<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Toyota Camry teaser on UMW website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gajen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-254081</link>
		<dc:creator>Gajen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-254081</guid>
		<description>eaton said, 
August 3, 2009 @ 1:21 am  
 
I used to own year 2000 Camry (2.2l) and 2004 Honda Accord (2.4l). I can&#8217;t say for the current generation Camry or Accord but based on my previous experiences, Toyota was not really as good of a highway cruiser as some claim. Not based on my expectation at least. The suspension was a bit too soft and if you travel at 150km/h and above, you don&#8217;t feel that the car is connected to the road. Accord on the other hand, is way much better and stable on highway. Also, the drive is much more dynamic without compromising much in comfort and I really liked it. 
At the end, it is about personal choices. You should test drive both and compare. Also, there is Mazda 6, Peugeot 407 at roughly the similar price range to consider. I &#8220;heard&#8221; Mazda 6 is good and feature pack. Worth to check it out. 
 
_______________________________________________________________________ 
 
yea kinda true...my dad used to have the 2.2 gx 1999 model...but then again..the car is very old...your accord is a generation higher than the camry u have...the new one has a good chassis and improved handling...when my dad changed his 1999 model to the 2007 one...it was a massive difference..=) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eaton said,</p>
<p>August 3, 2009 @ 1:21 am </p>
<p>I used to own year 2000 Camry (2.2l) and 2004 Honda Accord (2.4l). I can&rsquo;t say for the current generation Camry or Accord but based on my previous experiences, Toyota was not really as good of a highway cruiser as some claim. Not based on my expectation at least. The suspension was a bit too soft and if you travel at 150km/h and above, you don&rsquo;t feel that the car is connected to the road. Accord on the other hand, is way much better and stable on highway. Also, the drive is much more dynamic without compromising much in comfort and I really liked it.</p>
<p>At the end, it is about personal choices. You should test drive both and compare. Also, there is Mazda 6, Peugeot 407 at roughly the similar price range to consider. I &ldquo;heard&rdquo; Mazda 6 is good and feature pack. Worth to check it out.</p>
<p>_______________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>yea kinda true&#8230;my dad used to have the 2.2 gx 1999 model&#8230;but then again..the car is very old&#8230;your accord is a generation higher than the camry u have&#8230;the new one has a good chassis and improved handling&#8230;when my dad changed his 1999 model to the 2007 one&#8230;it was a massive difference..=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaton</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-253892</link>
		<dc:creator>eaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-253892</guid>
		<description>I used to own year 2000 Camry (2.2l) and 2004 Honda Accord (2.4l). I can&#039;t say for the current generation Camry or Accord but based on my previous experiences, Toyota was not really as good of a highway cruiser as some claim. Not based on my expectation at least. The suspension was a bit too soft and if you travel at 150km/h and above, you don&#039;t feel that the car is connected to the road. Accord on the other hand, is way much better and stable on highway. Also, the drive is much more dynamic without compromising much in comfort and I really liked it.  
At the end, it is about personal choices. You should test drive both and compare. Also, there is Mazda 6, Peugeot 407 at roughly the similar price range to consider. I &quot;heard&quot; Mazda 6 is good and feature pack. Worth to check it out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to own year 2000 Camry (2.2l) and 2004 Honda Accord (2.4l). I can&#039;t say for the current generation Camry or Accord but based on my previous experiences, Toyota was not really as good of a highway cruiser as some claim. Not based on my expectation at least. The suspension was a bit too soft and if you travel at 150km/h and above, you don&#039;t feel that the car is connected to the road. Accord on the other hand, is way much better and stable on highway. Also, the drive is much more dynamic without compromising much in comfort and I really liked it. </p>
<p>At the end, it is about personal choices. You should test drive both and compare. Also, there is Mazda 6, Peugeot 407 at roughly the similar price range to consider. I &quot;heard&quot; Mazda 6 is good and feature pack. Worth to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pokleh</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-253483</link>
		<dc:creator>pokleh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-253483</guid>
		<description>what a boring car! designed for nenek and atuk... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a boring car! designed for nenek and atuk&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intermilan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-253245</link>
		<dc:creator>intermilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-253245</guid>
		<description>OTR price of selected 2.0L D-segment car 
 
