<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ex-Ford man to lead new Volvo takeover bid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/</link>
	<description>Paul Tan on the Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:34:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: one9712745</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-265544</link>
		<dc:creator>one9712745</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-265544</guid>
		<description>Guess the Chinese govt will change its name from &#039;Volvo&#039; to &#039; Wolwo&#039; maybe? They changed &#039;Rover&#039; to &#039;Roewe&#039;, wonder what will happen then?  
 
Pity Volvo owners.... (including myself) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess the Chinese govt will change its name from &#039;Volvo&#039; to &#039; Wolwo&#039; maybe? They changed &#039;Rover&#039; to &#039;Roewe&#039;, wonder what will happen then? </p>
<p>Pity Volvo owners&#8230;. (including myself)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rulered</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-265434</link>
		<dc:creator>Rulered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-265434</guid>
		<description>I would be  happy even if Proton can develope something with VW (the Toyota of Europe). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be  happy even if Proton can develope something with VW (the Toyota of Europe).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-265166</link>
		<dc:creator>Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-265166</guid>
		<description>Proton has benefited from Lotus.  I can testify that Proton cars beginning with Waja are stronger, handling better than most Japanese, Koreans and Chinese cars in their categories.  We get Proton cars with European handling, Japanese reliability and Malaysian Price. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proton has benefited from Lotus.  I can testify that Proton cars beginning with Waja are stronger, handling better than most Japanese, Koreans and Chinese cars in their categories.  We get Proton cars with European handling, Japanese reliability and Malaysian Price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Msia Saga 1.5 owner</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-265093</link>
		<dc:creator>Msia Saga 1.5 owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-265093</guid>
		<description>Is buying Volvo cheaper than building an F1 team? Go buy Volvo! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is buying Volvo cheaper than building an F1 team? Go buy Volvo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystvearn</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-265075</link>
		<dc:creator>mystvearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-265075</guid>
		<description>Ptoton by Volvo will be match in heaven. Can see on proton cars: 
 
Handling by lotus 
Safety by Volvo 
Price by Proton </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ptoton by Volvo will be match in heaven. Can see on proton cars:</p>
<p>Handling by lotus</p>
<p>Safety by Volvo</p>
<p>Price by Proton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Littlefire</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-265045</link>
		<dc:creator>Littlefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-265045</guid>
		<description>I think Volvo make more sense compare to Lotus.. Volvo can help introduce safety standart in our cars and they also built passenger cars, wagon &amp; SUV... (safety belt is also introduce first by volvo..) 
 
Still remember our country is one of the most accident countries in the world? If every car have the technology, i think we can save more lives... By Mass producing, i dont think their safety technology will cost a bomb. As we all knew those car are expensive in Malaysia due to tax and not technology...  
 
By the way, how many people benefit directly from Lotus? I dont see a lot of user on the road driving lotus sport car... Yes, they do provide technical support for Proton. For me in this country, safety is more concern compare to road n handling by Lotus... Do normal user everyday drive through corners at high speed or drift? Just think about it...  
 
Anyway those Volvo are actually famous for thier low pressure turbo &amp; 5 cylinder 20V engine.. If you drive the new S80 with 2.5 Turbo, u will know how good the torque.   
 
Anyway if Proton is really rich, i would like them to buy Volvo and combine both safety and road n handling by Lotus. Should be a great combination for Proton.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Volvo make more sense compare to Lotus.. Volvo can help introduce safety standart in our cars and they also built passenger cars, wagon &amp; SUV&#8230; (safety belt is also introduce first by volvo..)</p>
<p>Still remember our country is one of the most accident countries in the world? If every car have the technology, i think we can save more lives&#8230; By Mass producing, i dont think their safety technology will cost a bomb. As we all knew those car are expensive in Malaysia due to tax and not technology&#8230; </p>
<p>By the way, how many people benefit directly from Lotus? I dont see a lot of user on the road driving lotus sport car&#8230; Yes, they do provide technical support for Proton. For me in this country, safety is more concern compare to road n handling by Lotus&#8230; Do normal user everyday drive through corners at high speed or drift? Just think about it&#8230; </p>
<p>Anyway those Volvo are actually famous for thier low pressure turbo &amp; 5 cylinder 20V engine.. If you drive the new S80 with 2.5 Turbo, u will know how good the torque.  </p>
<p>Anyway if Proton is really rich, i would like them to buy Volvo and combine both safety and road n handling by Lotus. Should be a great combination for Proton..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MADBOY</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-265014</link>
		<dc:creator>MADBOY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-265014</guid>
		<description>Littlefire said, 
October 7, 2009 @ 10:31 am  
 
