckle up summons. </p>
<p>no money out, more money in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walksay</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199799</link>
		<dc:creator>walksay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199799</guid>
		<description>from the gua musang incident, current buckle up enforcement didn&#039;t give
any advantage! this kind of enforcement should be the last thing to do by
the police. they should tackle on how to avoid accident first.

for me, this enforcement only to avoid fatality and nothing to do with number
of accidents. its like 2007 have 1,000 accident with 20 fatality, this year
they target 1,000 accidents with 5 fatality. they better reduced the number
of accidents to 0. with 0 accidents, where got fatality one.

btw, without this enforcement, i&#039;m buckle up all the time. it for my own safety.
no need to enforce me to buckle up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the gua musang incident, current buckle up enforcement didn&#8217;t give<br />
any advantage! this kind of enforcement should be the last thing to do by<br />
the police. they should tackle on how to avoid accident first.</p>
<p>for me, this enforcement only to avoid fatality and nothing to do with number<br />
of accidents. its like 2007 have 1,000 accident with 20 fatality, this year<br />
they target 1,000 accidents with 5 fatality. they better reduced the number<br />
of accidents to 0. with 0 accidents, where got fatality one.</p>
<p>btw, without this enforcement, i&#8217;m buckle up all the time. it for my own safety.<br />
no need to enforce me to buckle up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe v2.0</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199770</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe v2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 03:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199770</guid>
		<description>Again, it was not a fully or throughly research on public safety, just half bake fruit cake, Just take research journal for safety from other country without doing research on our own country implementation.  Safety is not a thing that can be implement half bake to see good results.

The result has been shown on the new year fatality accident in gua musang that took 10 lives involving a kenari, kancil and a nissan-murano.  I doubt, from the condition of kenari and kancil not even a rear seat belt can drastically change their fatality fate, and yes 10 lives were taken from a pathetic level of car safety standard, malaysian made, nad for the murano, none, not even the cockpit area were compromise.  

The goverment should do a throughly effort on safety, not just half bake stuff, wasting money but no decent results.  Such as road conditions, Gua musang or the kelantan area road has been having high tolls of fatality accident mainly head on due to over taking incindents, why they dont do something about the road? Why dont upgrade the road to 2 lane per way.  This should reduce head on accidents causing from over taking.  But why until now, nothing has been done? why? politics issues? Are accidents select people from which party? 

Safety is a system, a system is secured as it weakes point, like the gua musang case, if you think u are secure in a car by having only safety belts, but you&#039;ll probably need to look more further on car itself and other factors such as the road conditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, it was not a fully or throughly research on public safety, just half bake fruit cake, Just take research journal for safety from other country without doing research on our own country implementation.  Safety is not a thing that can be implement half bake to see good results.</p>
<p>The result has been shown on the new year fatality accident in gua musang that took 10 lives involving a kenari, kancil and a nissan-murano.  I doubt, from the condition of kenari and kancil not even a rear seat belt can drastically change their fatality fate, and yes 10 lives were taken from a pathetic level of car safety standard, malaysian made, nad for the murano, none, not even the cockpit area were compromise.  </p>
<p>The goverment should do a throughly effort on safety, not just half bake stuff, wasting money but no decent results.  Such as road conditions, Gua musang or the kelantan area road has been having high tolls of fatality accident mainly head on due to over taking incindents, why they dont do something about the road? Why dont upgrade the road to 2 lane per way.  This should reduce head on accidents causing from over taking.  But why until now, nothing has been done? why? politics issues? Are accidents select people from which party? </p>
<p>Safety is a system, a system is secured as it weakes point, like the gua musang case, if you think u are secure in a car by having only safety belts, but you&#8217;ll probably need to look more further on car itself and other factors such as the road conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tokmoh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199668</link>
		<dc:creator>tokmoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199668</guid>
		<description>walksay,

if u are the transport minister, I dare u to say that to the public. Ponder on this: more people die bcuz of car-related incidents than guns. We&#039;re just into 4th day of new yr, but check out Sunday Star&#039;s front page on how many Msians hv died due to accidents.

Since those idiots dun wanna buckle up, might as well make some money out of them, they&#039;re gonna die anyway, rite? Why waste opportunity? Dun like it? Wear seatbelt la!! Dare u to complain to the authority that police taking bribes cuz u broke d law?