Toyota Camry 2.0E - RM144,990 
Toyota Camry 2.0G - RM154,990 
Mazda 6 2.0          -  RM146K 
Peugeot 407 Classic - RM128,888  
Peugeot 407 Premium - RM136,888  
Honda Accord 2.0 VTi - RM141,800 
Honda Accord 2.0 VTi-L RM149,800 
Hyundai Sonata 2.0 - ~RM119K 
Kia Optima EX - RM102K 
Kia Optima Ex Novus - RM110K 
BMW 5 series, Merc etc - from RM300K onwards </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OTR price of selected 2.0L D-segment car</p>
<p>Toyota Camry 2.0E &#8211; RM144,990</p>
<p>Toyota Camry 2.0G &#8211; RM154,990</p>
<p>Mazda 6 2.0          &#8211;  RM146K</p>
<p>Peugeot 407 Classic &#8211; RM128,888 </p>
<p>Peugeot 407 Premium &#8211; RM136,888 </p>
<p>Honda Accord 2.0 VTi &#8211; RM141,800</p>
<p>Honda Accord 2.0 VTi-L RM149,800</p>
<p>Hyundai Sonata 2.0 &#8211; ~RM119K</p>
<p>Kia Optima EX &#8211; RM102K</p>
<p>Kia Optima Ex Novus &#8211; RM110K</p>
<p>BMW 5 series, Merc etc &#8211; from RM300K onwards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDM</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-253005</link>
		<dc:creator>JDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-253005</guid>
		<description>Guys, 
       No car is perfect.....It depends on individual what is acceptable to them. 
Or what they can tolerate. For example Camry may be comfort oriented as the manufactures intended. If you want handling then firm setup is more suitable for you hence Accord maybe a better choice. If you are looking of style then Alfa or Peguoet is way to go hence if you can tolerate sitting in workshop most weekend and waist money trying to upkeep the lifestyle and at the end sell for peanuts then fine.... 
 
So goes back to my point no car is perfect. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,</p>
<p>       No car is perfect&#8230;..It depends on individual what is acceptable to them.</p>
<p>Or what they can tolerate. For example Camry may be comfort oriented as the manufactures intended. If you want handling then firm setup is more suitable for you hence Accord maybe a better choice. If you are looking of style then Alfa or Peguoet is way to go hence if you can tolerate sitting in workshop most weekend and waist money trying to upkeep the lifestyle and at the end sell for peanuts then fine&#8230;.</p>
<p>So goes back to my point no car is perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comarezzi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252974</link>
		<dc:creator>comarezzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252974</guid>
		<description>if i work in langkawi... only if </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if i work in langkawi&#8230; only if</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Jack</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252899</link>
		<dc:creator>White Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252899</guid>
		<description>The RM4000 price increase due to Japanese Yen and Thai Baht value increase agaist Ringgit :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RM4000 price increase due to Japanese Yen and Thai Baht value increase agaist Ringgit <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keeman</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252871</link>
		<dc:creator>Keeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252871</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the 4K comes with Navi or DVD player? 
Latest Pajero Sports now has a DVD player. 
 
