<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Peugeot 206+ entry-level car for Europe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmad</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-221444</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-221444</guid>
		<description>Got my bestari end of jan. So far so good. Average 14.5 km/liter on urban/hway route. Achieve 170 km/hrs during my recent trip to mcca. Pickup a bit slugish in auto but combination wth th tiptronic some local car wth almost same capicity fall way behind. IMHO very comfortable  easy, on my wallet and no regret. If u love continental u love 206. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got my bestari end of jan. So far so good. Average 14.5 km/liter on urban/hway route. Achieve 170 km/hrs during my recent trip to mcca. Pickup a bit slugish in auto but combination wth th tiptronic some local car wth almost same capicity fall way behind. IMHO very comfortable  easy, on my wallet and no regret. If u love continental u love 206.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shazza</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-218794</link>
		<dc:creator>Shazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-218794</guid>
		<description>Hi...a new fan of the 206.  
 
Correct me if wrong, if I want to buy a Peugeot 206, only the Naza 206 Bestari version is available in Malaysia and not a Peugeot 206? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&#8230;a new fan of the 206. </p>
<p>Correct me if wrong, if I want to buy a Peugeot 206, only the Naza 206 Bestari version is available in Malaysia and not a Peugeot 206?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intermilan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211745</link>
		<dc:creator>intermilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211745</guid>
		<description>lowprofile said, 
 
February 18, 2009 @ 11:44 pm 
 
you think the facelift looks good? 
 
=========== 
 
i actually do too.. and great if the engine is 1.6 (minimum the 110bhp) or if 1.4 the almost still &#039;new&#039; 16V (90bhp) please... if not , it will get bashed to death by everyone. 
  
this 206+ is really a &#039;semi 207&#039; (with 207 front &amp; rear bumper + dashboard + interior). 
 
and a 206+ sedan too ( if the rear portion is not ugly).  
 
Nasim should do a market survey... fast! 
 
 
but what about 207 dude? why dont just bring in the 207 as CKD? Maybe in 2010? emm... to many decision / options.. Nasim Peugeot product planning people must have a constant headache.. but a good one! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lowprofile said,</p>
<p>February 18, 2009 @ 11:44 pm</p>
<p>you think the facelift looks good?</p>
<p>===========</p>
<p>i actually do too.. and great if the engine is 1.6 (minimum the 110bhp) or if 1.4 the almost still &#039;new&#039; 16V (90bhp) please&#8230; if not , it will get bashed to death by everyone.</p>
<p>this 206+ is really a &#039;semi 207&#039; (with 207 front &amp; rear bumper + dashboard + interior).</p>
<p>and a 206+ sedan too ( if the rear portion is not ugly). </p>
<p>Nasim should do a market survey&#8230; fast!</p>
<p>but what about 207 dude? why dont just bring in the 207 as CKD? Maybe in 2010? emm&#8230; to many decision / options.. Nasim Peugeot product planning people must have a constant headache.. but a good one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOP</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211655</link>
		<dc:creator>KOP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211655</guid>
		<description>the car looks good, but i think i prefer 207 better....hope Nasim will bring in the 207 instead..... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the car looks good, but i think i prefer 207 better&#8230;.hope Nasim will bring in the 207 instead&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normal_user</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211631</link>
		<dc:creator>normal_user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211631</guid>
		<description>lowprofile said, 
 
February 18, 2009 @ 11:44 pm 
 
you think the facelift looks good? 
 
=========== 
 
Yeah, I think it looks good. Considering the Euro ride handling refinement &amp; dynamics, its a good buy compared to City/Vios, MINUS the performance and space. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lowprofile said,</p>
<p>February 18, 2009 @ 11:44 pm</p>
<p>you think the facelift looks good?</p>
<p>===========</p>
<p>Yeah, I think it looks good. Considering the Euro ride handling refinement &amp; dynamics, its a good buy compared to City/Vios, MINUS the performance and space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karmatrix</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211607</link>
		<dc:creator>Karmatrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211607</guid>
		<description>The 1.6 will be priced too high. 
The 206+ looks gorgeous.  
 
Will this be the new model Naza is introducing this year? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1.6 will be priced too high.</p>
<p>The 206+ looks gorgeous. </p>
<p>Will this be the new model Naza is introducing this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redwings</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211604</link>
		<dc:creator>Redwings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211604</guid>
		<description>The makeover really look refresh. Peugeot really putting effort on the makeover. The front look impress and the change of the dashboard make it like a all new 206. Double Thumbs up. 
 
Can other car manufacturers follow what Peugeot is doing? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The makeover really look refresh. Peugeot really putting effort on the makeover. The front look impress and the change of the dashboard make it like a all new 206. Double Thumbs up.</p>
<p>Can other car manufacturers follow what Peugeot is doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowprofile</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211585</link>
		<dc:creator>lowprofile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211585</guid>
		<description>if it comes here, i&#039;m quite sure nasim will retire the 1.4 (been around too long) and maybe bring in the 1.6. now would that be nicer? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it comes here, i&#039;m quite sure nasim will retire the 1.4 (been around too long) and maybe bring in the 1.6. now would that be nicer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211572</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211572</guid>
		<description>nazri said, 
February 19, 2009 @ 2:22 am 
 