The media can show gory images of accidents. They can make it front page news everyday on dangers of not wearing seat belt. But do you think it has ever worked?

See why I hate to talk abt safety? When Msia impose heavy fines, say will encourage corruption la, ask to let it be la, proton la, kroni la, BN la, but if Australia, Japan, US, UK do the same, say &quot;bcuz they 1st world country, they strict, they civilised, they got no UMNO, they this, they that blablabla&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>walksay,</p>
<p>if u are the transport minister, I dare u to say that to the public. Ponder on this: more people die bcuz of car-related incidents than guns. We&#8217;re just into 4th day of new yr, but check out Sunday Star&#8217;s front page on how many Msians hv died due to accidents.</p>
<p>Since those idiots dun wanna buckle up, might as well make some money out of them, they&#8217;re gonna die anyway, rite? Why waste opportunity? Dun like it? Wear seatbelt la!! Dare u to complain to the authority that police taking bribes cuz u broke d law?</p>
<p>The media can show gory images of accidents. They can make it front page news everyday on dangers of not wearing seat belt. But do you think it has ever worked?</p>
<p>See why I hate to talk abt safety? When Msia impose heavy fines, say will encourage corruption la, ask to let it be la, proton la, kroni la, BN la, but if Australia, Japan, US, UK do the same, say &#8220;bcuz they 1st world country, they strict, they civilised, they got no UMNO, they this, they that blablabla&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walksay</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199528</link>
		<dc:creator>walksay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 08:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199528</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s all about the back passenger own safety.
if they don&#039;t want to die, they will buckle up.
but if they want to die and don&#039;t want buckle up,
why would the police give a summon?
why should they enforce the law and try make it money
from them? just educated them is enough!

it&#039;s all about the insurance company. they want to minimize
claim of life insurance. if you die bcoz you not buckle up,
it against new law and then you are not entitle to get any claim.
it like you commit suicide. die for nothing.

but then let the insurance company enforce that law, but why
need to police or JPJ enforce it too?

more summon item, more opportunity to make more money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s all about the back passenger own safety.<br />
if they don&#8217;t want to die, they will buckle up.<br />
but if they want to die and don&#8217;t want buckle up,<br />
why would the police give a summon?<br />
why should they enforce the law and try make it money<br />
from them? just educated them is enough!</p>
<p>it&#8217;s all about the insurance company. they want to minimize<br />
claim of life insurance. if you die bcoz you not buckle up,<br />
it against new law and then you are not entitle to get any claim.<br />
it like you commit suicide. die for nothing.</p>
<p>but then let the insurance company enforce that law, but why<br />
need to police or JPJ enforce it too?</p>
<p>more summon item, more opportunity to make more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fastcx</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199373</link>
		<dc:creator>fastcx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 09:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199373</guid>
		<description>to clarify most of the concern, i belive motor trader posted a great Q&amp;A on their site, http://www.motortrader.com.my/NUS/articles/article_1729/page_m.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to clarify most of the concern, i belive motor trader posted a great Q&amp;A on their site, <a href="http://www.motortrader.com.my/NUS/articles/article_1729/page_m.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.motortrader.com.my/NUS/articles/article_1729/page_m.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tokmoh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199351</link>
		<dc:creator>tokmoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 05:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199351</guid>
		<description>Arararara. My least favourite topic. Safety. It is the topic where idiots come out at full throttle to display their stupidity.

Finally. I admit our govt is full of sheez, but not this one. In fact, this is quite a gem actually. More ppl can hv higher chance to survive in crashes, police meanwhile gets more kopi from idiotic stubborn arseholes who&#039;d rather die than doin what was told by a party that calls them pendatang. Sure indeed, their pride is more valuable than rm10 kopi + fractured skull.