Can upgrade and put TV receiver then can hear (not watch) RTM/TV3 news while driving...? :p </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the 4K comes with Navi or DVD player?</p>
<p>Latest Pajero Sports now has a DVD player.</p>
<p>Can upgrade and put TV receiver then can hear (not watch) RTM/TV3 news while driving&#8230;? :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afezi</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252868</link>
		<dc:creator>afezi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252868</guid>
		<description>camry is really good and practical car..like the design and the spaciousness! though 4speed..still practical in here.. 
like to have camry 2.0G with 5 speed and black leather interior..GPS should also be included.. 
I wonder when the new Dual VVTi in camry.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>camry is really good and practical car..like the design and the spaciousness! though 4speed..still practical in here..</p>
<p>like to have camry 2.0G with 5 speed and black leather interior..GPS should also be included..</p>
<p>I wonder when the new Dual VVTi in camry..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leslie boon</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252859</link>
		<dc:creator>leslie boon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252859</guid>
		<description>Acceptable facelift but why the price keep raising when there is a facelift ..... 
If offer black interior are much better . </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acceptable facelift but why the price keep raising when there is a facelift &#8230;..</p>
<p>If offer black interior are much better .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Jack</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252857</link>
		<dc:creator>White Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252857</guid>
		<description>How about fuel consumptions of Accord vs Camry ? :) 
 
 
=========================================== 
Gajen said, 
July 28, 2009 @ 6:03 pm  
 
this camry is a very good car&#8230;i really dont know why they are lots of people bashing camry and saying tht accord is better JUST because it has 5 speed compared to camry&#8217;s 4 speed for the 2.0&#8230; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about fuel consumptions of Accord vs Camry ? <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>===========================================</p>
<p>Gajen said,</p>
<p>July 28, 2009 @ 6:03 pm </p>
<p>this camry is a very good car&hellip;i really dont know why they are lots of people bashing camry and saying tht accord is better JUST because it has 5 speed compared to camry&rsquo;s 4 speed for the 2.0&hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ???</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252853</link>
		<dc:creator>???</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252853</guid>
		<description>none want to start bashing proton and gov? thats curious!! no Malaysian here ka read the article.....hehe 
 
emmm.......... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>none want to start bashing proton and gov? thats curious!! no Malaysian here ka read the article&#8230;..hehe</p>
<p>emmm&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gajen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252827</link>
		<dc:creator>Gajen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252827</guid>
		<description>this camry is a very good car...i really dont know why they are lots of people bashing camry and saying tht accord is better JUST because it has 5 speed compared to camry&#039;s 4 speed for the 2.0... 
 
camry has HID with auto leveling lights, projector headlamps, front sensor, gate shift gearbiox, footbrake,side rear sunshade, front passenger shoulder seat controls...which the accord don&#039;t have at all...whatmore altho the accord produces more horse powers but a lot of test drive reports have stated that the power only kicks in at very high rpm which means at normal driving,u dont get much power...and camry&#039;s NVH level is also lower than accord.. 
 
ive been driving the pre facelift camry..2007 for 2 years now..its is a great car...the engine is responsive...the car is very practical..im not saying tht accord is not good...camry and accord are certainly good cars...both are awesome </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this camry is a very good car&#8230;i really dont know why they are lots of people bashing camry and saying tht accord is better JUST because it has 5 speed compared to camry&#039;s 4 speed for the 2.0&#8230;</p>
<p>camry has HID with auto leveling lights, projector headlamps, front sensor, gate shift gearbiox, footbrake,side rear sunshade, front passenger shoulder seat controls&#8230;which the accord don&#039;t have at all&#8230;whatmore altho the accord produces more horse powers but a lot of test drive reports have stated that the power only kicks in at very high rpm which means at normal driving,u dont get much power&#8230;and camry&#039;s NVH level is also lower than accord..</p>
<p>ive been driving the pre facelift camry..2007 for 2 years now..its is a great car&#8230;the engine is responsive&#8230;the car is very practical..im not saying tht accord is not good&#8230;camry and accord are certainly good cars&#8230;both are awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toothless Zombie</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252813</link>
		<dc:creator>Toothless Zombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252813</guid>
		<description>Wow, a facelifted Camry, I&#039;m as excited as an office clerk at lunch break. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a facelifted Camry, I&#039;m as excited as an office clerk at lunch break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: namiras</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252787</link>
		<dc:creator>namiras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252787</guid>
		<description>camry...is my dream car....dapat yang lama pun dah ok...perfect design. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>camry&#8230;is my dream car&#8230;.dapat yang lama pun dah ok&#8230;perfect design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiziks</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252760</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiziks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252760</guid>
		<description>if that is all they can offer malaysians, this one is a skip </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if that is all they can offer malaysians, this one is a skip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csv</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252759</link>
		<dc:creator>csv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252759</guid>
		<description>lol, sales stuff cocky. i agree, but not as bad as the audi ones. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, sales stuff cocky. i agree, but not as bad as the audi ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fab_4</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252742</link>
		<dc:creator>fab_4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252742</guid>
		<description>Lightning McQueen 
 
