Comments on: Another facelift for the old Naza Citra?

By: Citra LoVer'S

Citra LoVer'S — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:31:49 +0000

I bru je berangan2 nk sambar citra this month but all ur comment make me unhappy,B4 ni pakai Iswara Kete Kebal tu ha..lgla byk diffrent perfomance bile dh dpt pakai Citra nnt..but 1 more things “Tepuk Selera tanye Dada”
kalu tye dade amik je..peduli ape org kate..hehehe..idup citra lover’s…

By: Citra LoVer'S

Citra LoVer'S — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:27:18 +0000

Just want 2 selitla here..i bru je berangan2 nk sambar citra this month but all ur comment make me unhappy..but 1 more things “Tepuk Selera tanye Dada”
kalu tye dade amik je..peduli ape org kate..hehehe..idup citra lover’s…

By: siti zainab mazlan

siti zainab mazlan — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:49:03 +0000

sampai dh citra sy sehari sblm raya. berjalan jauh ke terengganu. ok jer minyak x sampai pun rm200 pergi balik siap jln2 di k.t’ganu. servis di kia k.t’ganu pun ok. sudah pakai br tahu.

By: uwak

uwak — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:18:34 +0000

Dah pakai citra 4 years now. Still satisfied with the handling n performance.X penah rosak, alhamdullilah. B4 this pakai waja. Fuel consumption jimat lagi citra. Now waiting for my 2nd car.. Mazda3, frust dapat lepas raya ni

By: bob

bob — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:14:52 +0000

YOUR MONEY UUU DECIDE !
URSELF HAVE TO PAY THE MONTHLY INSTALLMENT.R. TAX, SERVICE AND GOD KNOWS WHATS WILL HAPPEN NEXT.

By: Kamaldeep

Kamaldeep — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:20:29 +0000

Hi to all Assholes!

First U kutuk Proton, then kutuk Perodua & then kutuk Naza. What are your actual problems? U want a car for RM 1? That also you will kutuk what because U assholes are very terkutuk.

Naza is cheap but U kutuk, Proton also U kutuk. Later Perodua MPV come out RM 10k lesser than Proton, that also U fuckers will kutuk.

I can’t imagine how your spouses even put up with Assholes like U.

By: siti zainab mazlan

siti zainab mazlan — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:39:57 +0000

WELL…. U ALL ” TEPUK DADA TANYA SELERA”…
Ikut kemampuan dan citarasa sendiri… Malaysiakan demokrasi..
Pada yang langsung tak mampu tu nak pakai MPV Murahan spt citra ni, Janganla kutuk lebih lebih… cermin diri… jangan nak kondem aje….
ada $ budget lebih… amik exora… lagi lebih.. amik eastar… lagi lebih.. amik livina…. lagi lebih… amik innova dan seterusnya…. ukur poket sendiri…
yang nak bayar bulan bulan , nak maintain, nak idup roadtax insuran tahun2 DIRI Sendiri….
anak ramai n nak selesa… nak murah??? inila mpvnyer…
nak laju???? beli ferari….
Support produk buatan malaysia walau ciplak…
Bole naza group bagi kerja kilang pada yang takde kerja kat gurun tuh.. Amin.

saya sokong sesgt
dengan harga yang dikira sgt la murah dengan keselesaan yang optimum, saya sekeluarga memilih citra new fclift. mpv ni bkn utk berlumba bw laju2 atas jalanraya mcm kata sorang brader tu nk laju beli ferrari nk murah beli citra. my citra will coming this week. x sabar rasenye.

