<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suzuki cancels the Suzuki Kizashi D-segment sedan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:38:58 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sex is wonderful, but it's like champagne.If you're forced to have four glasses at every meal you start to fantasize about water.</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200575</link>
		<dc:creator>Sex is wonderful, but it's like champagne.If you're forced to have four glasses at every meal you start to fantasize about water.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200575</guid>
		<description>a really stupid decision</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a really stupid decision</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheophilusChin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200277</link>
		<dc:creator>TheophilusChin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200277</guid>
		<description>Well, there&#039;s hope yet...

&quot;After a story surfaced yesterday detailing Suzuki&#039;s cancellation of its mid-sized sedan program... Suzuki (North America) spokesman Jeff Holland told Automotive News, &quot;The production version will debut at this year&#039;s New York auto show in April.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there&#8217;s hope yet&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;After a story surfaced yesterday detailing Suzuki&#8217;s cancellation of its mid-sized sedan program&#8230; Suzuki (North America) spokesman Jeff Holland told Automotive News, &#8220;The production version will debut at this year&#8217;s New York auto show in April.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: revo</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200262</link>
		<dc:creator>revo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200262</guid>
		<description>i like the look... but if its in production pun, it will take years for suzuki to bring it here, malaysia. I thnk seems the american economy is doing badly, why don&#039;t the japanese target some south east asia market which does not affected tht much from the economical crysis. hehehe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the look&#8230; but if its in production pun, it will take years for suzuki to bring it here, malaysia. I thnk seems the american economy is doing badly, why don&#8217;t the japanese target some south east asia market which does not affected tht much from the economical crysis. hehehe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles27</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200148</link>
		<dc:creator>charles27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200148</guid>
		<description>its not always true that this d segment is getting smaller.
now its so easy to spot the new honda accord on the road...
every parking lane in shopping centre, you can found 1 parked there. so many of it. even if its not accord, its gonna be camry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its not always true that this d segment is getting smaller.<br />
now its so easy to spot the new honda accord on the road&#8230;<br />
every parking lane in shopping centre, you can found 1 parked there. so many of it. even if its not accord, its gonna be camry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red7</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200126</link>
		<dc:creator>red7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200126</guid>
		<description>i see an original design here
without much cues from other cars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i see an original design here<br />
without much cues from other cars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheophilusChin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200121</link>
		<dc:creator>TheophilusChin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200121</guid>
		<description>Ada kat http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/22/suzuki-kizashi-3-concept/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ada kat <a href="http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/22/suzuki-kizashi-3-concept/" rel="nofollow">http://paultan.org/archives/2008/03/22/suzuki-kizashi-3-concept/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy73</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200120</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200120</guid>
		<description>Paul &amp; guys, do you think this is coincidence....I&#039;m quite pleased with this version of 408 though...check out the link.

http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2008/10/peugeot-408-rendered-in-kizashi-sort-of.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul &amp; guys, do you think this is coincidence&#8230;.I&#8217;m quite pleased with this version of 408 though&#8230;check out the link.</p>
<p><a href="http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2008/10/peugeot-408-rendered-in-kizashi-sort-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2008/10/peugeot-408-rendered-in-kizashi-sort-of.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200090</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200090</guid>
		<description>That pic is a very nice rear end for a car. Anyone got the front pic of that car?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That pic is a very nice rear end for a car. Anyone got the front pic of that car?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xx- Ferrari -xX</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200087</link>
		<dc:creator>Xx- Ferrari -xX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200087</guid>
		<description>hack !!! Suzuku comopany just cancelled the production of a damn nice car... This car would definitely sell like hot cake since it looks more nicer than current accord and camry.... They TOOK THE WRONG DESICION !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hack !!! Suzuku comopany just cancelled the production of a damn nice car&#8230; This car would definitely sell like hot cake since it looks more nicer than current accord and camry&#8230;. They TOOK THE WRONG DESICION !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hidrogentank</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200034</link>
		<dc:creator>hidrogentank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200034</guid>
		<description>BanyakMasukWorkshop said,
January 6, 2009 @ 10:26 am 

hidrogentank said,
January 6, 2009 @ 9:57 am 

TheophilusChin said,
January 6, 2009 @ 9:21 am 

It’s actually rather strange they wanted to do a D-segment car to begin with. They wanted a slice of Camry and Accord sales in US and Canada. But aren’t they better off doing a C-segment car? It’ll sell better elsewhere too, nowadays people are downsizing anyway.

I don’t the SX-4 isn’t a C-segment car.
—————————————————————-
id just like to ask, why not? the result(kizashi) isnt bad at all……..id say theyd be good at doing small, big or super whenever they choose.

__________________________________-

if you read paul’s article, you would know the reason, as he mentioned it there.

-------------------------------------------------------------
dude.. what u talkin about??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BanyakMasukWorkshop said,<br />
January 6, 2009 @ 10:26 am </p>
<p>hidrogentank said,<br />
January 6, 2009 @ 9:57 am </p>
<p>TheophilusChin said,<br />
January 6, 2009 @ 9:21 am </p>
<p>It’s actually rather strange they wanted to do a D-segment car to begin with. They wanted a slice of Camry and Accord sales in US and Canada. But aren’t they better off doing a C-segment car? It’ll sell better elsewhere too, nowadays people are downsizing anyway.</p>
<p>I don’t the SX-4 isn’t a C-segment car.<br />
—————————————————————-<br />
id just like to ask, why not? the result(kizashi) isnt bad at all……..id say theyd be good at doing small, big or super whenever they choose.</p>
<p>__________________________________-</p>
<p>if you read paul’s article, you would know the reason, as he mentioned it there.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
dude.. what u talkin about??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kei9</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200027</link>
		<dc:creator>kei9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200027</guid>
		<description>Cancel ornot. 