well, if you can afford an rm170k car and above you wouldn&#039;t mind to pay some more for the maintenance as the higher the price of the car the higher the maintenance cost. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightning McQueen</p>
<p>well, if you can afford an rm170k car and above you wouldn&#039;t mind to pay some more for the maintenance as the higher the price of the car the higher the maintenance cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kambing Laut</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252740</link>
		<dc:creator>Kambing Laut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252740</guid>
		<description>Just wait for perdana replacement.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wait for perdana replacement..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torque</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252735</link>
		<dc:creator>torque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252735</guid>
		<description>Charger said, 
July 27, 2009 @ 3:02 pm  
 
A4? 3-series? That&#8217;s not even in the same segment as Camry. lol 
 
__________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Dear Charger, 
 
Perhaps you don&#039;t understand my point! I never said that the A4 nor the 3 series is the same segment as Camry, do I?! But tell me this, if you could afford a RM175k car...doesn&#039;t that tell u that u are doing financially well? I know very well for a fact that u can&#039;t get a brand new luxury exec Audi or BMW for that money...but u still could get a &#039;04 2nd hand Audi A4 1.8 Turbo, 150k plus unreg 325i or take my word for it...go crazy and get a 190k unreg 330ci with 230hp at ur disposal...I certainly had driven that coupe quite frequently. My point dear Charger, like what I said earlier...if you wanted a car with driving dynamics...this is the car that I can suggested to u. Driving dynamics my fren!!!  
 
Or...there&#039;s always the handsome Mazda 6 2.5 u could have. Even s60T had better grasp of the issue discussed here. Fact 1, they are in diff segment...Fact 2, they cater for diff targets...Fact 3, that RM175k, it&#039;s ur money...u want space &amp; highway cruiser = Camry...u want driving dynamics = A4 or the BMW...even if it&#039;s 2nd hand!! Peace u all, drive safely. 
 