To those worried abt &quot;what if got 4 passengers&quot;, ermm..... I suggest tryin to get the 2 thinnest rear passangers to belt up wit the same seat belt. It&#039;s possible seriously. Unless all 4 are santa claus, dat one sory la....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arararara. My least favourite topic. Safety. It is the topic where idiots come out at full throttle to display their stupidity.</p>
<p>Finally. I admit our govt is full of sheez, but not this one. In fact, this is quite a gem actually. More ppl can hv higher chance to survive in crashes, police meanwhile gets more kopi from idiotic stubborn arseholes who&#8217;d rather die than doin what was told by a party that calls them pendatang. Sure indeed, their pride is more valuable than rm10 kopi + fractured skull.</p>
<p>To those worried abt &#8220;what if got 4 passengers&#8221;, ermm&#8230;.. I suggest tryin to get the 2 thinnest rear passangers to belt up wit the same seat belt. It&#8217;s possible seriously. Unless all 4 are santa claus, dat one sory la&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peanuts</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199265</link>
		<dc:creator>Peanuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199265</guid>
		<description>westleytca, if you really don&#039;t want to wear your rear safety or to remind your back seat passengers to buckle up, it&#039;s really simple. Don&#039;t wear it, but don&#039;t ever regret if anything ever happen to you in the future.I hope for your own sake nothing ever will. Ask yourself this: Why are there rear seat belts in car the first place if it&#039;s not really an issue? And if you say g&#039;ment are &quot;robbing&quot; our money, you willingly let yourself be &quot;robbed&quot; in the first place!

2 dogs, It is true that no law is perfect. Even enforcement in this country is &quot;hangat hangat tahi ayam&quot; at times. But once again, the laws are there to tell us what we, if we have any common sense, SHOULD have been doing in the first place to ensure safety of ourselves and those we care about. If you are gonna be driving recklessly, speeding, breaking the traffic lights, etc., no number of laws, summons or whatever gonna help you or anyone for that matter be a safer driver. If other people are gonna be a devil on the road, they are risking their own lives. At least you have thought about your own safety first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>westleytca, if you really don&#8217;t want to wear your rear safety or to remind your back seat passengers to buckle up, it&#8217;s really simple. Don&#8217;t wear it, but don&#8217;t ever regret if anything ever happen to you in the future.I hope for your own sake nothing ever will. Ask yourself this: Why are there rear seat belts in car the first place if it&#8217;s not really an issue? And if you say g&#8217;ment are &#8220;robbing&#8221; our money, you willingly let yourself be &#8220;robbed&#8221; in the first place!</p>
<p>2 dogs, It is true that no law is perfect. Even enforcement in this country is &#8220;hangat hangat tahi ayam&#8221; at times. But once again, the laws are there to tell us what we, if we have any common sense, SHOULD have been doing in the first place to ensure safety of ourselves and those we care about. If you are gonna be driving recklessly, speeding, breaking the traffic lights, etc., no number of laws, summons or whatever gonna help you or anyone for that matter be a safer driver. If other people are gonna be a devil on the road, they are risking their own lives. At least you have thought about your own safety first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199250</link>
		<dc:creator>Wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199250</guid>
		<description>So what do we have here....

Hmmm buckle up at the back. Nice. We all should do this.

My view. I see this more like a supporting regulation. More like a finishing touch once all the main issues were sorted.

Have the government properly study all the statistics, the data, the main cause of accidents, analyses ways to overcome it and came up with all the necessary regulation, action and proper enforcement? 

For example, we all aware that motorcyclist recorded the highest fatalities due to any reasons name it negligence, road condition or just plain rempit.
They (government) just introduced a law to prevent motorcyclist from wearing half-sized helmets, a law which kind of &#039;extra&#039; for me. Will that reduce the number of fatalities among motorcyclist?

As a ruler, G should know how to make the roads a safer place and it doesn&#039;t have to be this direct.

Or this could be one of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what do we have here&#8230;.</p>
<p>Hmmm buckle up at the back. Nice. We all should do this.</p>
<p>My view. I see this more like a supporting regulation. More like a finishing touch once all the main issues were sorted.</p>
<p>Have the government properly study all the statistics, the data, the main cause of accidents, analyses ways to overcome it and came up with all the necessary regulation, action and proper enforcement? </p>
<p>For example, we all aware that motorcyclist recorded the highest fatalities due to any reasons name it negligence, road condition or just plain rempit.<br />
They (government) just introduced a law to prevent motorcyclist from wearing half-sized helmets, a law which kind of &#8216;extra&#8217; for me. Will that reduce the number of fatalities among motorcyclist?</p>
<p>As a ruler, G should know how to make the roads a safer place and it doesn&#8217;t have to be this direct.</p>
<p>Or this could be one of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alvin_chan88</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199246</link>
		<dc:creator>alvin_chan88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199246</guid>
		<description>Ya, same goes to my question, what if I have 4 passengers at the back? I know its not everytime but sumtimes we do ferry more than what it should be rite? So what will happen towards the 4th passenger or the driver? 