By: bob

bob — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:01:00 +0000

Dear All who commented bad about Citra,
1.firstly to say that korean car are fuel guzzler coz of the weight are heavier , due to safety features. Most korean are more safety than average japs cars. the chasis itself are heavy and withstand impact.
2. Low resale value- bmw,audi, vw, ciroen.peuguet and etc has hiresale value ?
no, right ! why people buy, coz its feature- safety, comfort,quality.stlying and ets, they willing to pay. Korean car also like that , when people buy ,they buy like the germans can offer but not same quality but not bad for it price.
3. Don;t compare 2000cc with 1.5 or 1.6 cc emgine. all engine when fix on different body/chasis have different performance. Ask exora owner and waja cps owner , what the fuel comsumption ?
Every car got its fan. Citra car for those can afford to maintain the service, fuel, mothly payment, r.tax. Who can’t afford just stick to ur affordable one.
If we do some survey about japs cars like nissan.toyota,honda like the budget car (city, vios ) are build mainly for third world country. 1st country seldom buy this car. it is a cheap skate car but highly appreciated by malaysian even they have to pay mountain for the high taxs cars. The spes are only average compare to korean compare price wise.
Your money you decide !!!
adios !

By: joe

joe — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 05:22:37 +0000

most people say FC is high because 1. compare to their saga,wira or waja. 2. referring to the carens 1.8 with an old KIA engine, the citra uses hyundai beta ii engine but the weight of the citra is over 1.5 tons which gives it a slight higher FC, Perdana is actually worst. Using this car for 3 years now and i’m happy with it, after sales are rubbish but outside shops can easily service it plus parts can sometime be cheaper than proton or P2. Paid 70k for it and really value for money, with monocoque chassis compared to van like avanza. New facelift ugly though.

By: Jens

Jens — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:40:43 +0000

….contribute their RM of course if anytin goes wrong.. its the truth notin but the truth.. big fat small luxury slim power underpower or even kapcai… you have to pay on ur own la.. worth buying or not… try dulu baru tau la.. heheheheeh

By: Jens

Jens — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:20:20 +0000

Sometimes my friends, you have to be glad for what you have, and for what you don’t have.. just celebrate the differences.. every company has their own stategies and nothing in this world is 100% perfect,, there will always be something wrong somewhere…

Up to that individual, what you think suits you ..just go for it ! because at the end of the day.. its your pocket not someone else’s!! None of us here in this forum will contribute heheheehehehe…

By: Jens

Jens — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:08:33 +0000

Just bought my Citra this month and today is 15/07 is the launching day of this new facelift. Mine is black.

Hem.. read lots of comment here.. just wondering la, semua kereta dalam dunia ni pandai rosak.. kalau tak pandai rosak takde lah kilang kereta.. memang dah lama lah kilang keta kat dunia ni tutup sebab semua orang yang ada keta boleh guna sampai dunia kiamat.. yang tak rosak ‘jalan kaki’ jer lah..tapi kaki pulaklah sakit.. yang tu baru tak ada spare part.. sebab bas, boats and aeroplanes pun rosak jugak.. hehehehe

By: ZZ

ZZ — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:12:05 +0000

Aku dah 4 tahun guna Citra ni. So far ok.. Minyak memang kuat sikit. Performance memang best. Wish 2.0 & Stream 2.0 aku dah makan banyak kali dah…… Sayur je….. Meter dah habis pedal boleh tekan lagi.

By: Prismo

Prismo — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:00:06 +0000

nevermind that bro DEED… mr. nazarali can stand it… he will get used with it…isn’t it true mr. naza rali??

By: DEED

DEED — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:20:00 +0000

nazarali..
before you book your citra make sure you comfirm with the dealer,,,when you can get your car…i had wait for 3 month and still waiting…REMEMBER, the naza service center is suCk..

By: nazarali

nazarali — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:30:36 +0000

had a very long discussion wit my wife to buy naza citra.
conclusion-will buy although heard/read so many complaints etc.
reason-looking for 2.0 vehicle and this guy is affordable in terms of monthly payment, maintenance and so on.
note-every person has their own pro and contra towards any kind of brand/vehicles and its not wrong. i want to exercise mine
tq

By: justme

justme — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:42:51 +0000

he3…………..

By: easy drive

easy drive — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:10:09 +0000

citra is a good mpv, coz my frend already use about 5 years but still have nocomplains. Jalan jauh beb dari tengah sarawak ke hujung sarawak still mantain that is a worst keta ke.