P/S: I had test driven the new Audi A4...yes, I know it cost 230k plus but it can give the 3 series a run for their money...even if it is a FWD car!! Now, that too are not the &#039;same&#039; segment to BMW since their 3 series is a RWD, ain&#039;t it? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charger said,</p>
<p>July 27, 2009 @ 3:02 pm </p>
<p>A4? 3-series? That&rsquo;s not even in the same segment as Camry. lol</p>
<p>__________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Dear Charger,</p>
<p>Perhaps you don&#039;t understand my point! I never said that the A4 nor the 3 series is the same segment as Camry, do I?! But tell me this, if you could afford a RM175k car&#8230;doesn&#039;t that tell u that u are doing financially well? I know very well for a fact that u can&#039;t get a brand new luxury exec Audi or BMW for that money&#8230;but u still could get a &#039;04 2nd hand Audi A4 1.8 Turbo, 150k plus unreg 325i or take my word for it&#8230;go crazy and get a 190k unreg 330ci with 230hp at ur disposal&#8230;I certainly had driven that coupe quite frequently. My point dear Charger, like what I said earlier&#8230;if you wanted a car with driving dynamics&#8230;this is the car that I can suggested to u. Driving dynamics my fren!!! </p>
<p>Or&#8230;there&#039;s always the handsome Mazda 6 2.5 u could have. Even s60T had better grasp of the issue discussed here. Fact 1, they are in diff segment&#8230;Fact 2, they cater for diff targets&#8230;Fact 3, that RM175k, it&#039;s ur money&#8230;u want space &amp; highway cruiser = Camry&#8230;u want driving dynamics = A4 or the BMW&#8230;even if it&#039;s 2nd hand!! Peace u all, drive safely.</p>
<p>P/S: I had test driven the new Audi A4&#8230;yes, I know it cost 230k plus but it can give the 3 series a run for their money&#8230;even if it is a FWD car!! Now, that too are not the &#039;same&#039; segment to BMW since their 3 series is a RWD, ain&#039;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BB</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252730</link>
		<dc:creator>BB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252730</guid>
		<description>camry or accord?  they attract two difference segment of buyer.  generally camry desinated executive buyer such as &quot;matured&quot; buyers,so you see lots of company car use camry for their exec staff.  accord more sporty-look, youngsters preference.  a few thousand difference will not affect buyer decision between the two! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>camry or accord?  they attract two difference segment of buyer.  generally camry desinated executive buyer such as &quot;matured&quot; buyers,so you see lots of company car use camry for their exec staff.  accord more sporty-look, youngsters preference.  a few thousand difference will not affect buyer decision between the two!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torque</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252726</link>
		<dc:creator>torque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252726</guid>
		<description>Hahaha...thanks paul! You were right about that! Kinda remind me of that time when Nissan bring in their old Fairlady to the US (Forget what old model it is)...their early ads said &quot;It fits four adult&quot; but when the car did arrived to the US shore, they change the ads...&quot;It fits four Japanese adult&quot;. Kekeke!! Yup, the Avalon really are built for the US size ppl. Great post paul! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha&#8230;thanks paul! You were right about that! Kinda remind me of that time when Nissan bring in their old Fairlady to the US (Forget what old model it is)&#8230;their early ads said &quot;It fits four adult&quot; but when the car did arrived to the US shore, they change the ads&#8230;&quot;It fits four Japanese adult&quot;. Kekeke!! Yup, the Avalon really are built for the US size ppl. Great post paul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Jack</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252711</link>
		<dc:creator>White Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252711</guid>
		<description>LOL... Lighting McQueen, good one :) 
 
When exotic cars rosak, you also need exotic workshop to repair, wait for the exotic spare parts to come, and with exotic bill to settle.. LOL :) 
 
So you need to get a VIVA as spare car to use when your exotic car breakdown LOL :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230; Lighting McQueen, good one <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>When exotic cars rosak, you also need exotic workshop to repair, wait for the exotic spare parts to come, and with exotic bill to settle.. LOL <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So you need to get a VIVA as spare car to use when your exotic car breakdown LOL <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lightning McQueen</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252708</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightning McQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252708</guid>
		<description>fab_4 
 