as for 2 dogs:
Ya, I totally agree with you, that is why I hope all of us can buckle up for the sake of our loved ones... Since our enforcement are considered.... weak?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, same goes to my question, what if I have 4 passengers at the back? I know its not everytime but sumtimes we do ferry more than what it should be rite? So what will happen towards the 4th passenger or the driver? </p>
<p>as for 2 dogs:<br />
Ya, I totally agree with you, that is why I hope all of us can buckle up for the sake of our loved ones&#8230; Since our enforcement are considered&#8230;. weak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199175</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199175</guid>
		<description>I would like to know if cars that are registered before 1995 a exempted from wearing or exempted from installing? What happens if you car has rear seat belts but is registered before 1995?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know if cars that are registered before 1995 a exempted from wearing or exempted from installing? What happens if you car has rear seat belts but is registered before 1995?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199172</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199172</guid>
		<description>Its about time. Malaysians who go to UK can do it, why in our country we cannot do it as well. So time to get used to buckle up at the back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its about time. Malaysians who go to UK can do it, why in our country we cannot do it as well. So time to get used to buckle up at the back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2 dogs</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199164</link>
		<dc:creator>2 dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199164</guid>
		<description>I TOTALLY AGREE that wearing seat belts is a good thing for our own safety.

I TOTALLY AGREE that stiff fines and we should never give duit kopi.

BUT for those who thinks they follow all the rules, answer these questions.

1. Have they EVER exceed the speed limit while driving down a 6 lane highway with a speed limit of 70kph!

2. Have they EVER park on yellow lines (outside your apartment, near banks, near mosque while praying, around DBKL building, along the highway etc)??

3. Have they EVER accelerate their car when the traffic lights is orange (you&#039;re suppose to slow down) when the timing of the lights has gone haywire (very often) and you&#039;ve waited very long?

Rules are made by man, and if silly man create silly rules AND not run or enforce them properly, we became more silly. We are not against the seat belt ruling, but against the silly Malaysian way of creating rules that punish the innocent while those speedsters, road bullies, modified cars, blinding halogen lights, heavy tinted glass, queue jumpers, etc got away scott free!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I TOTALLY AGREE that wearing seat belts is a good thing for our own safety.</p>
<p>I TOTALLY AGREE that stiff fines and we should never give duit kopi.</p>
<p>BUT for those who thinks they follow all the rules, answer these questions.</p>
<p>1. Have they EVER exceed the speed limit while driving down a 6 lane highway with a speed limit of 70kph!</p>
<p>2. Have they EVER park on yellow lines (outside your apartment, near banks, near mosque while praying, around DBKL building, along the highway etc)??</p>
<p>3. Have they EVER accelerate their car when the traffic lights is orange (you&#8217;re suppose to slow down) when the timing of the lights has gone haywire (very often) and you&#8217;ve waited very long?</p>
<p>Rules are made by man, and if silly man create silly rules AND not run or enforce them properly, we became more silly. We are not against the seat belt ruling, but against the silly Malaysian way of creating rules that punish the innocent while those speedsters, road bullies, modified cars, blinding halogen lights, heavy tinted glass, queue jumpers, etc got away scott free!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fastcx</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199163</link>
		<dc:creator>fastcx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199163</guid>
		<description>anything related to current G or proton will kena bash, no matter what, malaysian mentality -.-&quot; really disappointing! no matter how harsh the penalty is or how expensive it is, does it bothers u if u wear ur belt? they put exemption u also need to bash? go check those cars n bus! 

for bus, they r suppose to hv ppl stand, n they r suppose to cruise at slow speed! n its a big heavy mass, on impact it wont have the kind of impact smaller cars get!