By: ketip_kuku

ketip_kuku — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:55:48 +0000

By: mangkuk_tandas

mangkuk_tandas — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:29:22 +0000

Bro Lipas…..Kalau teruk sangat model citra ni… kenapa boleh jual kat;
1. Amerika
2. Kanada
3. UK
4. Australia
walaupun pasang kat gurun, kedah. tapi kualiti lebih kurang je.
Cuma Naza kena baiki Aftersales Services, ramai owner complain.
anyway keta ni memang sedap bawak jalan jauh.

CKD dgn CBU mn sama bro..dr segi kualiti….yg luar malaysia adalah CBU…KIA CARENS bukan CITRA…..NAZA mmg mangkuk tandas dlm bab2 cetak rompak neh….

By: mangkuk_tandas

mangkuk_tandas — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:24:27 +0000

another boring day , boring product from naza…my friends told me if it is originally KIA then quality isnt a problem but if naza rebadge/assembled..then many problem..is it right?somebody to comment?

MMG x dinafikan sebab aku owner KIA CBU…
nak compare proton,perodua dgn KIA CBU…heheh..jauh panggang dari api…
NAZA CKD version mmg pakai part local…especially..utk interior…sbb tu HAMPEH>>>tau copycat jek…

By: BOB

BOB — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:13:18 +0000

DEAR ALL !
EVERY BODY BASHING UP THE CITRA. I THINK MOST OF THEM NEVER HAVE ONE. THOSE WHO OWNED IT ONLY NEW WHAT IS GOOD OR BAD OF THIS CITRA. I JUST BOUGHT IT 2 MONTHS OLD , OWNER WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT SOME EXPERIENCES. I USE TO DRIVE WIRA 1.5 SEDAN (1997 TO 2003) AND THE BUY ANOTHER WIRA ABK 1.5 (2003 TO 2009). CONSUMPTION WISE :
WIRA SEDAN & ABK MT : FULL TANK 50 LITERS CAN GO 470 KM ONLY.(1500cc)
CITRA AUTO 2000cc :FULL TANK 55 LITRES CAN GO 430 KM ONLY (2000CC).
YOU ALL JUST CALCULATE BY YOURSELF , DO YOU THINK THAT THE CITRA ARE FUEL GUZZLER ????????
BOTH CALCULATED IN TOWN DRIVE.
ACTUALLY WIRA 1.5 MANUAL COMPARE TO CITRA AUTO 2.0 AT ALMOST AT PAR FOR THEIR CONSUMPTION.
THE WIRA SHOULD BE MORE ECONOMICAL COZ OF THE SMALLER CC AND RUN ON MANUAL TRANMISSION.

By: budleee

budleee — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:56:54 +0000

hmmm a citra with out airbags or abg or sport rims

i would use it as a spacious 5 seater with a big boot, like a station wagon. if i am not mistaken its still naza best selling model…

i guess those who bought the citra must not read this forum :p

By: memeranglaut

memeranglaut — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:07:33 +0000

Lipas,
u must be naza die hard fan or naza sc or working with naza. Anyway, citra is a fuel guzzler and the quality on the engine part are in doubt. We are not talking yet about spare part availibility here or the quality of after sales services.
Seat low quality…masuk macam van?.exora? what kind of bashing is that? I know u hate proton but as a fortune teller, your story on indonesia and thailand is great.

By: Lipas

Lipas — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:37:40 +0000

Kalau teruk sangat model citra ni… kenapa boleh jual kat;
1. Amerika
2. Kanada
3. UK
4. Australia
walaupun pasang kat gurun, kedah. tapi kualiti lebih kurang je.
Cuma Naza kena baiki Aftersales Services, ramai owner complain.
anyway keta ni memang sedap bawak jalan jauh.
EXORA GUNA SEAT LOW QUALITY LA, MASUK DALAM RASA MACAM VAN. PROTON JUAL KERERTA MAHAL KAT DALAM NEGERI. NAK JUAL KAT INDONESIA PUN TAK LEPAS LAGI. THAILAND AWAL2 DAH TAK NAK.