1.4 L 70Horsepower only&#8230; very underpower 
------------- 
The 70HP should be on the wheel instead of on the engine as stated by Japanese car manufacturers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nazri said,</p>
<p>February 19, 2009 @ 2:22 am</p>
<p>1.4 L 70Horsepower only&hellip; very underpower</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>The 70HP should be on the wheel instead of on the engine as stated by Japanese car manufacturers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izaman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211509</link>
		<dc:creator>izaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211509</guid>
		<description>nazri said, 
February 19, 2009 @ 2:22 am 
 
1.4 L 70Horsepower only&#8230; very underpower 
 
---------- 
 
i think it is using the same engine as current 206. have you tested / drive current 206? i think the power is enough. it is achievable at low rpm. (around 3000rpm if i&#039;m not mistaken). and max torque are achievable at low rpm too. what the purpose of having 120hp if it&#039;s only achievable at 6000rpm. it&#039;s not like u constantly drive at 6000rpm. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nazri said,</p>
<p>February 19, 2009 @ 2:22 am</p>
<p>1.4 L 70Horsepower only&hellip; very underpower</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>i think it is using the same engine as current 206. have you tested / drive current 206? i think the power is enough. it is achievable at low rpm. (around 3000rpm if i&#039;m not mistaken). and max torque are achievable at low rpm too. what the purpose of having 120hp if it&#039;s only achievable at 6000rpm. it&#039;s not like u constantly drive at 6000rpm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nazri</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211464</link>
		<dc:creator>nazri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211464</guid>
		<description>1.4 L  70Horsepower only... very underpower </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.4 L  70Horsepower only&#8230; very underpower</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CocoBear</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211454</link>
		<dc:creator>CocoBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211454</guid>
		<description>Okay, wait for 1 year plus for CBD and another 4 years for CKD by Naza. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, wait for 1 year plus for CBD and another 4 years for CKD by Naza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ago87</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211418</link>
		<dc:creator>ago87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211418</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t really like this model from Peugeot.. 
Perhaps other models.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#039;t really like this model from Peugeot..</p>
<p>Perhaps other models..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alister</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211417</link>
		<dc:creator>Alister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211417</guid>
		<description>Will be interesting to see if it will arrive in the Malaysian market as a Naza or as a Peugeot 206+. 
 
Would also be nice to see the sedan bodystyle (Sold in Iran, South America &amp; China) here (Creating a Euro alternative to the popular City &amp; Vios.). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will be interesting to see if it will arrive in the Malaysian market as a Naza or as a Peugeot 206+.</p>
<p>Would also be nice to see the sedan bodystyle (Sold in Iran, South America &amp; China) here (Creating a Euro alternative to the popular City &amp; Vios.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izaman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211413</link>
		<dc:creator>izaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211413</guid>
		<description>IMHO, they will introduce this car in malaysia since they seems to be clearing out current 206 by giving 0% interest loan. anyway, the design some sort like between 206 and 207. anyway, nice look. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, they will introduce this car in malaysia since they seems to be clearing out current 206 by giving 0% interest loan. anyway, the design some sort like between 206 and 207. anyway, nice look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: efzet</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211412</link>
		<dc:creator>efzet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211412</guid>
		<description>i think it looks fresh...but a bit old..prefer Swift styling nways.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it looks fresh&#8230;but a bit old..prefer Swift styling nways..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowprofile</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211410</link>
		<dc:creator>lowprofile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211410</guid>
		<description>normal_user said, 
February 18, 2009 @ 11:36 pm  
 
Will Naza introduce the 206+ as the facelift for the current Bestari? 
The current model exterior looks are ageing fast. Naza should act quickly like what it did with the 407 facelifted model launch. 
 
you think the facelift looks good? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>normal_user said,</p>
<p>February 18, 2009 @ 11:36 pm </p>
<p>Will Naza introduce the 206+ as the facelift for the current Bestari?</p>
<p>The current model exterior looks are ageing fast. Naza should act quickly like what it did with the 407 facelifted model launch.</p>
<p>you think the facelift looks good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: normal_user</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211408</link>
		<dc:creator>normal_user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211408</guid>
		<description>Will Naza introduce the 206+ as the facelift for the current Bestari? 
The current model exterior looks are ageing fast. Naza should act quickly like what it did with the 407 facelifted model launch. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Naza introduce the 206+ as the facelift for the current Bestari?</p>
<p>The current model exterior looks are ageing fast. Naza should act quickly like what it did with the 407 facelifted model launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donovan Chin</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211406</link>
		<dc:creator>Donovan Chin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211406</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the bodykit will be available here in Malaysia. Looks good </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the bodykit will be available here in Malaysia. Looks good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xx- Ferrari -xX</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211405</link>
		<dc:creator>Xx- Ferrari -xX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211405</guid>
		<description>Peaogeat isne nice car from france... Though they are not as famous as other continental cars here, they&#039;re priced fairly good in our shores.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peaogeat isne nice car from france&#8230; Though they are not as famous as other continental cars here, they&#039;re priced fairly good in our shores&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowprofile</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211404</link>
		<dc:creator>lowprofile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211404</guid>
		<description>those look like 15 inch wheels </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those look like 15 inch wheels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/02/18/new-peugeot-206-entry-level-car-for-europe/#comment-211402</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=12206#comment-211402</guid>
		<description>1st </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