older cars, u think just simply drill n install can take the force? sudden pull for restraining passenger need high strength, the harness need to be securely attached to the car&#039;s chassis.

this new law is as good as it gets, but some malaysian r just a bunch of monkey that keep making noise no matter what! sad case for malaysian mentality</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anything related to current G or proton will kena bash, no matter what, malaysian mentality -.-&#8221; really disappointing! no matter how harsh the penalty is or how expensive it is, does it bothers u if u wear ur belt? they put exemption u also need to bash? go check those cars n bus! </p>
<p>for bus, they r suppose to hv ppl stand, n they r suppose to cruise at slow speed! n its a big heavy mass, on impact it wont have the kind of impact smaller cars get!</p>
<p>older cars, u think just simply drill n install can take the force? sudden pull for restraining passenger need high strength, the harness need to be securely attached to the car&#8217;s chassis.</p>
<p>this new law is as good as it gets, but some malaysian r just a bunch of monkey that keep making noise no matter what! sad case for malaysian mentality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alvin_chan88</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199161</link>
		<dc:creator>alvin_chan88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199161</guid>
		<description>It is good that this law will be implemented, I do agree with some of them saying that it is an opportunity that the police will have another &quot;source of income&quot; or the government earning even more from the rakyat... but WAIT! If we did not offend the law, how in the world they will have the chance to do so? So for the sake of your loved once and also to reduce corruption in the country, and also stop the G from sucking our money, We shall just OBEY THE LAW. Hehe.

But 1 more question, what if I have more than 3 passengers in my car, will the 4th 1 kena? If the 4th passenger is omitted by the law, then what is the law implemented in the 1st place?

But anyhow, JUST BUCKLE UP FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR LOVED ONES. HAPPY NEW YEAR PAUL AND TO OTHER VISITORS AS WELL. Thank you Paul and everyone for providing valuable info through this blog. Thank you everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good that this law will be implemented, I do agree with some of them saying that it is an opportunity that the police will have another &#8220;source of income&#8221; or the government earning even more from the rakyat&#8230; but WAIT! If we did not offend the law, how in the world they will have the chance to do so? So for the sake of your loved once and also to reduce corruption in the country, and also stop the G from sucking our money, We shall just OBEY THE LAW. Hehe.</p>
<p>But 1 more question, what if I have more than 3 passengers in my car, will the 4th 1 kena? If the 4th passenger is omitted by the law, then what is the law implemented in the 1st place?</p>
<p>But anyhow, JUST BUCKLE UP FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR LOVED ONES. HAPPY NEW YEAR PAUL AND TO OTHER VISITORS AS WELL. Thank you Paul and everyone for providing valuable info through this blog. Thank you everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fliedlice</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199155</link>
		<dc:creator>fliedlice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199155</guid>
		<description>Oh and I think someone has mentioned earlier in the forum that all the airbags in the world; and a 5 star EuroNCAP car is useless if you don&#039;t wear your seatbelts. That kind of says it all really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I think someone has mentioned earlier in the forum that all the airbags in the world; and a 5 star EuroNCAP car is useless if you don&#8217;t wear your seatbelts. That kind of says it all really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fliedlice</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199152</link>
		<dc:creator>fliedlice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199152</guid>
		<description>dodgeviper88,