Alfa ehhh... 
Think this.... FIAT 
F = fiat  
I = is 
A = always 
T = trouble 
 
ALFA 
A = alfa 
L = like 
F = fiat 
A = also 
 
and its true conti cars comes with bad A/C and bad UV resistance... 
ur new car will looks older than its real life... eg front head lamp will become dull after 3 YO... that&#039;s why u call exotic? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fab_4</p>
<p>Alfa ehhh&#8230;</p>
<p>Think this&#8230;. FIAT</p>
<p>F = fiat </p>
<p>I = is</p>
<p>A = always</p>
<p>T = trouble</p>
<p>ALFA</p>
<p>A = alfa</p>
<p>L = like</p>
<p>F = fiat</p>
<p>A = also</p>
<p>and its true conti cars comes with bad A/C and bad UV resistance&#8230;</p>
<p>ur new car will looks older than its real life&#8230; eg front head lamp will become dull after 3 YO&#8230; that&#039;s why u call exotic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252706</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252706</guid>
		<description>camry is too expensive, if u talk about inflation, why dont u lo kat the exchange rate now, yen is stronger so much now. toyota profit is too much, dont talk about tax. silly people wil buy this brand, just to show they got the top jap brand, also the sales staff is fucking cocky...sudah la </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>camry is too expensive, if u talk about inflation, why dont u lo kat the exchange rate now, yen is stronger so much now. toyota profit is too much, dont talk about tax. silly people wil buy this brand, just to show they got the top jap brand, also the sales staff is fucking cocky&#8230;sudah la</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fab_4</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252693</link>
		<dc:creator>fab_4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252693</guid>
		<description>think the camry is just too safe and common 
add in rm14k more from 2.4v price you can get the (not so)new alfa romeo 159. 
the plus point is the alfa is an exotic on malaysian roads and possibly better equipped. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>think the camry is just too safe and common</p>
<p>add in rm14k more from 2.4v price you can get the (not so)new alfa romeo 159.</p>
<p>the plus point is the alfa is an exotic on malaysian roads and possibly better equipped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Dean</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252691</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252691</guid>
		<description>If you want Toyota brand and comfortable cruising, go for this boring Camry. I prefer 407 with many more additional features &amp; much better driving dynamics. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want Toyota brand and comfortable cruising, go for this boring Camry. I prefer 407 with many more additional features &amp; much better driving dynamics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamaki</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252690</link>
		<dc:creator>tamaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252690</guid>
		<description>oh man,i wonder how u driving??i own vios and as good as new even push as hard as i can :P peace </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh man,i wonder how u driving??i own vios and as good as new even push as hard as i can <img src='http://paultan.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fadzly Supporter</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252689</link>
		<dc:creator>Fadzly Supporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252689</guid>
		<description>Camry looks boring. Suitable for those aged 40 plus plus who wants luxury but cannot afford BMW and Benz.  
 
Ya Camry considered a luxury in this country thanks to the tax. It&#039;s a 88K car in Langkawi. On behalf of the government and fellow Malaysian, thank you for your 55K of tax money. Thank you Uncles Aunties. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camry looks boring. Suitable for those aged 40 plus plus who wants luxury but cannot afford BMW and Benz. </p>
<p>Ya Camry considered a luxury in this country thanks to the tax. It&#039;s a 88K car in Langkawi. On behalf of the government and fellow Malaysian, thank you for your 55K of tax money. Thank you Uncles Aunties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mi16</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/07/27/new-toyota-camry-teaser-on-umw-website/#comment-252687</link>
		<dc:creator>Mi16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16028#comment-252687</guid>
		<description>All you guys out there, DONT BE FOOLED by toyota and thier so called best quality and reliability, Its just a lump of S*#T, with 4 wheels. You are better off with a perdana and that gearbox. Am talking based on my toyota ownership for the past 1 year, REGRETING, My advice, if you want to get a toyota, get the JDM or the ones that is not assembled in our country or our neighbouring country. The JDM has superb built quality.Ponder this, car 1 year old, all 4 brake systems including DISC,and drum units changed, 4 new absobers,Drive shaft problem till now cant be fixed by toyota(clueless), tappets/valves making noise, belts making noise. And many more intersting features on my car. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you guys out there, DONT BE FOOLED by toyota and thier so called best quality and reliability, Its just a lump of S*#T, with 4 wheels. You are better off with a perdana and that gearbox. Am talking based on my toyota ownership for the past 1 year, REGRETING, My advice, if you want to get a toyota, get the JDM or the ones that is not assembled in our country or our neighbouring country. The JDM has superb built quality.Ponder this, car 1 year old, all 4 brake systems including DISC,and drum units changed, 4 new absobers,Drive shaft problem till now cant be fixed by toyota(clueless), tappets/valves making noise, belts making noise. And many more intersting features on my car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