By: osh_kosh

osh_kosh — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:54:40 +0000

same old same old….

By: memeranglaut

memeranglaut — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:00:10 +0000

Naza or Korean car quality are more or less same and sometime worst than proton and perodua. This is based on citra, naza ria, suria and so on. To say perodua is better than proton and naza, think again. Nowday quality are dropping as volume become bigger. go and surf the web loh. I have perodua and a proton, part in perodua tend to go kaput ealier than in proton and the price of the part are more or less with proton.
if one say proton had contagious problem now little bother perodua is getting the same sickness but the big brother nowday seem geeting better than the small one. power window problem, brake problem, gear box are very common problem with the ‘best model selling in 3 years in the row’. The new proton are fairer in this area with the new model. Plus proton are better in the safety side.
Naza or Kia in other hand are worst in this area. Maybe other with Naza rides could explain more.

By: azzahar

azzahar — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:55:50 +0000

this citra could propably be the cheapest mpv in malaysia. Yet, i admit that korean’s car quality better than our proton. But, if you considering about after sales services and resell value, korean’s car are no match for proton. Proton’s after sales services are way better than korean’s but as all you know that proton always got problems, as it’s a contagious problems.eg: first the power window, then the gear box, then brake failure…. and so on. While comparing to perodua, perodua is good in quality, but not so good in safety. So is toyota, toyota is good in quality and safety, but failed in comfort. Nissan failed in spare parts, so is mazda. Honda……em……. a lil’ bit pricy i think. Mers, bimmer, lexus not good for you pocket. conclusion: ride LRT, faster.

By: BanyakMasukWorkshop

BanyakMasukWorkshop — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:16:05 +0000

[quote comment="244366"]
spot on king?that is what the average Malaysian are like. But who can blame them, we were robbed off the right to enjoy real car that has real research and technology in them, just to protect the two P? or rather the fat cat behind them.[/quote]

what do you mean you’re robbed? you can buy any car you want, as long as you can afford it of course. so whats the problem?

By: RdLey

RdLey — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:46:00 +0000

[quote comment="244620"][quote comment="244591"]Why banyak komen pasal ria or citra kuat makan minyak………stupid punya komen laaaa…….2.0 v6 perdana, Unser pun kuat gak……Dah mmg kereta 2.0 keatas mmg la minyak lg banyak pakai. Kalau korg. pakai keta produa mmg la tak kuat minyak, tapi nyawa anda fragile le…….. dari viva sampai myvi semua mcm tin milo kalau tak percaya……cuba ketuk dgn tangan kat pintu keta….kecuali old kancil. Walau mcm mana pun rakyat Malaysia patut berterima kasih pada Naza sbb berjaya mengucarkacirkan Proton dan Perodua…sebelum ni depa dua ekoq tu juai kereta mahai nak mampuih….kereta dah la mcm sial, korg. perasan tak sbb naza jual kereta dgn. harga yg kompetitif baru la dua ekoq tu turun harga…….tapi harus di ingat proton dgn perodua masih cuba nak mengabui mata pelanggan dgn. memjual murah kereta tapi cc kecik. nak kata murah pun tak la….Exora 1.6 harga RM75 ribu tetap tak berbaloi…naik genting mcm siput berbanding Citra 2.0 RM70 ribu naik genting tip top….Myvi kereta kegilaan hangpa tu lagi aku menyumpah2, dah la aku beli mahai tapi tayar pancit kalau full load
aku rasa nak sepak ja tak berguna langsung……harap pungkoq ja besaq tapi lugage kecik mcm kancil.[/quote]

what an idiot……[/quote]

yeap.. i agreed… really2 idiott… adaka full load tayar boleh pancit.. ape kena mengena tayar pancit ngan keta jenis aper… nak salahkan keta sbb tayar pancit… mmg pandir la mangkuk nih….. buduh.. itu tayar la mangkuk!!!!!!!! hahahahahaha