If you look at an airbag, it is labelled &quot;SRS&quot;. That stands for &#039;Supplemental Restraint System&#039;. It is meant to supplement the seatbelt. Seatbelts are still the main safety restraint system in cars. So, having people wear their rear seatbelts is the first step. Putting in many airbags is the next step which I also would like to see. But don&#039;t doubt that it is for your own safety. If you understand and accept that wearing seatbelts in the front is for your own safety, then the principle for rear seatbelts is the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dodgeviper88,</p>
<p>If you look at an airbag, it is labelled &#8220;SRS&#8221;. That stands for &#8216;Supplemental Restraint System&#8217;. It is meant to supplement the seatbelt. Seatbelts are still the main safety restraint system in cars. So, having people wear their rear seatbelts is the first step. Putting in many airbags is the next step which I also would like to see. But don&#8217;t doubt that it is for your own safety. If you understand and accept that wearing seatbelts in the front is for your own safety, then the principle for rear seatbelts is the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dodgeviper88</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199151</link>
		<dc:creator>dodgeviper88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199151</guid>
		<description>Allow me to state my opinion that this law is very stupid. To begin with, there are exemptions of cars before 1995 bla bla bla. This makes it very difficult to enforce. Imagine police man having to check registration to prove that this car is registered before 1995 and check anchorage points etc etc. Furthermore, if you&#039;re really concerned about the safety of passengers, force automakers to make airbags and other safety equipments mandatory. In the UK even the lowest spec car has at least 6 airbags &amp; ABS standard. In 2011 the US is making traction control a standard equipment and they have tire pressure monitoring system a standard feature. Passing half-baked rule like is stupid to say the least and I&#039;m highly doubting that it is for our own safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to state my opinion that this law is very stupid. To begin with, there are exemptions of cars before 1995 bla bla bla. This makes it very difficult to enforce. Imagine police man having to check registration to prove that this car is registered before 1995 and check anchorage points etc etc. Furthermore, if you&#8217;re really concerned about the safety of passengers, force automakers to make airbags and other safety equipments mandatory. In the UK even the lowest spec car has at least 6 airbags &amp; ABS standard. In 2011 the US is making traction control a standard equipment and they have tire pressure monitoring system a standard feature. Passing half-baked rule like is stupid to say the least and I&#8217;m highly doubting that it is for our own safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fliedlice</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199150</link>
		<dc:creator>fliedlice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199150</guid>
		<description>westleytca,

Many intelligent people have already explained that wearing your seatbelt at the rear is for your own safety. If you have any intelligence at all you will realise that the fine is there as a deterrent to make sure people here wear their seatbelts FOR THEIR OWN SAFETY. Plus, it is not difficult or uncomfortable to wear your rear seatbelt.

Use your brain; learn how to spell and how to write properly in English before you shoot off such a large pile of rubbish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>westleytca,</p>
<p>Many intelligent people have already explained that wearing your seatbelt at the rear is for your own safety. If you have any intelligence at all you will realise that the fine is there as a deterrent to make sure people here wear their seatbelts FOR THEIR OWN SAFETY. Plus, it is not difficult or uncomfortable to wear your rear seatbelt.</p>
<p>Use your brain; learn how to spell and how to write properly in English before you shoot off such a large pile of rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autojohndoe</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199149</link>
		<dc:creator>autojohndoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199149</guid>
		<description>westleytca said,

****

all u think is about money taken by govt...

where the safety awareness of yours?

money is important than ur life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>westleytca said,</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>all u think is about money taken by govt&#8230;</p>
<p>where the safety awareness of yours?</p>
<p>money is important than ur life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legacy88</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199146</link>
		<dc:creator>legacy88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199146</guid>
		<description>You can spot many test crash dummy driving everyday here in Malaysia.  Not to mention some dumb parents who let their kids in MPV with sunroof hanging out like a dog taking a fresh air while the vehicle is in motion.

