Paul Tan's Automotive Industry News

GM’s Bare Necessity Car Concept – a perfect trade-off between creature comforts and efficiency?

Advertisement

GM Bare Necessity Car

This is GM’s “Bare Necessity” Car concept, which was the result of them asking themselves: what are people willing to trade off for efficiency’s sake? And this is what they think is the car with the lowest cost per mile of any four-seater on the road.

They’ve conceptually designed it with some interesting stuff like retractable wipers to improve aerodynamic efficiency, and on the slide detailing the interior you can see that the default is pretty bare but they’ve already pre-planned various add-ons such as a reconfigurable touch display, modular HVAC systems, etc.

GM Bare Necessity Car

I’m pretty sure it’s an EREV with a hybrid system like the Volt too, since the instrumentation panel features both fuel levels and a battery level. GM thinks the best way to go about car propulsion now is what they call an Extended Range Electric Vehicle, which means the vehicle runs primarily on a battery and an electric motor, but a combustion engine is available to run to produce power to charge the battery only, not drive the wheels.

Look after the jump to view all the slides they’ve published. There’s also a video where they interview some of the team behind the concept.

3808027810_bc70b8073e_b
3807235049_05f7c1e930_b
3798775850_63fc233b9b_b
3797961061_d3b7deaaf2_b
3798781756_2c50126d51_b
3798776036_fc4d28c3d2_b
3798489267_074607ee90_b
3798776000_0970ba4dfa_b
3798489345_30c2777160_b
3807249699_58dc92dc40_b
3797958143_69f67d7788_b
3798775568_58374bb585_b
3797957945_67f49214f2_b
3799305560_6ea704e4cb_b
3798775212_4e1d437b91_b
3799305484_a2bb22bd43_b
3798754964_e5a14e995c_b
3798781638_0f16ceb52e_b
3797963793_2ae67589f7_b
3798775964_d850ffab7a_b

14 Comments »

  1. Anonymous said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 1:02 pm

    Paul, any review about new Citroen C5? Recently saw one in KL. Looks hot!

  2. badboy said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 1:16 pm

    cheh! i tot with “Bare Necessity” tagline they going to challange TATA Nano, but it just another expensive car that people most likely not going to buy.

  3. Paul Tan said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 1:16 pm

    They want their own Fiat 500/MINI Cooper?

  4. melissa said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 1:38 pm

    good work gm,if you’re into customer needs & cover every expect of their necessities.
    its going to be a time to roll out your creativitity and talents in production.
    proton,its not to late,adapt yourself with the values and profession that’s lack in you and show out the total skills and technology of a malaysia brand.you can do it.

  5. bmpower said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 1:44 pm

    GM still don’t know what is their right direction.
    they will bankrupt for the 3rd time later. :D

  6. MycarMylife said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 2:44 pm

    Now they ( GM) are thinking with their brains coming out with new ideas after the near death situation in the auto biz.Expect more to come out from GM after some Bud and fries otherwise GM will be history.

  7. jcws_87 said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 3:00 pm

    sorry out of the topic…..hope tat tis car’s emblem is not tat expensive lar compare to toyota dugong…cos the latest toyota dugong’s “TRD Sportivo” is selling at RM370….anyone want?

  8. Elvis said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 3:25 pm

    I read BYD electric car on similar hybrid idea where there’s a small engine to charge up the battery and not run the car drive system a year ago. AGAIN, GM claiming the publicity stuff….

  9. Kimi Räikkönen fan said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 4:40 pm

    alot of people will buy this car or just to show off??

  10. barca_supporter said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 5:59 pm

    this car outline… make me think of savvy

  11. mystvearn said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 8:37 pm

    Retractable wipers? That will increase the cost. People also want something that looks good as well.

  12. csv said,

    August 12, 2009 @ 9:28 pm

    think they should focus on managing their company well and cutting dead weight first before delving into all these concepts.

  13. azrai said,

    August 13, 2009 @ 7:56 am

    Already bancrupt and still wanna play with this kind of things?

  14. kerelbort said,

    August 13, 2009 @ 11:18 am

    caution : sexist remarks!

    a girl design a car? its a car… not a cupcakes!! hahahaa..
    anyway.. its quite a good design.. very futuristic but not that realistic… most of it might be tune down to fit mass manufacturing capability (read: accounting department)

Leave a Comment

Log in

Please do not submit your comment twice, the system has accepted your comment, it just needs to be moderated first. Once your first comment is approved, all subsequent comments will show automatically.

previous post: Jamie Green takes the E 63 AMG to the track
next post: How do differentials work: old-school video