Then how about Lotus fall for Malaysian-man? Money talks end of the day&#8230; 
-------------------------------------------- 
Yes, money talks. Last time Proton was able to buy Lotus as it was relatively cheap compare with Volvo.  
Honestly speaking, do you think Proton has that kind of money to buy Volvo.  
Such money is better use to development new car or joint-venture with other manufacturer </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Littlefire said,</p>
<p>October 7, 2009 @ 10:31 am </p>
<p>Then how about Lotus fall for Malaysian-man? Money talks end of the day&hellip;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Yes, money talks. Last time Proton was able to buy Lotus as it was relatively cheap compare with Volvo. </p>
<p>Honestly speaking, do you think Proton has that kind of money to buy Volvo. </p>
<p>Such money is better use to development new car or joint-venture with other manufacturer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Littlefire</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-265005</link>
		<dc:creator>Littlefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-265005</guid>
		<description>Then how about Lotus fall for Malaysian-man? Money talks end of the day... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then how about Lotus fall for Malaysian-man? Money talks end of the day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 Malaysia</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-264995</link>
		<dc:creator>1 Malaysia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-264995</guid>
		<description>i think the Crown will eventally success to tae over Volvo, unless their offer is too far behind than Geely.  why? simply bcoz the westeners will &quot;no face&quot; if Volvo fall under the China-man. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the Crown will eventally success to tae over Volvo, unless their offer is too far behind than Geely.  why? simply bcoz the westeners will &quot;no face&quot; if Volvo fall under the China-man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barca</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-264961</link>
		<dc:creator>barca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-264961</guid>
		<description>volvo should not be &#039;bastardized&#039; by anyone except the Swedes...it&#039;s just so wrong. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>volvo should not be &#039;bastardized&#039; by anyone except the Swedes&#8230;it&#039;s just so wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annihilated</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-264948</link>
		<dc:creator>Annihilated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-264948</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more with you Paul. 
 
If any Malaysians want to bid for this brand, let it be private and not government. The investment scale is just huge and brand/tech for money ratio is simply overrated compare to sales. So, I doubt it&#039;ll be a winning situation for any of Malaysian bidders with our current capital market &amp; manufacturing capacity. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#039;t agree more with you Paul.</p>
<p>If any Malaysians want to bid for this brand, let it be private and not government. The investment scale is just huge and brand/tech for money ratio is simply overrated compare to sales. So, I doubt it&#039;ll be a winning situation for any of Malaysian bidders with our current capital market &amp; manufacturing capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nabill</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-264928</link>
		<dc:creator>nabill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-264928</guid>
		<description>&quot;bastardisation&quot; got to be my word of the day ! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;bastardisation&quot; got to be my word of the day !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-264920</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-264920</guid>
		<description>The kind of safety tech that Volvo uses is expensive and not suitable to use for the price ranges that the majority here can afford. Of course then we can bring in the argument that car prices should be lower... it&#039;s never-ending! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kind of safety tech that Volvo uses is expensive and not suitable to use for the price ranges that the majority here can afford. Of course then we can bring in the argument that car prices should be lower&#8230; it&#039;s never-ending!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://paultan.org/2009/10/07/ex-ford-man-to-lead-new-volvo-takeover-bid/#comment-264917</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultan.org/?p=16475#comment-264917</guid>
		<description>Chinese are comming! 
 
Malaysia proton will crushed by Chinese cheap products. 
 
Anyway, Why malaysia goverment don&#039;t bid volvo? 
 
this is a good chance for proton. 
 
volvo is 1000 times much valuable brand than lotus. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese are comming!</p>
<p>Malaysia proton will crushed by Chinese cheap products.</p>
<p>Anyway, Why malaysia goverment don&#039;t bid volvo?</p>
<p>this is a good chance for proton.</p>
<p>volvo is 1000 times much valuable brand than lotus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