With that kind of attitude and mentality no wonder we are the best for road fatalities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can spot many test crash dummy driving everyday here in Malaysia.  Not to mention some dumb parents who let their kids in MPV with sunroof hanging out like a dog taking a fresh air while the vehicle is in motion.</p>
<p>With that kind of attitude and mentality no wonder we are the best for road fatalities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: westleytca</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199140</link>
		<dc:creator>westleytca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199140</guid>
		<description>Wearing safty belt is good for the safety of the passengers but the fine is too much. From 1st Jan 09 to 30th June 09, the fine will be RM 300.00 .After 1st July 2009,the fine increased to RM 2,000.00 plus 1 year in jail.The government really desperated for our hard earn money. We paid everything for the government but they still want get some extra money from us. This morning i saw an articles in newpapers in which someone commited CBT involved of RM 20,000.00 but only sentenced to jail 1 year only without any fines. Compared with the offence of not wearing safety belt, i think the CBT case is more serious than never wear safety belt. I don&#039;t know what are the government trying to do. To take action on innocent people but let the criminals go away. What government is this!!!!! Frankly, how many accident involved that rear passengers passed away? I don&#039;t think the government really know? If really government want to implement on safety belt issues, why don&#039;t set a standard rules that all vehicles at rear must wear sefety belt no matters whether passenger or commercial vehicle (including bus). Take example of flight, all passengers are required to wear safety bely before/after take off and also landing. I think government is running out of idea how to make money from their citizens, that is why they are trying to collect from the vehicle without safety belt. Landslide happened at Bukit Antarabangsa, what have government done to prevent it? They did nothing.Sheesh,this types government should not represent the citizen of Malaysia................................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wearing safty belt is good for the safety of the passengers but the fine is too much. From 1st Jan 09 to 30th June 09, the fine will be RM 300.00 .After 1st July 2009,the fine increased to RM 2,000.00 plus 1 year in jail.The government really desperated for our hard earn money. We paid everything for the government but they still want get some extra money from us. This morning i saw an articles in newpapers in which someone commited CBT involved of RM 20,000.00 but only sentenced to jail 1 year only without any fines. Compared with the offence of not wearing safety belt, i think the CBT case is more serious than never wear safety belt. I don&#8217;t know what are the government trying to do. To take action on innocent people but let the criminals go away. What government is this!!!!! Frankly, how many accident involved that rear passengers passed away? I don&#8217;t think the government really know? If really government want to implement on safety belt issues, why don&#8217;t set a standard rules that all vehicles at rear must wear sefety belt no matters whether passenger or commercial vehicle (including bus). Take example of flight, all passengers are required to wear safety bely before/after take off and also landing. I think government is running out of idea how to make money from their citizens, that is why they are trying to collect from the vehicle without safety belt. Landslide happened at Bukit Antarabangsa, what have government done to prevent it? They did nothing.Sheesh,this types government should not represent the citizen of Malaysia&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fridz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199138</link>
		<dc:creator>Fridz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199138</guid>
		<description>legacy88,
the test dummy also wear the seatbelt laa...

ayoyo...just buckle up yur belt laaaa....why talk so much?inconvinientLAH,safety not compromisedLAH,bribeLAH...

im just thinking,the only way to make Msia as a developed country IS TO CHANGE THE WAY YOU THINK.you got 1st class ifrastructure but you hv 3rd class narrow minded.same as drive a 5star NCAP Merc car but didnt fasten the belt..

just change the way we think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>legacy88,<br />
the test dummy also wear the seatbelt laa&#8230;</p>
<p>ayoyo&#8230;just buckle up yur belt laaaa&#8230;.why talk so much?inconvinientLAH,safety not compromisedLAH,bribeLAH&#8230;</p>
<p>im just thinking,the only way to make Msia as a developed country IS TO CHANGE THE WAY YOU THINK.you got 1st class ifrastructure but you hv 3rd class narrow minded.same as drive a 5star NCAP Merc car but didnt fasten the belt..</p>
<p>just change the way we think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autojohndoe</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199137</link>
		<dc:creator>autojohndoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199137</guid>
		<description>very good example by the policeman... 
 Thank God, there is still honest policeman....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good example by the policeman&#8230;<br />
 Thank God, there is still honest policeman&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsrulz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199124</link>
		<dc:creator>rsrulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199124</guid>
		<description>Ralliace said,
December 31, 2008 @ 3:28 pm

LogicallyMad said,

If u want to pay the summon, then don’t give them bribery… when they offer, say to them ” no i rather pay the RM300 summon than give u RM30?. I bet most malaysia would not say that…

=============================================

I have said this to a cop before and they just sigh and let me go scott free after being adviced…. jalan jalan jalan…. lain kali jangan buat lagi. LOL!

_____________________________

My  friend from Singapore got caught for speeding once and asked me to bribe the policeman as he didn&#039;t know Malay and the policeman didn&#039;t want to take his money. Instead of bribeing him, I got out and told him that he was doing the right thing by not taking rasuah. He then just let us go scott free too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralliace said,<br />
December 31, 2008 @ 3:28 pm</p>
<p>LogicallyMad said,</p>
<p>If u want to pay the summon, then don’t give them bribery… when they offer, say to them ” no i rather pay the RM300 summon than give u RM30?. I bet most malaysia would not say that…</p>
<p>=============================================</p>
<p>I have said this to a cop before and they just sigh and let me go scott free after being adviced…. jalan jalan jalan…. lain kali jangan buat lagi. LOL!</p>
<p>_____________________________</p>
<p>My  friend from Singapore got caught for speeding once and asked me to bribe the policeman as he didn&#8217;t know Malay and the policeman didn&#8217;t want to take his money. Instead of bribeing him, I got out and told him that he was doing the right thing by not taking rasuah. He then just let us go scott free too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsrulz</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199122</link>
		<dc:creator>rsrulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199122</guid>
		<description>This is a worse punishment than Singapore but I think is good as you really need to push people to wear seatbelt. I lived in Singapore for awhile (2006 and 2007) and most people don&#039;t buckel up at the back there either so can you imagine how much you must push us Malaysians to wear belt? And I totally agree with fastcx.