It is not going to be a hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cancel ornot. </p>
<p>It is not going to be a hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afhstingray</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200020</link>
		<dc:creator>afhstingray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200020</guid>
		<description>the real life pics of the car dont look that attractive.

whats the source of this story? i could only find a report on a rumor of its cancellation :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the real life pics of the car dont look that attractive.</p>
<p>whats the source of this story? i could only find a report on a rumor of its cancellation :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neveraproton</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200017</link>
		<dc:creator>neveraproton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200017</guid>
		<description>It is a great looking car.

Perhaps PROTON should buy over the blueprint, and have their Perdana replacement model eh?

TheophilusChin, do your stuff please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a great looking car.</p>
<p>Perhaps PROTON should buy over the blueprint, and have their Perdana replacement model eh?</p>
<p>TheophilusChin, do your stuff please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KKTE</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-200014</link>
		<dc:creator>KKTE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-200014</guid>
		<description>Well suzuki is starting to take thier move! This car looks elegant though. Dont know what is the price of this car. I think it should be the same as accord and camry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well suzuki is starting to take thier move! This car looks elegant though. Dont know what is the price of this car. I think it should be the same as accord and camry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BanyakMasukWorkshop</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-199993</link>
		<dc:creator>BanyakMasukWorkshop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-199993</guid>
		<description>hidrogentank said,
January 6, 2009 @ 9:57 am 

TheophilusChin said,
January 6, 2009 @ 9:21 am 

It’s actually rather strange they wanted to do a D-segment car to begin with. They wanted a slice of Camry and Accord sales in US and Canada. But aren’t they better off doing a C-segment car? It’ll sell better elsewhere too, nowadays people are downsizing anyway.

I don’t the SX-4 isn’t a C-segment car.
—————————————————————-
id just like to ask, why not? the result(kizashi) isnt bad at all……..id say theyd be good at doing small, big or super whenever they choose.

__________________________________-

if you read paul&#039;s article, you would know the reason, as he mentioned it there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hidrogentank said,<br />
January 6, 2009 @ 9:57 am </p>
<p>TheophilusChin said,<br />
January 6, 2009 @ 9:21 am </p>
<p>It’s actually rather strange they wanted to do a D-segment car to begin with. They wanted a slice of Camry and Accord sales in US and Canada. But aren’t they better off doing a C-segment car? It’ll sell better elsewhere too, nowadays people are downsizing anyway.</p>
<p>I don’t the SX-4 isn’t a C-segment car.<br />
—————————————————————-<br />
id just like to ask, why not? the result(kizashi) isnt bad at all……..id say theyd be good at doing small, big or super whenever they choose.</p>
<p>__________________________________-</p>
<p>if you read paul&#8217;s article, you would know the reason, as he mentioned it there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hidrogentank</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-199985</link>
		<dc:creator>hidrogentank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-199985</guid>
		<description>TheophilusChin said,
January 6, 2009 @ 9:21 am 

It’s actually rather strange they wanted to do a D-segment car to begin with. They wanted a slice of Camry and Accord sales in US and Canada. But aren’t they better off doing a C-segment car? It’ll sell better elsewhere too, nowadays people are downsizing anyway.

I don’t the SX-4 isn’t a C-segment car.
----------------------------------------------------------------
id just like to ask, why not? the result(kizashi) isnt bad at all........id say theyd be good at doing small, big or super whenever they choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TheophilusChin said,<br />
January 6, 2009 @ 9:21 am </p>
<p>It’s actually rather strange they wanted to do a D-segment car to begin with. They wanted a slice of Camry and Accord sales in US and Canada. But aren’t they better off doing a C-segment car? It’ll sell better elsewhere too, nowadays people are downsizing anyway.</p>
<p>I don’t the SX-4 isn’t a C-segment car.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
id just like to ask, why not? the result(kizashi) isnt bad at all&#8230;&#8230;..id say theyd be good at doing small, big or super whenever they choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lambov12</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-199975</link>
		<dc:creator>lambov12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-199975</guid>
		<description>quite a shame that suzuki don&#039;t want to produce the kicashi ... 

it is a very beatiful car ... 

haiz ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quite a shame that suzuki don&#8217;t want to produce the kicashi &#8230; </p>
<p>it is a very beatiful car &#8230; </p>
<p>haiz ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheophilusChin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-199974</link>
		<dc:creator>TheophilusChin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-199974</guid>
		<description>i meant to so I don&#039;t think the SX-4 is C-segment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i meant to so I don&#8217;t think the SX-4 is C-segment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheophilusChin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/01/06/suzuki-cancels-the-suzuki-kizashi-d-segment-sedan/#comment-199973</link>
		<dc:creator>TheophilusChin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=10935#comment-199973</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s actually rather strange they wanted to do a D-segment car to begin with. They wanted a slice of Camry and Accord sales in US and Canada. But aren&#039;t they better off doing a C-segment car? It&#039;ll sell better elsewhere too, nowadays people are downsizing anyway.

I don&#039;t the SX-4 isn&#039;t a C-segment car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually rather strange they wanted to do a D-segment car to begin with. They wanted a slice of Camry and Accord sales in US and Canada. But aren&#8217;t they better off doing a C-segment car? It&#8217;ll sell better elsewhere too, nowadays people are downsizing anyway.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t the SX-4 isn&#8217;t a C-segment car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