P.S: I hope that the police enforce this law and don&#039;t ask for rasuah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a worse punishment than Singapore but I think is good as you really need to push people to wear seatbelt. I lived in Singapore for awhile (2006 and 2007) and most people don&#8217;t buckel up at the back there either so can you imagine how much you must push us Malaysians to wear belt? And I totally agree with fastcx.</p>
<p>P.S: I hope that the police enforce this law and don&#8217;t ask for rasuah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fliedlice</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199118</link>
		<dc:creator>fliedlice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199118</guid>
		<description>Bravo Peanuts!! Well said!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo Peanuts!! Well said!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legacy88</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199113</link>
		<dc:creator>legacy88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199113</guid>
		<description>Sheesh!  Just buckle up lah stupid!!!  Unless you are test crash dummy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh!  Just buckle up lah stupid!!!  Unless you are test crash dummy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peanuts</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2008/12/30/seatbelt-fine-of-rm300-from-1st-january-2009/#comment-199111</link>
		<dc:creator>Peanuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10829#comment-199111</guid>
		<description>Some of the comments here clearly shows the typical narrow-mindedness that has infested some of our Malaysian minds.

1. It&#039;s inconvenient to wear.
- If you care about your safety or the safety of others, you buckle up. It isn&#039;t 100% fail proof but every bit helps. If you want to take the risk of not wearing, then go ahead but you never know what may hit you one day.I bet you won&#039;t complain any bit about the inconvenience then, if you&#039;re still alive that is!

2. Lack of enforcement will make this ineffective.
- Once again, refer back to #1. So what if no law enforcer is gonna catch you or other people for not buckling up, it&#039;s YOUR safety and the safety of those you care about that&#039;s within your responsibility! If you can think maturely, you don&#039;t even need someone to force you to take care of YOUR own safety.

3. Too harsh penalty and bribery potential.
- Once again, if you buckle up, you don&#039;t have anything to worry right? As in #2, if you&#039;re thinking maturely, you don&#039;t need anyone to force you to buckle up for your own safety. And if you get caught, it&#039;s YOUR FAULT that you didn&#039;t wear in the first place. So if the police asked for anything you are equally guilty in the first place for giving it to him. Remember, it takes 2 hands to clap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the comments here clearly shows the typical narrow-mindedness that has infested some of our Malaysian minds.</p>
<p>1. It&#8217;s inconvenient to wear.<br />
- If you care about your safety or the safety of others, you buckle up. It isn&#8217;t 100% fail proof but every bit helps. If you want to take the risk of not wearing, then go ahead but you never know what may hit you one day.I bet you won&#8217;t complain any bit about the inconvenience then, if you&#8217;re still alive that is!</p>
<p>2. Lack of enforcement will make this ineffective.<br />
- Once again, refer back to #1. So what if no law enforcer is gonna catch you or other people for not buckling up, it&#8217;s YOUR safety and the safety of those you care about that&#8217;s within your responsibility! If you can think maturely, you don&#8217;t even need someone to force you to take care of YOUR own safety.</p>
<p>3. Too harsh penalty and bribery potential.<br />
- Once again, if you buckle up, you don&#8217;t have anything to worry right? As in #2, if you&#8217;re thinking maturely, you don&#8217;t need anyone to force you to buckle up for your own safety. And if you get caught, it&#8217;s YOUR FAULT that you didn&#8217;t wear in the first place. So if the police asked for anything you are equally guilty in the first place for giving it to him. Remember, it takes 2 hands to clap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
